NFL Draft Question: Why is 60 a Significant Number this Week?

[Truthteller]

I remember back in the mid-to-latter part of the 1990's, when I used to follow college football and the NFL draft much more closely, I used to be upset to see that only about 72 to 75 whites would be picked (close to 30%) year-after-year. Little did I know at the time things would get progressively worse. Based on the way things are trending, 70 whites drafted this week would be a minor miracle and a very much welcome surprise, as only 53 to 59 whites being drafted has been the absolute norm for several years now.

So, will 60 whites be drafted this year -- minus kickers, punters and snappers?

Perhaps? But my guess is we will not see 65 whites (minus special teams) drafted in any draft any time soon. If there is any credible reason to believe a "Caste System" might exist, one only needs to ask why year-after-year pretty much the same percentage of whites are selected -- in the 23 to 26% range -- with almost no variation? My guess is even CF's most hardened skeptics would have a hard time giving us a reason why the numbers never change!


Why am I starting this thread and not posting this in the main draft thread?

We need to get it out there (to lurkers) that the same number/percentage of whites are getting selected year after year. Will this year be any different? At that point, they might ask why the numbers/percentages never change much, as we have for the last couple years here at CF.

Even if the top 3 picks are white tonight (rumor is the white LT's might go 1,2,3), we will still be lucky to see more than 60 whites picked...last year we here were happy to see 10 white first rounders, yet the numbers still came out about the same (just below 60), excluding a few special teams "goys".


My prediction: 63 whites will be picked this year. 3 to 5 will be special teams (kickers/punters) types, so the true number will, once again, be in the high 50's.

 

[Freethinker]

23 to 26%[/B] range -- with almost no variation?

Well like magic, we are at 25% White players selected after the 1st round. I'm sure we'll be in that same range after "Mr. Irrelevant" is selected.

 

[Leonardfan]

Well like magic, we are at 25% White players selected after the 1st round. I'm sure we'll be in that same range after "Mr. Irrelevant" is selected.

Yep, it's funny how predictable it all is. It was a good idea to make this it's own thread.

 

[Truthteller]

Yep, it's funny how predictable it all is. It was a good idea to make this it's own thread.

L-fan, in the last few years we've brought up this topic (total number and percentage of white draft picks being almost exactly the same year-after-year) so many times here at CF. But that info always got washed away in a large post that had 100 or more replies and probably wasn't noticed as much as it should've been. So I felt it would be best to start a separate thread on this topic and, also, to post it prior to the start of the draft. Too bad Vegas doesn't take odds on the racial breakdown of the NFL draft, as most of us here at Caste would have little problem hitting the jackpot!

Freethinker, everything is going exactly to plan. Last year 10 whites were drafted in round one, which was pleasantly high. This year the number slipped a bit, but is still not as horrific as it was in the 90's. I think the 1990 draft had only 2 whites picked total (QB, C) in round one and the 1993 had only 3 (Bledsoe, Mirer & a center). Most other years in the 90's it rarely was more than 5 or 6....But in those years, teams would actually pick more whites from rounds 2 to 7 and the numbers would usually top out in the 70's (after the draft was cut from 12 rounds in '93). Perhaps it's because white linebackers were more common (after round 3) and white defensive tackles were not as rare as they are these days? You probably also had a higher percentage of white OL's being selected -- their seems to be a lot more black guards now?

Now, as I've stated, we get more white first rounders these days (back to the 1980's level?), but fewer whites are being picked after round two. Average usually comes out to about 7.9 whites per round. So using that number, I would guess there will be between 15 and 19 whites drafted tonight -- rounds 2 & 3 combined. Which would bring the total number of whites drafted in the top 3 rounds to somewhere in the 23 to 26 area. And of those whites drafted tonight, the vast majority will certainly be at "cast-safe" spots -- QB, TE & OL. That part never really changes.


Another quick point worth noting: I used to think (wrongly) that once the "wildly overrated" and "high ceiling" prospects were selected in the top rounds, teams would go for "safer picks". "Goys" that have excellent character, good college stats and solid measurables. Ergo, more whites? Never works that way. Whites will be screwed from round 1 to round 7. Don't be shocked to see whites that most believe are absolute draft locks go undrafted, while teams load up on blacks from D-2 and FCS schools, or FBS blacks with horrible workout/40 times. It happens every year. No reason to think it changes now?

 

[Leonardfan]

L-fan, in the last few years we've brought up this topic (total number and percentage of white draft picks being almost exactly the same year-after-year) so many times here at CF. But that info always got washed away in a large post that had 100 or more replies and probably wasn't noticed as much as it should've been. So I felt it would be best to start a separate thread on this topic and, also, to post it prior to the start of the draft. Too bad Vegas doesn't take odds on the racial breakdown of the NFL draft, as most of us here at Caste would have little problem hitting the jackpot!

Freethinker, everything is going exactly to plan. Last year 10 whites were drafted in round one, which was pleasantly high. This year the number slipped a bit, but is still not as horrific as it was in the 90's. I think the 1990 draft had only 2 whites picked total (QB, C) in round one and the 1993 had only 3 (Bledsoe, Mirer & a center). Most other years in the 90's it rarely was more than 5 or 6....But in those years, teams would actually pick more whites from rounds 2 to 7 and the numbers would usually top out in the 70's (after the draft was cut from 12 rounds in '93). Perhaps it's because white linebackers were more common (after round 3) and white defensive tackles were not as rare as they are these days? You probably also had a higher percentage of white OL's being selected -- their seems to be a lot more black guards now?

Now, as I've stated, we get more white first rounders these days (back to the 1980's level?), but fewer whites are being picked after round two. Average usually comes out to about 7.9 whites per round. So using that number, I would guess there will be between 15 and 19 whites drafted tonight -- rounds 2 & 3 combined. Which would bring the total number of whites drafted in the top 3 rounds to somewhere in the 23 to 26 area. And of those whites drafted tonight, the vast majority will certainly be at "cast-safe" spots -- QB, TE & OL. That part never really changes.


Another quick point worth noting: I used to think (wrongly) that once the "wildly overrated" and "high ceiling" prospects were selected in the top rounds, teams would go for "safer picks". "Goys" that have excellent character, good college stats and solid measurables. Ergo, more whites? Never works that way. Whites will be screwed from round 1 to round 7. Don't be shocked to see whites that most believe are absolute draft locks go undrafted, while teams load up on blacks from D-2 and FCS schools, or FBS blacks with horrible workout/40 times. It happens every year. No reason to think it changes now?

Great post Truthteller. Teams will go out of their way not to draft white players 95% of the time.

 

[Freethinker]

As predicted, the 2nd and 3rd rounds were as dark as usual. Don't you think the "powers that be" should switch their formula a little so that more White guys don't catch on to this affirmative action BS?

2nd round - 5 out of 30 or 17%
3rd round - 3 out of 35 or 9%

Disgusting.

However, I'm sure we'll see White "goys" magically fly of the board today to bring that "random" number to around 25% again.

 

[jaxvid]

Great post Truthteller. Teams will go out of their way not to draft white players 95% of the time.

I think one of the changes over time has been the creeping acceptance of black dysfuntionality. Teams used to have an incentive to avoid potential trouble so they would load up on the White boy scouts that virtually all pro-level White players comprise. Similar to what the big colleges do. Legal problems, locker room trouble, fan backlash was a more significant problem.

Now who cares? Is there anything more yawn inducing then a black professional athlete being arrested. It has long been my contention that being a lawbreaker is a plus in the eyes of NFL talent evaluators as it indicated a high-T, high risk, emotionally uncontrollable, individual, that would translate to an impact player on the field.

Society has decided that anti-social and criminal behavior is acceptable up to a certain extreme degree so there is little downside to selecting those types of players and since they are seen as better prospects then well behaved White players with similar or even superior measureables (you can't teach psychosis) it is another incentive for teams to select black players, even extreme reaches from small schools (who are often there because of their low intelligence and bad behavior).

 

[Tannehill17]

I think the NBA set the tone for what we now see in the NFL. Remember back in the late 90's when it seemed like NBA players were getting arrested on a weekly basis (Jailblazers anyone?) It was only a matter of time before the dysfunctional playground the NBA houses crept over into the NFL. Now it is commonplace to see NFL players with cornrows, gold teeth, and rap sheets that are about a mile long. The NFL used to hold itself to a higher standard and at least attempted to weed out the problem elements if the college football programs hadn't done so already. Now with college football being such a big time business, the universities will literally sell their souls to the devil and let any kind of criminal scumbag play on their teams as long as he's a standout "afflete" The NFL followed suit which is why they now resemble their NBA counterparts. When you combine this with the myth of black athletic superiority, this pretty much spelled doom for white football players.

 

[jaxvid]

I haven't followed the draft very much, I despise this over hyped event and it's cousin "signing day" the way Ebenezer Scrooge despised Christmas. And I don't expect a late night visit from "Draft-day past" as that would only make my point.

However if you choose to live in modern society the agenda will see to it that you are exposed to the news, like it or not. In my particular case the local teams draft story line is revolving around their first round pick Ziggy Ansah. Out of BYU. Yup the Whitest team in college football can only produce a first round pick if it is one of the converted brown people that are the most recent victims of that phony cult. What no Mormon Samoans to choose from?

At any rate his arrival in Detroit is being treated with the same enthusiasm as the second coming. Is there anything that the DWF crowd and their media enablers love more then an actual 'african' african? Along with Ndomicant Suh the Lions can look forward to the day, like the Tigers, that nearly all players on the roster will be foreign born non-whites. After the horrible experiences with the native species of negros-americanus perhaps some hope is held out that members of the original stock can be trained to behave in a more socially acceptable manner if enough money and White women are thrown at them?

Huge crowds showed up to some event welcoming him to the city. I didn't see video of it but heard that they were all wearing glasses like (apparently) Ziggy wore when he was drafted. The fake glasses look is popular amongst a certain crowd as it signifies.....I'm not sure what it signifies, probably some sense of hip irony that a person with 20-20 eyesight is wearing horn rimmed glasses like some kind of White nerd, or maybe imitating some dumb ass rapper, which is the more likely explanation.

I think a certain percentage of the DWF crowd is in a very subtle way mocking the clowns that make up the professional black athlete class. The whole face painting, war dancing, imitating rituals of the modern sports fan is a way for a straight, White working professional to play like he is a goofball athlete. I'm not so sure it is a straight up case of worship. Many of these guys that I know despise black people and talk about them like they are dirt often using the n-word when discussing them.

They have very little contact with them and would commit hari-kari if their daughters got with a black guy but still the hypocrisy level is very high. I think many White fans see the black athletes not as some kind of hero but as some kind of half-human ape, whose physical ability is based on the fact that they are not quite a fully developed homo-sapiens.

I think it's why White fans prefer black players to White and use all kinds of mind twisting gyrations to try and explain why they are better then White players even if they are not faster or stronger in combine testing. Heck, if the big strong White kid next door can play in the NFL then it's not really some semi-mythical gladiatorial contest where only superhuman half animals can succeed through their superior physical power and primitive rage.

The more ghetto the better. The more african the better. The darker skinned the better. That signifies you are seeing something different. Not just another sports contest but the N freakin' F - L, where transformer sized super humans compete in a state of mindless anger to bring victory to the home team. You want regular sports then go watch those White kids and tiny hispanics wearing pajamas and standing around waiting for a guy to swat a ball around the "park". That's what the NFL is selling. If you are a typical fan it's what you are buying.

 

[dwid]

As predicted, the 2nd and 3rd rounds were as dark as usual. Don't you think the "powers that be" should switch their formula a little so that more White guys don't catch on to this affirmative action BS?

2nd round - 5 out of 30 or 17%
3rd round - 3 out of 35 or 9%

Disgusting.

However, I'm sure we'll see White "goys" magically fly of the board today to bring that "random" number to around 25% again.

Doesn't look like its happening, still pretty dark

 

[seattlefan]

I think it's why White fans prefer black players to White and use all kinds of mind twisting gyrations to try and explain why they are better then White players even if they are not faster or stronger in combine testing. Heck, if the big strong White kid next door can play in the NFL then it's not really some semi-mythical gladiatorial contest where only superhuman half animals can succeed through their superior physical power and primitive rage.

The more ghetto the better. The more african the better. The darker skinned the better. That signifies you are seeing something different. Not just another sports contest but the N freakin' F - L, where transformer sized super humans compete in a state of mindless anger to bring victory to the home team. You want regular sports then go watch those White kids and tiny hispanics wearing pajamas and standing around waiting for a guy to swat a ball around the "park". That's what the NFL is selling. If you are a typical fan it's what you are buying.

Good post! The same dynamic exists in boxing. At some level, sports is about middle class and up white people watching "feral races" duke it out on the field, court or ring. Since they look down on these athletes, they don't know how to react to a white athlete, who they can't look down on that way.

There is also the element of being impoverished and ghetto as a pre-condition to being a good fighter or athlete. I remember years ago hearing, I believe it was Jim Lampley, saying that if they want good American boxers in the future, they need to keep the Democrats in power because that will maintain the ghettos that these boxers come from. Of course, it is absurd to think that you need to be from the projects to be a good boxer or athlete, but that's what these people think. It's sort of fetishing them.

 

[wile]

NFL is social engineering brought to you mainly by the jewish prescense, the non-jewish big wigs being too stupid to realize that.

Its painful to read you guys who take this data seriously, like who runs what or when or how, because that is tertiary to the whole story line. TPTB have created a story line that leaves them as morally superior and quibbling the data points seems like being a bad sport. (yes folks how many times have each of you been banned for basically stating that the odds are stacked against competitive white men?)

The NFL is anti-white and is bad for whites. No more needs to be said

 

[Thrashen]

However if you choose to live in modern society the agenda will see to it that you are exposed to the news, like it or not. In my particular case the local teams draft story line is revolving around their first round pick Ziggy Ansah. Out of BYU. Yup the Whitest team in college football can only produce a first round pick if it is one of the converted brown people that are the most recent victims of that phony cult. What no Mormon Samoans to choose from?

At any rate his arrival in Detroit is being treated with the same enthusiasm as the second coming. Is there anything that the DWF crowd and their media enablers love more then an actual 'african' african? Along with Ndomicant Suh the Lions can look forward to the day, like the Tigers, that nearly all players on the roster will be foreign born non-whites. After the horrible experiences with the native species of negros-americanus perhaps some hope is held out that members of the original stock can be trained to behave in a more socially acceptable manner if enough money and White women are thrown at them?

Huge crowds showed up to some event welcoming him to the city. I didn't see video of it but heard that they were all wearing glasses like (apparently) Ziggy wore when he was drafted. The fake glasses look is popular amongst a certain crowd as it signifies.....I'm not sure what it signifies, probably some sense of hip irony that a person with 20-20 eyesight is wearing horn rimmed glasses like some kind of White nerd, or maybe imitating some dumb ass rapper, which is the more likely explanation.

Epic overall rant, Jax. Ironically, I wrote the following with concern to Ziggy Ansah in the “NFL Combine” thread a few weeks back. At the time, I had no idea the Lions were interested in his lame services…

I watched almost every BYU game last season, and every time the Cougar defense would first take the field to start the game, “Ziggy” Ansah was always the primary “NFL draft talking point” of the announcers. “His upside!” “His athleticism!” “His prototypical size!” “His Ghanaian heritage!” They shrieked.

What? We’re talking about a player who totaled 3 tackles and 0 sacks as a sophomore, 7 tackles and 0 sacks as a junior, and 62 tackles and 4.5 sacks as a senior. During this so-called “breakout” senior season, the big, uncoordinated African doofus was as invisible as Ndomokong Suh is for the Lions each Sunday…


CAPTION: “Land of the Lost” Sleestak Stunt Double

Here’s a highlight reel of “Old Black Ziggy” knocking down quarterbacks several seconds after they release the ball, making generic tackles on running backs, and making tackles for a loss against football powerhouses such as Weber State and New Mexico State. Very impressive stuff!

[video=youtube;Bg2X0yktczc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Bg2X0yktczc[/video]
CAPTION: Bustacular BYU Blackie

Naturally, while the Casteon Mouthpieces were busy building Ansah’s draft stock, BYU’s impact players (Daniel Sorenson, Brandon Ogletree, Spencer Hadley, etc) were playing fearless defensive football.

Now, Suh and Ansah, the “Ugly Brothers,” are on the same team, on the same DL. At least Suh, unlike Ansah, was a dominant college player at Nebraska before busting in the NFL. However, during the past two seasons, the only time Suh’s name was mentioned is when he’s getting into high-speed car accidents, trash talking, fighting with lineman after the whistle, tearing off helmets, making hair-brained statements during post-game interviews, or stomping players when they’re down. Aside from that circus, he’s utterly indiscernible from other Lions defensive lineman (accept for the recently-released Kyle Vanden Bosch, of course).

At least Ansah seems like a good-natured African galoot, so I’m sure he won’t get into trouble on or off the field…he’ll just suck immediately and fade into Casteon Oblivion…

CAPTION: Handsome Ziggy – The 23 or 32?

CAPTION: Detroit DWF’s Dedicate Devotion to Drafted Dolt

I think a certain percentage of the DWF crowd is in a very subtle way mocking the clowns that make up the professional black athlete class. The whole face painting, war dancing, imitating rituals of the modern sports fan is a way for a straight, White working professional to play like he is a goofball athlete. I'm not so sure it is a straight up case of worship. Many of these guys that I know despise black people and talk about them like they are dirt often using the n-word when discussing them.

They have very little contact with them and would commit hari-kari if their daughters got with a black guy but still the hypocrisy level is very high. I think many White fans see the black athletes not as some kind of hero but as some kind of half-human ape, whose physical ability is based on the fact that they are not quite a fully developed homo-sapiens.

We seem to come from very different settings (I’m from extremely rural PA and I assume you live in suburban Detroit), but the hypocritical phenomena you described is applicable to the whites I interact with as well. I’ll express a principal that is racially “hardcore” (much more so than the kinds of stuff I post online) and in the moment they’ll passionately concur…yet in the next breath they’ll exhibit a nauseating devotion to the ultra-odious Pittsburgh Steelers, Philadelphia Eagles, the 76ers, the Pirates, the Republican Party, etc. I can’t figure them out, either. I try to influence them the best I can, but herd animals rarely break free from their lot in life, accept enlightenment, and experience the freedom of pro-white contemplations. They’re so lost in the Marxist Labyrinth and their trail of bread crumbs have long been consumed by the ancient, voracious flock obsessed with white annihilation.

Anyway, Truthteller was correct as usual, and magically, roughly the same number of whites were drafted in 2013 as were drafted since I began following Caste Football back in 2004.

 

[Don Wassall]

What makes this draft so bad is how lopsided it was -- few Whites drafted in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th rounds, the bulk going in the 6th and 7th. The o-linemen that went early and probably the tight ends should do ok, but for the rest, even the QBs, it's a crapshoot at best. When Swope goes in the 6th, and Zach Line not at all -- no team even wanted him as a fullback or a "tweener" -- you know it's an horrendous draft for White players. Being drafted in the 6th and 7th rounds is purgatory for most White players; a long racial apprenticeship is the best result they can hope for with few exceptions. And being undrafted is worse even though they often have more choice as far as which team to sign with.

 

[Leonardfan]

This is what I emailed NFL.com :

To Whom It May Concern:

I have been an NFL fan for most of my life and an avid draft follower for the past 10 years. Over that time during the predraft and draft process I have noticed that more and stereotypes are being used when describing white players. I believe that a great amount of prejudice exists within NFL Front Offices, Scouting department on down to Major college football recruiting and all the of the "recruiting services" - Scout.com, Rivals.com and ESPN.com being the main culprits.

Journalists and people like Warren Moon have long complained about the plight of being black and a quarterback - stating that racial prejudices still exists. I have yet to hear anyone stand up and state the obvious regarding white players at Running back, Wide Reciever, Defensive Line, Linebacker, Safety and Cornerback. After doing research it seems that some sort of system is in play to funnel white athletes playing these positions in High School to other positions in college. Here are the main trends I have noticed:

Running Backs are converted to Fullbacks
Wide Recievers are not recruited at all
Defensive linemen seem to always be converted to offensive linemen
Cornerbacks are converted to safety if recruited at all.

Deep seated stereotypes and untruths are used by college recruiters even if a player has great measureables and production in college their are plenty of stories stating that a college recruiter will not even scout the player because he is the "wrong color" for the position. This mindset is also very prevalent in the NFL scouting community from what I have observed.

Year after year I have noticed the constant recycling of the same terms when talking about white football players during the draft process:

Blue-Collar
High Motor
Not the best athlete
Deceptivly fast
More quick than fast
Brings his lunch pail to work
Tight Hips
Not explosive/not a quick twitch athlete

Also, it seems that their is a 25% limit on the number of white athletes being drafted year in and year out. The number usually is between 55-60 white players drafted. Is this by design?

I guess my main point in writing you is to ask why nothing is being done to address this. Several initiatives exist to be more inclusive of minorities as coaches and personnel men. Safety initiatives are being undertaken by the NFL from the ground level as well - teaching youth league coaches proper fundamentals etc. It seems that a fundamental prejudice exists against white players so I just wanted to bring that to the NFL's attention since no one there seems to care.

 

[jaxvid]

This is what I emailed NFL.com :

That's an awesome letter. Very good job! I think you managed to make the point in a succint and logical manner. It was also polite. I hope someone at least reads it. I can't see how they could possibly do anything even if they wanted to. The cultural marxist system is in place and there is not a whole lot they can do. And of course they don't really want to do anything. Not as long as the money is rolling in. You might have added that you would withhold your money from them as a result but that probably wouldn't have made a difference.

 

[Soccer&track]

That's an awesome letter. Very good job! I think you managed to make the point in a succint and logical manner. It was also polite. I hope someone at least reads it. I can't see how they could possibly do anything even if they wanted to. The cultural marxist system is in place and there is not a whole lot they can do. And of course they don't really want to do anything. Not as long as the money is rolling in. You might have added that you would withhold your money from them as a result but that probably wouldn't have made a difference.

As long as droves of idiots keep buying tickets and jerseys, nothing will change. Until the average white man raises a stink, nothing will change. The NFL seems to be the most popular sport in this country and to be honest, in my experiences, most whites could care less if there is a single white on the field. I know guys at my work who are DWFs down to a tee and they seem to be perfectly content rooting for teams that are all, or mostly black. The powers to be have decided that football is a black mans game and they can get away with it because its only popular in the US and that allows them to control every aspect of it. If football was world wide like soccer, things would be drastically different, but unfortunately it is not. I'd like to say that letter will change things, and it is well written, however I don't think something like that will have much of an impact. Society in general discriminates against whites so I see general life and society needing to change well before a sport will.

 

[Freethinker]

Great job Leonard Fan! I've been awaiting your letter since you first mentioned it weeks (months?) ago. Please let us know if you get a written response.

 

[wile]

Maybe we can all mail them a form type letter because I can see little to change on that one, and a volume mail might make a difference. We also might want to mail or contact the sponsors of the nfl to see if they approve of racist stereotypes being used by essentially their employees.

 

[Extra Point]

Excellent thread!

I think that the fact that the number of whites drafted each year is always fewer than 60 is a good talking point. It's something that can be brought up whenever discussions about the draft arise. Perhaps it will stick in someone's mind and get them thinking down the road.

 

[Truthteller]

Thought this was a pretty good time to bump this thread, which I first started right before the 2013 NFL draft. Matter of fact, I think this a thread that should be "bumped up" prior to each draft, as long as things stay the same.

By the way, according to Leonardfan's calculations, 61 whites were selected last April (2013 NFL draft). 4 of those 61 were punters or kickers, so the beat goes on? More of the same this season -- which means not counting "kicking specialists" no more than 60 can be drafted?

