We Are Living In A Cartoon
- Thread starter foobar75
- Start date
The Oklahoma City Bombing After 22 Years
Paul Craig Roberts
Today, April 19, 2017, is the 22nd anniversary of the Oklahoma City Bombing. The bombing of the federal Murrah office building was blamed by federal authorities on a bomb made from fertilizer inside a truck parked in front of the building by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols.
There are many anomalies associated with the official explanation, including mysterious deaths of some, including a police officer, who understood that the actual facts did not accord with the explanation. Investigators who report the actual facts are branded “conspiracy theorists” and dismissed. This has been the Deep State’s way of controlling explanations since the 1940s.
Americans, being the insouciant people that they are, never noticed that the Murrah building blew up from the inside out, not from the outside in.
However, Air Force General Benton K. Partin, the US Air Force’s top explosive expert, did notice. He prepared a detailed report containing “conclusive proof that the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was not caused solely by the truck bomb. Evidence shows that the massive destruction was primarily the result of four demolition charges placed at critical structural points at the third floor level.” Here is a copy of General Partin’s letter accompanying the report he sent to US Senator Trent Lott.http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/PARTIN/ok8.htm
General Partin was my neighbor in Alexandria, Virginia. I went through his report those years ago, and it is clear that the official “investigation” ignored all the facts presented by General Partin. Indeed, Partin’s report is not even part of the record. Wikipedia does not even mention the report as a “conspiracy theory” in Wikipedia’s recitation of the official line.
There was no more an investigation of the Oklahoma City Bombing than there was of 9/11.
It has never been clear to me why a number of people knew better than to come to work that day in the Murrah building or why what was likely deep state perpetrators desired to kill several hundred people, including children.
Perhaps it was targeted at the militias and the creation of police powers that could be used against them. Two years previously the Clinton regime murdered approximately 100 men, women, and children at the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas. The religious sect was threatening no one and in violation of no laws, but it was a dissident group that the US government decided to terminate.
The focus on dissidents changed with 9/11, which Israel and Israel’s American neoconservative allies used to apply wide-ranging and long-lasting massive violence to seven Muslim countries, costing US taxpayers trillions of dollars and what remained of the reputation of the United States.
The main consequence of “terrorism” is the extraordinary growth of unconstitutional police state powers throughout the Western world. Every protective shield of individual rights, except for the Second Amendment, has been stripped from the US Constitution by the so-called “war on terror.”
All of the alleged terrorist attacks have puzzling, uninvestigated, and unreported anomalities. It is astonishing that the media never asks any questions. Consider, for example, the Nice, France, Truck attack.
Nice police authorities have the unambigious evidence of the security cameras on every block of the truck’s alleged murderous route. There should be no question whatsoever about what really happened. Yet, the Minister of the Interior in Paris ordered the Nice public authorities to destroy the video evidence and not to release it. So all we have is a very grainy inconclusive video taken by a person allegedly married to a former Mossad intelligence officer. This person turns out to be the same person who provides the only video of an attack in Germany.
The bridge attack in London is overwhelming with the lack of any evidence. We simply get an official story.
Sandy Hook is famous for the one bereaved parent, but there were allegedly scores of dead children. Where are the other parents? Aren’t they bereaved?
If these terror events are real, it is a simple matter for the media to ask questions, to investigate, and to give the public the facts. But the media never does. The media only repeats the official story without checking it.
In other words, the facts are whatever the government says they are. So what is the purpose of the media?
No purpose except to be a trumpet for the government.
The official stories of the Murrah office building bombing and 9/11 are now enshrined in memorials, the purpose of which is to make a lie the truth.
For insouciant Americans this works.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/04/19/oklahoma-city-bombing-22-years/
Paul Craig Roberts
Today, April 19, 2017, is the 22nd anniversary of the Oklahoma City Bombing. The bombing of the federal Murrah office building was blamed by federal authorities on a bomb made from fertilizer inside a truck parked in front of the building by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols.
There are many anomalies associated with the official explanation, including mysterious deaths of some, including a police officer, who understood that the actual facts did not accord with the explanation. Investigators who report the actual facts are branded “conspiracy theorists” and dismissed. This has been the Deep State’s way of controlling explanations since the 1940s.
Americans, being the insouciant people that they are, never noticed that the Murrah building blew up from the inside out, not from the outside in.
However, Air Force General Benton K. Partin, the US Air Force’s top explosive expert, did notice. He prepared a detailed report containing “conclusive proof that the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was not caused solely by the truck bomb. Evidence shows that the massive destruction was primarily the result of four demolition charges placed at critical structural points at the third floor level.” Here is a copy of General Partin’s letter accompanying the report he sent to US Senator Trent Lott.http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/PARTIN/ok8.htm
General Partin was my neighbor in Alexandria, Virginia. I went through his report those years ago, and it is clear that the official “investigation” ignored all the facts presented by General Partin. Indeed, Partin’s report is not even part of the record. Wikipedia does not even mention the report as a “conspiracy theory” in Wikipedia’s recitation of the official line.
There was no more an investigation of the Oklahoma City Bombing than there was of 9/11.
It has never been clear to me why a number of people knew better than to come to work that day in the Murrah building or why what was likely deep state perpetrators desired to kill several hundred people, including children.
Perhaps it was targeted at the militias and the creation of police powers that could be used against them. Two years previously the Clinton regime murdered approximately 100 men, women, and children at the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas. The religious sect was threatening no one and in violation of no laws, but it was a dissident group that the US government decided to terminate.
The focus on dissidents changed with 9/11, which Israel and Israel’s American neoconservative allies used to apply wide-ranging and long-lasting massive violence to seven Muslim countries, costing US taxpayers trillions of dollars and what remained of the reputation of the United States.
The main consequence of “terrorism” is the extraordinary growth of unconstitutional police state powers throughout the Western world. Every protective shield of individual rights, except for the Second Amendment, has been stripped from the US Constitution by the so-called “war on terror.”
All of the alleged terrorist attacks have puzzling, uninvestigated, and unreported anomalities. It is astonishing that the media never asks any questions. Consider, for example, the Nice, France, Truck attack.
Nice police authorities have the unambigious evidence of the security cameras on every block of the truck’s alleged murderous route. There should be no question whatsoever about what really happened. Yet, the Minister of the Interior in Paris ordered the Nice public authorities to destroy the video evidence and not to release it. So all we have is a very grainy inconclusive video taken by a person allegedly married to a former Mossad intelligence officer. This person turns out to be the same person who provides the only video of an attack in Germany.
The bridge attack in London is overwhelming with the lack of any evidence. We simply get an official story.
Sandy Hook is famous for the one bereaved parent, but there were allegedly scores of dead children. Where are the other parents? Aren’t they bereaved?
If these terror events are real, it is a simple matter for the media to ask questions, to investigate, and to give the public the facts. But the media never does. The media only repeats the official story without checking it.
In other words, the facts are whatever the government says they are. So what is the purpose of the media?
No purpose except to be a trumpet for the government.
The official stories of the Murrah office building bombing and 9/11 are now enshrined in memorials, the purpose of which is to make a lie the truth.
For insouciant Americans this works.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/04/19/oklahoma-city-bombing-22-years/
werewolf
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- May 6, 2011
- Messages
- 5,997
General Parton, as it says, was the USA's foremost expert on explosives. He made two speeches here that I attended. He said that there was no way in the world that a so called fertilizer bomb took down that bomb proof building. I've written about that here before. It was a practice run for 911. 1993 was an earlier attempt to do the 911 on Lucky Larry's money losing WTC towers. I was slightly involved in that one - and came very close to be totally involved in the big one. Sandy Hoax was as phony as Barry's birth certificate.
A friend of mine wrote this, published today on altright.com, which has a lot of good material.
The Peaceful Origins of Nazi Violence
Is the meme of Brownshirt aggression yet another Big Lie of the establishment left?
by Vincent Law
The opening salvo of the political violence now flaring up across American cities was the infamous January 20, 2017 “sucker punch” of Richard Spencer, from behind, as he was calmly attempting to answer questions by a reporter. This terroristic assault by a masked anarchist in the streets of our nation’s capitol was, obviously, an assault on the ideals on which America was founded. The idea of a peaceful man, freely and openly expressing his opinion with reason and logic on a public street, being ambushed by communist thugs intent on silencing him with violence, is something of which Mao Zedong would approve but Patrick Henry would abhor.
This didn’t stop thousands of brainwashed normies and libtards on social media from applauding the assault, of course. On TIME magazine’s Facebook page, the sadistic headline “Watch White Nationalist Richard Spencer Get Punched” had nearly 8,500 likes and hundreds of gleeful commentswithin 24 hoursof posting. The top comment, with over 1,500 likes in the same short timespan, smugly asked “I thought punching nazis in the face was a long standing American tradition?”
This comment, and countless like it, alluded to the famous cover of “Captain America Comics” #1, which features the eponymous superhero punching German Chancellor Adolf Hitler in the face (while hiding behind a mask, incidentally). This piece of pop art is well known, but what is less well known is the fact that it was published a full year before America’s involvement in the war, when the vast majority of the American people wanted to maintain absolute neutrality. Contrary to popular belief, the cover of “Captain America Comics” #1 was not expressing any American tradition at the time, but was a hugely controversial work of propaganda by comic book creators (((Joe Simon and Jack Kirby))), who hoped thereby to inspire thousands of American boys to willingly sacrifice themselves as cannon fodder in the war in Europe.
That the herd instinct of the mob on social media would gleefully cheer bullying and violence when it is sanctioned by corporations and the media against a politically incorrect target, while ignorantly trampling over the ideals of our nation’s Founders and willingly dancing to the pied piper of (((scheming warmongers))), should come as no surprise to anyone who is a student of history and human nature. What might come as a surprise to some, however, is that the entire meme of Nazi violence is itself based on an even bigger lie.
Whatever one may think of the former Austrian painter, it goes without saying the man known as more as a speaker than as a fist fighter. Throughout the decade of the 1920s, he communicated his ideas to his fellow Germans with the spoken word, and built his entire movement on the power of free speech. Yes, speech: that same sacred right enshrined in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Hitler didn’t force the German people into his meetings with clubs and bayonets. They came willingly under the democratic Weimar constitution to listen to what he had to say. He argued passionately, forcefully but convincingly for his point of view. But there were other forces in Germany and throughout Europe at the time who were determined to reply not with words, but only with violence.
By 1920, bloody communist revolutions had already overthrown governments by force in Russia, Hungary and in Hitler’s home province of Bavaria. The Red Terror of Béla Kun, the unspeakable atrocities of the Cheka, the murders carried out by the Bavarian Soviet Republic all gruesomely demonstrated to patriots everywhere what treatment they could expect under the tender mercies of Marxism. Like ISIS today, the communists believed any atrocity was justified in the pursuit of their utopian future state, and that initiating violence was morally justified by their own radical worldview. In his 1920 book “Terrorism and Communism,” Soviet leader Leon Trotsky derides the “principle of the sacredness of human life” as a “shameful lie” and advocates the use of terror and intimidation as well as mass murder as “not only a necessary evil but an expedient act in time of revolution.” The initiation of political violence ran deep in the Marxist DNA, with all the moral certainty of Old Testament wrath.
In Germany, as the young leader of the N.S.D.A.P. attempted to build popular support for his party, he found his meetings confronted again and again by apostles of communism determined to put Trotsky’s words into action. This was the era of the infamous S.A, or Brownshirts, the Nazi paramilitary force whose very name is today a byword for violent intimidation of political opponents. Yet the S.A. was first organized informally as a defensive force to protect National Socialist speakers against violent attacks. The original name of the Brownshirts was Saalschutzabteilung, or “meeting hall protection detachment,” and Hitler writes about their origin in his autobiography: “Its first task was limited: it consisted of making possible the holding of meetings which without it would have been flatly prevented by the opponents…. It did not want to establish violence as its aim, but it wanted to protect the messengers of the spiritual aim against oppression by violence.”
He further admonishes his bourgeois (cuckservative) critics, writing: “For them, of course, our principle, ‘those who attack us with force we will ward off with force,’ had something terrifying. They not only reproached us for the brutal worship of the blackjack, but also for the lack of spirit in itself. But it makes no impression whatsoever on such a quack that in a peoples’ assembly a Demosthenes can be silenced if only fifty idiots, supported by their talk and their fists, won’t let him speak.” Demosthenes was a classical Athenian statesman famous for his oratory and intellectual prowess.
