NFL News, Rumors and Musings

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
I was thinking what became of Tylor Gaffney. Last I heard he was on the PATS practice squad. Does any CFer know more than that?
Just checked Wiki. He is on the IR with Jacksonville.
 

Rocky B

Master
Joined
Jan 1, 2017
Messages
2,051
Just checked Wiki. He is on the IR with Jacksonville.

I’ve followed his career from Stanford backup to Pirates baseball to Stanford senior stud....
Always getting hurt since getting drafted by the Panthers...He had a great camp last year and would have made the Pats, but another injury happened.....Not sure what the Jags have planned for him....Maybe Yeldon or Ivory don’t come back......His dad is white and his mom is Poly/Hawaiian, by the way......I always rooted for him, seemed liked a rock solid kid.....
 

Jack Lambert

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
4,743
I applaud Zimmer for giving a lot of white players chances at non-caste positions, but as for QB, what a buffoon. Just commit to Keenum and have your "competition" in the offseason. And of course weenieworld's predictable "analysis." In what sane world would you bench a QB off of an 9-2 team that's won seven straight? Only in the loony, backwards world of the caste system is benching such a QB like Keenum for an average at best game manager who's hasn't played in two years even a conversation topic.

From rotoworld:

Vikings coach Mike Zimmer wouldn’t commit to Case Keenum as his starter beyond next week.

Keenum has played good enough to not be benched, but remains on a short leash. Despite seven straight wins, he’s a bad week away from returning to a backup role. The Vikings view Teddy Bridgewater as their franchise quarterback and need to see Bridgewater post knee-surgery in a walk year. Keenum will start against the Falcons, but his job security is week-to-week.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,319
Location
Pennsylvania
Danny's all the way back:

Ravens offensive coordinator Marty Morhnhinweg said Woodhead won't have a snap count Monday against the Texans, Jamison Hensley of ESPN.com reports. Woodhead didn't really appear to have any limitations in a 23-0 win over the Packers last week, but he ended up with only six touches (five catches) on 13 snaps due to the blowout nature of the contest. It's notable that he was targeted on more than one-third of his snaps, as similar usage could lead to some very productive days when the Ravens find themselves in more competitive contests. Monday's game won't necessarily qualify, as the Ravens are heavy favorites against a Houston team that's gone 1-3 with a minus-44 point differential in Tom Savage's four starts.
 

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
Mike Zimmer might be appeasing the media and DFWs by making it sound as if Bridgewater might take Keenum's place. He might have no intention of replacing Keenum this year.

But with the caste system being what it is, who knows?
 

Leonardfan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
22,968
Mike Zimmer might be appeasing the media and DFWs by making it sound as if Bridgewater might take Keenum's place. He might have no intention of replacing Keenum this year.

But with the caste system being what it is, who knows?

It's pretty unbelievable the head coach is not giving Keenum any vote of confidence after this week considering what he has done for the Vikings. Again it makes no sense to invest anything into Bridgewater since he is a free agent after this season. If they viewed him as their "franchise" than logic would dictate that they lock him up to a long term deal. I think Zimmer's handling of this situation is beyond moronic. We see in Green Bay that McCarthy is sticking with a garbage black quarterback which has cost his team a playoff berth this season yet Keenum doing nothing but playing stellar and winning games gets no sort of job security. I feel for Keenum at this point - part of me feels like this may end up like the Bills back in 99 when Flutie led them to the playoffs only to be replaced by Rob Johnson.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,319
Location
Pennsylvania
What's particularly grating is that when the Vikings traded for Sam Bradford after Bridgewater's knee injury last summer, Bradford was an instant big-time upgrade over Bridgewater, even though Bradford was playing behind a terrible offensive line. And now, following Bradford's balky knee acting up again and ruining his season, Keenum stepped in and within a few starts has been playing at or very near Bradford's level. To continually threaten to turn to a rusty downgrade as soon as Keenum stumbles in a game is inexplicable, except for the racial dynamics involved. If the QBs involved were White, or both black for that matter, there would be no discussion at all about replacing the starter.

Some might say the speculation is justifiable because Bridgewater was a first round draft pick and Keenum wasn't even drafted, but that meant nothing when last year's first overall draft pick Jared Goff struggled as a rookie on a bad offense and was widely written off as a bust. And look how quickly no one cares that Paxton Lynch was a first round pick when he didn't immediately play like an all-star in all of two starts as a rookie. Bridgewater in two seasons as a starter didn't show that he could be anything more than a middling game manager at best, yet the anti-White media promotes the idea that Bridgewater could step right in after missing a season and two-thirds and be an instant improvement over Keenum. A significant portion of DWFs are lapping up the Bridgewater hype as they can always be counted on to do, but at least this time around a lot aren't buying the propaganda with many even seeing through it for once.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Danny's all the way back:

Ravens offensive coordinator Marty Morhnhinweg said Woodhead won't have a snap count Monday against the Texans, Jamison Hensley of ESPN.com reports. Woodhead didn't really appear to have any limitations in a 23-0 win over the Packers last week, but he ended up with only six touches (five catches) on 13 snaps due to the blowout nature of the contest. It's notable that he was targeted on more than one-third of his snaps, as similar usage could lead to some very productive days when the Ravens find themselves in more competitive contests. Monday's game won't necessarily qualify, as the Ravens are heavy favorites against a Houston team that's gone 1-3 with a minus-44 point differential in Tom Savage's four starts.
Really hoping Woody can impress during these last games and not get injured. He is such a dynamic player when on point.
 

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
One of the dumber ideas being propagated is that the Vikings should start Bridgewater to assess him for the future. The Vikings are headed for the playoffs but some of the DWFs think assessing Bridgewater is more important than winning games.

The real reason they want Bridgewater starting is that he's black and DWFs always want white players replaced by black players. The DWFs may not be aware of this agenda consciously but they sure support it. Reasons such as the need to "assess" Bridgewater are just excuses for their racist agenda.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
One of the dumber ideas being propagated is that the Vikings should start Bridgewater to assess him for the future. The Vikings are headed for the playoffs but some of the DWFs think assessing Bridgewater is more important than winning games.

The real reason they want Bridgewater starting is that he's black and DWFs always want white players replaced by black players. The DWFs may not be aware of this agenda consciously but they sure support it. Reasons such as the need to "assess" Bridgewater are just excuses for their racist agenda.
To surmise your post, Extra Point, White ppl are close to our worst enemies starting back in 1968. What happened to us??
 

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
To surmise your post, Extra Point, White ppl are close to our worst enemies starting back in 1968. What happened to us??

White people have been subjected to an intense and prolonged campaign of brainwashing, sometimes called coercive persuasion. The goal of this brainwashing is the destruction of the white race and the civilization they built, Western Civilization. This brainwashing has been very effective and has resulted in large numbers of white people internalizing ideas, thoughts and ways of behavior that are destructive to whites and their society.

One of the ways this is manifested is for brainwashed whites to regard blacks as superior. Another way is for whites to want other whites to be replaced by blacks. You see this in football.
 

booth

Mentor
Joined
Jul 23, 2015
Messages
1,717
To surmise your post, Extra Point, White ppl are close to our worst enemies starting back in 1968. What happened to u
Integration of our schools and making whites sell homes to blacks in all white neighborhoods . This brought down our education system and corrupted our morals.
 

ximasa

Guru
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
237
Location
Taipei
Watching Brett Hundley throws is painstaking, witnessing Jordy Nelson has nothing to do on the pitch is even excruciating.
Zimmer needs to know Thielen is stellar only with arms like Bradford or Keenum (winnieworld: average white arms), under Bridgewater Thielen had 150 yds at most...
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
To surmise your post, Extra Point, White ppl are close to our worst enemies starting back in 1968. What happened to us??

190px-1934_Protocols_Patriotic_Pub.jpg
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
769
Location
Tennessee
Lurkers beware: its not even worth arguing that the 3 best defensive players in the NFL at all 3 levels of Defense (D-Line, LB, DB) are white dudes! The overachiever's are the great JJ Watt at DE, Luke Kuechly at LB, and Eric Weddle at DB/Safety!

Anybody doubting the existence of a caste-system in the NFL, please explain how the hell are the VERY TOP defensive players are whites, when blacks are the better athletes, prospects, and the majority making-up almost 80% of the NFL's D population!??
The truth is pretty damn simple, black players get marginally more chances to prove themselves than their white counter-parts.
NFL Coaches, GM's, and Scouts all prefer to develop the best "Athletes on defense, rather than the more productive/ skillful DE's, LB's, or DB's...
A players straight line-speed, Size, vertical leap, and pretty much how dark their skin color is will be what an NFL Scout looks for mainly, even though plenty of white players possess great athleticism as well! Theirs a myth that is believed, which is whites are not athletic as blacks no matter what LOL...

These amazing NFL GM's/Scouts ignore most of our best white defensive prospects with a few guys even they can't resist, with whites usually among the most productive and skillful players in college Football, more than likely they'll go for a black first probably hardly contributed to his Team "But hey he's Fast"....

The truth is that the majority of the time when a white LB/DE/SS gets a legit chance most the time they produce, people usually say"He's better than I expected", more athletic than he gets credit for, deceptive, sneaky, crafty, high-motor the list goes on and on..

