Flint
Mentor
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2016
- Messages
- 1,468
For the second year in a row, Sports Illustrated has put a transgender person on its cover. Plus, for us older gents they blessed us with a lay out of 81-year-old Matha Stewart.
Getting on the trans band wagon assures support from the rich liberal advertisers that long ago replaced readers subscriptions as their source of income.
This kind of controversy creates some interest in what would otherwise be a non-news event. What's the point of a few pictures in a magazine of sexy girls In swimsuits when you can access gigs of pics of fully naked woman with a few clicks?
There’s little downside to Sports Illustrated doing these kinds of stupid woke stuff. No one buys the rag anymore, is it even available in print other then these special issues?Sports Illustrated Faces Backlash Over Trans Pop Star Kim Petras as Swimsuit Issue Cover Model
The Grammy-winning singer is now the second trans woman to be included in the annual SI editionwww.yahoo.com
Getting on the trans band wagon assures support from the rich liberal advertisers that long ago replaced readers subscriptions as their source of income.
This kind of controversy creates some interest in what would otherwise be a non-news event. What's the point of a few pictures in a magazine of sexy girls In swimsuits when you can access gigs of pics of fully naked woman with a few clicks?