Automation doesn't have to be a bad thing, but do you really want it to happen with the current group of psychopaths who are pushing it, namely the WEF crowd that believes people are nothing more than "hackable animals," that tell us we will "own nothing and be happy" as we eat bugs and lab meat and our travel rights are greatly restricted and everyone happily lives together in multiracial "15 minute cities" where we are under constant surveillance? And do these type of globalist psychopaths even want "excess useless eaters" around after most of their jobs have been eliminated?Even if this is the case, is it really a bad thing? Does it make sense to artificially preserve jobs for sake of having jobs? If we have the technology to automate menial tasks in a cost effective manner, its inevitably going to happen. In the past, a huge percentage of the labor force was in either agriculture or manufacturing. Now we can perform those tasks cheaper and more efficiently with a fraction of the human labor. Would it have made sense to limit advanced farming equipment and robotics to preserve those jobs?
It might cause some growing pains in the short term, but people will probably find better things to do. Any job that can be fully replaced with AI or robotics is probably menial and tedious anyway. As long as it doesn't spiral in a technocratic dystopia, can't automation be viewed as a positive thing?
You must be much more trusting than me if you think this is some kind of natural process that will benefit mankind rather than be steered in a way that benefits only the top 1%. Here's just one example of an article I saw today. Many more are all over the alternative media. They don't even hide their intentions anymore, the only issue is whether they will be thwarted in their ambitions: