Jimmy Chitwood
Hall of Famer
there are a quartet of white running backs in this year's draft class who've managed to shine despite the barriers the Caste System has placed in their way. however, their struggles are certainly not over. this thread is to keep an eye on these backs (and any others i'm unaware of) in this year's Draft.
for the first post i'll comment on Danny Woodhead, since "for some reason" he wasn't invited to the NFL Combine despite being the all-time rushing leader in NCAA history and possessing blazing speed.
as this video demonstrates, the alleged reason behind Woodhead's shunning from the "real" football world is his lack of size. he's listed anywhere from 5-7 to 5-9 and from 195-pounds to 205-pounds. so, since these physical measurements are so "obviously" lacking that he's not even considered a legitimate NFL running back candidate, i thought i'd compare his size with that of several of the "real" talents who were invited to the Combine.
so, keep this in mind: Danny Woodhead; Chadron State: about 5-8, 195 pounds.
now, here's the measurables of some "vastly superior" athletes who possess "legitimate" size so much more impressive that it is "obviously" more suited for success at the next level (these measurements are provided by NFL.com's own Combine listings)...
Thomas Brown; Georgia: 5-9, 198 pounds.
Justin Forsett; California: 5-8, 190 pounds.
Mike Hart; Michigan: 5-9, 195 pounds.
Chris Johnson; East Carolina: 5-11, 195 pounds.
Rafael Little; Kentucky: 5-9, 194 pounds.
Ray Rice; Rutgers: 5-9, 195 pounds.
Dantrell Savage; Oklahoma State: 5-8, 187 pounds. that's not a typo!
Steve Slaton; West Virginia: 5-10, 195 pounds.
please take note of how many are virtually identical in size to the "diminutive" Woodhead...
then there are a few who are only marginally larger than him...
Jamaal Charles; Texas: 6-1, 200 pounds.
Felix Jones; Arkansas: 6-0, 200 pounds. those numbers may be "official," but i can tell you that he is NOT that tall or heavy.
Kalvin McRae; Ohio: 5-9, 208 pounds.
so, the evidence is readily apparent and completely obvious.
the argument that Woodhead is far too small, first to get recruited to Division I, and now to be a "real" NFL tailback is complete nonsense.
i'm sure more dis-information will surface regarding what Woodhead (and Hester, Hillis, and Schmitt) has to overcome. and this thread is the place to refute it.
for the first post i'll comment on Danny Woodhead, since "for some reason" he wasn't invited to the NFL Combine despite being the all-time rushing leader in NCAA history and possessing blazing speed.
as this video demonstrates, the alleged reason behind Woodhead's shunning from the "real" football world is his lack of size. he's listed anywhere from 5-7 to 5-9 and from 195-pounds to 205-pounds. so, since these physical measurements are so "obviously" lacking that he's not even considered a legitimate NFL running back candidate, i thought i'd compare his size with that of several of the "real" talents who were invited to the Combine.
so, keep this in mind: Danny Woodhead; Chadron State: about 5-8, 195 pounds.
now, here's the measurables of some "vastly superior" athletes who possess "legitimate" size so much more impressive that it is "obviously" more suited for success at the next level (these measurements are provided by NFL.com's own Combine listings)...
Thomas Brown; Georgia: 5-9, 198 pounds.
Justin Forsett; California: 5-8, 190 pounds.
Mike Hart; Michigan: 5-9, 195 pounds.
Chris Johnson; East Carolina: 5-11, 195 pounds.
Rafael Little; Kentucky: 5-9, 194 pounds.
Ray Rice; Rutgers: 5-9, 195 pounds.
Dantrell Savage; Oklahoma State: 5-8, 187 pounds. that's not a typo!
Steve Slaton; West Virginia: 5-10, 195 pounds.
please take note of how many are virtually identical in size to the "diminutive" Woodhead...
then there are a few who are only marginally larger than him...
Jamaal Charles; Texas: 6-1, 200 pounds.
Felix Jones; Arkansas: 6-0, 200 pounds. those numbers may be "official," but i can tell you that he is NOT that tall or heavy.
Kalvin McRae; Ohio: 5-9, 208 pounds.
so, the evidence is readily apparent and completely obvious.
the argument that Woodhead is far too small, first to get recruited to Division I, and now to be a "real" NFL tailback is complete nonsense.
i'm sure more dis-information will surface regarding what Woodhead (and Hester, Hillis, and Schmitt) has to overcome. and this thread is the place to refute it.