The Trump Era Begins

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Ginsberg does not have much time left. Next year Trump could have another Justice installed. I see alot more WINNING.
 

Heretic

Master
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
3,261
Ginsberg does not have much time left. Next year Trump could have another Justice installed. I see alot more WINNING.
I heard Justice Thomas was planning to retire next year if the Republicans can hold the Senate. If they can get someone else like him in there, but 20+ years younger, that would be a big plus as well. Then there's Libs Ginsberg and Breyer who are getting way up there in years and Sotomayor has diabetes and is in poor health. Would be nice to see Trump get 2-3 more Justices.
 

Riggins44

Master
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
3,043
Location
Virginia
I heard Justice Thomas was planning to retire next year if the Republicans can hold the Senate. If they can get someone else like him in there, but 20+ years younger, that would be a big plus as well. Then there's Libs Ginsberg and Breyer who are getting way up there in years and Sotomayor has diabetes and is in poor health. Would be nice to see Trump get 2-3 more Justices.

Yes, and he should start with Amy Coney-Barrett. If Ginsberg dies or retires while Trump is in office, he should nominate Barrett. If she gets confirmed, that will mean a 6-3 conservative majority. If Thomas is thinking of retiring he should go ahead and do it while Trump is in office and the Republicans control the Senate. That way he will be replaced by a younger conservative. A huge mistake Ginsburg made is that she didn't retire when Obama was President and the Dems controlled the Senate. Had she not been so egotistical and short-sighted she would have retired and then Obama could have replaced her with another shi#lib who was 20-30 years younger. Now this communist will likely be replaced by a conservative when she croaks in the next few years. You have to love it.
 
Last edited:

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Yes, and he should start with Amy Coney-Barrett. If Ginsberg dies or retires while Trump is in office, he should nominate Barrett. If she gets confirmed, that will mean a 6-3 conservative majority. If Thomas is thinking of retiring he should go ahead and do it while Trump is in office and the Republicans control the Senate. That way he will be replaced by a younger conservative. A huge mistake Ginsburg made is that she didn't retire when Obama was President and the Dems controlled the Senate. Had she not been so egotistical and short-sighted she would have retired and then Obama could have replaced her with another shi#lib who was 20-30 years younger. Now this communist will likely be replaced by a conservative when she croaks in the next few years. You have to love it.
Agreed.
 

The Hock

Master
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
3,909
Location
Northern California
Just watched rodent faced Chris Wallace try equate Kavanaugh with Roy Moore in an interview with Mitch McConnell and the good senator called him on it, saying any comparison between the two is "outrageous."

Wallace reminds me of Jim Grey of HBO boxing.

The Son of Mike doing groundwork for an impeachment effort if November turns out as he hopes?
 
Last edited:

Booth

Master
Joined
Jul 23, 2015
Messages
2,073
I don't know what happen but McConnell and Graham grew a pair when they were needed the most.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
771
Location
Land of the Savages
Yes, and he should start with Amy Coney-Barrett. If Ginsberg dies or retires while Trump is in office, he should nominate Barrett. If she gets confirmed, that will mean a 6-3 conservative majority. If Thomas is thinking of retiring he should go ahead and do it while Trump is in office and the Republicans control the Senate. That way he will be replaced by a younger conservative. A huge mistake Ginsburg made is that she didn't retire when Obama was President and the Dems controlled the Senate. Had she not been so egotistical and short-sighted she would have retired and then Obama could have replaced her with another shi#lib who was 20-30 years younger. Now this communist will likely be replaced by a conservative when she croaks in the next few years. You have to love it.

Beware of Coney-Barrett. First of all, any women with a hyphenated name should not be trusted. And let's not forget that she adopted several black Haitain children. She's not in our best interest.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
771
Location
Land of the Savages
Coney Barrett is also in a wierd cult. This woman is dangerous.

https://slate.com/human-interest/20...igious-group-people-of-praise-what-is-it.html

Many critics are particularly incensed over her apparent membership in a Catholic-adjacent group called “People of Praise,” which the New York Times reported last fall. Law professor and Senate candidate Richard Painter tweeted the old Times story this weekend and said People of Praise “looks like a cult”; another prominent critic one-upped Painter by calling it a “secretive religious cult.”