In a December 20, 1931 interview with the New York Times, Hitler was asked by reporter Harold Callender about the S.A. and “Nazi tactics” from the American point of view. Hitler responded, “The National Socialist movement is not a military but a political organisation. It is characterised, however, by very strict discipline. The form and nature of a political organisation are determined not only by the will of its members but also by its opponents. Germany has today more than 6,000,000 Communists and from six to seven million other varieties of international Socialists. These represent the advance guard in our own country of a formidable foreign power. Democratic theories and admonitions do not suffice to resist a force which is motivated not by belief in democracy but by bloody brutality. If America had 20,000,000 Communists and Social-Democratic Marxists, the American people would readily understand why the National Socialist movement inculcates in its members the highest discipline and a readiness for self-sacrifice.”
The idea that the S.A. was founded as an association of bullies and thugs to use violence to intimidate and silence peaceful opponents expressing different points of view is one of the Big Lies of the last century. It is an unalterable historical fact that the rise of the N.S.D.A.P. was achieved primarily through the building of popular support via the peaceful democratic channels of free speech and free assembly. It is also an indisputable fact that the original purpose and function of the S.A. was not to physically attack opponents exercising their right to free speech, but to defend the right of free speech and free assembly of its own supporters from physical attack by leftists. It is likewise an indisputable fact that Hitler, in his own writings, over and over again articulated this defensive function of the S.A, while Trotsky explicitly advocated the initiation of violence and terrorism in support of the communist goals and worldview.
It is self-evident that the spiritual heirs to Trotsky, the so-called Antifa of the 21st century, believe wholeheartedly in the communist advocacy of initiating political terror and physical violence against all dissenting political opinions, whether against members of Alt Right, or simply normal patriotic Americans who happened to vote for Trump. Whenever anyone on the right accuses these leftists of using “Brownshirt tactics,” or goes along with the Big Lie about the origins and nature of the S.A, they thereby lay the groundwork for the justification of violence against anyone tagged with the “Nazi” label by the mainstream media, and they strike from their own hands the method of their self-defense.
https://altright.com/2017/04/20/the-peaceful-origins-of-nazi-violence/
The Peaceful Origins of Nazi Violence
Is the meme of Brownshirt aggression yet another Big Lie of the establishment left?
by Vincent Law
The opening salvo of the political violence now flaring up across American cities was the infamous January 20, 2017 “sucker punch” of Richard Spencer, from behind, as he was calmly attempting to answer questions by a reporter. This terroristic assault by a masked anarchist in the streets of our nation’s capitol was, obviously, an assault on the ideals on which America was founded. The idea of a peaceful man, freely and openly expressing his opinion with reason and logic on a public street, being ambushed by communist thugs intent on silencing him with violence, is something of which Mao Zedong would approve but Patrick Henry would abhor.
This didn’t stop thousands of brainwashed normies and libtards on social media from applauding the assault, of course. On TIME magazine’s Facebook page, the sadistic headline “Watch White Nationalist Richard Spencer Get Punched” had nearly 8,500 likes and hundreds of gleeful commentswithin 24 hoursof posting. The top comment, with over 1,500 likes in the same short timespan, smugly asked “I thought punching nazis in the face was a long standing American tradition?”
This comment, and countless like it, alluded to the famous cover of “Captain America Comics” #1, which features the eponymous superhero punching German Chancellor Adolf Hitler in the face (while hiding behind a mask, incidentally). This piece of pop art is well known, but what is less well known is the fact that it was published a full year before America’s involvement in the war, when the vast majority of the American people wanted to maintain absolute neutrality. Contrary to popular belief, the cover of “Captain America Comics” #1 was not expressing any American tradition at the time, but was a hugely controversial work of propaganda by comic book creators (((Joe Simon and Jack Kirby))), who hoped thereby to inspire thousands of American boys to willingly sacrifice themselves as cannon fodder in the war in Europe.
That the herd instinct of the mob on social media would gleefully cheer bullying and violence when it is sanctioned by corporations and the media against a politically incorrect target, while ignorantly trampling over the ideals of our nation’s Founders and willingly dancing to the pied piper of (((scheming warmongers))), should come as no surprise to anyone who is a student of history and human nature. What might come as a surprise to some, however, is that the entire meme of Nazi violence is itself based on an even bigger lie.
