And that means alot when bringing in Based (((Mark freaking Levin))). Ive been lurking here since the days of the best white man in basketball Jason Kidd conversations were popular. Or Montana is going to beat Tennessee because of more whites. Every freaking weak there was talk of these upsets simply because of whiteness. All the while no one ever called out the BS trying to bring this place down.
What you really need is a spotlight on questionable behavior. Its only been the past couple of years that its been acceptable to mention who really controls sports. That slow development was due in part to massive shilling.
Anyone feel like they woke up in 1950's America with all of the outrage specifically directed at Trump's use of the term"son of a bitch"? These people have no shame with their blatant hypocrisy.
Cheers!!. Eloquently put. Nice to know Beyond and La France have my back after getting slapped around a bit.I've been a lurker for a while too, and the idea that Caste Football used to be some sort of neocon cuck site where Jewish influence in sports was not allowed to be mentioned until "shilling" by some group of mysterious underground heroes changed it is ridiculous. We've always been allowed to talk about Jews here, but there's been a basic rule that the sports forums should concentrate on sports and political talk is more of a thing for the Happy Hour/Media Stereotyping forums.
What Caste Football doesn't need are silly litmus tests, on either side, measuring whether posters are "too mainstream" or "not mainstream enough." The only litmus test we need is the one about being pro-White. Anyone who is pro-White has always been welcome here, provided they follow the rules. We're free to like Mark Levin, dislike Mark Levin, or not care about Mark Levin. Or, we could even recognize that Mark Levin's incorrect views on other subjects don't somehow put cooties on his accurate criticism of LeBrown James and Cuck Popovich.
In the most unlikeliest of scenarios in which you are not a shill, Levin is a fake conservative Screechy Zionist. If you need the help of a tiny screaching rat face man to stand for your beliefs, then please start eating better and exercising.
Was there a notable difference in the demographics of the replacement players and the players on strike?I watched one of BSPN's 30 for 30 shows a few weeks ago about the players' strike of 1987. It focused on the Redskins, whose players were the most hard line team in favor of the strike. As the NFL owners began to field teams of replacement players and the league went ahead with its regular season games without the union players, the veteran players started to trickle back in, slowly at first and then in a torrent. Except for Washington, where no NFLPA players walked across the union picket line.
The Cowboys executives put a lot of pressure on their players to break ranks, and by the third week of replacement games almost half the Cowboys had returned. The players union then buckled completely and ended their strike, a humiliating defeat for the union and the union head Gene Upshaw. The final week of replacement games featured the Redskins with their team of scabs facing the Cowboys, with most of their key players back, on a nationally televised Monday night game. The Redskins were big underdogs but won and went on to win their division thanks in large part to the 3-0 record of their replacement players, and by that time the Redskins fans supported them completely and didn't want the regular players back. So yeah, the players in the NFL, a good chunk of whom are there thanks to extremist affirmative action policies in college recruiting and opportunity followed by more favoritism by the NFL, are easily replaceable by players who are just as good if not better.
Was there a notable difference in the demographics of the replacement players and the players on strike?
Just hoping the Law Enforecment agencies follow the law and beat the f*ck out of those anti-fa scum.As if the Leftists behind the whole anti-White/disrespect the Flag/screw the USA stuff wasn't enough, the Cultural Marxist bunch wants to go full bore on Nov 4. These blood-thirsty malcontents can't do anything except ruin, destroy, cause trouble and make anarchy commonplace:
https://michaelsavage.com/2017/09/29/antifa-planscivil-war-to-overthrow-the-government/
It's certainly just what they deserve. It's likely they'll pull their crap in Democratic-run cities, where the Mayor's have the Police stand down, via a puppet Chief.Just hoping the Law Enforecment agencies follow the law and beat the f*ck out of those anti-fa scum.
It seemed pretty close. They mainly focused on a half dozen of them, with one being a White safety who is now an IT executive in Connecticut. Another one was a black QB who was released from prison specifically to play for the Redskins. He was the backup until the White replacement QB was injured in the final Monday night game against Dallas and then he went in and made a few notable plays but seemed very erratic, just as they are now.
As far as the league in general, the defenses were less black then but still black dominated, the o-line was still White dominated and there were fewer black quarterbacks, about the same number of White WRs, still a few White RBs left before they were completely extinguished, and tight end was a bit blacker then. I think Scott Case was the only starting White CB.