UFC 71

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
ABILTY and CHARARCTERISTIC "segregation" is just symantics. If blacks are not wanted in some endevour then they have no "right" to be allowed in, who cares what their "ability" is? Sports is entertainment not some activity ordained by the Gods to only select the "best" (however that is determined), people own and run and watch the games, if they don't want a group in it is their right, they should not be forced to decide otherwise by those who think they know better.

And anyway if you really believed in ABILITY segregation then you would support white women for the Miss Black America pageant because to most people they would be considered "better" looking or at least worthy of a chance, but you acknowledge that it is OK to ABILTY segregate in that case but not when it is whites doing it. So you are a hypocrite as well as an anti-white troll.

You also wrote:
In so many cases, financial, educational, in the criminal justice system, your (our?) white skin is a BONUS. Something that makes it easier to get that loan, avoid that ticket or prison time, and live in a better neighborhood with better schools. Open your eyes or read a book, life will confirm this much.

If that is true then I say HURRAH! White people who administer those things should favor their blood kin over another race of people, it's what every other people in the world do because it is the RIGHT thing to do from a genetic/survival perspective. What kind of an ass would want to grant equal treatment to a people that have behaved as black people have for centuries? I don't get it? Why would you, a white man (if you are in fact white) want to put other people ahead of your own? What is the end result for a people that favor other people over their own? Please tell me what that end result is, you seem like a smart man, what is the end result of one race putting another race over it's own?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Actually what we have today is characteristic discrimination against

whites.



Of course. Team owners would GLADLY trade billions in revenue and
alienate white fans that a marquee white player brings in...all to be
politically correct? Sports is like alot in America.
Capitalist. And with the high expectations by it's shareholders
and especially it's fanbase, a professional sports team has even less
tolerance for crap like that than most corporate entities.



Have any real data, or just anecdotes and liberal propaganda?



Facts have a NOTORIOUS liberal bias.


The Redskins were always competitive as an all white team. The

most talented blacks were always allowed to play for other teams,

and the Redskins would often beat the integrated teams.



Not often enough. Between 1946 and 1968, while the rest of the
NFL was integrating much faster, the Redskins had only 3 winning
seasons.


Joe 6pack: You should apply to ESPN for a job as a sportscaster.

They are looking for people JUST like you.



Good-looking with a jaw of granite, eyes of fire, and a heart of gold (and I don't mean Asian either)?
 

PitBull

Guru
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
448
Whites have no legal advantages. Just genetic and character ones which
leads to success rather than failure. Blacks are underrepresented in the
criminal justice system in relation to the number of crimes they really
commit.

Integration had to be forced by the government because almost all white
people never wanted it. Why? Because there is no advantage to it for us.
Its also illegal. Thanks for making my point by acknowledging it was
forced. Its easy to argue when the people you're arguing against prove all
your points.

By corporate entities putting up with crap, that means blacks like you, eh?
Thought so.

Are you sure its not a head of granite, gold teeth, and a lit blunt? Pull
your pants up too. Hey, if you don't have any hair on your head, where
do you stash your comb?
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
LOL at anybody who thinks whites aren't discriminated against in this country. Blacks and Hispanics don't have to score as high on admissions exams, supervisory exams, they get preferential treatment in hiring and promotions, they are almost always shown in a favorable light in television and movies, they cannot be criticized in public, they receive special victim status when they are the victim of an interracial crime (which is far, far less than whites,) and the federal government even goes so far as to separate Hispanics into two separate categories for victims and perpetrators, which has the effect of making whites commit more crimes than they actually do. Their culture is promoted at every turn in the media while traditional white culture is denigrated, I mean I don't know what else you need to show discrimination. It's as plain as day.
 

Bart

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
4,329
JoeSixpack said:
Of course. Team owners would GLADLY trade billions in revenue and alienate white fans that a marquee white player brings in...all to be politically correct? Sports is like alot in America. Capitalist. And with the high expectations by it's shareholders and especially it's fanbase, a professional sports team has even less tolerance for crap like that than most corporate entities.


Could you explain why the highly succesfull NASCAR is doing it's best to alienate it's fan base of whites ( mostly Souhern ), by discouraging the display of Confederate flags, funding programs for the development of black drivers and car owners, and show more and more commercials featuring blacks??
 

JD074

Master
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
2,301
Location
Kentucky
JoeSixpack said:
That's EXACTLY what I'm saying. Keeping blacks out because you
are intimidated by their skills is not the same as keeping whites out
because they don't have skills. Many whites that is, not all.


Would I get banned for saying that?

Well, I'm not a moderator, but I sure hope so! This site is for us, not you. We get banned on other sports sites. Eye for an eye.

I don't think I've been
discreet in saying that, on average, blacks are better athletes than
whites. Because that's what I believe and that's what history has
shown...

Then it's time for you to go.
 

JD074

Master
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
2,301
Location
Kentucky
JoeSixpack said:
Of course. Team owners would GLADLY trade billions in revenue and
alienate white fans that a marquee white player brings in...all to be
politically correct?

