Would you date outside your "race"?

[darthvader]

White savaga wrote:

1. Geographic isolation.

2. Xenophobia, a strong tendency, either instinctual or "cultural" against cross-breeding.

#1 is pretty much off the table for modern Whites.

That leaves option 2.


Geographic isolation can happen but two things have to happen. Complete all out race war or scorching this planet. Either way is inevitable. The survival of our race depends on it as far as I'm concerned. Exactly how does option 2 help? We're getting outbreeded and getting our asses kicked by our own people (THE rich and powerful). So pray that the system collapses soon and all hell breaks loose. Be happy when any nonwhite burns down the houses of all the rich who sold us out. You see I don't hate other races. I just hate having to live and coexist with them. But the fact that we all have to share the same land and breathe the same air makes them my enemies.&nbs p;

 

[Bart]

Until we develop a healty anger and visceral hatred for what has happened to us we willcontinuebeing victimized. Wish to God we would getrid of that "Can't we all just get along" nonsense."

 

[jaxvid]

Until we develop a healty anger and visceral hatred for what has happened to us we will continue being victimized.   Wish to God we would get rid of that  "Can't we all just get along" nonsense."   


 

Exactly!

 

[Riddlewire]

The original post is non-specific.
I feel a bit more qualification would've led to simpler answers. For instance, here's mine:

Date? Yes.
Mate? No.

 

[johnnyboy]

Johnny,
I'd say the actual survival of the White race is *slightly* more important than the number of White RBs in the NFL, even if it would be nice to see more of the latter.

Whites are not reproducing in replacement numbers in any nation on Earth. That means if this trend continues, more Whites are going to die every generation that are born. You know what this means right? A smaller pool of White athletes to draw on! (Also, eventually, the whole extinction thing ya know.) And White men reproducing with and raising non-White children doesn't help matters, no matter how nice the women or kids.

Which part of this is so hard to understand? It doesn't even have anything to do with with feeling towards other races. What, the genome of snail darters and other creatures is worth preserving, but not that of the White race?

1. i'd say there's a direct correlation between the "survival" of the white race (atleast here in america) and the number of white sports stars. think about it, nine out of ten times you see a hot white girl with a black guy on tv, what's the dude's profession??...exactly, he's usually some type of high paid athlete (balla). if we had a significant/appropriate number of white athletic superstars, we would in essence be destroying the myth of black physical superiority (we'd also strike a huge blow to that sexual mandingo bs mythology). and by doing so, we'd kill the allure that that race has for some white women. let's face it, they don't have much. if we take away the attention they get for being "superior" athletes there ain't a whole lot left to look at. we kill that myth and their desirability plummets.

2. as far as reproduction numbers, whats the difference now? was there ever a point in history when whites outbred all other nonwhite races combined? also, you talk about reproduction but do you take into account mortality rates?? every saturday morning i watch tv and see atleast one "save the children" commercial comes on, but i've never seen a white kid in them. the baby with the distended belly and the flies in his eyes is always black and or south american. they might breed more, but they sure as hell die more too.

oh and as far as the white athlete gene pool is concerned, the problem isn't the size of the gene pool. the problem is the clear and deliberate bias that exists against all white athletes that choose to compete with blacks in athletic arenas. if we get rid of that, then we have no problem.

3. none of what you're saying is too hard to understand, i just respectfully disagree with just about all of it.

 

[Bronk]

As a young man I dated a few mestizas but never ever considered marrying one. I could have dated a couple of black girls but opted not to.

As a high schooler I was attracted to a particular white girl. However after a couple of people told me she'd had a fling with a black classmate of ours, my interest waned. A close friend of mine in high school dated a very beatuiful and exotic looking girl who was half white and half black. We didn't see that much in my neck of the woods back then. She had white features and dark skin and everyone speculated on her nationality.

 

[White_Savage]

Apparently you do NOT understand...the infant mortality rate and the like does not much change anything, at best, it extends the shrinkage over a few more years.

If White women produce less than 2 children on average, the race shrinks. This is true whether their average life expectancy is 30 or 130. Note that 2 children on average represents 0 excess reproduction...in real terms, where some members of the population will die before reproducing or fail to reproduce for some other reason, this would also lead to shrinking populations.

Reproductive strategies can be broadly defined as "R" or "K", which roughly means the strategy of having as many offspring as possible (salmon for instance) vs. the strategy of having fewer offspring and investing more in them to make them more likely to reach reproductive age (most mammals). Environmental factors play a part-If you live in a climate where the pregnant mother is unlikely to survive the winter without paternal investment, then paternal investment will be selected for, even if his means making fewer offspring with fewer females. Some races (Whites) demonstrably lean more towards the K strategy, others (Blacks) provably lean more towards the R end of the spectrum, relative other humans.

Under normal conditions, the K strategy is at least equal to the R strategy. However, because of the White man's civilization, medicine, welfare, etc, the infant mortality rate has been greatly reduced among R strategists. Thus Whites have almost ensured their racial competitors will eventually out-breed and outnumber then through their own misplaced "charity".

2. as far as reproduction numbers, whats the difference now? was there ever a point in history when whites outbred all other nonwhite races combined? also, you talk about reproduction but do you take into account mortality rates?? every saturday morning i watch tv and see atleast one "save the children" commercial comes on, but i've never seen a white kid in them. the baby with the distended belly and the flies in his eyes is always black and or south american. they might breed more, but they sure as hell die more too......



3. none of what you're saying is too hard to understand, i just respectfully disagree with just about all of it.

Edited by: White_Savage

 

[Thrashen]

"let's face it, they don't have much. if we take away the attention they get for being "superior" athletes there ain't a whole lot left to look at. we kill that myth and their desirability plummets."


Well said, man

. The bottom line is....what young white woman, while growing up, would want to share her life with a "man" who cheats, has children out of wedlock, constantly leaves her, and never has a job because he's either too lazy or too uneducated?

They'll never learn. Unlike many of the posters here, I enjoy watched white women "learn the hard way." Any real woman would need a real man.Edited by: Thrashen

 

[Ground Fighter]

Raquel Welch circa 1975 and Jessica Alba are two mestizos that are damn fine.....

(I consider them white but they have traces of Amerindian blood).

Most people don't know this, but Catherine Bach (the original "Daisy Duke" from Dukes of Hazzard) is half Mexican.

 

[Ground Fighter]

Awesome response Quiet Speed!

 

Lucy Pinder is a good example of why I never understood it when people said British women are unattractive.

Another really smokin hot British woman is Louise Glover. Google up some pics, you'll see what I mean.

 

[Ground Fighter]

went with several ladies from Puerta Rica.

Yeah, I made my fair share of latina "mistakes" when I was a younger as well. Some of the Whiter looking ones are pretty hot, but uh, to put it nicely, they're not exactly a "challenge" when it came to making "boom-boom". lol.

Sometimes, I swear hispanic women are just genetically predisposed to being slutty.

 

[johnnyboy]

Apparently you do NOT understand...the infant mortality rate and the like does not much change anything, at best, it extends the shrinkage over a few more years.

If White women produce less than 2 children on average, the race shrinks. This is true whether their average life expectancy is 30 or 130. Note that 2 children on average represents 0 excess reproduction...in real terms, where some members of the population will die before reproducing or fail to reproduce for some other reason, this would also lead to shrinking populations.

Reproductive strategies can be broadly defined as "R" or "K", which roughly means the strategy of having as many offspring as possible (salmon for instance) vs. the strategy of having fewer offspring and investing more in them to make them more likely to reach reproductive age (most mammals). Environmental factors play a part-If you live in a climate where the pregnant mother is unlikely to survive the winter without paternal investment, then paternal investment will be selected for, even if his means making fewer offspring with fewer females. Some races (Whites) demonstrably lean more towards the K strategy, others (Blacks) provably lean more towards the R end of the spectrum, relative other humans.

Under normal conditions, the K strategy is at least equal to the R strategy. However, because of the White man's civilization, medicine, welfare, etc, the infant mortality rate has been greatly reduced among R strategists. Thus Whites have almost ensured their racial competitors will eventually out-breed and outnumber then through their own misplaced "charity".

you ignored my comment on white athletes and their effects on the black athlete "mystique."

i get your argument about reproductive strategies. it makes sense....if you're a salmon farmer. but as much as i love salmon, i have to disagree with the way you're applying your argument to my initial point.

i get that you want whites to only marry (and procreate) with "full blooded" whites, because this would ensure greater numbers of new white babies. and i get that blacks and their penchance for having multiple "babies mamas" have a clear reproductive advantage over whites and the nuclear family. that's a good point. it's also a pretty obvious one. no one can deny your strategy is solid and no one can deny the reproductive edge, but we also have to look at the undeniabilty of the fact that we are not salmon...nor black...nor have a hive mentality.

