NFL 2013-14 Playoff thread

[Old Scratch]

It would be like cheering for Duke in basketball if they started one white against an all-black team in the national championship game. Hey, coach K could go down as the greatest coach ever and he used to have white teams so why not cheer for them? I suppose I'd want Denver's 4 whites to beat Seattle's 5 whites. And, yes, it is cool that they start two white receivers. But it would be a coal-fest nonetheless and I hope we can avoid that with a Pats win over the Black Broncos.

A more apt comparison would be Dirk Nowitzki and the Mavs vs the repugnant LeBron James and the Miami Heat. You didn't have a rooting interest in that match up?

 

[Old Scratch]

Who are the white starters for the Seahawks, all offensive line + a tight end? I can't see the difference between that and Peyton Manning, Wes Welker and Eric Decker. I suppose you're right, I guess I'd root for the Broncos in that case.

 

[Liverlips]

A more apt comparison would be Dirk Nowitzki and the Mavs vs the repugnant LeBron James and the Miami Heat. You didn't have a rooting interest in that match up?

I don't follow much NBA. Was Dirk the only white starter? Like I said, if it is a basketball game with 1 white starter against zero white starters I would cheer for the team with one. But I wouldn't be very excited about it as it would still be a coal fest that reinforces the caste system.

 

[Liverlips]

Who are the white starters for the Seahawks, all offensive line + a tight end? I can't see the difference between that and Peyton Manning, Wes Welker and Eric Decker. I suppose you're right, I guess I'd root for the Broncos in that case.

The problem is, that is ALL the Broncos have (and a lone white O-lineman). There are 22 starters on a team. Only 4 are white for Denver.

 

[jaxvid]

The problem is, that is ALL the Broncos have (and a lone white O-lineman). There are 22 starters on a team. Only 4 are white for Denver.

How many whites does Denver start? I can't tell from your many posts on the subject.

Seriously, everyone agrees, even Peyton Manning's biggest CF supporter, that the Pats are a better choice as winner. But if the Broncos win how can you argue that they are not CF fav's? Even if they only had one white guy and it was Peyton Manning. Plus they will have a couple other white guys involved in handling the ball. Maybe even returning punts. That's "caste-busting" stuff. Offensive lineman are not going to be a) noticed, and b) changing the image of the caste system. Decker hauling in a long TD pass, or Welker moving the chains, or one of them returning a punt for a long gain, will change that image.

 

[davidholly]

The way I see it is that if a team with 21 white starters and a black QB would be facing a team with 21 black starters and a white qb, I'd pick the team with the white QB. The QB position must remain white. If the QB position ever turns predominantly black the NFL is dead not just to CFers either but to most white Americans.

When Manning and Brady retire the NFL is going to take a big hit regardless of whether or not the QB position is still white. I don't think people realize just how much good that rivalry has done for the NFL. No matter how hard DWFs try to convince themselves otherwise they know deep down that no black QB will ever be as good as those two.

If white QBs should ever fall into obscurity I see the NFL going the way of the NBA. Still profitable but nowhere near as popular as it used to be.

 

[Ieroner]

I bet a lot of your average DWFs don't even know the names of the starting OL for their own team. It's just "Our line sucks" or "Our line is awesome" or "Our quarterback can't do anything if the line doesn't protect him" without actually knowing anything about the individual guys on the line and which ones are the weak/strong links. So if Seattle has a significantly white OL and not much else to show as far as white athletes goes, that doesn't do much for demonstrating to fans that whites are tremendous athletes and deserve more NFL representation. So it definitely makes more sense to root for Denver's 4 than Seattle's 5. Quite frankly if you took every white offensive lineman in the NFL and replaced him with black linemen, but then replaced black WRs and RBs with that same number of white WRs and RBs, well...I have to say I'd be pretty excited about it. Yeah the QBs wouldn't have the same quality protection so they'd have less time to throw, but I just love watching white guys getting touchdowns.

 

[Don Wassall]

The idea of turning on a game and doing a head count of White faces without taking any other factors into account, is only looking at a part of the picture. The Caste System is built upon the idea not only of black superiority, but of shutting Whites completely or nearly completely out of certain positions, literally forever. So a Wes Welker, future Hall of Famer, the first great White WR in over a quarter century, is worth about 50 White o-linemen in the larger scheme of things as o-line along with quarterback are the only two positions where Whites are a majority (or roughly equal as linemen) and the public pretty much expects to see them playing there, or at least isn't surprised when they are.

Another context to take into account is injuries. If they hadn't been injured, Denver would also be starting Walton at center, Tamme at tight end, Bradley at middle linebacker, and Wolfe at defensive end. That's 8 White starters, which would put the Broncos a tier below the Patriots but right up there with the best of the rest, especially considering their two White receivers. San Fran and Seattle didn't lose any White starters; their plan from the beginning of the season was to have a few Whites on the o-line and every other position coal black, with the exception of Justin Smith, who unfortunately is near the end of his career.

To call Denver and San Francisco "equal" or equally bad just isn't accurate, or at least it's not going to fly with many (if any) posters here no matter how many times Denver's current 4 White starters are mentioned. San Francisco and Seattle are two of the shining lights of the Caste NFL and its promotion of black QBs; Denver is a team that challenged Caste orthodoxy by playing Welker and Decker, while suffering injuries to key White players. There's a significant difference between them and the two teams left in the NFC, and that's without even mentioning the great Peyton Manning (btw, the 49ers start just 3 Whites, 2 o-linemen and Smith).

 

[scroat]

http://imgur.com/KAW6hk2?desktop=1

In regards to the Wilson Kaepernick debate... I'm no fan of Wilson but its undeniable that Kaepernick is an uber-douche.

 

[GiovaniMarcon]

I get the feeling that the NBA just isn't as popular as the media likes to make it out to be. Certainly it's got its fans, but honestly I think that there are fewer genuine, household-name superstars compared to twenty or twenty-five years ago.

And the media nicknames that some of these players are given, to make it seem like they're superstars (in the way that Hollywood people will say "Tom" and you already know they mean Tom Cruise). For example, "'Melo" for Carmelo Anthony.

First of all, he's NOT that good, and second, what a stupid name, and third, he's not popular enough with the general public for them to even know who the Hell he is.

"Nique" for Dominique Wilkins, on the other hand, or Larry, or Michael, and so on, these people really ARE recognizable because they are (or were) actual superstars.

The NBA seems to have been more of a family-oriented product in the past so that more people could enjoy it even if most of the players were Black. Now, it just seems like a niche product, and a CRAP one at that, in most cases.

Anyway I agree with the sentiment that the QB position must remain White. Not just because I'm White and I prefer White people, but simply because they are better at it. Why should White people surrender their positions of superiority just to make some low-life dumbasses feel better? If they actually earn it, fine. But they have to E-A-R-N it. And, Black people have shown time and again that when the playing field is ACTUALLY level, they FAIL, EVERY TIME.

 

[foobar75]

Looks like the Seattle DWFs will do anything to score some tickets so they can watch their Africans in person this Sunday.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/...r-tickets-240043121.html?mobile=y&clmob=y&c=n

I have made my decision. I'll be rooting heavily against Seattle this weekend. The stench of these worthless fans, wigger-Pete and that ever present smug look on his face, and classless punks like Richard Sherman and Earl Thomas outweigh, by the slightest of margins, whatever SF brings to the table, which is almost, but not quite as loathsome.

Plus, from a match-up standpoint, I believe SF would be the preferred opponent for either DEN or NE.

 

[celticdb15]

I think san Fran will win too. Game manager Russell has been exposed. Either way I feel AFC will be favorite to win it all. Go pats!

 

[foreverfree]

And the media nicknames that some of these players are given, to make it seem like they're superstars (in the way that Hollywood people will say "Tom" and you already know they mean Tom Cruise).

Not Tom Hanks? Tom Berenger? Tom Mix?