The Times story does not use the word cult, but it’s easy to see why some of its details alarmed many readers. People of Praise members are said to be accountable to a same-sex adviser, called a “head” for men and (until recently) a “handmaiden” for women, who gives input on a wide variety of personal decisions. They swear “a lifelong oath of loyalty” to the group.

An introductory essay on the group’s website sums it up as “hard to understand and that’s OK.”

When I mentioned Barrett’s potential Supreme Court nomination to Csordas, he corrected me, saying she was only a circuit court judge. Yes, I said, but she’s been said to be in the running for the highest court in the country. “I see,” he said. He hadn’t heard. He paused for a long time. There’s always the possibility, he said, that “the thoughtfulness and conscientiousness of that community could provide a check to rein her in, in a way that Alito and Thomas don’t have. They’re just out there on their own.” And in any event, he said: “She couldn’t be any worse than the guys on there now.”
 

Riggins44

Master
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
3,043
Location
Virginia
Beware of Coney-Barrett. First of all, any women with a hyphenated name should not be trusted. And let's not forget that she adopted several black Haitain children. She's not in our best interest.

She and her husband adopted two black children from Haiti. They also have five biological white children of their own. How many white children do you have?

She is also pro-life. from Wikipedia - "Barrett is a practicing Roman Catholic.[14]The New York Times reported that Barrett was a member of a small, tightly knit Charismatic Christian group called People of Praise.[14] Barrett is affiliated with Faculty for Life, a pro-life group at the University of Notre Dame. In 2015, Barrett signed a joint letter to Catholic bishops which affirmed the Church's teachings including "the value of human life from conception to natural death," and that family and marriage are "founded on the indissoluble commitment of a man and a woman.'"

So she could be described as a devout Catholic. I personally think that's much better than a communist, cultural marxist like Ruth Bader-Ginsburg or Sonia Sotamyor. Maybe you disagree.

And the NY Slimes doesn't like the religious group she's in, so that's good enough for you? So you're a big fan of the NY Times?
 

BeyondFedUp

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
4,468
Location
United States
If the Jewish-owned Christ-hating New York Times doesn't like her and is smearing her she's probably great. Those demons will lie, slander and try to destroy any and every Christian of any denomination or sect. To hell with them, literally.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
771
Location
Land of the Savages
I'd certainly take her over Ginsburg, the fat lesbian, or the wise latina, but I don't think she's as conservative as they want us to believe. If adopting black kids isn't a huge red flag of liberal virtue signaling, then I don't know what is. My vote is for Britt Grant, Appeals Judge on the 11th Circuit if we need a female for the next opening. Attractive, 40 years old, conservative, Southerner, a non-hyphenated last name, clerked for Kavanaugh, on Trump's Supreme Court short list

https://www.law.com/nationallawjour...h-circuit-judge-takes-oath-from-her-old-boss/
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
1,779
I think this Barrett woman is dodgy from what I have seen.

Obvious red flag with the haitian adoptions and don't get me started on how Catholics have always stood against and undermined WASP values in the US.
 

Riggins44

Master
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
3,043
Location
Virginia
I understand the concern with adopting black children. I get it. But:

1. She has borne and is raising five white children
2. She is pro-life
3. She has stated and put into writing that she believes marriage is between one man and one woman
4. She is a devout Christian
5. She was a clerk to Scalia
6. She has opined that judges aren't bound by precedent that conflicts with the Constitution
7. Feinstein, Durbin, and other globalist shi$lib Senators don't like her
8. She is only 45 and would most likely serve on the Supreme Court for decades

She has alot more plusses than minuses. Other than adopting the two Haitian children, she doesn't have any minuses. We are not going to get anyone better than her confirmed. She would likely be a tremendous addition for our side in the Culture Wars. #MAGA.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
I understand the concern with adopting black children. I get it. But:

1. She has borne and is raising five white children
2. She is pro-life
3. She has stated and put into writing that she believes marriage is between one man and one woman
4. She is a devout Christian
5. She was a clerk to Scalia
6. She has opined that judges aren't bound by precedent that conflicts with the Constitution
7. Feinstein, Durbin, and other globalist shi$lib Senators don't like her
8. She is only 45 and would most likely serve on the Supreme Court for decades

She has alot more plusses than minuses. Other than adopting the two Haitian children, she doesn't have any minuses. We are not going to get anyone better than her confirmed. She would likely be a tremendous addition for our side in the Culture Wars. #MAGA.
She will waltz through confirmation. Her having 5 kids of her own gets a major pass from me. Its a matter of months before vile Ginsberg is asked to leave by herself or someone higher. Barrett is next up and has my full support.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,583
Location
Pennsylvania
This isn't directly related to Trump, but he's brought in toward the end of the article.

The Fattening: At The Intersection Between Shitliberalism And The Wall
October 9, 2018 by CH

There is a reinforcing FEEDback loop that connects fatness, ugliness, shitlib views, and premature impact with the Wall, and is especially pronounced in the female of the species.

For a real life example, look what’s happened to Taylor Swift, once a chan-repurposed Aryan icon now turned schoolmarmish shitlib pussyhatter:

swift1.jpg


swift2.jpg


swift3.jpg


These before and after shots are NOT ‘SHOPPED.

Tay Tay got tub tub.

That first set of pics is particularly tragic. She’s one tray tray of donuts and box wine away from looking like pre-gastric sleeve Mama June:

mama-june-losing-weight.jpg


Doesn’t Weigh Weigh have an Instawhore account of her cat? UH OH

catlady2.jpg


They say the bloom on the Southern Belle Rose doesn’t last long, but fer crikey’s sake, Swift is swiftly nearing Wall impact at the ripe age of 28!

It’s not a cohencidence that Taylor Swift publicly came out as a cat-carrying member of Pussyhat, Inc at the point in her life when she’s bloated up and the Wall has risen into view. The rose is wilted; the screechy shrew is germinated. It’s nothing but White man-hating spite from here on out. Taking bets on Swift’s first mudshark paparazzi shot.

She’ll need to be retired as a frogtwatter secret-soopremacist Nordi-Alpine icon.

The ugly truth is that she’s an express line rider of the **** carousel. There are no innocent virginal women left in America, but the extremely homely who had no choice. How many boys have graced her song lyrics? None of them were good enough for her, or she wasn’t good enough for them. Solution: Carbs, cats, and cuntery.

The lifestyle is finally taking its tribute in the form of her sanity, like it does for most famous women. She is “anti-Kavanaugh” now and hitting the campaign trail for the Dem in TN’s midterm race. Her assimilation into the celebutard borg is complete (as is her retirement from peak nubility). Another White woman lost to The Fuggernaut. Sad!

Lesson: White women get married off before 25, or they instantly become hags for hillary.

Same goes for the trough. White women push away from the table, or they become hogs for hillary.

What’s not sad: Trump’s nuclear neg!

Trump tells us upon arriving back at the White House he likes Taylor Swift’s music but maybe about “25 percent” less now that she has endorsed Bredesen

We are blessed to have this man as our President. Trump is a Master of Game. I like this response, it’s very clever. It operates like a neg: you don’t want to come right out and insult a (former) hottie, because she’ll know you’re bitter, butthurt and try-hard. But if you say you still like the hottie “but just 25% less”, that’s a dig that reflects on her rather than on you.

Trump is smart, especially street smart. Lefties know this, but won’t ever admit it, so they prefer to go crazy denying the obvious.

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/201...rsection-between-shitliberalism-and-the-wall/
 

Heretic

Master
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
3,261
This isn't directly related to Trump, but he's brought in toward the end of the article.

The Fattening: At The Intersection Between Shitliberalism And The Wall
October 9, 2018 by CH

There is a reinforcing FEEDback loop that connects fatness, ugliness, shitlib views, and premature impact with the Wall, and is especially pronounced in the female of the species.

