The Eradication of Christianity!

Carolina Speed

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Messages
5,778
what does birth control have to do with white countries' destruction?
europeans have been doing it for ages and everything was fine

the problem comes from the open borders ideology more: http://openborders.info/blog/the-old-testament-on-immigration/


I'm no expert on the subject, but some forms of birth control such as the pill can cause harmful side effects to women, I believe.

Also, doesn't the U.S. provide free birth control at the tax payers expense? I don't agree on 14,15, and 16,etc. year old girls having sex out of wed-lock, but I can't stop it either, but I sure as heck don't want to pay for them to have sex with my hard earned money by way of more taxes! I have to pay my own insurance. I don't want to pay for everyone else's.

Isn't that way of thinking called socialism?
 

Carolina Speed

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Messages
5,778
Now,this is bang out of order!

Do you claim to have the transcript of every conversation Don and I have had,maybe over other modes of communication?

What do you know about whatever it was that Don advised me to do,over PM?

So do us a favor and make not such tall claims.


And you call me an idiot! You can't even read. It's on Don's post #33 on this thread! Go back and read it, if you can?
 

Carolina Speed

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Messages
5,778
Philosopher, you are violating the guidelines on flaming, religious slurs, and profanity. If you cannot discuss this subject civilly, don't discuss it at all.


This is post #33, The Philosopher. Can you read what this says or do I need to translate. It has nothing to do with a PM. You are scared and paranoid to boot.
 

Carolina Speed

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Messages
5,778
Just thank your stars that Don's on your side.


Or what......? No, if Don was on my side, He would have given you 1 warning and then he would have had you banned for wanting to destroy a pro-white Christian who contributes to this site in a mature manner without threats.

You made a mistake, no you made 2 or 3, heck, I can't count them all.... grow up, admit it and move on.
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
I'm no expert on the subject, but some forms of birth control such as the pill can cause harmful side effects to women, I believe.

Also, doesn't the U.S. provide free birth control at the tax payers expense? I don't agree on 14,15, and 16,etc. year old girls having sex out of wed-lock, but I can't stop it either, but I sure as heck don't want to pay for them to have sex with my hard earned money by way of more taxes! I have to pay my own insurance. I don't want to pay for everyone else's.

Isn't that way of thinking called socialism?

look at my earlier post, i'm talking about the "witches" that the early christians of europe killed, who were responsible for birth control
nothing to do with socialism or taxes
 

Carolina Speed

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Messages
5,778
look at my earlier post, i'm talking about the "witches" that the early christians of europe killed, who were responsible for birth control
nothing to do with socialism or taxes

My apologies frederic38. I only mentioned it, birth control, in context with what Old Scratch mentioned in his post. I thought Old Scratch was talking about the late 60's and early 70's in this country when the drug culture, feminism, etc. really started to become prevalent.

I'll go back and look, thanks for bringing that to my attention.
 

Old Scratch

Mentor
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
1,055

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
The birth control pill in addition to other things allowed women to slut it up with a lot less consequence which is bad for the stability of marriage.

pchVt6A.jpg


women in pre-christian europe:
In the Greek society, men were the heads of the families. Society expected women to marry when they became of age. Their fathers and prospective husbands arranged this marriage. Women were simply passed from the house of one kyrios (master) to the house of another. Fathers gave their daughters their dowry when they married. If their fathers were dead, their brothers made a provision for it. When women became divorced, or when their husbands died and they had no children, these women returned to their former families, and took their dowries with them.

The ease with which a Grecian husband could terminate the marriage is quite disturbing to a contemporary student of history. The only thing the husband needed to do was to send his wife away to her paternal family and the marriage ended.13 Society did not allow women to conduct legal or economic transactions without a male guardian. In Athenian law women could not own property. Women did not generally inherit anything in the presence of equally close males.14

During their marriage, women in the Graeco-Roman world were supposed to occupy themselves with weaving within the house confines. The seclusion of women was common among Athenians as well. This lifestyle was probably promoted by the cultures of the most active trading peoples, whose influence was strong in the developed world. Greeks and Hebrews were those well-known merchants in the Mediterranean and Europe from 200 B.C. on. What made fashionable that practice was the fact wealthy Jewish traders had homes in each of the major cities of the known world, and to them, secluded wives were a display of social status. It was a matter of pride for Greek and Jewish merchants to have their wives as conspicuously and expensively secluded as possible.15

A respectable woman was not allowed to leave the house unless a trustworthy male escort accompanied her. A wife was not permitted to eat or interact with male guests in her husband’s home; she had to retire to her woman’s quarters. Men kept their wives under lock and key, and women had the social status of a slave. Girls were not allowed to go to school, and when they grew up they were not allowed to speak in public. Women were considered inferior to men. The Greek poets equated women with evil, such as they did with Pandora. In men’s view, woman was responsible for unleashing evil on the world.16

Since a Grecian woman’s sphere of life was her family, her active life did not really begin until her marriage. In the Classical period, women had been able to look forward to only two journeys: the first, from their father’s house to their husbands, the next from their husband’s house to the grave. Fortunately, with the entering of the Hellenistic period, things began to change for women.17 Families migrated to the new cosmopolitan cities, and although some restrictive conventions of the old city-states were retained, others were altered or completely discarded in response to the new dynamics of societal and individual needs.18

Nonetheless, the mindset of many was still firmly anchored in paternalism. This paternalism, so inherent to the Athenian male society, was based on the presumption that men were more intelligent than women. David Schaps concludes, “Each sex was considered to have a proper role for which it was fitted, and intelligence, beyond such understanding as was necessary to mange the day-to-day affairs of a household, was not thought necessary or desirable for the Greek woman.â€19 Yet, the Athenian men recognized that women were people, and they were interested in women’s well-being. But men would not entrust to a woman the power to guarantee that welfare. In the majority of cases, the head of the family chose the husband for the bride. Thus her family, not her, made the most important decisions of a Grecian woman’s life.

The status of Roman women was also very low. Roman law placed a wife under the absolute control of her husband, who had ownership of her and her possessions. He could divorce her if she went out in public without a veil. A husband had the power of life and death over his wife, just as he did his children. As with the Greeks, the Romans did not allow women to speak in public.20


the influence of christianism:


As the developed world was undergoing social, political, and economic revisions on its journey to the new era, unbeknownst, mankind was moving toward the “fullness of time†of Christ’s coming. That single man’s effect on the arena of the Graeco-Roman world of first century would make such a profound impact on history that the collective rulers of influential Greece and powerful Rome could not begin to duplicate it. Life as it had been known thus far, was no longer. There was a well of abundant life, a spring of living waters that this Son of Man brought to men and women alike, causing the reassessment and profound alteration of all philosophical systems, and all theological beliefs. The validity of the “natural†inferiority of women, and their subordinate place in society was duly challenged and exposed as false. This new kyrios was becoming the head of all who wanted to experience life to the fullest, and in Him there were no longer male or female priority status.35

Jesus valued women and treated them with respect and dignity. The New Testament’s position on women developed that perspective, and passed it along to the following centuries. We do not find the value of women that permeated the teachings of the New Testament in the Greco-Roman culture, or the cultures of other societies. The extremely low status that the Greek, Roman, and Jewish women had for centuries was radically affected by the appearance of Jesus Christ. His actions and teachings raised the status of women to new heights, often to the dismay and sharp disapproval of His friends and enemies. By word and deed, He went against the ancient, taken-for-granted beliefs and practices that defined women as socially, intellectually, and spiritually inferior.

With this new teaching, revolutionary trends began to appear. Throughout the empire there was developing a new conception of the rights of married women. Gradually they had passed out from the restrictions of the old in manu marriage and were permitted to study, if not to practice, learned professions, to control their own property, and in many other ways to break from the restraints set by the old views of the necessary wife’s subjection.36 The emancipation of women advanced steadily.