Whatever one may think of the former Austrian painter, it goes without saying the man known as more as a speaker than as a fist fighter. Throughout the decade of the 1920s, he communicated his ideas to his fellow Germans with the spoken word, and built his entire movement on the power of free speech. Yes, speech: that same sacred right enshrined in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Hitler didn’t force the German people into his meetings with clubs and bayonets. They came willingly under the democratic Weimar constitution to listen to what he had to say. He argued passionately, forcefully but convincingly for his point of view. But there were other forces in Germany and throughout Europe at the time who were determined to reply not with words, but only with violence.
By 1920, bloody communist revolutions had already overthrown governments by force in Russia, Hungary and in Hitler’s home province of Bavaria. The Red Terror of Béla Kun, the unspeakable atrocities of the Cheka, the murders carried out by the Bavarian Soviet Republic all gruesomely demonstrated to patriots everywhere what treatment they could expect under the tender mercies of Marxism. Like ISIS today, the communists believed any atrocity was justified in the pursuit of their utopian future state, and that initiating violence was morally justified by their own radical worldview. In his 1920 book “Terrorism and Communism,” Soviet leader Leon Trotsky derides the “principle of the sacredness of human life” as a “shameful lie” and advocates the use of terror and intimidation as well as mass murder as “not only a necessary evil but an expedient act in time of revolution.” The initiation of political violence ran deep in the Marxist DNA, with all the moral certainty of Old Testament wrath.
In Germany, as the young leader of the N.S.D.A.P. attempted to build popular support for his party, he found his meetings confronted again and again by apostles of communism determined to put Trotsky’s words into action. This was the era of the infamous S.A, or Brownshirts, the Nazi paramilitary force whose very name is today a byword for violent intimidation of political opponents. Yet the S.A. was first organized informally as a defensive force to protect National Socialist speakers against violent attacks. The original name of the Brownshirts was Saalschutzabteilung, or “meeting hall protection detachment,” and Hitler writes about their origin in his autobiography: “Its first task was limited: it consisted of making possible the holding of meetings which without it would have been flatly prevented by the opponents…. It did not want to establish violence as its aim, but it wanted to protect the messengers of the spiritual aim against oppression by violence.”
He further admonishes his bourgeois (cuckservative) critics, writing: “For them, of course, our principle, ‘those who attack us with force we will ward off with force,’ had something terrifying. They not only reproached us for the brutal worship of the blackjack, but also for the lack of spirit in itself. But it makes no impression whatsoever on such a quack that in a peoples’ assembly a Demosthenes can be silenced if only fifty idiots, supported by their talk and their fists, won’t let him speak.” Demosthenes was a classical Athenian statesman famous for his oratory and intellectual prowess.
In a December 20, 1931 interview with the New York Times, Hitler was asked by reporter Harold Callender about the S.A. and “Nazi tactics” from the American point of view. Hitler responded, “The National Socialist movement is not a military but a political organisation. It is characterised, however, by very strict discipline. The form and nature of a political organisation are determined not only by the will of its members but also by its opponents. Germany has today more than 6,000,000 Communists and from six to seven million other varieties of international Socialists. These represent the advance guard in our own country of a formidable foreign power. Democratic theories and admonitions do not suffice to resist a force which is motivated not by belief in democracy but by bloody brutality. If America had 20,000,000 Communists and Social-Democratic Marxists, the American people would readily understand why the National Socialist movement inculcates in its members the highest discipline and a readiness for self-sacrifice.”
The idea that the S.A. was founded as an association of bullies and thugs to use violence to intimidate and silence peaceful opponents expressing different points of view is one of the Big Lies of the last century. It is an unalterable historical fact that the rise of the N.S.D.A.P. was achieved primarily through the building of popular support via the peaceful democratic channels of free speech and free assembly. It is also an indisputable fact that the original purpose and function of the S.A. was not to physically attack opponents exercising their right to free speech, but to defend the right of free speech and free assembly of its own supporters from physical attack by leftists. It is likewise an indisputable fact that Hitler, in his own writings, over and over again articulated this defensive function of the S.A, while Trotsky explicitly advocated the initiation of violence and terrorism in support of the communist goals and worldview.