For a real life example, look what’s happened to Taylor Swift, once a chan-repurposed Aryan icon now turned schoolmarmish shitlib pussyhatter:

swift1.jpg


swift2.jpg


swift3.jpg


These before and after shots are NOT ‘SHOPPED.

Tay Tay got tub tub.

That first set of pics is particularly tragic. She’s one tray tray of donuts and box wine away from looking like pre-gastric sleeve Mama June:

mama-june-losing-weight.jpg


Doesn’t Weigh Weigh have an Instawhore account of her cat? UH OH

catlady2.jpg


They say the bloom on the Southern Belle Rose doesn’t last long, but fer crikey’s sake, Swift is swiftly nearing Wall impact at the ripe age of 28!

It’s not a cohencidence that Taylor Swift publicly came out as a cat-carrying member of Pussyhat, Inc at the point in her life when she’s bloated up and the Wall has risen into view. The rose is wilted; the screechy shrew is germinated. It’s nothing but White man-hating spite from here on out. Taking bets on Swift’s first mudshark paparazzi shot.

She’ll need to be retired as a frogtwatter secret-soopremacist Nordi-Alpine icon.

The ugly truth is that she’s an express line rider of the **** carousel. There are no innocent virginal women left in America, but the extremely homely who had no choice. How many boys have graced her song lyrics? None of them were good enough for her, or she wasn’t good enough for them. Solution: Carbs, cats, and cuntery.

The lifestyle is finally taking its tribute in the form of her sanity, like it does for most famous women. She is “anti-Kavanaugh” now and hitting the campaign trail for the Dem in TN’s midterm race. Her assimilation into the celebutard borg is complete (as is her retirement from peak nubility). Another White woman lost to The Fuggernaut. Sad!

Lesson: White women get married off before 25, or they instantly become hags for hillary.

Same goes for the trough. White women push away from the table, or they become hogs for hillary.

What’s not sad: Trump’s nuclear neg!

Trump tells us upon arriving back at the White House he likes Taylor Swift’s music but maybe about “25 percent” less now that she has endorsed Bredesen

We are blessed to have this man as our President. Trump is a Master of Game. I like this response, it’s very clever. It operates like a neg: you don’t want to come right out and insult a (former) hottie, because she’ll know you’re bitter, butthurt and try-hard. But if you say you still like the hottie “but just 25% less”, that’s a dig that reflects on her rather than on you.

Trump is smart, especially street smart. Lefties know this, but won’t ever admit it, so they prefer to go crazy denying the obvious.

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/201...rsection-between-shitliberalism-and-the-wall/
Man, is that really Taylor Swift today? Just a year ago she was still "hot" and refused to bash Trump. I'm not easily shocked these day, but this is hard to believe.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,583
Location
Pennsylvania
Man, is that really Taylor Swift today? Just a year ago she was still "hot" and refused to bash Trump. I'm not easily shocked these day, but this is hard to believe.

I followed it up with a quick search before posting it, and she's definitely been packing on the pounds. It happened to the now forgotten Jessica Simpson at about the same age. I also remember Kelly Clarkson being kind of cute when she hit it big, but she quickly became a fattie.

It's amazing that all someone like Taylor Swift needs to do is to take care of her figure as long as possible, but can't or won't. And look at all the black NFL players who can't stay in shape, even a lot of rookies. But it does seem, from reading the "mainstream" media and from personal observation, that a lot of White women are aging (hitting the "wall") earlier than they used to. And there's a strong correlation between obese, unmarried, aging White women and their eventual conversion to toxic feminism. As others have noted, has anyone ever known a happy feminist? They're universally bitter and miserable and live to inflict their hatred and desire for revenge on everyone else.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,583
Location
Pennsylvania
Interesting read I'd like you guys' thoughts on, especially you Don. Thanks:

www.thinkaboutit.online/attack-on-america-hidden-by-our-media/

I don't buy it at all. No way China will attack the U.S. militarily. Even though American armed forces are grossly over-rated -- they've been unable to defeat anyone other than mighty Grenada over the past 35 years of constant warmongering -- Washington's thousands of nukes are more than enough to prevent such a surprise attack. Though Russia may feel forced at some point to pre-emptively attack due to the constant threats and pressure from the neo-con madmen.