The humane and respectful way Jesus showed toward the Samaritan woman at the well in John 4, was in effect a radical proclamation of equality in sexes. His disciples were stunned at such treatment. Jesus ignored the Jewish anti-Samaritan prejudices along with the prevailing view that saw women as inferior beings. He started a conversation with a Samaritan woman in public. He went at least against three restrictive rules for communication — Samaritan, woman, and public. The rabbinic oral law was quite explicit: “He who talks with a woman in public brings evil upon himself.†Another rabbinic teaching prominent in Jesus’ day taught, “One is not so much as to greet a woman.â€37 No wonder the Messiah’s disciples were amazed to find Him talking to a woman, Samaritan at that, in public.

Yet, that was not the only example of Jesus’ revolutionary attitude toward women. Among His closest friends were Mary, Martha, and Lazarus, who entertained Him at their home. Martha assumed the traditional female role of preparing a meal for Jesus, her guest, while her sister Mary did what only men would do — learn from Jesus’ teachings.38 By accepting Mary in the men’s circle of disciples, and even commending her for her thirst of spiritual knowledge, Jesus violated the rabbinic law that said, “Let the words of the Law [Torah] be burned rather than taught to women. … If a man teaches his daughter the law, it is as though he taught her lechery.â€

When Lazarus died, Jesus comforted Martha with this promise containing the heart of the Christian gospel: “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die.†Then He asked her, “Do you believe this?â€39 Schmidt says, “To teach a woman was bad enough, but Jesus did more than that. He called for a verbal response from Martha. Once more, He went against the socio-religious custom by teaching a woman, and by having her publicly respond to Him — a man.â€40

All three of the Synoptic Gospels note that women followed Jesus — a highly unusual phenomenon in first-century Palestine. In the prevailing culture only prostitutes and women of very low repute would follow a man without a male escort. Yet, these women were genuine followers of Christ, and some even provided financial support for Him and the apostles.41 Shockingly, the first people Jesus chose to appear to after His resurrection were women. He instructed them to tell His disciples that He was alive.42 In a culture where a woman’s testimony was worthless because she was inferior and untrustworthy, Jesus elevated the value of women beyond anything the world had seen. The Living Word — the Creator of humankind — gave women the status and respect they were always intended to have — a status equal to men. Author Dorothy Sayers, a friend of C.S. Lewis, wrote: “Perhaps it is no wonder that the women were first at the Cradle and last at the Cross. They had never known a man like this Man — there had never been such another. A prophet and teacher who never nagged at them, who never flattered or coaxed or patronized; who never made arch jokes about them, never treated them either as ‘The women, God help us!’ or ‘The ladies, God bless them!’; who rebuked without querulousness and praised without condescension; who took their questions and arguments seriously, who never mapped out their sphere for them, never urged them to be feminine or jeered at them for being female; who had no ax to grind and no uneasy male dignity to defend; who took them as He found them and was completely unselfconscious.â€

She continues: “There is no act, no sermon, no parable in the whole Gospel that borrows its pungency from female perversity; nobody could possibly guess from the words of Jesus that there was anything ‘funny’ about woman’s nature.â€43 Not only did Jesus break with the anti-female culture of His era, but He also set a standard for Christ-followers. Peter and Paul both rose to the challenge in what they wrote in the New Testament.

People often accuse the apostle Paul of being a misogynist, one who hates and fears women. Yet, if one looks at the church as fraternity within the Roman Empire, one would appreciate the teaching of Paul on the details of social life. His teaching in each department of social communication was affected both by practical considerations, resulting from the actual environment in which the Christian life was to be lived, and also by the regulative conceptions of his eschatology. Thus, Paul’s teachings on women reflect the creation order, and high value God places on women as creatures made in His image. Paul’s commands for husbands and wives in Ephesians 5 provided a completely new way to look at marriage: as an earthbound illustration of the spiritual mystery of the union of Christ and His bride — the church. Paul called wives to not only submit to their husbands as to the Lord, but he called husbands to submit to Christ.44 He called men to love their wives in the self-sacrificing way Christ loved the church. In a culture where a wife was property, and a disrespected piece of property at that, Paul elevated women to a position of honor previously unknown in the world.