It is self-evident that the spiritual heirs to Trotsky, the so-called Antifa of the 21st century, believe wholeheartedly in the communist advocacy of initiating political terror and physical violence against all dissenting political opinions, whether against members of Alt Right, or simply normal patriotic Americans who happened to vote for Trump. Whenever anyone on the right accuses these leftists of using “Brownshirt tactics,” or goes along with the Big Lie about the origins and nature of the S.A, they thereby lay the groundwork for the justification of violence against anyone tagged with the “Nazi” label by the mainstream media, and they strike from their own hands the method of their self-defense.
https://altright.com/2017/04/20/the-peaceful-origins-of-nazi-violence/
werewolf
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- May 6, 2011
- Messages
- 5,997
I keep trying to correct people whenever I see comments about how "Antifa is exactly like the brownshirts", who were, as Mr Law observes, formed to defend themselves against the "antifas" who were violently disrupting their peaceful meetings and injuring and killing their people, which is what they always do - that's what commie scum do - and now people here too are finally realizing that organized resistance is the way to defend against them.
Antifa Has Ties To The Mayor Of Berkeley
https://altright.com/2017/04/22/antifa-has-ties-to-the-mayor-of-san-francisco/
https://altright.com/2017/04/22/antifa-has-ties-to-the-mayor-of-san-francisco/
DixieDestroyer
Hall of Famer
Article claims "1 in 5" UK adults can't change a lightbulb or boil an egg. They must've included the "turd world" invaders in the count.
https://www.studyfinds.org/change-lightbulb-household-chores-study/
https://www.studyfinds.org/change-lightbulb-household-chores-study/
WEIRD SCIENCE
Bill Nye: the freaky-deaky sexual perversity propagandist guy?
Bill Nye became known to most American schoolchildren of the '90s as "The Science Guy," a lovable, bowtied eccentric who would entertainingly display various scientific principles, like, say, friction, or gravity, or electricity, or other generally unquestioned factual phenomena.
"TheScientism Enforcer Guy,"establishment stooge and upholder of official dogma like global cooling, erm, global warming, erm "climate change" ("yeah,that's the ticket") against skeptics, critics, and so-called "denialists."
But he hasn't stopped there. In his latest Netflix show, "Bill Nye Saves the World," it would appear that Nye has now become "The Perversity Propagandist Guy," all in the name of, uh, "science"?
Anyhow, words ultimately fail in the face of sheer horror.... Watch this excerpt, if you dare, featuring the rapping "talents" of actress Rachel Bloomdoing her best to lecture her audience about polymorphous perversity, or something, while making copious references to her vagina (but of course). Eventually some fruity, lisping nerd joins in and helps her finish out her horrifically unfunny paean to sexual dimorphism, or pansexuality, or gender fluidity, or something.
Um, so...Day of the Rope... when?
http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2017/04/weird-science.html#more
Bill Nye: the freaky-deaky sexual perversity propagandist guy?
Bill Nye became known to most American schoolchildren of the '90s as "The Science Guy," a lovable, bowtied eccentric who would entertainingly display various scientific principles, like, say, friction, or gravity, or electricity, or other generally unquestioned factual phenomena.
"TheScientism Enforcer Guy,"establishment stooge and upholder of official dogma like global cooling, erm, global warming, erm "climate change" ("yeah,that's the ticket") against skeptics, critics, and so-called "denialists."
But he hasn't stopped there. In his latest Netflix show, "Bill Nye Saves the World," it would appear that Nye has now become "The Perversity Propagandist Guy," all in the name of, uh, "science"?
Anyhow, words ultimately fail in the face of sheer horror.... Watch this excerpt, if you dare, featuring the rapping "talents" of actress Rachel Bloomdoing her best to lecture her audience about polymorphous perversity, or something, while making copious references to her vagina (but of course). Eventually some fruity, lisping nerd joins in and helps her finish out her horrifically unfunny paean to sexual dimorphism, or pansexuality, or gender fluidity, or something.
Um, so...Day of the Rope... when?
http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2017/04/weird-science.html#more
werewolf
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- May 6, 2011
- Messages
- 5,997
A civilization in its death throes. The decadent ruling class mocking the working class...
Nordstrom Now Selling $425 ‘Mud-Coated’ Jeans for People Who Want to Pretend they Have a ‘Dirty’ Job
https://heatst.com/culture-wars/nor...le-who-want-to-pretend-they-have-a-dirty-job/
Nordstrom Now Selling $425 ‘Mud-Coated’ Jeans for People Who Want to Pretend they Have a ‘Dirty’ Job
https://heatst.com/culture-wars/nor...le-who-want-to-pretend-they-have-a-dirty-job/
The Hock
Master
I had to check to make sure this dirty jeans story wasn't a prank. Sad to say it isn't. My next trip to Nordstrom would be my first, but now there will never be a first trip.
