The part in bold is the most important part. The history of humanity is mostly one of conquest and war, winners and losers. Every race had it done to them at some time or another, and every race either did it at some point or would have done it if they had been strong enough to do so. Every "stolen land" argument I've ever seen has made use of selective outrage, based on who the arguer likes and doesn't like. Non-white invaders like Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan invaded white land and killed the white natives. Brown Muslims invaded white Spain and would have overrun Europe if Charles Martel hadn't stopped them. But we white people are the only race banned from using the "we were invaded/colonized/had our land stolen" argument, even though we've been victims of it just as much as any other race.
I don't think Indians have any right to rise up and kill white Americans because "we took their land." Nor do the Maori have any right to kill white New Zealanders, nor do the Abos have any right to kill white Australians. Therefore, I can't support the Palestinian "kill for stolen land" argument either. The Jews stole the Muslims' land, yes, but the Muslims stole it from white Christians in the 7th century when they invaded the Byzantine Empire, who were the custodians of Jerusalem at the time. At least the Indians, Maori, Abos were all in their respective lands first, Palestinians can't even claim that.
I agree that the Jews love talking about this stuff in a "gay weasel" way (great choice of words) and it makes them look really obnoxious in the eyes of anyone who hasn't been blinded by "the chosen people are always victims" propaganda. I just get tired of all this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend, Muslims are our brothers" crap that I see too often on the far right. (Not blaming you at all, I appreciate the anti-Muslim "refugee" sentiment). None of those anti-white J's or M's belong in our countries.
Ironically, if a certain WWII leader hadn't made the mistake of stopping at Dunkirk, the entire British Expeditionary Force would have been surrounded and captured, Britain would have been forced to sue for peace, and with the Royal Navy out of the equation the certain leader's original plan, to send the Jews to Madagascar, would have been possible. The Jews could have had a peaceful state in Madagascar instead of one with endless war in the Holy Land. The Muslims could have had their own state in Palestine. Seems like a win-win for everyone.
But the "good guys" won WWII, as we always hear. (wink)