John

 

[seattlefan]

The way I see it is that if a team with 21 white starters and a black QB would be facing a team with 21 black starters and a white qb, I'd pick the team with the white QB. The QB position must remain white. If the QB position ever turns predominantly black the NFL is dead not just to CFers either but to most white Americans.

That's nuts. I'd pick the 21 white team every time.

 

[seattlefan]

I get the feeling that the NBA just isn't as popular as the media likes to make it out to be. Certainly it's got its fans, but honestly I think that there are fewer genuine, household-name superstars compared to twenty or twenty-five years ago.

NBA viewership has drastically declined - especially among whites. NBA has a large black fanbase. I don't have the information on hand, but if you look up black household TV ratings they are much higher when it comes to NBA games, while for the general population the ratings are pretty low. It is just blacks and diehard white fans(wiggers) watching NBA today.

 

[Thrashen]

I have made my decision. I'll be rooting heavily against Seattle this weekend. The stench of these worthless fans, wigger-Pete and that ever present smug look on his face, and classless punks like Richard Sherman and Earl Thomas outweigh, by the slightest of margins, whatever SF brings to the table, which is almost, but not quite as loathsome.

Plus, from a match-up standpoint, I believe SF would be the preferred opponent for either DEN or NE.

Agreed. When you stop and ponder the many ways in which the Seahawks are abhorrent, “The Manic-Depressive Bug-Eyed Wigger Psychopath” and his Casteon 49ers are certainly less objectionable…

1) Their abominable wigger coach, “Plantation” Pete Carroll. Constant cheating scandals at USC and NFL. Crooked recruiting. Very black NFL teams. Immature and ultra-animated at all times, despite being 62 years old...

CAPTION: Principal of the Plantation

2) Their blacker-than-night, PED-abusing defense, chock full of mouthy, showboating thugs. Seven different drug-cheats on the same defensive unit, some currently serving suspensions, some already served, some still playing...

CAPTION: DWF Idol - Drug Cheat Richard Sherman

3) The monstrously-ugly, gold-toothed thug RB, Marshawn Lynch. Some might forget Lynch’s “troubled” past, but I haven’t. In 2008, it was hit-and-run. Back in 2009, it was a misdemeanor gun charge. Lynch was also arrested for DUI in 2012. This witless paramecium also once stole $20 from a random woman in a Buffalo restaurant...

CAPTION: NFL's Most Handsome....Uhm, "Beast"

4) WR Golden Tate, the perma-showboating turd (see video below) with a bizarre criminal record that includes breaking into a doughnut store.

[video=youtube;EyeMS6xWGe4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyeMS6xWGe4[/video]
CAPTION: Seattle Seahawk “Sportsmanship”

5) Their World Heavyweight Champion DWF’s are now the most wretched in the NFL, easily eclipsing the obnoxious bastards comprising “Steeler Nation”…

CAPTION: That Poor Dog

In this video, a Seahawk DWF taught his 3-year old daughter to memorize every swarthy member of Seattle’s roster…

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=10051523

I suppose the “dream scenario” is that 49ers win, but Colin “Toucan Sam” Kaepernick is injured for the Superbowl, leaving Colt McCoy as the starter.

Another context to take into account is injuries. If they hadn't been injured, Denver would also be starting Walton at center, Tamme at tight end, Bradley at middle linebacker, and Wolfe at defensive end. That's 8 White starters, which would put the Broncos a tier below the Patriots but right up there with the best of the rest, especially considering their two White receivers. San Fran and Seattle didn't lose any White starters; their plan from the beginning of the season was to have a few Whites on the o-line and every other position coal black, with the exception of Justin Smith, who unfortunately is near the end of his career.

Also, had Chris Kuper not been injured during the 2011 season (costing him the RG position to Vasquez) and J.D. Walton and/or Dan Koppen not been injured this season (they were the top two centers on the team before Ramirez took over), Denver would likely still have their all-white interior offensive line as they did in past seasons. With Manning, Decker, Welker, Tamme/Dreessen, 3 white OL, and Wolfe and Bradley on defense, Denver could have had up to 9 white starters. It’s a shame for Denver, but the Patriots lost two starting spots (RT and TE) to non-whites also.