What's the saying? The fish rots from the head down?
Can't believe this is a real story. Somebody really had a brainstorm and it should cause a sh1tstorm. Wouldn't surprise me to see a "Nostrom pulls dirty jeans and apologizes story" soon.
What's the saying? The fish rots from the head down?
Can't believe this is a real story. Somebody really had a brainstorm and it should cause a sh1tstorm. Wouldn't surprise me to see a "Nostrom pulls dirty jeans and apologizes story" soon.
werewolf
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- May 6, 2011
- Messages
- 5,997
I too checked it out on the Nordstrom website, Hock. I think they are simply adorable and I don't mind a bit paying a little extra for something that is so delightfully chic. I ordered two pair. I'm going to wear them to the next protest. But will they color coordinate with my black mask that is the question that torments me. Oh...I love the button fly closure. One might forget to button them all, if you know what I mean wink wink.
$425
http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/prps-ba...category-personalizedsort&fashioncolor=INDIGO
$425
http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/prps-ba...category-personalizedsort&fashioncolor=INDIGO
Last edited:
The Hock
Master
I think we have a Nordsrom's here. I'm gonna go and see what these look like and maybe troll them.
Wow, just wow. Just when I thought I'd heard everything.
DixieDestroyer
Hall of Famer
It can be stated as a pure D fact...anyone who'd shell out $425 for a pair of britches has (far) more dollars than sense.
werewolf
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- May 6, 2011
- Messages
- 5,997
Nordstroms is too low class for me. I prefer Saks Fifth Avenue.
http://www.saksfifthavenue.com/main/ProductDetail.jsp?PRODUCT<>prd_id=845524447026201
Omigod those shorts are simply divine! And a steal at $435 (they must be marked down for clearance)! And do look at this darling top ...
http://www.saksfifthavenue.com/main/ProductDetail.jsp?PRODUCT<>prd_id=845524447042989
...and only $690! Does anyone know if they come in mens sizes?
http://www.saksfifthavenue.com/main/ProductDetail.jsp?PRODUCT<>prd_id=845524447026201
Omigod those shorts are simply divine! And a steal at $435 (they must be marked down for clearance)! And do look at this darling top ...
http://www.saksfifthavenue.com/main/ProductDetail.jsp?PRODUCT<>prd_id=845524447042989
...and only $690! Does anyone know if they come in mens sizes?
DixieDestroyer
Hall of Famer
Mr.Wizard favors Commander GL Rockwell a tad. ;-)
werewolf
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- May 6, 2011
- Messages
- 5,997
Are you just joking or do you know something? A couple of media personalities who were indeed right wing - John Wayne and the author Taylor Caldwell (both subscribed to Willis Carto's "Spotlight"). Of course there were others but those two come to mind. A couple of movie actresses who I love (I'm an old movie fan), the great French actress Arletty - they brought her up before the French postwar inquisition and charged her with treason for dating a German officer. She never backed off an inch and she famously said, "My heart is French, but my ass is international!" Another French actress that I love, Simone Simon, was given similar treatment by the witch hunting victors.
Last edited:
DixieDestroyer
Hall of Famer
It was in primarily in jest. FYI, "Mr.Wizard" Don Herbert's Wikipedia page says the following...
His career as an actor was interrupted by World War II when he enlisted in the United States Army as a Private. Herbert later joined the United States Army Air Forces, took pilot training, and became a B-24 bomber pilot who flew 56 combat missions from Italy with the 767th Bomb Squadron, 461st Bomb Group of the Fifteenth Air Force. When Herbert was discharged in 1945 he was a Captain and had earned the Distinguished Flying Cross and the Air Medal with three oak leaf clusters.
Last edited:
werewolf
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- May 6, 2011
- Messages
- 5,997
DixieDestroyer
Hall of Famer
Rockwell was truly one of a kind....Intelligent, Ivy League educated, Naval Commander, well spoken, humorous & charismatic. Above all, he was a prophetic hero of the great White race.
