Kaepernick refuses to stand during National Anthem

Dehbashi

Guru
Joined
Sep 27, 2017
Messages
124
First, proper English please Martellus.

Second, I really don't even know what the first tweet is saying.

Third, he won't be talking like that if he was fired. This is the same tool who was excited for winning the Super Bowl due to the fact he was going to get paid. Not teamwork, not glory, money. So him getting cut would be the worst thing for him.

He is only acting like that since the Packers will coddle him.
 

sprintstar

Master
Joined
Jun 3, 2016
Messages
2,094
Location
Canada
screw the Packers.........all of them! Time for a change, I would love to hear all the stadiums are empty because this "RACIST" agenda by the Jew owners and negro players... It has nothing to do with unity, football it is all to do with negros cant handle not being coddled and the almighty buck for the greedy owners. I remember a few years back I was watching a replay of the NFL draft and some no name negro got a call saying he was drafted, sorry I do not remember the team but I do remember hearing his fat obese mother saying "now he kin gets me a cadeelack anna big house" I almost died of laughter....

It is amazing the fear and hatred as well as racism being spewed out all because 1 white rb was drafted in the first round....albeit he is the best rb ever in College, he has the whole negro community up in arms...
 

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
It is amazing the fear and hatred as well as racism being spewed out all because 1 white rb was drafted in the first round....albeit he is the best rb ever in College, he has the whole negro community up in arms...

This is an interesting point. How much did the drafting of Christian McCaffrey cause blacks to resent a White man being drafted at "their" position.
 

BeyondFedUp

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
4,468
Location
United States
The Packers "letter" is unfreakingbelievable!

It's essentially saying, " We've totally given the middle finger to the Anthem, the Flag, and ALL Americans who hold it dear, and now we want you to give it the same desecration and disrespect with us. Let's all just chant F*** the USA while we're at it."

That piece of sh!t letter had to have been written by a lesbian c_nt from the Political Science Dept at U of W.

What a piece of sh!t put on a stick and shoved in the faces of the most historically devoted, blue-collar, middle America, flag waving fans. The stadium should be empty on Sunday.

F*** the Packers' front office all the way to hell.
 

Flint

Mentor
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
1,468
I read some good comments today about how the one, really the only job of an NFL player is to entertain the fans. That's it. Sure winning is nice but bottom line: Pro-football is entertainment. If it went away tomorrow the world would go on with not much changed. Thus the job of the players is to make sure the patriotic white fan base is enjoying their product. Protesting something the fans love is beyond stupid. If anyone, working anywhere, did so much to alienate thier customer base, they would be gone. It's not like there aren't a million other players waiting in the wings. You can even put aside the unseemly anti-American sentiment, it's just dumb business and in a free market country that behavior should be punished.
 

Dehbashi

Guru
Joined
Sep 27, 2017
Messages
124
The Packers "letter" is unfreakingbelievable!

It's essentially saying, " We've totally given the middle finger to the Anthem, the Flag, and ALL Americans who hold it dear, and now we want you to give it the same desecration and disrespect with us. Let's all just chant F*** the USA while we're at it."

That piece of sh!t letter had to have been written by a lesbian c_nt from the Political Science Dept at U of W.

What a piece of sh!t put on a stick and shoved in the faces of the most historically devoted, blue-collar, middle America, flag waving fans. The stadium should be empty on Sunday.

F*** the Packers' front office all the way to hell.

I agree. I was just a lurker reading here but I got so ticked off reading that I thought you all needed to know. Completely disrespectful and terrible business sense.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,441
Location
Pennsylvania
I read some good comments today about how the one, really the only job of an NFL player is to entertain the fans. That's it. Sure winning is nice but bottom line: Pro-football is entertainment. If it went away tomorrow the world would go on with not much changed. Thus the job of the players is to make sure the patriotic white fan base is enjoying their product. Protesting something the fans love is beyond stupid. If anyone, working anywhere, did so much to alienate thier customer base, they would be gone. It's not like there aren't a million other players waiting in the wings. You can even put aside the unseemly anti-American sentiment, it's just dumb business and in a free market country that behavior should be punished.