 

[Liverlips]

How many whites does Denver start? I can't tell from your many posts on the subject.

Seriously, everyone agrees, even Peyton Manning's biggest CF supporter, that the Pats are a better choice as winner. But if the Broncos win how can you argue that they are not CF fav's? Even if they only had one white guy and it was Peyton Manning. Plus they will have a couple other white guys involved in handling the ball. Maybe even returning punts. That's "caste-busting" stuff. Offensive lineman are not going to be a) noticed, and b) changing the image of the caste system. Decker hauling in a long TD pass, or Welker moving the chains, or one of them returning a punt for a long gain, will change that image.

Does Denver start two white receivers? I cannot tell as nobody ever mentions that when touting them.

 

[wile]

Seattle is IMO going to be a league killer in the same basic fashion the Detroit Pistons and Jordan set the tone for the NBA. They were great at the time, huge draws but they implemented the thug mentality and the selfish black man mentality and I would guess the reason you don't see pan shots of the crowds at the NBA is because most of the time there is no crowd in the upper stands. The DWF mentality IMO is continent wide but a micron thick, we basically break down the taboos against whites thinking, saying and acting in the interests in whites the caste system falls in weeks. Us mocking Seattle DWF gimps is one thing, millions more doing so will have those gimps fading away, quickly.

 

[Lew]

I get the feeling that the NBA just isn't as popular as the media likes to make it out to be. Certainly it's got its fans, but honestly I think that there are fewer genuine, household-name superstars compared to twenty or twenty-five years ago.

And the media nicknames that some of these players are given, to make it seem like they're superstars (in the way that Hollywood people will say "Tom" and you already know they mean Tom Cruise). For example, "'Melo" for Carmelo Anthony.

First of all, he's NOT that good, and second, what a stupid name, and third, he's not popular enough with the general public for them to even know who the Hell he is.

"Nique" for Dominique Wilkins, on the other hand, or Larry, or Michael, and so on, these people really ARE recognizable because they are (or were) actual superstars.

The NBA seems to have been more of a family-oriented product in the past so that more people could enjoy it even if most of the players were Black. Now, it just seems like a niche product, and a CRAP one at that, in most cases.

Anyway I agree with the sentiment that the QB position must remain White. Not just because I'm White and I prefer White people, but simply because they are better at it. Why should White people surrender their positions of superiority just to make some low-life dumbasses feel better? If they actually earn it, fine. But they have to E-A-R-N it. And, Black people have shown time and again that when the playing field is ACTUALLY level, they FAIL, EVERY TIME.

You're right the NBA is no where near as popular as the media makes it seem. As Don likes to say it's heavily propped up by the media and corporate sponsors. Try watching NBA highlights on ESPN, you'll be stunned at all the empty seats you regularly see. Most arenas are probably less than half full on a nightly basis. Then you'll inevitably ask yourself why NBA players are the highest paid pro athletes and making insane amounts of money, even players who most people have never heard of are making 8 figure salaries.

That's nuts. I'd pick the 21 white team every time.

Yeah his example was a little over the top but I agree with his sentiments. QB is the most important position from any perspective. We can't afford to lose it at the pro level considering how we've already all but lost it at the college level.

 

[foobar75]

Thrashen does an exceptional job of capturing the vile mass of Seattle DWFs thru photos and other evidence, such as that video of the 3 year old child. I just want to follow up on that aspect of it.

As I mentioned earlier, I used to live in Seattle many years ago, when I moved here for my first job right out of college. Though the fans here always loved their Seahawks (and Sonics), it was nothing remotely like what it is today. I now live in the exurbs about 2 hours east of Seattle, and thankfully have no business there and have not been to the city in over 3 years.

But I still see this fever that has gripped the region. Now, I don't mind these mindless adults and their senseless worship of these thugs, but you'll be amazed how many people have gotten their children into the act. I'm talking infants dressed in full Seahawks garb, young children (< 10 years old) wearing jerseys, helmets, some even with varying degrees of face-paint, and parents then proudly posting these photos on their Facebook pages and other social media. I find this highly disturbing, these poor children being brain-washed at the earliest possible age, which only ensures the caste system will carry on unabated. The next generation of DWFs are already being groomed, by their own parents no less.