China will eventually be the big winner by continuing to do what it's doing -- rebuilding the Silk Road to solidify the rise of Eurasia as the world's leading economic powerhouse, while simultaneously buying land and buildings all over the United States and other Western countries, sending millions of its students to U.S. universities to be educated with many staying here while maintaining their loyalty to China, and various other non-military tactics while the USSA continues to be hollowed out by the (((forces))) that conquered it from within without firing a shot. The long game favors China and Russia waiting patiently as Amerika rots from communist-style immigration, social and economic policies as the oligarchy frantically tries to divert attention from themselves to various made-up external enemies ("Hitlers of the month").
 

BeyondFedUp

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
4,468
Location
United States
I don't buy it at all. No way China will attack the U.S. militarily. Even though American armed forces are grossly over-rated -- they've been unable to defeat anyone other than mighty Grenada over the past 35 years of constant warmongering -- Washington's thousands of nukes are more than enough to prevent such a surprise attack. Though Russia may feel forced at some point to pre-emptively attack due to the constant threats and pressure from the neo-con madmen.

China will eventually be the big winner by continuing to do what it's doing -- rebuilding the Silk Road to solidify the rise of Eurasia as the world's leading economic powerhouse, while simultaneously buying land and buildings all over the United States and other Western countries, sending millions of its students to U.S. universities to be educated with many staying here while maintaining their loyalty to China, and various other non-military tactics while the USSA continues to be hollowed out by the (((forces))) that conquered it from within without firing a shot. The long game favors China and Russia waiting patiently as Amerika rots from communist-style immigration, social and economic policies as the oligarchy frantically tries to divert attention from themselves to various made-up external enemies ("Hitlers of the month").

Well said, Don and thank you for thoughts. I thought the article seemed a stretch. Good analysis from you regarding our ever increasing swirl downward from inner (((forces))), the proverbial nation wreckers since 33 A.D.

If I was younger I would condsider moving to Russia by some means if I actually had the means. I, like you and the comrads here will probably ride this thing out to our dying (yet not in vain) breath.
 

BeyondFedUp

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
4,468
Location
United States
Joined
Apr 28, 2017
Messages
105
Location
Arizona
I don't buy it at all. No way China will attack the U.S. militarily. Even though American armed forces are grossly over-rated -- they've been unable to defeat anyone other than mighty Grenada over the past 35 years of constant warmongering -- Washington's thousands of nukes are more than enough to prevent such a surprise attack. Though Russia may feel forced at some point to pre-emptively attack due to the constant threats and pressure from the neo-con madmen.

China will eventually be the big winner by continuing to do what it's doing -- rebuilding the Silk Road to solidify the rise of Eurasia as the world's leading economic powerhouse, while simultaneously buying land and buildings all over the United States and other Western countries, sending millions of its students to U.S. universities to be educated with many staying here while maintaining their loyalty to China, and various other non-military tactics while the USSA continues to be hollowed out by the (((forces))) that conquered it from within without firing a shot. The long game favors China and Russia waiting patiently as Amerika rots from communist-style immigration, social and economic policies as the oligarchy frantically tries to divert attention from themselves to various made-up external enemies ("Hitlers of the month").

Our armed forces are not near as over-rated as you think. In fact, they're pretty damn good. I should know. I spent 13 years in the Army and was medically discharged as a Warrant Officer. Then I spent 4 years as a defense contractor. We're good; real good. The problem isn't now. The worry you need to possess is the continuing emasculation of our men; the future catalyst of our destruction. We need to keep our kids competitive (whether it be in band or boxing), well informed, and well taught. I hate to say it, but everyone here needs to start stepping up and doing what we can to nip this in the bud. If not, if we sit on our asses and expect politicians in Washington to save us...we're f***ed.
 
Top