there's a lot of whites in america, and its ridiculous to think that we can get all of them to agree to never fall in love with a person of a different race. how many white males (or any males), in america, would hold a woman's race against her if she looked like Zhang Ziyi or Thandie Newton or Eva Longoria or Aishwarya Rai or Kim Kardashian AND she had all the metaphysical properties that said males looked for in a potential mate?????. i would say less than 10% and within that ten percent is probably a gay guy or two, so even that number might be high. its also very unrealistic to think we're going to get whites to reproduce on par with the avg. deadbeat black dad who has 10 kids and no job. the vast majority of whites are not irresponsible enough to give life to children they can't afford to take care of. a fact i'm kinda proud of. there is a sacred honor in the traditional white belief that its a father's duty to be able to provide for his wife, his daughters and his sons.

my point was that if we take back the "sports star" crown from the black population, we will be greatly reducing the chance of white women and future generations of white women going black. as i said before, if you take away that mythical superiority that the media gives blacks, then they are indeed left with very little to offer white women...although there's still the "hip hop" thing but whites are even making inroads into that industry, so the future is bright in that regard.

i ask again, all reproductive strategies aside, was there ever a time in written human history when whites outbred the sum total of all other minorities?? because when you talk about it wou make it seem like its some sort of big surprise that whites can't out breed all other races.

idk, i think maybe we are looking at the same thing two completely different ways. we might just have to agree to disagree.

cheers.Edited by: johnnyboy

 

[Fightingtowin]

would anyone here date a black (half)girl?



i dated a black girl in college, and while i never had the question of kids come up, i can say i really enjoyed dating her. 3 reasons why.



1- she was cute. every race has some cute girls.



2- we had the same sense of humor. she was a big Nick Swardson & Mitch Hedberg fan.



3- she wasn't the "typical" ghetto black girl. she didn't speak in Ebonics, she didn't use her race as a handicap, she wasn't loud, heck, she didn't even like hip hop.





does anyone else have a story about a moment where you were tempted to take a chance on a black girl? do you guys think that maybe culture or educational background plays a part in any way?



cheers guy.

Pretty much the same for me. Dated a black girl in college who was a 4.0 student from a rich family, (mother was a chemist and dad an attorney). Very cute, as far from ghetto as you can get. Also dated an Iranian girl in college. Had no idea she was Arab (edit: Persian) until the 3rd time I hung out with her. She could have told me she was Armenian, Greek or whatever and I would have had no idea. She acted like a typical college girl. Partied Thursday-Saturday, went to football and b-ball games. Funny thing, I never even asked her if she was Muslim. Back then I cared about two things. Were they hot? Were they fun? Could care less about politics, religion, where they were from, what their major was, etc. Pretty shallow, but those were the days.

Edited by: Fightingtowin

 

[Electric Slide]

Back then I cared about two things.  Were they hot?  Were they fun? 

Haha those are still my top two priorities. But in terms of getting more heavily involved in a relationship, that still might not be enough for me, but it sure counts for a lot!

 

[Europe]

[


immigration should be zero. That will help protect the white race.If countries like Italy are looking for people to move there, they should only allow people with Italian ancestry to move there, not Africans.  I would consider moving there. I am getting sikcer and sicker of this country that is being ruined by corporations with their outsourcing and support of immigration.The corporations  and "right' are forcing diversity ,not only the "left:" Of course the rich can isolate themselves from the rabble and leave us to live in a diverse country. The US gov't  is stabbing the white man in the back-both parties. I work at a very large corporation that is big on diversity. They only use  the US for subsidies and contracts. We are currently training our Indian replacements like so many other people.


Of course Europe has to be more diverse now too.Europe will not be European soon. Here is a soccer player that considers himself 100% italian.


[url]http://www.inter.it/aas/squadra/player1?codgioc=G0823&L= en&stagione=2008/09[/url]


I am getting fed up with black people takling over sports.


 Edited by: Europe

 

[White_Savage]

there's a lot of whites in america, and its ridiculous to think that we can get all of them to agree to never fall in love with a person of a different race.

That is unnecessary. Inter-racial interludes have always happened, but don't you think they happened a *BIT* less when people had been taught that it was not proper and it was socially frowned upon? As opposed to our present anti-racist stance which is every bit as dogmatic as radical Islam?

You act as if "falling in love" is something that frequently happens (outside of storybooks) when two people walk by each other or the like. In fact, if children are taught that X is wrong, most will listen. And if you aren't (forcibly) associating with the Other, even less likely.

i ask again, all reproductive strategies aside, was there ever a time in written human history when whites outbred the sum total of all other minorities?? because when you talk about it wou make it seem like its some sort of big surprise that whites can't out breed all other races.

