2014 World Cup Finals - Part Two

[Matra2]

What about the decision to take off Eden Hazard and put on Chadli? I know they had switched tactics to a long ball game and Hazard hadn't been playing well but still a weird decision.

 

[frederic38]

Higuain was without doubt,the star of the game.Late on he unleashed this thunderstrike,after a great waltzing run:

Which prompted this reaction from Sabella:

i love how he nutmegged the overweight black security guard kompany in the process:

another shot barely deflected by the defender after a great run:

he was the man of the match in that game
great contrast with benzema

 

[frederic38]

What about the decision to take off Eden Hazard and put on Chadli? I know they had switched tactics to a long ball game and Hazard hadn't been playing well but still a weird decision.

he could have replaced witsel instead
what a useless player by the way

 

[ThePhilosopher]

he could have replaced witsel instead
what a useless player by the way

Lol,he should've replaced Lukaku!:tongue1:

 

[frederic38]

Former Germany international Paul Breitner has claimed that Mesut Ozil should be dropped for the team's World Cup semi-final against Brazil.

The midfielder's performances for both Arsenal and the national side have come under increasing criticism in recent months.
Breitner now believes that coach Joachim Low must be brave and leave Ozil out of Tuesday's encounter with the hosts.
"If Joachim Low is brave and says that he doesn't want to play with just ten players, he will leave Mesut Ozil out of the next match," he is quoted as saying by Spanish newspaper AS.
"It would be a step towards the World Cup title and above all a step forward for the team. Nine players go out there and give everything for 90 minutes and one other does nothing but walk around on the pitch. At a World Cup, that can't happen. Joachim Low has to come out of his shadow and give a reaction."

http://www.sportsmole.co.uk/footbal...ews/breitner-ozil-must-be-dropped_163576.html

pretty obvious but it's always nice to see that we are not the only ones seeing it

 

[Tim]

The results and performances from certain players in this World Cup have been positive overall.

By and large, the African and Afro-Latin nations were thoroughly humiliated: Cameroon, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Ecuador, and Honduras. Nigeria made it out of its group, thanks to a horrific refereeing blunder that disallowed Dzeko's goal.

It was a good thing that Costa Rica, which normally fields 9 Whites and Mestizos at any given time, advanced so deeply at the expense of a Balotelli-led Italy and an England with an almost coal-black front-line.

But it's been disappointing to see Spain, Russia, Croatia, and Bosnia sent home packing so early on.

Teams with large foreigner contingents actually had their natives as their best players, with the foreigners playing horribly.

Ronaldo found himself surrounded by utter **** in Varela, Nani and Eder, but ten years ago he benefited from playing with Deco, Figo and Pauleta.

For England, the buck stops with the Black-dominated frontline with Sturridge, Welbeck, and Sterling, managing just 1 goal across three games.

For Holland, fortunately, all the good work is performed by native players: Robben, Sneijder, Van der Vaart, Van Persie, Huntelaar truly form a golden a generation of players born in 1983-1984. Add in the slightly older Kuyt. Holland's foreigners are not like a supporting cast in a movie, they're extras: Wijnaldum is the most anonymous midfielder of all time. Depay huffs and puffs but can't blow the house down. Martins-Indi doesn't look comfortable with the ball at his feet and has critical lapses in concentration - he could have conceded a penalty and seen red against Costa Rica.

Benzemerde performed horribly yet again in blue. The two goals against a semi-amateur Honduras shouldn't even count. He failed to step up when it mattered, with an absolutely pathetic performance against the Germans, and he couldn't even score against mighty Nigeria. Pogba is always a liability, a red card or foul waiting to happen. He likes to dribble aimlessly, but nothing comes out of it. Cabaye had to play a holding role, but he actually created as many chances as Pogba during the World Cup. With and without the ball at his feet, Pogba is nothing special. The clumsy pair of Sakho+Varane is responsible for losing the game against Germany. Valbuena was sensational, creating by far the most goal-scoring chances for his team. Debuchy was Mr. Reliable on the right side of defense. And Cabaye

For Belgium, De Bruyne and Hazard were sensational. It was Hazard who delivered victories against Russia and Algeria. And De Bruyne who played an absolute blinder against the USA. The bush-headed twins Fellaini and Witsel form perhaps the worst midfield pair ever - they can't do anything right: can't play a killer pass and can't boss the midfield. Bad Kompany was exposed yet again, it was he who gave away the ball in midfield leading to Higuain's goal. Origi looks like an urchin plucked off the street and sent to Brazil, while the lumbering Lukaku didn't even last 59 minutes in a single game.

 

[frederic38]

The results and performances from certain players in this World Cup have been positive overall.

By and large, the African and Afro-Latin nations were thoroughly humiliated: Cameroon, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Ecuador, and Honduras. Nigeria made it out of its group, thanks to a horrific refereeing blunder that disallowed Dzeko's goal.

It was a good thing that Costa Rica, which normally fields 9 Whites and Mestizos at any given time, advanced so deeply at the expense of a Balotelli-led Italy and an England with an almost coal-black front-line.

But it's been disappointing to see Spain, Russia, Croatia, and Bosnia sent home packing so early on.

Teams with large foreigner contingents actually had their natives as their best players, with the foreigners playing horribly.

Ronaldo found himself surrounded by utter **** in Varela, Nani and Eder, but ten years ago he benefited from playing with Deco, Figo and Pauleta.

For England, the buck stops with the Black-dominated frontline with Sturridge, Welbeck, and Sterling, managing just 1 goal across three games.

For Holland, fortunately, all the good work is performed by native players: Robben, Sneijder, Van der Vaart, Van Persie, Huntelaar truly form a golden a generation of players born in 1983-1984. Add in the slightly older Kuyt. Holland's foreigners are not like a supporting cast in a movie, they're extras: Wijnaldum is the most anonymous midfielder of all time. Depay huffs and puffs but can't blow the house down. Martins-Indi doesn't look comfortable with the ball at his feet and has critical lapses in concentration - he could have conceded a penalty and seen red against Costa Rica.

Benzemerde performed horribly yet again in blue. The two goals against a semi-amateur Honduras shouldn't even count. He failed to step up when it mattered, with an absolutely pathetic performance against the Germans, and he couldn't even score against mighty Nigeria. Pogba is always a liability, a red card or foul waiting to happen. He likes to dribble aimlessly, but nothing comes out of it. Cabaye had to play a holding role, but he actually created as many chances as Pogba during the World Cup. With and without the ball at his feet, Pogba is nothing special. The clumsy pair of Sakho+Varane is responsible for losing the game against Germany. Valbuena was sensational, creating by far the most goal-scoring chances for his team. Debuchy was Mr. Reliable on the right side of defense. And Cabaye

For Belgium, De Bruyne and Hazard were sensational. It was Hazard who delivered victories against Russia and Algeria. And De Bruyne who played an absolute blinder against the USA. The bush-headed twins Fellaini and Witsel form perhaps the worst midfield pair ever - they can't do anything right: can't play a killer pass and can't boss the midfield. Bad Kompany was exposed yet again, it was he who gave away the ball in midfield leading to Higuain's goal. Origi looks like an urchin plucked off the street and sent to Brazil, while the lumbering Lukaku didn't even last 59 minutes in a single game.

i didn't remember that kompany lost the ball before higuain's goal but yes, it was reported by belgium media
during the tournament alan hansen, who has criticised kompany in the past, said that kompany was the best defender at the world cup: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...t-seriously-short-on-top-class-defenders.html

i was impressed by yepes
he doesn't play much at club level but at the world cup he was incredible

 

[ThePhilosopher]

i was impressed by yepes
he doesn't play much at club level but at the world cup he was incredible

Correct,Yepes didn't let Neymar breathe!:smokin:
Plus he had a goal wrongly disallowed.

 

[Rebajlo]

This World Cup (and - significantly - I'm not exclusively referring to the finals tournament...) has been an all-round disaster in terms of race, regardless of whichever nation will eventually win the trophy. Not one of the sixteen teams that made it to the second round was 100% White. Apart from Greece - with their one mestizo Jose Holebas - the European teams in the last sixteen were markedly non-White (as our regulars know, I don't count Albanians or any other Muslims as White - if anyone doesn't like it, I recommend getting up off your blinkered, US-oriented, "but, but, but...David Duke said" arse, actually boarding a plane and visiting a Muslim area of any big city in the UK, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, et cetera...). By "markedly" I mean habitually starting at least three non-Whites (France, England, Switzerland, Belgium, Germany) or starting two or three Negroes then bringing on more in the second half from a largely black bench (the current version of the ever-Negro friendly Netherlands).

The fact that all of the blackest and most Muslim-ridden teams from Europe qualified for the finals is quite cataclysmic in itself as this only reinforces the media message of the value of non-White - particularly black - players. France, England, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland, Portugal and Germany all field non-Whites in practically every game. Bosnia might as well be Turkey. What's more, Croatia have their pair of naturalised Brazilians, while Italy have the egregiously overexposed Balotelli.

Let's not beat about the proverbial bush: the European nations with all-White teams failed to deliver the goods again and allowed such heavily non-White sides to qualify for the finals and represent Europe on the world stage. The all-White teams like Poland, Ukraine, Serbia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Romania, and Hungary all finished behind sides full of Negroes and Muslims and therefore didn't do our "cause" any favours. Such a state of affairs isn't good enough and bodes ill for the future, no matter how much people wish to sugarcoat it with endless videos and graphs. The stark reality is this: if all-White or minimally (strictly one or two players) non-White teams continuously succumb to significantly (three or four players) or mostly non-White teams at both club and international level the overall trend of ever-increasing numbers of blacks and Arabs in the sport will never be reversed.

Football is a team game and if spectators see teams with more blacks and Arabs routinely beating teams with less (or no) blacks and Arabs then it's no surprise they'll naturally begin to assume that a sizeable non-White presence in the lineup is a beneficial thing. That's how the public interpret what they see and - in the end - it's exceedingly difficult to argue against such conclusions because sporting ability is viewed solely through the prism of success.

Now before all manner of accusations erupt like stinking puss from a whopping great arse boil, the statements and sentiments in the preceding paragraphs are not "defeatist", "treasonous", or ****ing "Jewish". They simply reflect the truth and anyone who cannot or does not want to see it must be quite deficient in the brains department.

I've only bothered to watch five matches in their entirety (Brazil v Croatia, Australia v Chile, England v Italy, Australia v Holland, England v Uruguay). My sole reason for wasting time watching the opening game was to confirm my predictions of Brazil receiving favourable treatment from the officials. Funnily enough, Brazil was gifted a penalty...

Australia were the usual one-dimensional joke, conceding crucial goals via startlingly inept schoolboy defending (against Chile, Jorge Valdivia was left unmarked at the dead centre of the edge of the box while the entire Australian defence moved towards the player in possession in true U-7s style; against the Netherlands, van Persie was played onside by the snail-witted quarter-Japanese Jason Davidson, who stood still pissing himself and gaping about while the rest of the defence moved out in unison).

The less said about England, the better. It would be conveniently easy to lay the entire blame on the Negroes but - truth be told - every player "performed" abysmally (yet again...). Apart from his goal against Uruguay plus that one superlative pass to Daniel Sturridge for the equaliser against Italy, 300,000 quid per week Wayne Rooney did bugger all. Gary Cahill's full-nappies positional bungling gifted Balotelli the winner. The perennially-grimacing Steven Gerrard's "passing" was painfully devoid of invention. Andrea Pirlo - who is almost exactly one year older - made Gerrard look like an anaemic reserve-grade amateur wearing second-hand boots lacking a couple of studs. Even physio Gary Lewin contributed to the carnival of embarrassment when he somehow managed to dislocate his bloody ankle celebrating Sturridge's goal and was carried out on a stretcher. The only thing missing was a soporific speech by that dynamic light-bulb head William Hague. Come to think of it, given England's disgracefully lacklustre performances perhaps Hague did deliver the half-time team talk - but it's odds on he was otherwise engaged in a bit of parliamentary back-room sodomy at the time...

The problems which beset English football are manifold and I shan't expound on them now but one thing's for sure: that woeful loser Roy Hodgson should be kicked into retirement (and a pulp...) post-haste. I've ranted about England for long enough but when it comes to a complete lack of ability, the footballing non-entity named Danny Welbeck deserves a special mention. Welbeck is so abjectly useless that he even made a complete hash of his dive against Italy. Twenty six caps for England - what has the world come to..?

Holy **** the Algerians actually showed the same sportsmanship as Germany.

I'm not sure how much You actually know about football (although You recent posts have provided a snapshot of the typical one-eyed Germany enthusiast the likes of which proliferate around any pro-White site...) but German teams have never been renowned for sportsmanship. In fact, German teams have traditionally had a reputation for the exact opposite. I've previously discussed that detestable prick Harald Schumacher's infamous "foul" on Patrick Battiston in the semi-final of the 1982 World Cup in addition to the flagrant fix between West Germany and Austria in their final group game of the same tournament. Jurgen Klinsmann (I'm sure You've heard of him...) holds the dubious distinction of being the most theatrical European diver I've ever seen and - believe me - I've seen plenty. Klinsmann's antics make that ugly, bald cheat Arjen "I've Been Shot" Robben appear almost Old Corinthian in comparison.

I've posted the following highlights video before but I'll add it again as I'm guessing You've never seen it. It features Germany's Euro 1984 qualification match away to Albania, played in March 1983. The Germans' 2-1 "win" eventually proved decisive as they finished level on points with Northern Ireland (after losing twice to the Ulstermen...) and qualified for the finals on the basis of goal difference.

Rudi Voller opens the scoring with a legitimate goal. Pay attention to the next segment as Stefan Engels takes the ball just inside the Albanian box then blatantly barges into the defender and drops to the ground like a sack of ****. Germany are instantly awarded a penalty, which is converted by Karl-Heinz Rummenigge. The final passage shows the German defender Gerd Strack attempting to get away with a shamelessly deliberate handball in his own box, which resulted in a penalty for Albania. This "obscure" match has always stuck in my memory as Engels' crude dive ultimately denied the small nation of Northern Ireland a berth at the 1984 European Championship finals.

[video=youtube;n0qcc9IYUI0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0qcc9IYUI0[/video]

Speaking of "sportsmanship" how about Manuel Neuer deliberately knocking the ball from the grasp of an Algerian player who was trying to get it back for a quick, last-gasp restart following Algeria's goal? That's precisely the kind of repugnant behaviour one expects from "paragons" of fair play like Brazil or Uruguay. Perhaps You "failed" to notice Phillip Lahm cynically pulling Yacine Brahimi's shorts down? Matra2 has already posted a photo of this commendable exhibition of gentlemanly conduct, but here it is again (just in case You "missed it...):

I'm certainly no admirer of Joachim Low but blaming him alone (in addition to Germany's non-Whites, of course...) for a "lack of success" is absolute bollocks. Let's examine Low's "miserable record of failure": during his eight years in charge he has led Germany to the final of the 2008 European Championship, third place in the last World Cup, and the semi-finals of Euro 2012. Now, here's the really important bit: those three tournaments were all won by Spain, the most dominant team on the planet during Low's tenure and widely regarded as one of the finest sides of all time. Spain beat Germany in the Euro 2008 final and eliminated them at the semi-final stage of the 2010 World Cup. So, are some people here inferring that Germany would surely have triumphed on those occasions if only they had a different manager? Because that's the impression I'm receiving...

Therefore, I'll just ask the question outright: do some of our posters actually believe that Germany would win everything in sight by five-goal margins if only Low wasn't at the helm? Because to put it bluntly, such an attitude differs little from the Brazilian "we are the real champions" excuse-laden whining and fulfils all of the very worst stereotypes of arrogant German fans who steadfastly believe their players are always innately superior and - if only the team wasn't nefariously undermined by this or that - would effortlessly massacre all opposition with one hand tied behind their backs.

Another thing: many of our posters appear to believe that the sole reason Jerome Boateng, Mesut Ozil, and Sami Khedira are in the German team is because they are mysteriously favoured (or even loved...) by the "metrosexual" Low and that another manager wouldn't select them. Well, consider the following line of thought. Both Jupp Heynckes and Pep Guardiola have regularly picked Boateng for Bayern Munich so if he is a fixture in the dominant Bundesliga club and was a starter in the team which won the Champions League final two seasons ago (Bayern Munich started three blacks in that match and brought on a fourth in injury time) then it stands to reason that any Germany manager would definitely include him in the squad and seriously consider him as a first-choice, regardless of the existence of unofficial national team quotas. We mightn't like that but - let's face it - if Negroes or other non-Whites play in teams which consistently win at the highest level, they shall be picked again and again and again. That's why it's vitally important for the White or "Whitest" teams to deliver the goods, both at club and international level.

By the way, any ideas for Low's potential replacement? As far as I'm aware, Erich Ribbeck is still alive... :icon_wink:

 

[frederic38]

I'm certainly no admirer of Joachim Low but blaming him alone (in addition to Germany's non-Whites, of course...) for a "lack of success" is absolute bollocks. Let's examine Low's "miserable record of failure": during his eight years in charge he has led Germany to the final of the 2008 European Championship, third place in the last World Cup, and the semi-finals of Euro 2012. Now, here's the really important bit: those three tournaments were all won by Spain, the most dominant team on the planet during Low's tenure and widely regarded as one of the finest sides of all time. Spain beat Germany in the Euro 2008 final and eliminated them at the semi-final stage of the 2010 World Cup. So, are some people here inferring that Germany would surely have triumphed on those occasions if only they had a different manager? Because that's the impression I'm receiving...

Therefore, I'll just ask the question outright: do some of our posters actually believe that Germany would win everything in sight by five-goal margins if only Low wasn't at the helm? Because to put it bluntly, such an attitude differs little from the Brazilian "we are the real champions" excuse-laden whining and fulfils all of the very worst stereotypes of arrogant German fans who steadfastly believe their players are always innately superior and - if only the team wasn't nefariously undermined by this or that - would effortlessly massacre all opposition with one hand tied behind their backs.

for germany, not winning a title for such a long time and considering a semi final or a final as a victory is not normal
something has changed in the way germany plays
i believe that with their big pool of players , germany should have won a competition amongst the ones you mentioned

Another thing: many of our posters appear to believe that the sole reason Jerome Boateng, Mesut Ozil, and Sami Khedira are in the German team is because they are mysteriously favoured (or even loved...) by the "metrosexual" Low and that another manager wouldn't select them. Well, consider the following line of thought. Both Jupp Heynckes and Pep Guardiola have regularly picked Boateng for Bayern Munich so if he is a fixture in the dominant Bundesliga club and was a starter in the team which won the Champions League final two seasons ago (Bayern Munich started three blacks in that match and brought on a fourth in injury time) then it stands to reason that any Germany manager would definitely include him in the squad and seriously consider him as a first-choice, regardless of the existence of unofficial national team quotas. We mightn't like that but - let's face it - if Negroes or other non-Whites play in teams which consistently win at the highest level, they shall be picked again and again and again. That's why it's vitally important for the White or "Whitest" teams to deliver the goods, both at club and international level.

and how about khedira, who almost hasn't played this year, and ozil, the biggest flop of the premier league?

 

[frederic38]

My sole reason for wasting time watching the opening game was to confirm my predictions of Brazil receiving favourable treatment from the officials. Funnily enough, Brazil was gifted a penalty...

fernandinho not getting a yellow card for his fouls against chile and then against colombia has to be the biggest joke ever:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/wo...driguez-Brazil-Colombias-World-Cup-clash.html

 

[frederic38]

This World Cup (and - significantly - I'm not exclusively referring to the finals tournament...) has been an all-round disaster in terms of race, regardless of whichever nation will eventually win the trophy. Not one of the sixteen teams that made it to the second round was 100% White. Apart from Greece - with their one mestizo Jose Holebas - the European teams in the last sixteen were markedly non-White (as our regulars know, I don't count Albanians or any other Muslims as White - if anyone doesn't like it, I recommend getting up off your blinkered, US-oriented, "but, but, but...David Duke said" arse, actually boarding a plane and visiting a Muslim area of any big city in the UK, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, et cetera...). By "markedly" I mean habitually starting at least three non-Whites (France, England, Switzerland, Belgium, Germany) or starting two or three Negroes then bringing on more in the second half from a largely black bench (the current version of the ever-Negro friendly Netherlands).

The fact that all of the blackest and most Muslim-ridden teams from Europe qualified for the finals is quite cataclysmic in itself as this only reinforces the media message of the value of non-White - particularly black - players. France, England, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland, Portugal and Germany all field non-Whites in practically every game. Bosnia might as well be Turkey. What's more, Croatia have their pair of naturalised Brazilians, while Italy have the egregiously overexposed Balotelli.

Let's not beat about the proverbial bush: the European nations with all-White teams failed to deliver the goods again and allowed such heavily non-White sides to qualify for the finals and represent Europe on the world stage. The all-White teams like Poland, Ukraine, Serbia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Romania, and Hungary all finished behind sides full of Negroes and Muslims and therefore didn't do our "cause" any favours. Such a state of affairs isn't good enough and bodes ill for the future, no matter how much people wish to sugarcoat it with endless videos and graphs. The stark reality is this: if all-White or minimally (strictly one or two players) non-White teams continuously succumb to significantly (three or four players) or mostly non-White teams at both club and international level the overall trend of ever-increasing numbers of blacks and Arabs in the sport will never be reversed.

Football is a team game and if spectators see teams with more blacks and Arabs routinely beating teams with less (or no) blacks and Arabs then it's no surprise they'll naturally begin to assume that a sizeable non-White presence in the lineup is a beneficial thing. That's how the public interpret what they see and - in the end - it's exceedingly difficult to argue against such conclusions because sporting ability is viewed solely through the prism of success.

come on rebajlo, i would have agreed before the world cup, the darkest ever for sure, but white teams and white players had a fantastic world cup
greece beat ivory coast in a total caste match, and almost reached the quarter finals
amongst the final 4 teams, there are argentina, the perfect team to root for, and germany, a big european team with only 1 black in the starting 11
enjoy it while we can still see something like that
to see france or england with only 1 black in the squad we would have to go back to the beginning of the 20th century
and the arabs they start are unanimously seen as the weak links of the team

 

[Jack Lambert]

This World Cup (and - significantly - I'm not exclusively referring to the finals tournament...) has been an all-round disaster in terms of race, regardless of whichever nation will eventually win the trophy. Not one of the sixteen teams that made it to the second round was 100% White. Apart from Greece - with their one mestizo Jose Holebas - the European teams in the last sixteen were markedly non-White (as our regulars know, I don't count Albanians or any other Muslims as White - if anyone doesn't like it, I recommend getting up off your blinkered, US-oriented, "but, but, but...David Duke said" arse, actually boarding a plane and visiting a Muslim area of any big city in the UK, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, et cetera...). By "markedly" I mean habitually starting at least three non-Whites (France, England, Switzerland, Belgium, Germany) or starting two or three Negroes then bringing on more in the second half from a largely black bench (the current version of the ever-Negro friendly Netherlands).

The fact that all of the blackest and most Muslim-ridden teams from Europe qualified for the finals is quite cataclysmic in itself as this only reinforces the media message of the value of non-White - particularly black - players. France, England, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland, Portugal and Germany all field non-Whites in practically every game. Bosnia might as well be Turkey. What's more, Croatia have their pair of naturalised Brazilians, while Italy have the egregiously overexposed Balotelli.

Let's not beat about the proverbial bush: the European nations with all-White teams failed to deliver the goods again and allowed such heavily non-White sides to qualify for the finals and represent Europe on the world stage. The all-White teams like Poland, Ukraine, Serbia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Romania, and Hungary all finished behind sides full of Negroes and Muslims and therefore didn't do our "cause" any favours. Such a state of affairs isn't good enough and bodes ill for the future, no matter how much people wish to sugarcoat it with endless videos and graphs. The stark reality is this: if all-White or minimally (strictly one or two players) non-White teams continuously succumb to significantly (three or four players) or mostly non-White teams at both club and international level the overall trend of ever-increasing numbers of blacks and Arabs in the sport will never be reversed.

Football is a team game and if spectators see teams with more blacks and Arabs routinely beating teams with less (or no) blacks and Arabs then it's no surprise they'll naturally begin to assume that a sizeable non-White presence in the lineup is a beneficial thing. That's how the public interpret what they see and - in the end - it's exceedingly difficult to argue against such conclusions because sporting ability is viewed solely through the prism of success.

Now before all manner of accusations erupt like stinking puss from a whopping great arse boil, the statements and sentiments in the preceding paragraphs are not "defeatist", "treasonous", or ****ing "Jewish". They simply reflect the truth and anyone who cannot or does not want to see it must be quite deficient in the brains department.

I've only bothered to watch five matches in their entirety (Brazil v Croatia, Australia v Chile, England v Italy, Australia v Holland, England v Uruguay). My sole reason for wasting time watching the opening game was to confirm my predictions of Brazil receiving favourable treatment from the officials. Funnily enough, Brazil was gifted a penalty...

Australia were the usual one-dimensional joke, conceding crucial goals via startlingly inept schoolboy defending (against Chile, Jorge Valdivia was left unmarked at the dead centre of the edge of the box while the entire Australian defence moved towards the player in possession in true U-7s style; against the Netherlands, van Persie was played onside by the snail-witted quarter-Japanese Jason Davidson, who stood still pissing himself and gaping about while the rest of the defence moved out in unison).

The less said about England, the better. It would be conveniently easy to lay the entire blame on the Negroes but - truth be told - every player "performed" abysmally (yet again...). Apart from his goal against Uruguay plus that one superlative pass to Daniel Sturridge for the equaliser against Italy, 300,000 quid per week Wayne Rooney did bugger all. Gary Cahill's full-nappies positional bungling gifted Balotelli the winner. The perennially-grimacing Steven Gerrard's "passing" was painfully devoid of invention. Andrea Pirlo - who is almost exactly one year older - made Gerrard look like an anaemic reserve-grade amateur wearing second-hand boots lacking a couple of studs. Even physio Gary Lewin contributed to the carnival of embarrassment when he somehow managed to dislocate his bloody ankle celebrating Sturridge's goal and was carried out on a stretcher. The only thing missing was a soporific speech by that dynamic light-bulb head William Hague. Come to think of it, given England's disgracefully lacklustre performances perhaps Hague did deliver the half-time team talk - but it's odds on he was otherwise engaged in a bit of parliamentary back-room sodomy at the time...

The problems which beset English football are manifold and I shan't expound on them now but one thing's for sure: that woeful loser Roy Hodgson should be kicked into retirement (and a pulp...) post-haste. I've ranted about England for long enough but when it comes to a complete lack of ability, the footballing non-entity named Danny Welbeck deserves a special mention. Welbeck is so abjectly useless that he even made a complete hash of his dive against Italy. Twenty six caps for England - what has the world come to..?


[/COLOR]
I'm not sure how much You actually know about football (although You recent posts have provided a snapshot of the typical one-eyed Germany enthusiast the likes of which proliferate around any pro-White site...) but German teams have never been renowned for sportsmanship. In fact, German teams have traditionally had a reputation for the exact opposite. I've previously discussed that detestable prick Harald Schumacher's infamous "foul" on Patrick Battiston in the semi-final of the 1982 World Cup in addition to the flagrant fix between West Germany and Austria in their final group game of the same tournament. Jurgen Klinsmann (I'm sure You've heard of him...) holds the dubious distinction of being the most theatrical European diver I've ever seen and - believe me - I've seen plenty. Klinsmann's antics make that ugly, bald cheat Arjen "I've Been Shot" Robben appear almost Old Corinthian in comparison.

I've posted the following highlights video before but I'll add it again as I'm guessing You've never seen it. It features Germany's Euro 1984 qualification match away to Albania, played in March 1983. The Germans' 2-1 "win" eventually proved decisive as they finished level on points with Northern Ireland (after losing twice to the Ulstermen...) and qualified for the finals on the basis of goal difference.

Rudi Voller opens the scoring with a legitimate goal. Pay attention to the next segment as Stefan Engels takes the ball just inside the Albanian box then blatantly barges into the defender and drops to the ground like a sack of ****. Germany are instantly awarded a penalty, which is converted by Karl-Heinz Rummenigge. The final passage shows the German defender Gerd Strack attempting to get away with a shamelessly deliberate handball in his own box, which resulted in a penalty for Albania. This "obscure" match has always stuck in my memory as Engels' crude dive ultimately denied the small nation of Northern Ireland a berth at the 1984 European Championship finals.

[video=youtube;n0qcc9IYUI0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0qcc9IYUI0[/video]

Speaking of "sportsmanship" how about Manuel Neuer deliberately knocking the ball from the grasp of an Algerian player who was trying to get it back for a quick, last-gasp restart following Algeria's goal? That's precisely the kind of repugnant behaviour one expects from "paragons" of fair play like Brazil or Uruguay. Perhaps You "failed" to notice Phillip Lahm cynically pulling Yacine Brahimi's shorts down? Matra2 has already posted a photo of this commendable exhibition of gentlemanly conduct, but here it is again (just in case You "missed it...):

I'm certainly no admirer of Joachim Low but blaming him alone (in addition to Germany's non-Whites, of course...) for a "lack of success" is absolute bollocks. Let's examine Low's "miserable record of failure": during his eight years in charge he has led Germany to the final of the 2008 European Championship, third place in the last World Cup, and the semi-finals of Euro 2012. Now, here's the really important bit: those three tournaments were all won by Spain, the most dominant team on the planet during Low's tenure and widely regarded as one of the finest sides of all time. Spain beat Germany in the Euro 2008 final and eliminated them at the semi-final stage of the 2010 World Cup. So, are some people here inferring that Germany would surely have triumphed on those occasions if only they had a different manager? Because that's the impression I'm receiving...

Therefore, I'll just ask the question outright: do some of our posters actually believe that Germany would win everything in sight by five-goal margins if only Low wasn't at the helm? Because to put it bluntly, such an attitude differs little from the Brazilian "we are the real champions" excuse-laden whining and fulfils all of the very worst stereotypes of arrogant German fans who steadfastly believe their players are always innately superior and - if only the team wasn't nefariously undermined by this or that - would effortlessly massacre all opposition with one hand tied behind their backs.

Another thing: many of our posters appear to believe that the sole reason Jerome Boateng, Mesut Ozil, and Sami Khedira are in the German team is because they are mysteriously favoured (or even loved...) by the "metrosexual" Low and that another manager wouldn't select them. Well, consider the following line of thought. Both Jupp Heynckes and Pep Guardiola have regularly picked Boateng for Bayern Munich so if he is a fixture in the dominant Bundesliga club and was a starter in the team which won the Champions League final two seasons ago (Bayern Munich started three blacks in that match and brought on a fourth in injury time) then it stands to reason that any Germany manager would definitely include him in the squad and seriously consider him as a first-choice, regardless of the existence of unofficial national team quotas. We mightn't like that but - let's face it - if Negroes or other non-Whites play in teams which consistently win at the highest level, they shall be picked again and again and again. That's why it's vitally important for the White or "Whitest" teams to deliver the goods, both at club and international level.

By the way, any ideas for Low's potential replacement? As far as I'm aware, Erich Ribbeck is still alive... :icon_wink:

First off, welcome back Rebajlo!!

I have posted this WC about not wanting Boateng in the starting XI, but that's a matter of opinion, as besides calling him slow, I (don't believe I have) haven't criticized his defending, as he has been pretty good so far. Khedira and Ozil, however, are another matter. Even German fans on the Bigsoccer website have about had it with Ozil starting and continously doing nothing. That "sexual feelings" comment I made a few pages back I'll admit was way off base, a knee-jerk reaction result of seeing those two (Ozil and Khedira) in the starting lineup yet again, despite them not really doing anything. I don't think Germany would win every match (nor do I expect them to..) if Loew was canned, but I'd say they'd look a bit better against a team like Algeria for instance. I've probably been a bit harsh on Loew as well because he steadfastly refuses to bench Ozil/Khedira, even if their performances aren't exactly up to par. Since this is a pro-white site, I don't always point the white players' bad performances out, but guys like Mario Goetze and Howedes (until the France game) have all struggled so far, with Goetze on the "level" of Ozil in that department.

It also doesn't help that the "diverse" teams tend to have most of the star power too. Ozil, for instance, can jog around the entire match not doing sh*t and losing the ball, but thanks to his skilled teammates like Schweinsteiger, Mueller, etc. he's on a winning squad. The same goes for the useless blacks on Holland. The blacks + Arabs on these teams are held up by the good white players on the teams, which unfortunately as you said, also works against us, in addition to for us. Even though the DWFs will notice the guys like Robben/Mueller score all the goals, they'll notice the useless guys like Martins Indi and think "he must've contributed as well!"

With the expanded Euro 2016 championships, hopefully we'll see some of these all-white countries you mentioned should have a golden oppurtunity in the Finals. I think this tournament will be huge for our cause. We're going to need the last all-white teams stepping up. Also, isn't Ireland an all-white team? I know they have had the odd black player or two, but I thought for the most part, they've had 23 white players.

As frederic said though, white players as a whole have had an awesome World Cup.

Also, we aren't the only ones that are criticizing Loew... I know the posters over at BigSoccer despise him waaaaay more than we do here.

 

[Thrashen]

I've only bothered to watch five matches in their entirety (Brazil v Croatia, Australia v Chile, England v Italy, Australia v Holland, England v Uruguay). My sole reason for wasting time watching the opening game was to confirm my predictions of Brazil receiving favourable treatment from the officials. Funnily enough, Brazil was gifted a penalty...

Speaking of "sportsmanship" how about Manuel Neuer deliberately knocking the ball from the grasp of an Algerian player who was trying to get it back for a quick, last-gasp restart following Algeria's goal? That's precisely the kind of repugnant behaviour one expects from "paragons" of fair play like Brazil or Uruguay. Perhaps You "failed" to notice Phillip Lahm cynically pulling Yacine Brahimi's shorts down? Matra2 has already posted a photo of this commendable exhibition of gentlemanly conduct, but here it is again (just in case You "missed it...):

I'm certainly no admirer of Joachim Low but blaming him alone (in addition to Germany's non-Whites, of course...) for a "lack of success" is absolute bollocks. Let's examine Low's "miserable record of failure": during his eight years in charge he has led Germany to the final of the 2008 European Championship, third place in the last World Cup, and the semi-finals of Euro 2012. Now, here's the really important bit: those three tournaments were all won by Spain, the most dominant team on the planet during Low's tenure and widely regarded as one of the finest sides of all time. Spain beat Germany in the Euro 2008 final and eliminated them at the semi-final stage of the 2010 World Cup. So, are some people here inferring that Germany would surely have triumphed on those occasions if only they had a different manager? Because that's the impression I'm receiving...

Therefore, I'll just ask the question outright: do some of our posters actually believe that Germany would win everything in sight by five-goal margins if only Low wasn't at the helm? Because to put it bluntly, such an attitude differs little from the Brazilian "we are the real champions" excuse-laden whining and fulfils all of the very worst stereotypes of arrogant German fans who steadfastly believe their players are always innately superior and - if only the team wasn't nefariously undermined by this or that - would effortlessly massacre all opposition with one hand tied behind their backs.

Another thing: many of our posters appear to believe that the sole reason Jerome Boateng, Mesut Ozil, and Sami Khedira are in the German team is because they are mysteriously favoured (or even loved...) by the "metrosexual" Low and that another manager wouldn't select them. Well, consider the following line of thought. Both Jupp Heynckes and Pep Guardiola have regularly picked Boateng for Bayern Munich so if he is a fixture in the dominant Bundesliga club and was a starter in the team which won the Champions League final two seasons ago (Bayern Munich started three blacks in that match and brought on a fourth in injury time) then it stands to reason that any Germany manager would definitely include him in the squad and seriously consider him as a first-choice, regardless of the existence of unofficial national team quotas. We mightn't like that but - let's face it - if Negroes or other non-Whites play in teams which consistently win at the highest level, they shall be picked again and again and again. That's why it's vitally important for the White or "Whitest" teams to deliver the goods, both at club and international level.

In the bolded portion above, you stated that you didn’t watch any of the contests involving Germany, yet you noticed Lahm’s foul and Neuer’s act of poor sportsmanship against Algeria? I suppose you were discussing “watching matches in their entirety,” so perhaps you merely caught the tail end where the two indiscretions occurred, I'm not sure.

I’m confused as to your comments regarding the “arrogant German fans” littering the two World Cup Finals threads created at Caste Football. Aside from the opening group game against Portugal (where they benefitted from a soft penalty kick awarded early and Portugal being a man down) and their bland, rain-soaked victory over the U.S., Germany have looked awful and everyone at CF has universally admitted that fact in countless posts critiquing their subpar play. The German/International media have rightly criticized the team with every waking breath, particularly after their rancid performances against Ghana and Algeria. I don’t see anyone “overrating” Germany or exhibiting delusions of “innate superiority,” as this squad clearly exudes some very major deficiencies...yet they’ve managed to survive a chaotic tournament with a chance to appear in the final match.

Aside from Hummels, Neuer, Müller, Schürrle, Klose, and Kroos (who hasn’t played well in the field, but has provided great services on set pieces and corners), Germany’s white players have been highly lackluster. Again, we’ve all confessed that it isn’t merely Ozil, Khedira, and Boateng that have been playing poorly…but surely these non-white dregs have been indolent (Ozil), careless (Khedira), or inconsequential (Boateng) when on the pitch.

Löw surely isn’t the greatest of national managers, particularly his decision to switch Lahm’s position, starting Mustafi as an attacking midfielder, and continually playing Ozil (despite his chaotic offensive play and slothful defending) ahead of Schürrle. Actually, it' s been mentioned several times that Löw’s 2014 installment of “Die Mannschaft” has been the “whitest” roster he’s ever selected at a major tournament. Truly disconcerting.

Despite the limited achievements of all-white squads at the WC, three of the four remaining teams are completely devoid of non-white “superstars.” Germany and the Netherlands might have 2-3 non-white starters (and the Netherlands has a half-black overall roster), but none is capable of scoring goals, with the possible exception of Ozil, who could nab another fortunate score. Argentina has a 3-4 starters with obvious Amerindian/Mestizo ancestry, which isn’t preferred, but at least Messi and Higuain score the goals...

Of course, I agree with everything you stated concerning the “all-white” (the precious few that remain) teams producing better results, both in qualifying and at the WC Finals. Those teams only have themselves to blame. With Croatia’s Negro (Sammir), Italy’s Negro (Balotelli), Russia’s Azerbaijani-Muslim (Samdov), and Greece’s Mestizo (Holebas), only Bosnia had an all-white roster. Of course, the debate as to whether or not they are “white like us” seems to be a nearly-universal “no.” I haven't spent any time around “white Muslims,” so I’ll have to take the good word my European brethren (such as yourself)...

 

[ThePhilosopher]

This World Cup (and - significantly - I'm not exclusively referring to the finals tournament...) has been an all-round disaster in terms of race, regardless of whichever nation will eventually win the trophy.

No,I think this World Cup has been bad atleast till the group stages,but if Argentina win,it would be excellent.It would then have been a great advert -

No wog would've as much as touched the WC trophy since 2002.

In this tournament:

Every black has been exposed this tournament,except Boateng....no other black has gone home with a good name.An there's still time for Boateng to establish his reputation.

Kompany,Lukaku,Origi,every black brazilian,Yaya Toure,Pogba,Matuidi,Varane,Sakho,Sturridge,Sterling,......have all have been exposed.

No colombian black,except for Cuadrado,maybe,is anything other than a figure of fun today.

No Asian team even qualified out of their group!


Even muslims Fellaini,Ozil and Khedira,Chadli,Benzema have flopped,big time.


Poor Brazilian blacks have failed miserably,plus no place to hide.

African teams have performed miserably.





Hell,this tournament has destroyed Balotelli's career.

Let's not beat about the proverbial bush: the European nations with all-White teams failed to deliver the goods again and allowed such heavily non-White sides to qualify for the finals and represent Europe on the world stage. The all-White teams like Poland, Ukraine, Serbia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Romania, and Hungary all finished behind sides full of Negroes and Muslims and therefore didn't do our "cause" any favours.

The team with the best Domestic leagues,are the best European teams.Jews,liberals,commies make sure that these leagues are filled with as many non-whites as it can take,and more.Next,they will make some wogs playing in those leagues to play for the country in which the league is located,irrespective of the fact that he is talentless and despite him having no connection whatsoever with said nation.Cacau plaing for Germany is the epitome of the above.


So for countries like Poland, Ukraine, Serbia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Romania, and Hungary to become footballing powers to be reckoned with,they would have to sustain respectable local leagues,which isn't feasible for most,for reasons which do not come under the scope of this post.In case,they did somehow establish a good,competitive league,it would lead to their 'blackening'.Refer to the paragraph above,for further details.

The less said about England, the better. It would be conveniently easy to lay the entire blame on the Negroes but - truth be told - every player "performed" abysmally (yet again...). Apart from his goal against Uruguay plus that one superlative pass to Daniel Sturridge for the equaliser against Italy, 300,000 quid per week Wayne Rooney did bugger all.

I think the blame completely lies at the feet of the Negroes.Even the DWFs blame the attack,not that their approval is anything significant.

If anything,before this tournament,England always had a settled,relatively solid defense and always atleast a good pair of box-to-box midfielders who would keep games tight.

Hodgson purposefully gave up control,creativity,believing the hype of his blacks,falling into the trap that 'pace' is everything,thinking that the negroes would score many.....he actually would've played Ox too,just for his pace,had he been fit.

Gary Cahill's full-nappies positional bungling gifted Balotelli the winner.

I think Candreva's cross for the goal was too good.

that woeful loser Roy Hodgson should be kicked into retirement (and a pulp...) post-haste.

I concur.

Welbeck is so abjectly useless that he even made a complete hash of his dive against Italy. Twenty six caps for England - what has the world come to..?

Well,he was indeed so bad that he deserves a special mention.
The world has come to this,than jews can get away with any-damn-thing.Anyways,I've seen worse 'English' players with more caps - Emile Heskey.

 

[ThePhilosopher]

I'm certainly no admirer of Joachim Low but blaming him alone (in addition to Germany's non-Whites, of course...) for a "lack of success" is absolute bollocks. Let's examine Low's "miserable record of failure": during his eight years in charge he has led Germany to the final of the 2008 European Championship, third place in the last World Cup, and the semi-finals of Euro 2012. Now, here's the really important bit: those three tournaments were all won by Spain, the most dominant team on the planet during Low's tenure and widely regarded as one of the finest sides of all time. Spain beat Germany in the Euro 2008 final and eliminated them at the semi-final stage of the 2010 World Cup.

Well,Spain beat Germany in Euro 2008 final to begin their journey towards becoming "one of the finest sides of all time".So Germany could've ended it right there,before it all began.That Spain team was completely different,and Torres was indeed their star man.Germany even then could've at least 'out-manouvered' them,if not 'out-played' them,I feel.Barcelona's mini 'Golden-age' was yet to begin.The point of stating is to remind the reader that atleast in the Euro 2008 final,the Spanish side weren't the all-conquering side they would later become.


I do not believe that Germany have a God-given right to win every time they turn up,but some perspective is needed.This is one of the traditional powerhouses of football.Not having won a trophy since 1996 is bad by all means,some cause of concern for a nation which is always blessed with great players,no matter which generation.

So, are some people here inferring that Germany would surely have triumphed on those occasions if only they had a different manager? Because that's the impression I'm receiving...

I don't get it,how many years without a trophy is okay for Loew?
Had Spain won this one too,would you still excuse Loew,for the poor fella couldn't have done any better against Mighty Spain?

Mourinho took on Barcelona's(who formed the core of Spain's squad) warship in its pomp....when they literally just had to turn up to win,and defeated it with his Canoe called Inter.

Okay,that was all 'negative' and 'anti-football'?


Juup Heynkes,last season,albeit with a warship of his own,spanked the Barca boys till they cried,quite literally.I've seen rag-dolls treated better by molesters.

