However, wouldn't you admit that - given today's (admittedly rather depressing) footballing landscape we had the best final we could? Would you have preferred Brazil-France? Plus the trouncing of every multiculturalist's (samba playing in the background) favourite team by an overwhelmingly White German team was a huge bonus! Sure, two all-white teams - say Grece-Russia or similar - would have been better, but the White players in these teams were just not up to snuff. From the beginning the possible candidates for the final were - Brazil, Argentina, Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, England(?). Maybe only Spain-Argentina would have been better...
Porthos -
As You may recall, I wrote the following:
Rebajlo said:
Sure, three of the final four teams were overwhelmingly White (if one avoided glancing towards the Dutch bench...) and things eventually turned out well, with an added bonus of Brazil copping a brace of embarrassing beatings to only finish fourth.
:icon_wink:
In my opinion, the "best" final would have been contested between Spain and Argentina. A Spanish victory would have yielded the immortal prestige of retaining the World Cup crown (on South American - specifically
Brazilian - soil to boot...) after winning two consecutive European Championships - with the added bonus of no Negroes or Muslims. Such an event would have cracked (or at least very seriously dented...) the "Brazil of the Pele era was the greatest of all time" legend. An Argentine victory would have provided Lionel Messi with that elusive World Cup winner's medal, the lack of which is always raised in comparisons with Maradona and that overrated ponce Pele. Mind You, I still view Maradona (complete with part-mestizo background) as superior to Messi. Of course, had Argentina lifted the trophy that priceless no Negro and no Muslim bonus would also have applied.
As things went, the reputation of the Spanish "golden team / generation" was catastrophically tarnished forever in the wake of a humiliating first-round elimination, compounded by that embarrassing 5-1 hiding at the hands of the Netherlands in their opening match. If I'm honest, the aforementioned wider implication of Spain's miserable failure ruined the entire tournament for me...
Truth be told, I never even remotely believed that England was a prospective candidate for the final. In fact, I was fairly sure that England would be unable to dig their way out of the first round (of course, I reasoned that they'd finish behind Italy and Uruguay, not
Costa Rica, Uruguay, and Italy...). Following the awfully uninspired play which characterised the defeat against Italy I was about 95% convinced that all was lost - which, taking into account the team's disgusting "blackness", was not a bad thing. If England had got past the first round I figured that all four of the potential opponents from Group C were "beatable" - although I reckon Colombia would have been far too much to handle for the lethargic, over-hyped and over-paid England players
of every colour. All in all, scraping into the quarterfinals aided by a lot of luck formed the absolute ceiling of England's, er, "potential".
Thrashen said:
Foobar75 has been an excellent, sincere, stalwart poster here for many years, so I’m certain that he is cognizant of your points concerning the unfortunate success and advancement of so many non-white squads at these World Cup Finals (and in qualifying). Naturally, we all find this to be highly disconcerting. However, now that the tournament has concluded, it does read as if you’re somewhat “unsatisfied” with the newly-crowned champions. You’re highlighting of past indiscretions of the German squad (some occurring many decades ago, prior to the birth of Germany’s current crop of players) does seem to be “out of place.”...
...None of us wanted Germany to feature two non-white starters (Boateng and Ozil) in the final match, but would you at least concede the fact that of the 16 teams that entered the “knockout stage,” the “whitest” team managed to win?
Thrashen -
foobar75 made his initial smug little comment about "looking forward to another anti-German diatribe from our friend Rebajlo" then followed it up with his accusation of "German bashing" plus this:
foobar75 said:
I find Rebajlo's overly gloomy assessment of this World Cup laughable. If one did not watch this WC and went strictly by his brilliant analysis, the only conclusion to be reached is that 4 African teams made the semis and Ghana were the eventual champions. Oh the horror, it was a negro-fest from start to finish.
My small handful of posts in this thread explained the reasoning underpinning my "assessment" in great detail. Correct? I'd say I outlined my views pretty clearly, don't You think? So why then, pray tell, did this "sincere" and "stalwart" fellow come up with the insultingly puerile drivel quoted above? The answer, of course, was that his posts were coloured by the great umbrage he took to my statements about the traditional German reputation for dirty play (which - incidentally - I'm not making up...).
