Considering the severe caste mentality of the NFL these moves are not coincidences, or conspiracy, they are business as usual. You could name a hundred other anti-White moves and it would still be due to the same thing, the NFL CASTE SYSTEM.
Exactly. Calling it a "conspiracy" just detracts from what the Caste System actually is, and makes it easier for supporters of the system to discredit opponents of it.
Was Mike Glennon replacing Josh Freeman the result of a conspiracy? No. Was Indy trading for Richardson instead of Gerhart a conspiracy? No. As jaxvid said, it's simply business as usual within the constraints and rules of the Caste System. Not everything goes against Whites, and every time a White player doesn't meet expectations it's not because there's a "scripted plan" to have him fail. There are inherent advantages and assumptions in favor of blacks and against Whites by way of extreme affirmative action and media-enforced stereotypes, but often times blacks fail to take advantage while Whites sometimes overcome the odds and succeed.
It's really no different than other institutions. Your local TV station, for example, knows that if it has six main anchors for its morning, noon and evening news telecasts, three will be women and at least one will be black. Every advertising firm knows that if there are more than two characters to be cast in a commercial, at least one must be black (or an asian female). The only difference with sports is that the masses assume there couldn't possibly be any affirmative action or racial favoritism because blacks are so predominant in football and basketball that the over-representation must have occurred naturally, a myth which the corporate sports media of course constantly reinforce through virulently pro-black, anti-White propaganda.
Last edited: