I would agree, in that adding yet another label to a segment of the unrepresented population (in this case Christian Nationalists) makes it that much easier to divide a movement that is already fragmented and without any strong organizations or representation. Marjorie Taylor Greene identifies with the term as do a few other Congressmen, but at this point I prefer referring to the half of the country that rejects what's going on simply as patriots or populists. It's going to take a fairly broad-based coalition to push back effectively, so in that respect we need "tolerance" for others who are on the same page on the important issues rather than endless parsing of perspectives and labels.I like most everything that Andrew Torba puts out there. My only question mark at this point is he is gone all in on the use of the term Christian Nationalist. That is fine by me in some sense but in other ways it could be perceived by political enemies as the eternal, ethereal, Bogeyman that the left likes to throw out there as they create anything to use against us.
I listen to some Christian talk shows here in this rural part of Arizona and a couple of them have expressed the same sentiments as I have. They, the Christian talk show hosts and commentators basically are saying the term is fitting but it depends on who is defining it as to whether it is to be perceived as good or bad. And we know the leftists want to make us all seem like we are the biggest problem, which is nothing new.