Colonel_Reb
Hall of Famer
Danny came back yesterday and had a great game. Looks like he will be ready for a playoff run now. I hope they make it to the championship!
whiteCB said:Thanks for the info. You can understand why I don't know these players but what's worse is my friends who claim they're "football fans" and yet have no idea who Steve Largent is!!! I almost crapped my pants and had to explain to them how Steve set all the records that Rice broke. Although I guess it doesn't help that the media gives the guy no credit whatsoever. Oh and who is that guy in your avatar Bronk?
Isn't it the truth though? They look for any little b.s. excuse to explain why a white RB isn't fit for the taboo position of RB.reclaimsocal said:I started compiling my spreadsheet on the various draft websites, experts and scouting services and noticed something strange. Danny Woodhead, who was supposedly too small to play D1 ball, and is almost certainly being downgraded as an NFL draft pick because of this, is actually bigger then the consensus #1 Senior Tailback prospect, Mike Hart. Its quite the nice system they have set up, any White who is "tailback" size is too small, and any White who isn't is considered a Fullback. There just isn't any place for a White Tailback in the system.
ToughJ.Riggins said:They can never mention the actual truth or they will lose their jobs or credibility as scouts; they have to do the status quo and be anti-white. I have seen many comments disparaging of white athletes by sports journalists that are "anti-white" though. Bill Simmons calling the Saint's LBs a white affirmative action experiment and that stupid post I saw of a writer mocking the Pats signing of Welker in the Pre-season as "an overpaid short undrafted white guy" "those types don't amount to much" or something of the sort. I guess these types of comments give them legitimacy amongst the liberal marxists, the drunken white fans and black athletes who like the status quo or are too blind to see.
ToughJ.Riggins said:They can never mention the actual truth or they will lose their jobs or credibility as scouts; they have to do the status quo and be anti-white. I have seen many comments disparaging of white athletes by sports journalists that are "anti-white" though. Bill Simmons calling the Saint's LBs a white affirmative action experiment and that stupid post I saw of a writer mocking the Pats signing of Welker in the Pre-season as "an overpaid short undrafted white guy" "those types don't amount to much" or something of the sort. I guess these types of comments give them legitimacy amongst the liberal marxists, the drunken white fans and black athletes who like the status quo or are too blind to see.
devans said:It's here...
Fox Sports Article
ToughJ.Riggins said:My mistake; I guess it was Kevin Hench. What a racist thing to say though.
Riddlewire said:After it became apparent that Ron Zook was determined to play his black quarterback the entire game (It's a senior display game, Ron. They're all supposed to share snaps.), I paid only intermittent attention. However, I made sure to at least look at the field whenever the West had the ball. From what I could tell, Danny only saw the field on three plays. He pass-blocked on one, had a bad pass thrown too low towards him on the other, and got a single carry into a stuffed line for no yardage. I believe that was all in the first quarter. His day was done after that. The other RBs for the West shared the rest of the day. Each getting multiple series.
There was no reason for Danny to attend this joke of a game.
Mike said:That's not exactly correct. The QB's rotated for both sides, and both Paul Smith and Ricky Santos played as much as Marshall's Bernard Morris....
Danny also had more chances then you attributed, and to be honest really didn't make the most of them.