I watched one of BSPN's 30 for 30 shows a few weeks ago about the players' strike of 1987. It focused on the Redskins, whose players were the most hard line team in favor of the strike. As the NFL owners began to field teams of replacement players and the league went ahead with its regular season games without the union players, the veteran players started to trickle back in, slowly at first and then in a torrent. Except for Washington, where no NFLPA players walked across the union picket line.

The Cowboys executives put a lot of pressure on their players to break ranks, and by the third week of replacement games almost half the Cowboys had returned. The players union then buckled completely and ended their strike, a humiliating defeat for the union and the union head Gene Upshaw. The final week of replacement games featured the Redskins with their team of scabs facing the Cowboys, with most of their key players back, on a nationally televised Monday night game. The Redskins were big underdogs but won and went on to win their division thanks in large part to the 3-0 record of their replacement players, and by that time the Redskins fans supported them completely and didn't want the regular players back. So yeah, the players in the NFL, a good chunk of whom are there thanks to extremist affirmative action policies in college recruiting and opportunity followed by more favoritism by the NFL, are easily replaceable by players who are just as good if not better.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
I watched one of BSPN's 30 for 30 shows a few weeks ago about the players' strike of 1987. It focused on the Redskins, whose players were the most hard line team in favor of the strike. As the NFL owners began to field teams of replacement players and the league went ahead with its regular season games without the union players, the veteran players started to trickle back in, slowly at first and then in a torrent. Except for Washington, where no NFLPA players walked across the union picket line.

The Cowboys executives put a lot of pressure on their players to break ranks, and by the third week of replacement games almost half the Cowboys had returned. The players union then buckled completely and ended their strike, a humiliating defeat for the union and the union head Gene Upshaw. The final week of replacement games featured the Redskins with their team of scabs facing the Cowboys, with most of their key players back, on a nationally televised Monday night game. The Redskins were big underdogs but won and went on to win their division thanks in large part to the 3-0 record of their replacement players, and by that time the Redskins fans supported them completely and didn't want the regular players back. So yeah, the players in the NFL, a good chunk of whom are there thanks to extremist affirmative action policies in college recruiting and opportunity followed by more favoritism by the NFL, are easily replaceable by players who are just as good if not better.
What I remember from that strike year was Joe Dudek, who should have been on an NFL strike or no strike. He broke all of Walter Payton's college rushing records. He was in the running for the Heisman Trophy that year. During a strike game he played he ran for over 150 yds and two 2 tds.
 

Leonardfan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
24,386
I watched one of BSPN's 30 for 30 shows a few weeks ago about the players' strike of 1987. It focused on the Redskins, whose players were the most hard line team in favor of the strike. As the NFL owners began to field teams of replacement players and the league went ahead with its regular season games without the union players, the veteran players started to trickle back in, slowly at first and then in a torrent. Except for Washington, where no NFLPA players walked across the union picket line.

The Cowboys executives put a lot of pressure on their players to break ranks, and by the third week of replacement games almost half the Cowboys had returned. The players union then buckled completely and ended their strike, a humiliating defeat for the union and the union head Gene Upshaw. The final week of replacement games featured the Redskins with their team of scabs facing the Cowboys, with most of their key players back, on a nationally televised Monday night game. The Redskins were big underdogs but won and went on to win their division thanks in large part to the 3-0 record of their replacement players, and by that time the Redskins fans supported them completely and didn't want the regular players back. So yeah, the players in the NFL, a good chunk of whom are there thanks to extremist affirmative action policies in college recruiting and opportunity followed by more favoritism by the NFL, are easily replaceable by players who are just as good if not better.

Exactly. I also find the comments by Martellus Bennet just show how insecure he really is (and blacks are in this country as a whole). No white person has come out and ever said that the only place they belong is on the football field - if they did they would of been exposed to the world as a racist and vehemently shamed by all the lemmings in Amerika 2.0. Bennett's mentality is that of many blacks who blame their problems on whites when it has been their own communities that have set the expectations so low to make most blacks either strive for a career in basketball, football or crime. Rather than see the world for what it is they are force fed the race card excuse which has been played out and now after about 50 odd years white people are fed up. Personally I would love to see the NFL get more white players, it would be a more enjoyable and all of the blacks move on to the professional careers that Bennett is stating he (and by extension all blacks) who are currently in the league are more than qualified for.

I also have to wonder how teams in future drafts will vet prospects coming out. I am really enjoying the fact that the caste system is coming back to bite it's enablers.
 