In point of fact, from the end of the Black Death to the 20th century the White population grew at a faster rate than any other racial population. One of the major reasons we drove the Indians into extinction is that, through a combination of genetic tendency, disease, and their primitive living conditions, they simply couldn't breed at the same rate we did.

You misunderstood what I was saying about the K reproductive strategy (in humans). Perhaps I was unclear. It does not necessarily imply small families or even monogamy (Although the latter has always more or less been the trend in Nordic societies.) It implies resource investment in paternal support, as opposed fathering of casual bastards. Edited by: White_Savage

 

[Jimmy Chitwood]

i can't believe the answer to this question is even in doubt.

sure, one can eventually find an attractive woman from any race. (of course, most of them have a white momma, but that is beside the point.

) i've also seen a polar bear ride a uni-cycle, but that doesn't mean that polar bears are gonna be joining up with the Hell's Angels.

white women are the most beautiful women on the planet, and being with one is the innermost desire of most every man on the planet. else why do you see blacks, mexicans, asians, everyone else wanting to get one? you don't see negroes and mexicans lining up to take a black chick home to mom do you? nope. at best, they'll settle for sticking their weiners in one if an ugly white woman won't take 'em.

white men should be with white women. it's as simple as that. and as for white women's attitudes being part of the problem, that is true. but so are white men's attitudes.

if white men took care of business in the way our forefathers did, this would be a non-issue. too many white men have become pussies and want to be "friends" with multi-cultural "people.".

 

[johnnyboy]

there's a lot of whites in america, and its ridiculous to think that we can get all of them to agree to never fall in love with a person of a different race.

That is unnecessary. Inter-racial interludes have always happened, but don't you think they happened a *BIT* less when people had been taught that it was not proper and it was socially frowned upon? As opposed to our present anti-racist stance which is every bit as dogmatic as radical Islam?

You act as if "falling in love" is something that frequently happens (outside of storybooks) when two people walk by each other or the like. In fact, if children are taught that X is wrong, most will listen. And if you aren't (forcibly) associating with the Other, even less likely.

i ask again, all reproductive strategies aside, was there ever a time in written human history when whites outbred the sum total of all other minorities?? because when you talk about it wou make it seem like its some sort of big surprise that whites can't out breed all other races.

In point of fact, from the end of the Black Death to the 20th century the White population grew at a faster rate than any other racial population. One of the major reasons we drove the Indians into extinction is that, through a combination of genetic tendency, disease, and their primitive living conditions, they simply couldn't breed at the same rate we did.

You misunderstood what I was saying about the K reproductive strategy (in humans). Perhaps I was unclear. It does not necessarily imply small families or even monogamy (Although the latter has always more or less been the trend in Nordic societies.) It implies resource investment in paternal support, as opposed fathering of casual bastards.

i'm not going to sit here and tell you your're wrong. i see the points you're making. but again, i think we're looking at it through different colored glasses.

i tend to lean more to a pragmatic approach. i just don't think you can institutionalize a national negative stigma on "inter-racial interludes." i don't think thats possible at all in our current America. take a look at our next commander in chief. and then take into account the fact he was voted there by americans. now, having said that, i do thnk having more white athlete icons will help take away some of the power and influence given to blacks by the mandingo myth.

as far as "falling in love." yeah i know it doesn't always happen "when people walk by each other," but usually that's how it begins. she walks by, you get that feeling in your gut. you steal a glance or two, before finally getting the courage to go up to her. well, it can start an infinite number of ways to be truthful. but having been in love before i can honestly tell you it wasn;t something i ever planned out or deliberated on. and believe me, her racial make-up or the genetic composition of her parents, were the last things on my mind.

as far as Black Death and the Indian genocide. i don't have the data and maybe its true that whites outbred any other race, but to me it still doesn't change the fact that whites will never be able to outbreed all other minorities combined. so, in response to your original post, i'm not that worried about say, the rise in population of africa. i am however worried about the lack of white athletes in some of the biggest sports in america ie Basketball, and Football. i am very afraid of the negative impact that will have on future generations of ALL americans, not just whites. whats going to happen when the last american forgets that whites once dominated the hardwood and the field and the diamond and the ring?? oh and as far as the Indians are concerned. if you're going to have their downfall as part of the argument, you've got to mention the fact that we starved and shot a lot of them. nothing brings the birth rate down quite as quickly as a bullet to the head.