Therefore, I'll just ask the question outright: do some of our posters actually believe that Germany would win everything in sight by five-goal margins if only Low wasn't at the helm?

No,Loew's dismissal wouldn't guarantee a thing,let alone 'five goal margins' everytime.But this man has had three attempts,in which he has failed.By how much and to whom does not matter.No one remebers the losers and any 'extenuating' circumstances that caused them to lose in the first place.

International coaches rarely stay at one place for one time....let alone one who hasn't won a damn thing,with a squad which is always atleast the third-best(and I'm being charitable here) in the competition they're taking part in!

Loew,has tried,tried again,and yet again...only to always fail.
So it would've made sense to have replaced him to see,you know,just in case,if the problem was with the coaching/management.


But now that Loew has made it so far,all talk of Loew now is of no consequence.He wins and stays....he loses,I think there is no way that he will not be fired.

 

[ThePhilosopher]

fernandinho not getting a yellow card for his fouls against chile and then against colombia has to be the biggest joke ever:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/wo...driguez-Brazil-Colombias-World-Cup-clash.html

[h=1]World Cup's dirtiest player?[/h]

19 fouls from five matches played, three more than the next closest player, makes Marouane Fellaini the leader in fouls conceded at the World Cup.

And he is yet to receive a yellow card this tournament.

 

[ThePhilosopher]

for germany, not winning a title for such a long time and considering a semi final or a final as a victory is not normal
something has changed in the way germany plays
i believe that with their big pool of players , germany should have won a competition amongst the ones you mentioned





and how about khedira, who almost hasn't played this year, and ozil, the biggest flop of the premier league?

Great point,you make:arms:.

Boateng as rightly pointed out by Rebaljo,is an ever-present in a pretty successful team so he will naturally be selected(that the formation is tinkered with to accommodate him is another thing).And to his credit,he hasn't *ucked up,yet.

Anti-white/Multi-kult agenda aside,there is/was no reason for Loew to start with those two you mention.

Oh,correction,Kheidra has played,in the CL final no less....but he was the worst player on the pitch,and the first to be taken off,rightly.

 

[Matra2]

Alfredo Di Stefano 1926-2014

One of the greatest of all time has died. It's a pity he didn't get to see the rest of the World Cup. I wonder what he thought about Messi.

http://www.marca.com/2014/07/07/en/football/real_madrid/1404747132.html

Here's a half hour documentary about his career:

[video=youtube;HyTfcoMPDXg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyTfcoMPDXg#t=4[/video]

 

[ENDSIEG]

Once again I hope against hope that the 'Third World 3' in the German team are dropped, injured or suspended for the final (If they get through of course!)

How many people would prefer Argentina to get through rather than Holland? Holland has a lot of Negroes on their subs' bench.

Argentina has no Negroes but a few Mestizo types.

Anyway, I'm looking forward to the match tonight, will miss the first half because I'm at my depressing jew-job...

 

[Thrashen]

I’m very concerned about Germany’s chances against Brazil today. Sure, the host nation hasn’t resembled the dominant sides of yesteryear, and will be without Neymar and Silva, but they always create chances and the crowd will be in a tizzy of national pride. Then again, Germany has been raucously “booed” by every crowd during every game in these WC Finals. Every time they possessed the ball against Algeria, for instance, there was an incessant, deafening “whistling” noise emitting from the crowd. They can expect far worse than that from the populace of “Mystery Meat Nation.”

One thing is certain…that Brazil will fight harder than France, who was sleep-walking through the final 20 minutes without the slightest sense of urgency to equalize. I’m envisioning a 2-0 Brazilian victory, but I hope I’m wrong.

Should Klose play today, let’s hope he can resurrect some of his trademark “magic” in the box and break his tie with the monstrously-unsightly Brazilian, Ronaldo, and reclaim sole ownership of the World Cup goal scoring record for the white race…

For the Netherlands-Argentina, I believe the Netherlands has had such good fortune at this tournament that I can’t see them losing.

 

[Matra2]

On BBC's Radio Five World Cup podcast there was a great quote from Alfredo Di Stefano from a book he wrote in 1961 about football. I'm paraphrasing here:

Although technique in Europe is improving they still don't pay enough attention to mastery of the ball, which in my opinion is the eternal key to efficient football. Europeans, and in particular the English, remain preoccupied with speed and the physical condition - vital elements, but by no means an end in themselves. The very mentioning of weight training as practiced in some European countries upsets me. Are we turning out machine tools or artists who achieve efficiency in the only way possible through mastery of the ball?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/5lfd

Not much has changed in 50 years.

 

[ThePhilosopher]

.... but they always create chances and the crowd will be in a tizzy of national pride.

Really,Thrashen?

Let us recap.....in their first game,Brazil scored three goals,two of which would've been saved by Vincent Enyeama,and that penalty.

In their second game,they don't score.

Cameroon doesn't count.

Against Chile,they scored from a corner,had to rely on penalties to advance.

Against Colombia,they scored first thanks to some negro muh-di**ing at the farpost.The second was a great freekick.Otherwise,not a chance in the whole game,from open play.


Die National Mannschaft haven't a thing to fear,except Ozil.

 

[Thrashen]

Really,Thrashen?

Let us recap.....in their first game,Brazil scored three goals,two of which would've been saved by Vincent Enyeama,and that penalty.

In their second game,they don't score.

Cameroon doesn't count.

Against Chile,they scored from a corner,had to rely on penalties to advance.

Against Colombia,they scored first thanks to some negro muh-di**ing at the farpost.The second was a great freekick.Otherwise,not a chance in the whole game,from open play.

Die National Mannschaft haven't a thing to fear,except Ozil.

That “second gameâ€￾ you’re referring to was against Mexico, where Brazil blasted shot after shot, header after header, at Ochoa. Against a lesser keeper, they might’ve scored 4-5 goals…

[video=youtube;TbMXy0G2mh0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbMXy0G2mh0[/video]

 

[ThePhilosopher]

That “second gameâ€￾ you’re referring to was against Mexico, where Brazil blasted shot after shot, header after header, at Ochoa. Against a lesser keeper, they might’ve scored 4-5 goals…

[video=youtube;TbMXy0G2mh0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbMXy0G2mh0[/video]

4-5 goals is pushing it a bit,but yes,they would've scored two atleast then,hadn't it been for Ochoa.

But still,you must remember that Mexico more than held their own against Brazil.Nobody begrudged Mexico for their point.