green fire317 said:do whites have an advantage in short distances like the 60m? im not really a track guy. also do whites have an advantage at events like the 10m?
The 10m distance is not ever run, but we have splits. Because the 10m split is of a 60m/100m runner, they could be faster. But the 10m/60m splits of blacks are slightly faster than whites, and we all know about the 100m. This is at the very elite level though, like top 20 in the world, and even so there are still whites there. The record in the 60m is 6.39, and we are still top 20 ever with Morne Nagel's 6.48 60, and we do even better in the 50m. Even in the 100, watch out for Christophe Lemaitre. And by the time we get higher to the 200/400 distance we are very competitive at the elit level. Ramil Guliyev may get bronze in the 200 in two days.
Straight line speed goes to the small advantage of blacks, yet we perform better internationally (i.e. w/o caste system) in most athletic and fast twitch sports like soccer, tennis, and rugby.
In conclusion, the is no advantage to having darker skin (black or west African) except fot the 100m and shorter at the elite level, and even then we can be elite too. It is not uncommon for a white person to make the finals in any race besides 100m (top 8 in world), and it even happens in the 100.
There are more than enough fast white people, trust me. No race (between blacks and whites) is faster until the elite level, and even then we are close, and potentially could be closer.