In conclusion let's face it, if whites received the same amount of opportunities blacks get, this League would look very different. My prediction for a NFL defense population without a CASTE-SYSTEM, or in other words fair would look like these numbers:

RB

30% white- Blacks might still be the majority here, as blacks call RB "Their Position"
WR
65%- We are seeing an annual increase in white WR's IRL, if the league was fair "the slot" would probably be strictly white, and the outside receiver would be half/half.
DT
45%- Their's so many fat-ass black guy's in America that they may be the slight majority
DE
70%- Whites would dominate with some black's
LB
80%- LB is the leader of the defense really it's odd that whites are not atleast 50% of the LB's
S
50% whites prove to be the smartest DB's with their ability to read the QB, they may even be the majority
CB
30%- Cornerback will likely stay majority, but we would at least see around 10-15 teams start a white CB which seems crazy.



players in college who ignore production/Skill, in favor of a 40 yard dash time or vertical leap (

witch you will find to be possesed whites from the Best LB's in college because they may be a tad slower than blacks
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2016
Messages
1,740
And for the remaining positions:

Fullback: 75% White

Tight end: 90% White - Whites dominate at this position even now

Kickers, punters, and long snappers: 100% White

Quarterback: Most likely all 32 starters would be White, with a few black second and third-stringers
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Was scouring the BSPN website. Not kidding, they have a piece about the blackest sports stories in 2017. Then goes on to state, if you do not any of them, then you need more black friends! Yes BSPN has really gone BSPN. F them!
 

wile

Master
Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
2,881
Noticed that TV last night did not show the upper seats in Pitt and even the lower level presumably the better seats showed a lot of empties, and this for a team with a good record already talking championship. Many reasons the NFK will wane, but having the players and the media scum poking the core fans in the eyes is probably the final shovel of dirt on the grave.
 

Claimjumper

Mentor
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
1,072
Location
Colorado
This should be reason enough to never purchase anything NFL related ever again.

Trying to squeeze out another 100 million from their white fan base and use the money to promote anti white hatred and black welfare.

Sources: NFL agrees to commit nearly $100M over seven years to social justice causes


My favorite parts of the article with regards to fund allocation....

Under the league's proposal, at least $89 million has been earmarked over a seven-year period for both national and local projects. On the national level, owners this year will allocate $5 million, with their commitment growing annually and maxing out at $12 million per year from 2021 through 2023

The agreement calls for national funds to be allocated accordingly: 25 percent to the United Negro College Fund; 25 percent to Dream Corps; and 50 percent to the Players Coalition, which has filed 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) paperwork for nonprofit status as a fiscally sponsored project
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...ial-justice-organizations-partnership-players
 

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
The Vikings have three quarterbacks in the last year of their contracts, Sam Bradford, Teddy Bridgewater and Case Keenum. It will be interesting to see what happens in the offseason.

I think Bradford is out of the picture due to his propensity to get injured. I could even see him retiring.

So it's between Bridgewater and Keenum. I'd sign Keenum because he's proven himself this year. The Vikings will probably sign Bridgewater because he's black and was a first round draft pick.
 

Shadowlight

Master
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
3,882
Nice when the shoe is on the other foot but so far Combine and media hero WR speedster John Ross has been one of the worst flops in recent memory for a top ten pick. The story isn't over but here at caste we "warned" of trouble ahead for a guy with the body of a baseball shortstop and a history of brittleness. Turns out at least so far he isn't much of a hustler (on the field that is) as he has been put on the healthy scratch list the past couple of games. See below an article on what was supposed to be the next great addition to the caste football league.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/11/26/bengals-again-keep-john-ross-inactive/
 

Leonardfan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
22,968
The Packers put Ty Montgomery on IR and sign a scrub WR. Looks like Janis won't be seeing the field at all this year besides making tackles on special teams.
 

Flint

Mentor
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
1,468
The Packers put Ty Montgomery on IR and sign a scrub WR. Looks like Janis won't be seeing the field at all this year besides making tackles on special teams.

What's the point of being a receiver on the Packers? I have had to bench Jordy Nelson, on of my top fantasy draft choices, because the black quarterback can't get the ball to one of the best receivers in the league. The guys a joke. The Packers should have gone out and lured Tony Romo back into the game when Rodgers got hurt. That would have been a move that a team that wants to win does. But the Packers are not that kind of team.
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2016
Messages
1,740
The Packers are the kind of team that wants to promote social JustUs, even to the point of whining and demanding that the fans link arms in the stands during the national anthem. It's no surprise that actually winning is far down on their list of priorities.
 

MrPoon

Mentor
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
635
The Packers put Ty Montgomery on IR and sign a scrub WR. Looks like Janis won't be seeing the field at all this year besides making tackles on special teams.
Apparently his "upside" of 4.3 soeed, 6'3 225 lbs, great preseason play, his 143 yards 2 tds in the freaking NFC championship game just doesn't cut it for even a backup role! Sickens me how that guy is getting screwed.
 
Top