A few comments on things mentioned in this thread:
That idiot Butal has been kicked off every sports board on the net. He's
the individual that said Wariner would deflate at the NCAAs. Then when
Wariner won Brutal said he'd be "smoked" by the bruthas at the Olympic
Trials. Then when Wariner won again, he said the blacks would sweep at
the Olympics because Wariner couldn't overcome genetics. He had no
answer for Wariner's Olympic win other than that Wariner was a flash in
the pan. He continued along the same lines (slightly changing his name
when he'd get kicked off some site) the following year. Then Wariner and
Rock went 1-2 at the World Championships. He shut up and no doubt
sulked for weeks. That finish by Wariner and Rock was very important for
many reasons. European fans and sportswriters were stunned, as they
have been brainwashed by the Caste System. Keep in mind the same
crowd runs the media in Europe and the US.
BTW, if Brutal goes on about medal counts in track, point out that black
favorites in men's events, as tabbed by TAFNews and other media outlets,
lost the 400, 800, 1500, triple jump, high jump, and marathon to whites
- and the 110 highs to an Asian. Well, El Guerrouj in the 1500 is
Caucasian, but he isn't white, so I'll step back from that a bit. El G did KO
the Kenyans and Ethiopians in the 5k, and he is not some high altitude E.
African. On the men's side blacks won 5 races the entire games, and one
field event, the long jump. Whites swept the high jump and the triple
jump - which happens with amazing regularity. You'd think blacks won
everything the way the Games are presented. The Games aren't only
track, and overall whites dominate. Cuba has done well in boxing using
blacks, but keep in mind the average age of their boxers up through the
'96 games was 26! Most other countries send kids. Our basketball
performance at the Games and World Champs speaks for itself.
It will take a few years for the effect of Wariner and Rock on white kids to
'show', but it will, provided we don't endure a total media blackout. Last
year's World's were almost absent on television, being shown on PAX. A
few of my friends and I were joking that Wariner and Rock were
responsible for that, since track pulls higher ratings on cable than the
NBA, yet it was banished to the far end of the cable universe.
Mennea's record in the 200 gets ignored because of the altitude.
However, this shows the hypocrisy. He set the record on the same track
that the previous record had been set. Tommie Smith set his record in the
'68 Games in Mexico City. Yet we never heard the end of stories about
Smith's "incredible record" and his "courage" in standing on the victory
podium in stinky socks, fist in the air. I get a kick out of Marxist sports
writers telling the story, over and over mentioning Smith and John Carlos
going 1-2. They went 1-3. Peter Norman, white, from Australia was 2nd.
But being white will get you no cred with the Bolshevist media. It's worth
noting that the fastest sea level time for many years was 20.0 by Valery
Borzov, and there was no doubt about his dominance over blacks and
everyone else in the world at the 100 and 200 for several years. Except
among sports writers determined to keep the brainwashing of white
Americans going full tilt. As a side note on Mennea, he was highly
regarded by knowledgeable track people, and was a co-favorite for Gold
in Moscow (with Cuba's Silvio Leonard and Jamaica's Don Quarrie) before
the boycott was announced. All three were regarded as superior to the
possible American entrants at the time. 100 meter man Wells' triumph
over the boycotters after the 1980 Games had the naysayers reeling, and
scratching around in the dirt for any and all excuses that might have been
available.
Blacks dominate the sprint lists due to having a high percentage of
talented individuals among their 'pool' AND decades of the gatekeepers
facilitating black advancement while hindering that of whites, whether
through the media or pressure on schools, etc. If the US had 4 white guys
in two years (Potter, Steele, Wariner, Rock) running under 45 seconds -
out of the small amount of whites who now participate in track and in this
event in particular - one wonders how many talented whites are out
there. It's as bad as what goes on in the NFL, NBA, etc. This is of course
true in other events beyond the 400 in track. I also can't help but to
mention the fact that blacks usually physically mature several years ahead
of whites, and are many times older than their white peers by a year or
two at each year of high school to compound things even more.
The brainwashing is the toughest thing to overcome. It's in so many
sports. Take boxing. You see Calzaghe dominate Lacy, and then whites all
around you, who just saw the same fight, will say Calzaghe was lucky,
Lacy had an off night, it was fixed or other equally inane comments. I
know, I heard them say this stuff. The rationalize the resounding success
of whites against blacks in NHB fighting the same way. Or they'll tell you
NHB isn't real fighting, when the opposite is true. Boxing isn't real
fighting per se.
The lack of improvement among whites in the 100 and other running
events goes far beyond the numbers of black, the drugs involved and so
on. It is psychological on some levels. No one running faster than
Woronin? Look at Britain's 800 and 1500/miler men from the 80's. How
many Kenyans are currently running as fast? Two? Moorcroft runs 13:00
in 1982, destroying Henry Rono's record, and only three whites have run
faster since? Yes, the participants are down to a trickle across the board,
and this is part of the problem, and what was hoped for! But the
complete absence of whites in some events is amazing. It is interesting
that for all the Kenyan and Ethiopian marathoners seen in various events
around the world, whites (and Asians) have generally been dominating at
the Olympics. People who don't know the sport all that well don't realize
that the bulk of the top white performers in many running events are
running slower than the stars of the 60's and 70's when it comes to
distances ranging from the 800 to the 10k! Oh, they're running faster on
average (per race), but at the top end, almost no whites are running as
fast, say, in the 10k as Ron Clarke did in the 1960's, or Dave Bedford and
others in the 70's, etc. It's stunning. Some experts have done
calculations taking Mondo track surfaces and rabbits into account, and
point out that it's unlikely that today's crop of top middle distance
runners are much better, if at all, than the top runners 20 - 40 years ago.
Someone with Jim Ryun's ability would be challenging for the top spots
today. Take drugs away and he might be the top runner.
Sports might not be the end all, but they are being manipulated to further
goals of 'containment' when it comes to whites. The attack on white self
confidence is from all sides.
Edited by: Colonel Callan