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
I agree. I was just a lurker reading here but I got so ticked off reading that I thought you all needed to know. Completely disrespectful and terrible business sense.

Welcome. I hope you post more.
 

Dehbashi

Guru
Joined
Sep 27, 2017
Messages
124
I watched one of BSPN's 30 for 30 shows a few weeks ago about the players' strike of 1987. It focused on the Redskins, whose players were the most hard line team in favor of the strike. As the NFL owners began to field teams of replacement players and the league went ahead with its regular season games without the union players, the veteran players started to trickle back in, slowly at first and then in a torrent. Except for Washington, where no NFLPA players walked across the union picket line.

The Cowboys executives put a lot of pressure on their players to break ranks, and by the third week of replacement games almost half the Cowboys had returned. The players union then buckled completely and ended their strike, a humiliating defeat for the union and the union head Gene Upshaw. The final week of replacement games featured the Redskins with their team of scabs facing the Cowboys, with most of their key players back, on a nationally televised Monday night game. The Redskins were big underdogs but won and went on to win their division thanks in large part to the 3-0 record of their replacement players, and by that time the Redskins fans supported them completely and didn't want the regular players back. So yeah, the players in the NFL, a good chunk of whom are there thanks to extremist affirmative action policies in college recruiting and opportunity followed by more favoritism by the NFL, are easily replaceable by players who are just as good if not better.
I didn't see it but the local radio here in DC talked about it.

The one thing that jumped out of it they said was if the replacement players would ever get Super Bowl rings for doing their part with helping that season. My understanding was that Jack Kent Cooke and the whole organization loathed that and said no at the time.

So they asked Charles Casserly and Joe Gibbs since obviously Cooke is dead. Gibbs pretty much said no while Casserly made the excuse that they already their share of the SB money and that should be enough. Also he said it would cost show much to make the same rings.

The radio guys, said that was disrespectful and and said they should get the rings, laughing at the cost of the rings pointing out the last Patriots Super Bowl rings saying in this day and age it would be far cheaper to make the old rings.

They pretty much said that it was most likely the non-scabs would hate they got it showing that even then the players were douches and sadly always were.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,441
Location
Pennsylvania
I didn't see it but the local radio here in DC talked about it.

The one thing that jumped out of it they said was if the replacement players would ever get Super Bowl rings for doing their part with helping that season. My understanding was that Jack Kent Cooke and the whole organization loathed that and said no at the time.

So they asked Charles Casserly and Joe Gibbs since obviously Cooke is dead. Gibbs pretty much said no while Casserly made the excuse that they already their share of the SB money and that should be enough. Also he said it would cost show much to make the same rings.

The radio guys, said that was disrespectful and and said they should get the rings, laughing at the cost of the rings pointing out the last Patriots Super Bowl rings saying in this day and age it would be far cheaper to make the old rings.

They pretty much said that it was most likely the non-scabs would hate they got it showing that even then the players were douches and sadly always were.

Whether or not the Redskins replacement players should have received Super Bowl rings was dealt with quite a bit, with the show obviously biased toward the viewpoint that they should have.

It focused on several of the Washington replacement players, both black and white, and went into their football backgrounds before they became replacement players and then their lives since. It was a well done show, no cultural communist axe to grind so I enjoyed it. I had forgotten a lot about the '87 strike so it was also nice to see a lot of footage from that event.
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
Yeah Martellus is an idjut.. Dude has like 6 drops in first 3 games, he SHOULD be fired for his friggin horrible play.

This whole thing has blown up in the NFLs face And like others have mentioned I'm enjoying the shitshow. The fact that Directv is giving people refunds no questions asked really shows that the public has spoken. Whether libtards want to admit it or not, Trump has the people and there are still many sane minded folks in Anerica who albeit slowly are awakening from their dumb white fan slumber and getting red pilled. The racial divide in America has never been so obvious it's crazy and millions are realizing that.

BTW Patriotardism man thats a good one!
 

