Danny Woodhead

[ToughJ.Riggins]

Some cautious optimism with this rant, that I hope will brighten some poster's day. I think this could be the year that a white RB stereotype debunker breaks through like Welker did at WR a few years back. Whites are fed up with AA, quotas and blacks still fighting for more entitlements in America- despite one rising to the presidency. There is the tea party movement and more talk of "reverse" discrimination under Afrocentric Prez Obama.

By my take- on mainstream message boards- it's getting closer to half of college fans waking up to a presence of a caste system holding down white RBs and WRs or AT LEAST accurately evaluating their performance. Toby Gerhart got tons of media coverage- and there were plenty of articles for the first time in "sheeple America" in SI and other mainstream media- basically asking how it was possible for one of only 5 or so starting white RBs out of 120 teams to be the best in the FBS, yet supposedly there are few or no others. Hillis is again getting fan support in Cleveland from fans avid enough to watch the pre-season. There are some who know about his dominance for 3 1/2 games as the starting tailback in Denver. There was a thread mocking Joe McKnight on the Jets forum and Danny Woodhead's top pre-season- single game rushing performance last season (actually the best since Mike Anderson in the mid 90s if they had the work ethic to research it more) was mentioned. NY is a very caste city, but still around 25% of the posters seemed to "already" know that Woodhead is MUCH better than McKnight "at this point" in time and probably will remain so.

It doesn't look good for Hester or Leonard unless one of the top 2 backs in front of them get hurt. If Matthews or Scott were to get minor injuries, I would not rejoice in their misfortune, but would simply be VERY HAPPY for the talented Jacob Hester, for instance, who hasn't been given even one legit shot in the regular season to compete for carries and get real rich like criminally inclined tailbacks like Bernard Scott do. There have been enough short glimpses of talented white backs dominating- only to go straight back to fighting for roster spots to wake some fans up. And Gerhart "at the college level" may have done more last season to raise the question from the typical American Sheeples that something isn't adding up here.

Add to this the fact that the cultural Marxist media like ESPN are flexing their muscles so much (with their agenda) as a reaction to what's going on- that more people are starting to see thorough them and it might backfire. Despite America being the most sheeple minded country in the industrialized democratic world IMO (due to the media, police state and two party system of government etc.), I have faith that there are more college fans (than many on CF believe) who found ESPN's list of 9 of the top 12 college QBs being black being a lie and nauseating. I agree with Don that if it weren't for fantasy football, the league would be starting to struggle like the 90s NBA. People are sick of the criminal issues in the league, spoiled players who dog it in non contract years, hold out, and let their greed and arrogance show in what they say and do- when most Americans TRULY have it tough right now. Hopefully the college fantasy football market will grow and hurt the National Farce League! Edited by: ToughJ.Riggins

 

[Don Wassall]

Some cautious optimism with this rant, that I hope will brighten some poster's day. I think this could be the year that a white RB stereotype debunker breaks through like Welker did at WR a few years back. Whites are fed up with AA, quotas and blacks still fighting for more entitlements in America- despite one rising to the presidency. There is the tea party movement and more talk of "reverse" discrimination under Afrocentric Prez Obama.

By my take- on mainstream message boards- it's getting closer to half of college fans waking up to a presence of a caste system holding down white RBs and WRs or AT LEAST accurately evaluating their performance. Toby Gerhart got tons of media coverage- and there were plenty of articles for the first time in "sheeple America" in SI and other mainstream media- basically asking how it was possible for one of only 5 or so starting white RBs out of 120 teams to be the best in the FBS, yet supposedly there are few or no others. Hillis is again getting fan support in Cleveland from fans avid enough to watch the pre-season. There are some who know about his dominance for 3 1/2 games as the starting tailback in Denver. There was a thread mocking Joe McKnight on the Jets forum and Danny Woodhead's top pre-season- single game rushing performance last season (actually the best since Mike Anderson in the mid 90s if they had the work ethic to research it more) was mentioned. NY is a very caste city, but still around 25% of the posters seemed to "already" know that Woodhead is MUCH better than McKnight "at this point" in time and probably will remain so.

It doesn't look good for Hester or Leonard unless one of the top 2 backs in front of them get hurt. If Matthews or Scott were to get minor injuries, I would not rejoice in their misfortune, but would simply be VERY HAPPY for the talented Jacob Hester, for instance, who hasn't been given even one legit shot in the regular season to compete for carries and get real rich like criminally inclined tailbacks like Bernard Scott do. There have been enough short glimpses of talented white backs dominating- only to go straight back to fighting for roster spots to wake some fans up. And Gerhart "at the college level" may have done more last season to raise the question from the typical American Sheeples that something isn't adding up here.

Add to this the fact that the cultural Marxist media like ESPN are flexing their muscles so much (with their agenda) as a reaction to what's going on- that more people are starting to see thorough them and it might backfire. Despite America being the most sheeple minded country in the industrialized democratic world IMO (due to the media, police state and two party system of government etc.), I have faith that there are more college fans (than many on CF believe) who found ESPN's list of 9 of the top 12 college QBs being black being a lie and nauseating. I agree with Don that if it weren't for fantasy football, the league would be starting to struggle like the 90s NBA. People are sick of the criminal issues in the league, spoiled players who dog it in non contract years, hold out, and let their greed and arrogance show in what they say and do- when most Americans TRULY have it tough right now. Hopefully the college fantasy football market will grow and hurt the National Farce League!

Good rant. Even though ESPN is more over the top than ever I agree there is more awareness of the Caste System than before. Among the more "intellectual" DWFs this site is now well known (and despised by the ones who consider themselves gatekeepers of the present anti-White system).

I think the most important things we can do are first to keep making Caste Football as good a source as possible of news, evidence and commentary; and second to post as much as time allows in comments sections after articles on other sites and on Youtube. The number of what can loosely be called anti-Caste, pro-CF comments has grown significantly in recent years, and needs to keep growing to the point of being omnipresent. No writer or announcer should be allowed to get away uncontested with anti-Whitestereotyping anymore, nor with overblown praise for blacks.

Many comments can be made without explicitly mentioning race by pointing out the abilities and achievements of White players, and/or contrasting the way they're treated or stereotyped compared to a black player. Articles in well-read but not mega-sites like ESPN should be targeted as the articles on ESPN, CBS, SI, Fox, etc., get so many comments, rapid fire style, that any particularcomment no matter how profoundis quickly lost in the maelstrom.

It's interesting how, through the gradualism method, fantasy football has been made into an integral part of NFL coverage in recent years, both on standard shows like NFL Live and on the NFL Network, and during the games themselves. The NFL and its supporting Cultural Marxist corporate media are very aware that fantasy has become the backbone of the league's popularity.

Hopefully fantasy football will peak soon and begin declining, which I believe is very possible because of several factors. Luck plays a huge role, which leaves all but one owner in a league unhappy each year; injuries are occurring on a more frequent basis (and more dubious ones too), plus there's always the "annoying" factor of having one or more of the players you were counting on arrested. Additionally, the internet and instantaneous updates has pretty much leveled the playing field among fantasy owners, except for the crazy ones who spend endless hours studying strengths of schedule and other minutae that usually is overwhelmed by the luck factor anyway. Edited by: Don Wassall

 

[white is right]

....Or in this case, "sub-Rudy", since, according to the comment, Division 2 stats are the equivalent to cheating.  If that were the case, some overlooked (by D1 schools) black super-afflete would have put the DII records out of reach by these pathetic "Rudy" white guys, right??  Sickening DWFs.

Just look at the traditional black colleges. I don't recall one under sized tailback putting up numbers like Woodhead since the SEC and the old SWAC started recruiting Blacks. Also it looks like the competition for Woodhead's spot could be the other small receiver who looked like he was in the coaches dog house for his poor decisions during punt returns. Edited by: white is right

 

[Colonel_Reb]

white is right, you mean SWC (Southwest Conference). The SWAC schools had em to begin with.

 

[white is right]

To be honest I thought there were two SWAC's. I stand corrected....

 

[ToughJ.Riggins]

Don, thanks for the feedback. One other thing I should note is that I do see some grateful blacks interviewed in the media, writers, politicians etc. who realize blacks have MORE than a fair opportunity now. A lot of the best sports articles on "reverse" racism in football are from black writers. But there is also still a very active and strong AA and quotas agenda being pushed by THE MAJORITY of blacks in America. The Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, NAACP political movement goes along with double standards like allowing black colleges and not white ones and the Rooney rule- with no rule like it anywhere for whites.

It seems that most blacks in sports fit into the afrocentric, who gives a $hit about whites mentality, who still want revenge against whites for things that have been resolved since the mid to late 60s and don't care that they have a much better opportunity because of their skin. ie. Lovie Smith, Mike Tomlin, Raheem Morris and bitter uneducated Bleacher report writers like Keilyn Ellis. Yet there are also blacks like Willie Taggert, Fred Jackson, Turner Gill, Tony Dungy, Jim Caldwell and writers like Taylor Bell and of course the one in SI from Phil Taylor. Marvin Lewis is really the only black coach I've seen that's in between.

I think the grateful blacks realize the blacks being "freak athletes" scholarship agenda will backfire and also creates a stereotype- from fans- that almost any black at a school like Notre Dame's campus are likely there as athletes and not students. The quotas and AA system is creating a new system of racism and resentment between blacks and whites.

In Canada, I find that blacks and whites assimilate much better to each other. The media brings up more "bold fresh" ideas up here, but amongst friends, at school, and of course at jobs other than with writers- race is discussed much less. Intellectuals/sociologists of course still talk about race, but it seems that most prefer more light hearted chat up here.

There is still a lot of "reverse" racism in Canada, but not nearly at the ridiculous level it has reached in the U.S. Yet somehow up here in a nation with less racial tension, more people are recognizing the discrimination against whites in football and basketball. I have talked with a handful of friends including my only black friend- a few of them very recently and all but ONE agreed that there is a discrimination problem. Surprisingly, my black friend whom I work with was very receptive to my arguments, despite not agreeing it goes quite as far as I believe it does. Our conversation ended when he asked "so what percentage of RBs do you think should be white in the NFL?" I said, I'd estimate almost half of scatbacks and 70% of powerbacks. His reply was basically that he thought that was a little over the top and he'd say more like a quarter or a third of RBs should be white from his observations of high school and college football. I guess this is a cultural difference (and partly based on Canada being a more racially homogeneous country), but there is less racial tension and more tact in dealings with race issues up here than in Jersey.

 

[ToughJ.Riggins]

BTW, do you guys agree with my assessment that there are few luke warm blacks in their feelings toward whites in most of the U.S? From my experience in Jersey, most blacks seemed rabidly anti-white or wanted equal opportunity and peace. But even still- even the latter type usually seemed to hang mostly with people of their own skin colour.

 

[whiteathlete33]

Woodhead will see a lot of carries tonight and should start, according to my local paper. I'm hoping he has an impressive performance just like last year.

 

[SuperSpeed23]

Annoucing during the jets/eagles game is terrible. No praise for danny woodhead and then after an interview with jim leonhard they start making fun of him.

 

[SuperSpeed23]

Danny just had a sweet touchdown run!

 

[FootballDad]

For Woodhead, his main competition has to be Chauncey Washington. According to folks I've chatted with (I can't see the game), McKnight looked soft, as expected, and had a disastrous fumble that went the other way for a TD. With Shonn Greene and LaDanian Tomlinson entrenched, there isn't much room in the backfield. I hope the Jets opt to keep 4 RBs, with Woodhead having the ST and WR versatility. Of course, that would mean that Mr. USC McKnight would be out.

 

[FootballDad]

Here's an article out of the Boston Herald today where Coach Ryan says that Woodhead will make the team. He also saysMcKnight will make the team, so I'll just keep my fingers crossed.

McKnight sucks, Woodhead rules

 

[whiteathlete33]

Of course McKnight will make the team. The Jets didn't waste a fourth round pick on a spectacular afflete out of USC for him to be cut. He has too much "upside" and affletic ability. As poorly as McKnight has played and the condition that he's in would lead one to believe he'd be left off the roster. That only happens to white players like Mike Hass though.

 

[JReb1]

I hope DW gets more opportunities to touch the ball this year because good things happen when he does!

 

[Rise]

Has anyone been watching "Hard Knocks" on HBO this year focusing on the Jets? If so, have they given any attention to Danny? Lord knows if this was a small black kid trying to make it at a position dominated by whites, the entire show would be focused on his plight....

 

[Westside]

Hey Rise he was "featured" on the second espisode of "Hard Knocks" for 5 minutes. Some of the affeletic teammates said that he would be a HOFer if he played "back in the day". I got the feeling that they knew he was a great player and clearly had the speed, so it was just in jest. I suspect he could beat all the RBs in a forty yard dash and most knew it. Hopefully fat f**k Ryan will see it as well.