as far as the K strategy, i understand completely what you were saying. but you're overlooking the fact that the limiting variable is the resource investment the parents are WILLIING to make in their children. i know whites can have as many babies as "ghetto" blacks or "african" blacks. but they're limited by the resources they allocate to "paternal support." in other words, white parents are on average, less likely to be ok with producing "casual bastards" because it means giving their children less paternal support. this is something i, for one, hope doesn't change.

cheers and Merry ChristmasEdited by: johnnyboy

 

[DixieDestroyer]

immigration should be zero. That will help protect the white race.If countries like Italy are looking for people to move there, they should only allow people with Italian ancestry to move there, not Africans.  I would consider moving there. I am getting sikcer and sicker of this country that is being ruined by corporations with their outsourcing and support of immigration.The corporations  and "right' are forcing diversity ,not only the "left:" Of course the rich can isolate themselves from the rabble and leave us to live in a diverse country. The US gov't  is stabbing the white man in the back-both parties. I work at a very large corporation that is big on diversity. They only use  the US for subsidies and contracts. We are currently training our Indian replacements like so many other people.


Of course Europe has to be more diverse now too.Europe will not be European soon. I]


 

Good stuff! It's indeed all by design. The Globalist Elite & their NWO allies have long sought the disablement of the great White race. To accomplish this, they use multiple lines of offense on various levels. Even "American" (based) companies have NO allegiance to American workers, and instead bring in a steady stream of 3rd rate H-1B visa workers (with their arrogant sense of entitlement). In terms of socialist Marxist, the inundation of a rising police state & erosion of National sovereignty, Europe is 10x worse than the U.S.

To add insult to (outsourcing/insourcing) injury, these traitorous Corporations (controlled by the same NWO ma$ters) embrace a cultural Marxist HR agenda (mostly for PR/window dressing). I worked for Fortune 10 Corporate for 13 years, & they constantly shoved "diversity"/"multi-culturalism" down our throats. It was so sanctimonious, it was sickening! Unfortunately, this is becoming par for the course with these Globalist Elite controlled Corporations...as they sellout our Constitutional Republic, traditional values & the great, superior White man!

Edited by: DixieDestroyer

 

[johnnyboy]

white men should be with white women. it's as simple as that. and as for white women's attitudes being part of the problem, that is true. but so are white men's attitudes.

if white men took care of business in the way our forefathers did, this would be a non-issue. too many white men have become pussies and want to be "friends" with multi-cultural "people.".

i'm curious, would you ever be friends with a person whom was half black and half white?

what does "(take) care of business" mean?

 

[johnnyboy]

Of course Europe has to be more diverse now too.Europe will not be European soon. Here is a soccer player that considers himself 100% italian.


[url]http://www.inter.it/aas/squadra/player1?codgioc=G0823&L= en&stagione=2008/09[/url]


I am getting fed up with black people takling over sports.


 

ok, you hate Mario because he's a black guy who's born in Palermo AND he considers himself 100% italian.

would you hate him more if Mario were a black guy who was born in Palermo and considered himself 100% african/black??

i live in Los Angeles and i wish the blacks here would consider themselves 100% American before they considered themselves black. maybe then they would give a sh*t about their communities.

 

[DixieDestroyer]

I won't speak for ol' Jimmy, but I don't consort with untermenschen (including mongrels, half-breeds, etc.). It's not that I "hate" them, but rather I prefer the company of my own kind. By this, I don't just mean Whites, but those of the same paleoconservative & WN beleifs that I embrace (as do most of the faithful CF'ers here). I don't care for the company of pinko, bed-wetters, race-traitors & other such vermin. It's my preference and doesn't equate to "hate" (as the cultural Marxist always try to claim...unless it's "Black History Month", the NAACP, BET, etc...then it's fine).

 

[Jimmy Chitwood]

i'm curious, would you ever be friends with a person whom was half black and half white?

what does "(take) care of business" mean?

when i entered college, i decided i knew better than my dad. i figured "we are all the same except for looking different." i became "friends" with several black guys, mainly because i was a tremendous basketball player and we all spent a lot of time running the courts. i won't bore you with all the details, but becoming "friends" with those dudes was a tremendous mistake. it is just one of many i made by not listening to my dad.

within a couple of years, i realized my mistake. i returned to the notion that being a proud white man is the way to go, and after a few "altercations" the respect i got from blacks increased, and believe it or not more white people gravitated toward me in the basketball gyms to play. it's like they felt comfortable knowing that a white guy was around who wouldn't put up with the ghetto bullcrap. everyone knew where i stood on racial issues, because i am very outspoken and assertive, both in how i play and in my daily outlook (for good or ill