Shadowlight

Master
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
3,882
Just a few thoughts, some that run a little contrary to some of the above posts. First of all I have utmost respect for Villanueva. I also think "under the circumstances" Jerry Jones did the best that he could have--when you are dealt a bad hand you just scramble to make the most of it. Jones DID NOT have his team disrepect the Anthem and flag and small victory that it was it was still a step in the right direction.
In my real life I am the boss and believe me before I was a boss I was a much happier human being. Being a boss usually means more headaches and learning the art of diplomacy. Sure you can crack the whip but in order to keep things running as smoothly as possible you have to COMPROMISE. Otherwise everyone will be out of work.
But the bottom line is the NBA and the NFL are BLACK DIRECTED LEAGUES. And MLB has a bucket full of other problems but it is still sort of directed by whites. In fact there was a discussion early in the season about brawls and I said at the time the purpose was to prevent actual bean balls. And though they do happen guess what so far this year nobody has been badly injured in the head by beanballs and that is because the old code in baseball where men know what is important abide by it. There is no such code in the NFL and NBA. Sure most of the owners in the NFL and NBA are white but in 2017 if you didn't think blacks control the majority of things this latest charade just reinforces it. Blacks run the league and the owners rely on them to make them winners so it gives the players ample oppurtunities to push their weight around. And you can bet your ass they do.
For crying out loud Lebron James and Stephen Curry think they are on the same level as President Trump. The black athlete of today has enormous propriety. Just look at the juvenile disgusting behavior of Odell Beckham. The last game he mimicked a dog urinating. I guess the owner called him in to "discuss" the situation but this clown has been doing these things for a while. Yet he remains on the team with no punishment because he is their "STAR" and they rely on him to win which they have done in the past. That act will get tired fast if the Giants continue losing.
Don has brought the subject up many times but there is only so much certain white athletes ( or even conservative black players) can do under these heavily black directed circumstances. Any major disruption could cause the team to fall in disarray and affect their chances to win which is the bottom line. This is their livelihood so chances are most players do not want to rock the boat. Who here can say they rock the boat at work without consequences?
At this juncture it is difficult to say where all this is heading. The NBA has an actual rule where a player MUST STAND for the Anthem. Perhaps down the road the NFL will adopt that rule. In the meantime, like everyone else here at CF I would love to see the NFL flounder and take gigantic financial losses and I wonder if the college players will start up this Anthem disrespect too which will further fan alienation.
The most encouraging thing is that some white fans are waking up to the fact that the black athletes they so cherish could give a rat's ass about them or the country. It is a black power movement and guess what in the NFL and NBA they are in power. We can only hope there are some changes.
 
Last edited:

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
The only power blacks have in the NFL is given to them by Whites. Whites need to start saying no.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
The only power blacks have in the NFL is given to them by Whites. Whites need to start saying no.

Only partially. The Tribesmen are not part of the great White race...& there's a boatload of lonsmen owners in the NFL. The "chosen" fully propagate the protocols of their "learned elders".
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
Back in August during a pre-season game, Packers DB, Ha-Ha Clinton-Dix did something pretty courageous when he honored fallen police officers who were recently killed in the line of duty in FL by writing their names on his cleats. He also wrote the following:

"I understand what’s going on in this world, but cops have to go home at the end of the day. They have a family. They have to go home, too. Growing up where I’m from, some people are afraid of cops. They don’t really like cops. And what a lot of people don’t realize is, they’re really not the bad guys. They’re really on our side, they’re really trying to help us out. And sometimes, we don’t understand that."

I wonder how he feels about the anthem protests, as he seems to be the only black NFL players who respects law enforcement.

M-2017-08-21-1551-HaHaClinton-Dix-Tweet-Twitter-1.jpg


https://www.sbnation.com/2017/8/22/...-dix-honor-four-fallen-police-officers-cleats

Like so many of the precious few "good" blacks in the NFL, Clinton-Dix is a religious black from the South who has a black girlfriend.
 
Last edited:

Shadowlight

Master
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
3,882
Mark Levin laying into Spurs idiot f*ck HC. Big time right now. Man, what turns white men into this Popof*ck????
Below is a Mark Levin radio spot where he goes after the thug lovers including Lebron James. At the end is his humorous take on Popovich. To summarize he doesn't like him ha. As for Popovich who has been rude to sports reporters for years, he is finished. He crossed the line with his sickening comments about white people. He will never win another championship and perhaps I suspect the rubber room awaits. Oh and by the way Levin broaches the subject of the ratio of blacks to whites in the NFL.
 