Right after his segment the show the feature a smaller affeletic player. A reciever who is 506 and about 165 lbs, that was trying to earn a spot as a kick returner. The coaches were barking at his decision making on kick returns and so forth. I don't think he will make the team.

 

[Westside]

Just finished watching the last episode. In the last Pre season game against the Eagles, they featured the RBs. All of the affeletic types were fumbling and not doing much. Ryan got pissed and told his coaches to put in Danny, knowing he would not fumble. Shortly thereafter, he got some great runs and TD.

I have a "Pollyana Feeling" that Danny will get alot of reps and open eyes this season.

During the training camp footage,they showed Danny catching a long pass then just run away from the affeletic corners. It was like watching a guy who runs a 4.3 vs guys running 4.6 or 4.5. Criminal how this guy did not play more last year. I hope things change this year.

It boggles my mind on why the Jets are keep Joe McNight! He sucked the entire pre season. Chauncy Washington should be on the team and McNight given his pink slip.

 

[The Hock]

I think I caught some caste mechanics coming into play in the game. During the drive when Danny was running the ball one of Ryan's gophers popped up from somewhere and discreetly asked Ryan something like "uh, you, uh, want to put McNight back in?" This, after McNight has been taken out for fumbling for the fourth time in just the pre-season, and right in the middle of a drive where Danny is running well and the Jets are moving the ball.

Now why in the hell would this guy choose that moment to ask Ryan if he wants to take Woodhead out of the game, with a guy who had fumbled four times in just the pre-season, other than some underlying pecking order that takes more than just game performance into account.

I had avoided watching the whole series because I figured I would just be watching Danny get screwed in the end. Now that he's made it I wish I had watched every episode, just so I could spot more of these little caste moments.


Edited by: The Hock

 

[ToughJ.Riggins]

What do you mean one of his gophers? A player or coach? I'm guessing you mean coach? I'm going to pull a Polyanna and say that I think McKnight's performance this pre-season makes him too risky to be used as the 3rd tailback- and that Woodhead could see 5 carries a game or so- in a Kevin Faulk type (receiving and third down back) role (if L.T struggles more than expected). Heck, Woodhead could even start seeing 10 carries a game or so- if L.T gets nicked up for a few games.

 

[Westside]

The gopher that the The Hock was talking about was Shottenihiemer making the statement. He seems to be a true castean type. During the episode, Ryan was very high on Danny's ability and skills. I think Ryan is going to give him opportunities to perform.

Danny's nickname is "white chocolate" and seems to have the respect of the other affeletic type skill players. Mainly, because it can not be denied how he dominates in practice and his time in the games.

 

[Leonardfan]

Westside, I am completlely with you on McKnight. The guy is a joke. Perfect example of entitlement affirmative action in professional sports. How he did not get cut is beyond me. He is afraid to run between the tackles, runs soft, does not have the speed to run to the outside, fumbles the ball, cannot pass block and has questionable recieving skills. I have pretty much seen or listened to all the Jets preseason games just to see how badly McKnight has screwed up and hoping that Danny does not get screwed over. Woodhead played so much better this preseason, had a better training camp, has better physical attributes and is just someone I can't help but be a huge advocate for.

 

[Westside]

A DWF with a little CF knowledge and sitting watching "Hard Knocks" then the preseason regarding the performances of McNight and Woodhead would see the criminal castesystem in full display. The injustices/double standards simply being overlooked because one is black=upside, white=?.

 

[FootballDad]

I guess that "Hard Knocks" was good for something, Danny is getting a lot of play on team forums around the league. Most that I've seen have remarkably good comments, especially coming from DWFs. Here's an example froma Vikings forum.

 

[Don Wassall]

Ya gotta love Weenieworld's doublespeak analysis of the Patriots signing Woodhead:

Patriots signed RB/WR Danny Woodhead. The former Jet takes the roster spot of Laurence Maroney, and is a perfect fit for the Patriots playing style, though chances are he won't stick with the Pats. The two teams square off Sunday in what should be a great game. Woodhead becomes the latest player involved in a long history of roster plucking.

 

[SuperSpeed23]

So...hes a perfect fit..but he wont stick with the team..yeeeeah that makes sense..