Ah, classic troll mistake. Here's how it works: coaches, GM's, and owners are just like you. They think that white athletes are inferior. Because of that belief, they assume that no white man can be a running back or cornerback, and very few can play wide receiver. Therefore, they don't want to "alienate white fans" by putting a supposedly inferior product on the field. Get it? They don't give white players equal opportunity regardless of how good they really are, and regardless of how popular they would be with white fans, because they assume that they're never good enough.

And let's be clear on one other thing: white fans wouldn't necessarily prefer a white RB or CB. Maybe after a while the white man would grow on them, but at first they would be extremely skeptical- even angry- towards him.

Sports is like alot in America.
Capitalist.

Sports is a lot like America. Stupid.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
JD074 said:
JoeSixpack said:
Of course. Team owners would GLADLY trade billions in revenue and
alienate white fans that a marquee white player brings in...all to be
politically correct?

Ah, classic troll mistake. Here's how it works: coaches, GM's, and owners are just like you. They think that white athletes are inferior. Because of that belief, they assume that no white man can be a running back or cornerback, and very few can play wide receiver. Therefore, they don't want to "alienate white fans" by putting a supposedly inferior product on the field. Get it? They don't give white players equal opportunity regardless of how good they really are, and regardless of how popular they would be with white fans, because they assume that they're never good enough.

And let's be clear on one other thing: white fans wouldn't necessarily prefer a white RB or CB. Maybe after a while the white man would grow on them, but at first they would be extremely skeptical- even angry- towards him.

Sports is like alot in America.
Capitalist.

Sports is a lot like America. Stupid.

Excellent post JD, you just slammed a six-pack!!!!
 

Sean

Mentor
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Messages
670
If Joe (does not have a) Sixpack is still around, I have a few questions for him. I really don't know why I bother, because he will have no answer for them, instead spouting off his same trollish nonsense, but here goes.

If black are better athletes, why:

Do they never win strength contests? Powerlifting, World Strongest Man, no strength records (squat, bench) that I know of.

Why do they only play a select few sports, unlike whites who play everything?

Why do whites dominate both summer and winter olympics, while blacks only do good in there select few events?

Why are the MAJORITY of good college baseball players white, but this does not carry over into the pros?

Why are white athletes in football overlooked, but not blacks?

Why can't the all black "dream team" beat all white teams from Lithuania, Argentina, etc?

Go ahead and try to answer a few of these.
 

Gary

Mentor
Joined
Dec 28, 2004
Messages
1,050
Blacks are better then Whites in some things- like stealing, farting, getting handouts, rape, failing the SAT, wrecking once nice cities, washing dishes. When Haiti gets the same standard of living as Sweden then I'll chance my mind.
Take this test-take two nations equal in all resources, put blacks in one nation and whites in the other. In 5 years the white nation will have a higher standard of living, manufacturing base, modern hospitals and unversities. The black nation will be steeped in proverty, unable to feed itself from it's own farms and a crime rate that is 4 times that of the white nation and in any sports competition such as the Olympics the whites will win almost every time. The whites will be better fed, better educated, better developed.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Whites have no legal advantages. Just genetic and character ones which

leads to success rather than failure. Blacks are underrepresented in the

criminal justice system in relation to the number of crimes they really

commit.



Actually, Whites have many legal advantages. Hence the harsher
sentences for blacks who commit crimes as their lighter-skinned
bretheren. Even with similiar criminal backgrounds.


Integration had to be forced by the government because almost all white

people never wanted it. Why? Because there is no advantage to it for us.



Thanks for proving MY point! Damn right white people STILL treat
black americans in a disadvantageous manner. Love it when people
prove my point for me.
smiley36.gif
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
363
People act as if the latest (or repeat offender) troll is arguing facts. If one
peruses the Dept. of Justice website, they will find whites have a
disadvantage in sentencing. For years the media would put statistics
garnered from black (and now black and brown) repeat offenders up
against 1st time white offenders and say there was a disparity. However,
when all elements are equal, suddenly it turns out whites receive harsher
treatment in the courts.
Blacks and other minorities receive breaks whether it's in college
admissions, home loans or treatment by professional sports teams. If
someone wanted to foist blacks on America, they would merely add more
and more each year until that's what you'd come to expect. Same thing
has been done with music. More and more rap poured on the US until this
sludge is the majority of what's on the radio and MTV. People think they
have a choice while being told what to think. Team owners are
brainwashed here and there, and others are too scared to buck the trend
so they toe the line. However, many team owners are from a group with
an historic race and religion based hatred of whites and are all too glad to
try and commit whites to the dustbin. Ask the troll if his soc professor
put him up to posting or if it's part of his required web monitoring duties
for his ethnically based frat house. Whites are no where near as
ethnocentric as blacks, hispanics, Asians and jews. That's the problem
and it's also what the folks in charge are worried about. Their continued
hatred of whites, their campaign to flood the US and rest of the West with
non-whites is adding fuel to the fire. In the end it's good, because it will
force whites to think as a cohesive racial group. We all know what
happens when whites are forced into a corner. Worse is better.
 

Bart

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
4,329
Colonel Callan said:
Their continued
hatred of whites, their campaign to flood the US and rest of the West with
non-whites is adding fuel to the fire. In the end it's good, because it will
force whites to think as a cohesive racial group. We all know what
happens when whites are forced into a corner. Worse is better.