 

[Don Wassall]

The wearing of the jerseys of individual players and general team regalia only goes back 40 years or so. And for a long time it was confined to a narrow demographic, roughly 15 to 25 year old men. Anyone older than that who was still wearing a player's jersey was viewed as a "Peter Pan" wannabe at best.

Now the demographic is both males and females from ages 2 to 82. The U.S. must be the first society in which the masses have been nearly completely infantilized, and it was done in large part by training them to admire and worship blacks while despising people who look like themselves along with their accompanying heritage and values. And of course the producers and directors of this "accomplishment" are intent on spreading it to every country on earth.

Look at photographs and footage of the crowds at sporting events from before the mid-1960s. Men often wore suits and women wore dresses. Can you imagine those Americans viewing the Seahawks' DWFs, or the DWFs of any other NFL team? They would be aghast and incredulous at how far a once-great nation had sunk and rightly so.

 

[PamelaOC]

How many players at other positions is a white QB worth? Obviously the 21/1 situation was an extreme example, but I'd much rather watch a white QB with a 5/5 black offensive line than a black QB with an all-saltine O-line.

 

[Liverlips]

What happens when the QB gets injured?

 

[FootballDad]

What happens when the QB gets injured?

Which would be inevitable with an all-sumo line. We would then hope that the white back-up comes out, stars, and makes a name for himself. He then displaces the black quarterback on another team.

 

[Liverlips]

The idea of turning on a game and doing a head count of White faces without taking any other factors into account, is only looking at a part of the picture. The Caste System is built upon the idea not only of black superiority, but of shutting Whites completely or nearly completely out of certain positions, literally forever. So a Wes Welker, future Hall of Famer, the first great White WR in over a quarter century, is worth about 50 White o-linemen in the larger scheme of things as o-line along with quarterback are the only two positions where Whites are a majority (or roughly equal as linemen) and the public pretty much expects to see them playing there, or at least isn't surprised when they are.

Another context to take into account is injuries. If they hadn't been injured, Denver would also be starting Walton at center, Tamme at tight end, Bradley at middle linebacker, and Wolfe at defensive end. That's 8 White starters, which would put the Broncos a tier below the Patriots but right up there with the best of the rest, especially considering their two White receivers. San Fran and Seattle didn't lose any White starters; their plan from the beginning of the season was to have a few Whites on the o-line and every other position coal black, with the exception of Justin Smith, who unfortunately is near the end of his career.

To call Denver and San Francisco "equal" or equally bad just isn't accurate, or at least it's not going to fly with many (if any) posters here no matter how many times Denver's current 4 White starters are mentioned. San Francisco and Seattle are two of the shining lights of the Caste NFL and its promotion of black QBs; Denver is a team that challenged Caste orthodoxy by playing Welker and Decker, while suffering injuries to key White players. There's a significant difference between them and the two teams left in the NFC, and that's without even mentioning the great Peyton Manning (btw, the 49ers start just 3 Whites, 2 o-linemen and Smith).

I don't really disagree, but I would point out that whites are indeed starting to be shut out in places like O-line and all the defensive positions. Denver is a case in point with a coal defense and only one white on the O-line. I take your point about starters and perhaps I harp on that too much. But I was pleasantly surprised by how many white backups the Colts, Panthers and to a lesser extent the Chargers played. I don't really see that with Denver in terms of starters or backups. Injuries actually show how deep the caste system is. Denver did not have any white backups to plug in when the injuries hit (as they always will). Compare that to the Pats who have many whites to plug in when the injuries occur. I don't think Denver is the same as SF and I even said I would support Denver over either Seattle or SF. But I would not do so very enthusiastically as we would be looking at the blackest SB ever if it is Denver v. SF. There would be 7/44 whites starting and not many white subs either. If CF readers take any joy in that then God bless and I hope your team wins.