DixieDestroyer
Hall of Famer
Question for ya'll soccer fans, which (remaining) WC team is the "Whitest"?...Germany, Netherlands, or 1 of the 2 South American teams? In other words, who's the "least caste-esque" team remaining (to pull for)?
alln2 said:Only a pk? They get a pk AND a red-card for the opponent. The rules are more than fair. Imagine if the episode happened in the first half. Uruguay would have played entire second half with one man less.  It is not the rules' fault that the ghanaians couldnt convert what was esentially a GIFT from the Ref. That missed pk should NOT have happened. The free-kick in the last min of the game, which led to the handball by Suarez, that free-kick was a GIFT from the ref. The uruguyan player DID NOT foul the ghanaian player, the african took a dive and the ref gifted the free-kick, even though Im sure he saw that it was a dive. Even the negro-loving english commentators on ITV acknowledged that the ref should not have given the free-kick to Ghana. The post-game commentators on ITV said that it was a "disgrace" what Suarez did. What really was a disgrace was the gift free-kick which led to that dangerous situation. Justice prevailed with that missed pk. The ghanaians were pitiful in extra-time. The "superior" negro affletes were very tired, they faked numerous injuries, like they did in the extra-time of the USA game. The better team was clearly Uruguay. They dominated the game apart from min 30-45 first half. They created more chances, unfortunately on a number of occasions, when the uruguyans players could have remained 1on1 vs ghana keeper, the last pass was too strong and the ball went straight to the ghana gk.Ghana would not have even made it out of their group if not for two stupid mistakes by serbian players, One was Lukovic, who received red card after he fouled a ghanaian in a completely non-dangerous situation, and the other was the handball by Kuzmanovic in the 85 min. Dumb serbs, they had a great chance to get to the semifinals, and in the end they almost let africans get to that stage. Thanks Uruguay, thanks for keeping the affletes in their places.ÂÂÂEurope said:I am glad Ghana lost,but something seems funny in the rules when a definite goal can be stopped via a handball and the team only gets a penalty. Penalties aren't guaranteed. If you had more officials or instant replay they could award a goal.
Ghana shouldn't have gotten past the group stage because of the bad call against kewell. Plus,they had an easy road in the knockout stages with the US and Uruguay compared to say Germany who had to play England and Argentina.
I read where he is of Senegalese descent. Oh how the former colonies are now colonizing their former colonizers (i.e. France, England, Holland)Jack Lambert said:
Highlander said:I read where he is of Senegalese descent. Oh how the former colonies are now colonizing their former colonizers (i.e. France, England, Holland)I missed a few minutes of the match, did Mueller get a Yellow Card?Germany looked invincible today. Superb defense, excellent ball-handling and very unselfish team play (unlike that of France, England, and the Africant's.) I wonder what the common-denominator is?Jack Lambert said:
Jack Lambert said:... This includes honorary white man Ozil...
EDIT: Just looked at around 10 guys from France's 21 U team, and they had over twice as many blacks in those ten guys than Germany has on it's entire team.
Here's "France's" Captain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamadou_Sakho
Im sure that Ozil is a descendent from these White Jannisaries, he behaves on the field like a White man. Considering the history of the majority White Jannisaries, considering that he looks White, he behaves White, it could well be that he is indeed White. Maybe not entirely, but at least 70-80%. Something like a castizo White.
His legs looks like they are shaved. Maybe he's a crossdresser and that's why he "runs very funny."Europe said:I can't stand Boeteng. Do his legs looked deformed? He runs very funny.
Europe said:Forget about this game. I am just talking about the rule in general. The point is it didn't happen in the first half. It happened at the end of the game when the defensive team has nothing to lose by touching the ball with their hands. Penalty kicks aren't that easy. Plus,they aren't playing anymore to give the one team an advantage with 11 men. Even if you have ten men, it is still difficult to score against them. Teams will just play everyone behind the ball.It's better to have a guy miss the next game than be knocked out, so with this rule why not touch it. It's kind of like fouling a guy before he has a chance to shoot a 3 to tie in baskeball and only given him 2 free throws, but the soccer rule is even worse.
alln2 said:Penalties are always easy for a man. They separate men from boys. If you are not capable to convert pk's, then dont start the game, or dont take them during the game. Always remember from now on : Pk's are never parried, they are always missed. The guy who shoots has many more chances to score that the gk has to stop the shot. If the pk is not converted, it is entirely the fault of the guy who shoots. Plus, pk's add drama, add excitement to the game. I enjoy the rules as they are, I think they are fair, I dont want them to be changed. And in basketball, if you are down 3 in the last seconds, it means that you were not good enough in the previous 47'50" min ( or 39'50" in europe). The team that fouls has every right to foul, to protect their hard work for 47'50" min ( or 39'50" in europe). Dont cry that you didnt have the chance to shoot the 3, ask yourself why you didnt play better for the previous 47'50" min ( or 39'50" in europe).Europe said:Forget about this game. I am just talking about the rule in general. The point is it didn't happen in the first half. It happened at the end of the game when the defensive team has nothing to lose by touching the ball with their hands. Penalty kicks aren't that easy. Plus,they aren't playing anymore to give the one team an advantage with 11 men. Even if you have ten men, it is still difficult to score against them. Teams will just play everyone behind the ball.It's better to have a guy miss the next game than be knocked out, so with this rule why not touch it. It's kind of like fouling a guy before he has a chance to shoot a 3 to tie in baskeball and only given him 2 free throws, but the soccer rule is even worse.