I hope you are right, but I'm not optimistic. By the time we wake up and realize what has happened, we will have been left with few resources and even fewer people to wage a campaign. Col. have you ever mentioned in what area of the media you were involved? Are you in a completely different field now? Just curious. You don't have to say if you you'd rather not.
 

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
Ibragimov just beat Shannon Briggs. Whites have all the heavyweight belts again. 14 of the 20 belts from heavyweight to middleweight are held by whites. Whites are clearly better fighters than blacks.
 

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
When blacks have to score 200-300 points higher on their SATs to get into the same schools as whites then we can talk about blacks being disadvantaged. Government, media, academia, corporations and every other institution in America discriminates against whites in favor of blacks. Yes, there are some racist whites but they have no power. The Congressional Black Caucus has quite a bit of power and they are racist to a man.
 

dkr77

Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
348
Location
United States
Joe fannypack wrote
"Actually, Whites have many legal advantages. Hence the harsher sentences for blacks who commit crimes as their lighter-skinned bretheren. Even with similiar criminal backgrounds."

WRONG AGAIN!
Incarcerated white's with similar criminal background's are much more likely to receive the death penalty than black's. However, black's are over represented per capita in criminal activity more than any other ethnic group in the world. There is also a strong correlation between criminal behavior and low IQ.
 

JD074

Master
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
2,301
Location
Kentucky
Liverlips said:
Yes, there are some racist whites but they have no power.

Exactly. People seem to think that white politicians and heads of corporations are "evil racists," but the fact of the matter is that the white people in power bend over backwards for minorities, while white "racists" are mostly on the fringe of society.Edited by: JD074
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
363
Bart said:
I hope you are right, but I'm not optimistic. By the time we wake up and realize what has happened, we will have been left with few resources and even fewer people to wage a campaign. Col. have you ever mentioned in what area of the media you were involved? Are you in a completely different field now? Just curious. You don't have to say if you you'd rather not.

Oh, I think the signs are all around we're headed to collapse. And worsening conditions will force Joe Sixpack to follow people who have the answer. There was a rally in Knoxville a couple of weeks ago (the Channon Christian murder). Usually 10 or 12 people show. This time there was over 100. As things get worse, it will be over 1000 and so on. All that's needed to tip things is 2 - 5% of the population. The white population that is. The folks in charge know that.

Media? I work for myself now, rent out an office at a company connected with major media, but they are not a media company themselves. I won't go too much into what I do, but yes, I am still connected to the media, but more with film than with TV now. In the past I had worked as a news / sports writer believe it or not as well as producing and directing several news and sports oriented shows. That's why I won't listen to anyone trying to tell me how the media works and who runs it. I was there, I know it's tightly controlled. As a young fella, I even did some work on a show put together by white hating John Entine in the 1980's at NBC. It was about how black affletes are superior and it was one of the defining moments in creating a lot of my views regarding media. So much info was slanted, skewed or left out to make blacks look like magical creatures it was amazing. While I still feel a higher percentage of the black population has "aptitude" for sprinting the 100 (just as more whites have more physical strength) there are whites out there with the ability to run under 10 secs etc. Which physiologists interviewed said was correct. Which was left out. Info on jumping was twisted, etc. I was not a major player in the show's creation, but it was a big time lesson for me. Never mind the time I had spent in track and field competing and working with athletes. I believe whites have a very wide bell curve of physical abilities and also believe the black "curve" is more narrow. That's all I'll go into for now.
 

ex-cop in ga

Newbie
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
5
Location
Georgia
LOL,Colonel Callan I think I remember that show! I was in high school when it first came on and whatI most recall wasthe narrator describedhow black affletes(HA) were superior due to their large leg and buttock muscles.
 

nopictures

Guru
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
114
I believe most sports to be overrepresented by blacks, who, failing college or a high school diploma, try and make it big in the professional sports game and that would make the fact that so many whites are curb stomping (it's an expression <3) them in boxing and MMA even funnier, particularly when they supposedly possess these supernatural martial talents and are just sooo much more f**king athletic.

I'd say that any athletic advantage they possess is part reality part social construct, there may be some truth to it as they are usually much poorer and are often encouraged at a young age either due to their old man or their own ignorance that striving for nothing but being a "pro basketball player" or a "rap star" is the hallmark of a well-rounded individual. Due to their often low social status they may keep in better shape then us, but that hardly qualifies as a natural athletic superiority, particularly when in all black nations they "naturally" have the lowest standard of living on earth, and can hardly feed themselves much less commit to an advanced training regimen.

Run on sentences and pointless drivel aside, the point is, if blacks are such natural athletes they should be all the more embarrassed when they are defeated by the "inferior" white or perish the thought, asian.
 

JD074

Master
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
2,301
Location
Kentucky
nopictures said:
I believe most sports to be overrepresented by blacks, who, failing college or a high school diploma, try and make it big in the professional sports game and that would make the fact that so many whites are curb stomping (it's an expression <3)

Inspired by American History X, perhaps?
smiley2.gif
 
Top