My guess is yes, although I hope I'm wrong. Perhaps we'll take a nostalgic trip back in time to the early-to-mid 1990's and see 75 whites selected? But even if that happens, it would still mean white account for less than 30% of draft picks.

 

[Leonardfan]

Good idea bumping this thread Truthteller. I never heard back about the email I sent to the NFL (wasn't expecting to). I identified about 70 or so players in the 2014 NFL Draft thread that I believe could be drafted. I think that would be a small "win" for us along with only one black quarterback threatening to be drafted in the first round. I am not going to hold my breath as the NFL and all the teams seem to be able to pull blacks from obscure colleges with less than stellar careers out of nowhere to draft over better qualified white players.

 

[Truthteller]

Good idea bumping this thread Truthteller. I never heard back about the email I sent to the NFL (wasn't expecting to).

Thanks Leonardfan. Most of the CF regulars knew about this, but I thought it would be good for lurkers and new posters.

As far as your letter to the NFL, certainly is no surprise they did not respond. It would be interesting to see how the person that read your letter (if anyone did?) reacted to it. Did they just throw it in the trash or did he or she show others in the NFL offices? I guess we will never know.

I identified about 70 or so players in the 2014 NFL Draft thread that I believe could be drafted.

Yes, I saw your list in the other thread. Thanks for posting it. While I don't follow college ball or the draft close, I do like to know who's coming into the league. Speaking broadly, I'd say the QB's/TE's and OL's you listed could be drafted close to where you projected them....per my thoughts, I believe you should probably drop all white WR's, RB's and defensive players down a round or two, at least. That might not be fair, but that's usually how the NFL does business...Excluding the occasional J.J. Watt, Luke Kuechly, Brian Cushing type, who are so good they can't be ignored.

I am not going to hold my breath as the NFL and all the teams seem to be able to pull blacks from obscure colleges with less than stellar careers out of nowhere to draft over better qualified white players.

I remember watching the draft just a couple years ago and being absolutely amazed at how many cornerbacks (all black, of course) were being selected fairly high from lower-rung or mid-major FBS schools, FCS (1-aa) schools and lower levels (D-II). I guess too many of the wildly overrated 5-star recruits were deemed worthless at the end of their SEC and ACC careers, so NFL teams went trolling for "athletes" from obscure schools, who just happened to run well at some pro day?

 

[Truthteller]

Thought this was a pretty good time to bump this thread, which I first started right before the 2013 NFL Draft. I think this a thread that should be "bumped up" prior to each draft, as long as things stay the same. I did not post here at CF between December of 2014 (when the site when down for several months) until September of 2018. So, after five years, I finally have the chance to bump this thread again. As, I noted in post #23, most of the CF regulars know about this, but I thought it would be good for lurkers and new posters. These never-changing numbers should be proof that some sort of "Caste System" does, in fact, exist.

Here is a great, similar post from 2012. Lurkers and newbies should, also, find this very informative: http://castefootball.us/index.php?threads/horrific-7-round-mock-draft.14530/#post-245778

NFL is social engineering brought to you mainly by the Jewish presence, the non-Jewish big wigs being too stupid to realize that.

Its painful to read you guys who take this data seriously, like who runs what or when or how, because that is tertiary to the whole story line. TPTB have created a story line that leaves them as morally superior and quibbling the data points seems like being a bad sport. (yes folks how many times have each of you been banned for basically stating that the odds are stacked against competitive white men?)

The NFL is anti-white and is bad for whites. No more needs to be said

Amazing post Wile. Your words today (in the current NFL Draft thread) were very similar. I give you huge props for being consistent. Nothing has changed in 6 years and you nailed it square on the head why the virulently anti-white agenda exists and, much more importantly, which group of people is behind the curtain pushing the Caste System and making sure things never chance.


So, brand new draft is almost 2 weeks away, we will get over the number 60, excluded kickers and punters, or will it be the same-old/same-old all over again?

 

[Leonardfan]

My guess is that we will see anywhere in the 50-60 player range drafted (not counting special teams). OL, TE and QB are all pretty deep positions for us. On paper the DL and LB groups have alot more players being viewed as "worthy" of being drafted than I can recall in recent years.