the Warhawks (what exactly is a Warhawk, anyway?) are fun to watch on offense ... and on Friday night were the first team i have ever seen to actually implement a system i've been talking about for several years: utilizing two dual-threat quarterbacks in the backfield at the same time.
ULM only used it for a handful of plays, but when quarterbacks Kolton Browning and Cody Wells were on the field together, the offense was incredibly effective running the zone read, with both QBs a threat to either run or throw the ball after the hand-off or fake. it was VERY fun to watch. and Baylor was completely unable to stop it. so it begs the following questions: 1) why didn't ULM run it more often? and 2) why don't more teams do this?
/QUOTE]The problem that we have run into as a high school offense, not just using 2 guys capable of throwing, just zone read with the pass option is getting a penalty for having offensive lineman going too far down the field. It can get confusing because they block like a running play where it doesn't matter but there is still that pass option in there. One play we have is similar to the inverted veer , except the guy coming on the jet sweep has the option to pass down field. We usually run the sweep to the side where there is only one wideout, and he runs straight down the field. This helps stretch the defense vertically, as most of our plays just stretch them horizontally and rely on yac because none of our guys can accurately hit someone deep down the field that is close to the sideline, unless it is a rollout to that side but we don't do that being shotgun most of the time . Its a very complicated play for high school kids to get right, but when it does it works well. Since it is so complicated we don't run it often, well we run basically the same play quite a bit except without the pass option which usually confuses defenses if we had the pass option in there earlier, even if it was an incomplete pass. Id imagine college kids could get it down more but still would run into some problems occasionally.