). for one example, there was a black dude who was dating this polynesian chick i was friends/had numerous classes/studied and worked on a lot of projects with. when i went over to her place to work/study, he was always there, and he knew i was pro-white all the way. he understood it, was comfortable with it, and knew where the line was that he couldn't cross with me.

once i accepted who i was and what i should be as a person (a proud white young man) there were no more false friendships, which was fine on all sides, but there was a change in how i was treated by the blacks. not to sound egotistical, but the blacks deferred to me. they recognized that i wasn't someone who they could f@ck with, and i didn't have nearly as many problems with even the "hard" hoods that most of the white dudes did. i hope that doesn't sound arrogant.

as for being "friends" with a mulatto, the half-black person would certainly have to earn my friendship. while i'm not outright hostile to black folks, and i treat them respectfully in a professional/business setting, it is far different to be "friendly towards" someone than to be "friends with" someone. as it is, i am quite comfortable with the fact that i don't have any black "friends" that i would invite inside my home. make of that what you will.

as far as what "taking care of business" means, it is pretty simple. a white man is supposed to do the right thing, no matter how hard it is. he is supposed to be strong, make no excuses for himself when he makes a mistake, and not back down from anyone when he is in the right (or believes he is). our forefathers were all those things, and the cultural principles of strength, honor, right and wrong, and so forth, led white men to be the most dominant group of people on this planet. women of all races looked to white men as a symbol of strength and pride, and probably the epitome of good looks, as well. abandoning those tenets has done nothing positive for white men or white society, but rather it has created many of the problems we are dealing with today.

this is just my two cents, but it seems to work for me in my personal life.

 

[Bart]

ok, you hate Mario because he's a black guy who's born in Palermo AND he considers himself 100% italian.

i live in Los Angeles and i wish the blacks here would consider themselves 100% American before they considered themselves black. maybe then they would give a sh*t about their communities.

Mario is a Negro living in Italy. He is not Italian by ethnicity.If he lived in Japan would he be Japanese? Only multicultturalist spin meisters believe that nonsense. If the blacks of LA considered themselves Americans, Watusis, or Irishmen, wouldit really matter in the long run? Race trumps everything.

 

[Westside]

I have being reading the preceeding posts. And to make a point clear is this: If any of you date outside of your race(white), there is always the potential that you will fall in love with this non white person and marry or at least have children with this being. The offspring will be part black or some other less desired race. The fact is that they will not be WHITE! You will only aid in the demise of the white race. With all of the out side forces conspiring to erase us, you, those who would contimplate a relationship with a non white is just outright aiding in our extinction.

There is a reason why negros, flips, arabs would drown their own mothers for a white woman, it makes a statement. They wake up every morning and see themselves in the mirror. Most don't like what they see, so the next option is have or marry a good looking white woman. They know the offspring won't be white but that thought is almost non existent. What drives them is have a white babe on their arms to make them feel better about themselves and the rest of the world to know it!

Ever wonder why black successful professionals or pro athelets perfer white women over their own? It is for the reason I explained. Deep down they can't stand themselves and lash back at white men and say. " look, you whippy ass whites, I am fornicating with your woman, and there is nothing your punkass is going to do about it." At this point I'll weave in Chitwood's statement about white men "not taking care of business". A large minority of white men have been emasculated, and cower when confronted by a minortiy. They perfer to run to save their hides rather that stand up and fight, with the possiblity of getting hurt/injuried. For some weird reason, alot of whites lost courage. In another posts, someone said white men got too comfortable. I think it was Don who utter this fact. Being comfortable made whites and their sons weak. Alot of White men forget it is better to stand and fight rather than run and call for help, even if you lose or get a ass whipping. This happeans all too often.

White women who date or marry blacks do it out of curiousity or are drawn to black confident men. Sadly, or justifiably they learn the hard way why negros are so dysfunctional for the most part and left to be single mothers with muliple mongrel(black) children, hoping the next negro is not like the first.

I see it all the time and laugh at these traitors.

These white women are in the league of the White NFL owners, GMs and Headcoaches. Hitler once said said when the end was certain for the Third Reich, " Germany doesn't deserve to go on, She was weak and should be destroyed." Sadly, I think sometimes the White Race will gladly aid in its demise and doesn't deserve to go on. If that point ever comes, I will have long died and looked down from heaven at a once glorious group of people.

Regarding blacks as friends, some are cool, but my policy is always keep them at a distance.