Now, why did I even mention these past incidents? Was it part of a sinister anti-German agenda courtesy of the dumb, drooling, B-Grade "white" Polack? Or was it perhaps a response to the following statement of stunned incredulity from Fortitud3?
Fortitud3 said:
Holy **** the Algerians actually showed the same sportsmanship as Germany.
I'd say it was the latter, don't You think? Lahm's dakking of Brahimi and Neuer's deliberate time-wasting obstruction both occurred in that particular match so it was only natural to point it out to Fortitud3 - who would definitely have drawn attention to such things had they been perpetrated by Algerians.
Providing concrete, preferably little-known historical examples is essential to avoid looking like a Wikipedia artist or a bull**** dealer who pulls unsubstantiated speculations straight out of his arse (certain members should probably take note of this...). I've posted and discussed the video of that 1983 Albania-West Germany European Championship qualifier before. Such an example handily doubles up as an exhibition of knowledge which only an unmistakably genuine lifelong football fanatic would possess as it's not something any halfwit would be aware of via Wikipedia or a quick Google search. I intended to leave it at that (Fortitud3 certainly did...) but as foobar75 interpreted it all as an "anti-German diatribe" I unhesitatingly stuck in the video of Christian Worns cynically fouling Davor Suker in 1998 just to reinforce my point and simultaneously piss him off - which obviously succeeded.
By now I hope You and everyone else here have noticed that - despite my unashamedly ultra-hard-core racism - I staunchly believe in objectivity and consequently don't shy away from unleashing opinions which may prove less-than-popular in "pro-White" settings.
When I quoted myself at the beginning of this post the passage included the phrase "and things eventually turned out well" so I don't see what all of the fuss is about. I've explained the "big picture" reasons for why I would have preferred a win by either Spain or Argentina straight after that quote.
The German starting lineup in the final featured a Negro and a Turk (and also would have included an Arab had Khedira not knackered himself in the warm-up), while the Argentine starting lineup contained three mestizos (Marcos Rojo, Ezequiel Garay, Enzo Perez). Had the mestizo Angel di Maria not been injured in the quarterfinal against Belgium he would definitely have started instead of Perez.
You are an American of German background and have stated on numerous occasions that You feel 100% German therefore You naturally wanted Germany to win. No problem. I, on the other hand, had no proverbial dog in the fight, so - in addition to what I have already said about Messi - was hoping for an Argentine victory for the following reasons:
(a) mestizos don't constitute an imported racial element in Argentina but are an unfortunate consequence of historical miscegenation, whereas
(b) Negroes and various shades of Muslims
are an imported racial element in Germany, therefore
(c) a German victory would boost the stocks of "multiculturalism" in German and European football far more than an Argentine victory, and
(d) the ever-presence of the black Boateng throughout the campaign and in the final provided a Negro component in the winning team of the most watched sporting tournament in the world (forget the Olympics - the World Cup is the real premier event for genuine fans of a sport, in stark contrast to casual television viewers who tune in to a media carnival in order to gape at sports they generally don't comprehend and only fleetingly hear about every four years...)
Surely
that doesn't constitute a crime. If You, foobar75, or anyone else wish to believe anything different and choose to read all manner of pernicious sub-texts into my opinions, well, good luck to You. After all, some here have convinced themselves that I'm pro-Israel or possibly even a Jew.
Thrashen said:
I wanted to retch as I heard Philipp Lahm’s ultra-generic “anti-racism” speech prior to the Germany-France contest. Naturally, if the players refuse to read these scripted, Marxism-seasoned corporate manifestos, FIFA would simply suspend them.
It goes without saying that all manner of "sanctions" would befall any player refusing to participate in FIFA's brazen indoctrination rituals. However, these "heroes" all finish their playing careers as multi-millionaires who are financially set for a few lifetimes yet nobody ever has the balls to say anything about the overtly anti-White agendas in the sport once they have retired from playing and are not involved in management. I'm not just talking about football players either. How many White ex-NFL or ex-NBA players have ever publicly opened their mouths about anti-White discrimination in recruitment and the anti-White racism they routinely copped from Negro players?