Last edited:

Shadowlight

Master
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
3,882
Trump just mentioned that the owners are afraid of the players and it set off a firestorm from the sizeable left wing portion of the media.
Not just the owners President Donald. We the people have to be afraid. Blacks are portrayed often as innocent children in the media and that they are simply pawns in the hands of white overlords. Look in between the lines of these so called "protests" and I see an underlying thread of revolution and violence. Even though recently it has mutated into calls for "unity and equality" which is a joke because the whole movement is based on black/white racial discord, the genesis of these protests is support for black criminals and hyper masculinized black males who want to intimidate and thug their way to the front of the line.The BLM movement provided glimpses of the seething violence with massive property destruction and general disruption, menace and mayhem the past several years. Make no mistake you can see the religious fervor and sheer excitement of many blacks over these recent spectacles and the disjointed anarchy surrounding the Anthem is another clue of the violent urge just waiting to be released.
This will really coalesce if the military starts to experience black racial disorder and suddenly the country could very well descend into chaos.
You wonder what is the endgame for people like Michael Bennett? Is the goal to wipe out white people from the face of the earth? Or turn white people into servants---which in the sports world seems like a reality more often than not.
The point is never underestimate how much damage this current black power/supremacist movement can cause in this country. They are point blank dangerous and must be taken seriously.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
Trump just mentioned that the owners are afraid of the players and it set off a firestorm from the sizeable left wing portion of the media.
Not just the owners President Donald. We the people have to be afraid. Blacks are portrayed often as innocent children in the media and that they are simply pawns in the hands of white overlords. Look in between the lines of these so called "protests" and I see an underlying thread of revolution and violence. Even though recently it has mutated into calls for "unity and equality" which is a joke because the whole movement is based on black/white racial discord, the genesis of these protests is support for black criminals and hyper masculinized black males who want to intimidate and thug their way to the front of the line.The BLM movement provided glimpses of the seething violence with massive property destruction and general disruption, menace and mayhem the past several years. Make no mistake you can see the religious fervor and sheer excitement of many blacks over these recent spectacles and the disjointed anarchy surrounding the Anthem is another clue of the violent urge just waiting to be released.
This will really coalesce if the military starts to experience black racial disorder and suddenly the country could very well descend into chaos.
You wonder what is the endgame for people like Michael Bennett? Is the goal to wipe out white people from the face of the earth? Or turn white people into servants---which in the sports world seems like a reality more often than not.
The point is never underestimate how much damage this current black power/supremacist movement can cause in this country. They are point blank dangerous and must be taken seriously.

Yes, but......left to their own devices the BLM, Black Panther scourge is no match for the "sleeping giant" that is the (real) White man.
 

DWF Upside

Mentor
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
670
Below is a Mark Levin radio spot where he goes after the thug lovers including Lebron James. At the end is his humorous take on Popovich. To summarize he doesn't like him ha. As for Popovich who has been rude to sports reporters for years, he is finished. He crossed the line with his sickening comments about white people. He will never win another championship and perhaps I suspect the rubber room awaits. Oh and by the way Levin broaches the subject of the ratio of blacks to whites in the NFL.
In the most unlikeliest of scenarios in which you are not a shill, Levin is a fake conservative Screechy Zionist. If you need the help of a tiny screaching rat face man to stand for your beliefs, then please start eating better and exercising.
 

BeyondFedUp

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
4,468
Location
United States
In the most unlikeliest of scenarios in which you are not a shill, Levin is a fake conservative Screechy Zionist. If you need the help of a tiny screaching rat face man to stand for your beliefs, then please start eating better and exercising.
Maybe a little more comradery among posters and less derisive insults and accusations. He's been a poster here a lot longer than you...
 

DWF Upside

Mentor
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
670
Maybe a little more comradery among posters and less derisive insults and accusations. He's been a poster here a lot longer than you...
And that means alot when bringing in Based (((Mark freaking Levin))). Ive been lurking here since the days of the best white man in basketball Jason Kidd conversations were popular. Or Montana is going to beat Tennessee because of more whites. Every freaking weak there was talk of these upsets simply because of whiteness. All the while no one ever called out the BS trying to bring this place down.

What you really need is a spotlight on questionable behavior. Its only been the past couple of years that its been acceptable to mention who really controls sports. That slow development was due in part to massive shilling.
 
Top