Paul also provided highly counter-cultural direction for the New Testament church.45 In the Jewish synagogue, women had no place, and no voice in worship. In the pagan temples, women served as prostitutes. The Christian church, on the other hand, was a place for women to pray and prophecy out loud.46 God gave spiritual gifts — supernatural enablings to build God’s church — to women as well as men. Paul commanded older women to teach younger ones. The invitation to women to participate in public worship of Jesus was unthinkable — but true. There was a great diversity of ministries available to Early Church women to perform.47

Paul’s “patronesses†are famous: Priscilla, Lydia, Phoebe, Mary, and others.48 These women seem to be people of some position — “chief women;†“honorable women;†having households, which they are able to influence; conducting church meetings in their own homes.49 E.A. Judge describes these and others of Paul’s female “sponsors†as a “cultivated social elite,†through whom the apostle was able to reach their social dependents by a sort of clientele system.50 Wayne Meeks relates the well-known prominence of women in Acts to a rising status of women, and the questioning that had began of male and female roles.51 Paul’s female converts demonstrated a freer participation of women, not only in the religious life of the community, but in the economic life of the Graeco-Roman society as well. Their story amounts to a functional equality in leadership roles that would have been unusual, and strongly rejected in that society prior to Christ.

http://enrichmentjournal.ag.org/201004/201004_000_christian_women.cfm
 

Charles Martel

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
8,484
source

The following appeared in The Century Magazine, in January 1928. It was written by one Marcus Eli Ravage (Ravitch), an American immigrant and personal biographer of the Rothschilds family. The piece, which was titled “A Real Case Against the Jews”, was a clever attempt to counter the perceived social anti-Semitism in the USA before the Second World War – no doubt due to Henry Ford’s circulation of The Dearborn Independent. I read this many years ago and have never forgotten it.

"Of course, you do resent us. It is no good telling me you don’t. So let us not waste any time on denials and alibis. You know you do, and I know it, and we understand each other. To be sure, some of your best friends are Jews, and all that. I have heard that before once or twice, I think. And I know, too, that you do not include me personally—“me” being any particular individual Jew—when you fling out at us in your wholesale fashion, because I am, well, so different, don’t you know, almost as good as one of yourselves. That little exemption does not, somehow, move me to gratitude; but never mind that now. It is the aggressive, climbing, pushing, materialistic sort you dislike—those, in a word, who remind you so much of your own up-and-coming brethren. We understand each other perfectly. I don’t hold it against you.


Bless my soul, I do not blame anybody for disliking anybody. The thing that intrigues me about this anti-Jewish business, as you play at it, is your total lack of grit. You are so indirect and roundabout with it, you make such transparent excuses, you seem to be suffering from self-consciousness so horribly, that if the performance were not grotesque, it would be irritating.

It is not as if you were amateurs: you have been at it for over fifteen centuries. Yet watching you and hearing your childish pretexts, one might get the impression that you did not know yourselves what it is all about.

You resent us, but you cannot clearly say why. You think up a new excuse—a “reason” is what you call it—every other day. You have been piling up justifications for yourselves these many hundreds of years and each new invention is more laughable than the last and each new excuse contradicts and annihilates the last.

Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe against Jewish invasion.

We are, if you are to be believed, at once clannish and exclusive and unassimilable because we won’t intermarry with you, and we are also climbers and pushers and a menace to your racial integrity.

Our standard of living is so low that we create your slums and sweated industries, and so high that we crowd you out of your best residential sections.

We shirk our patriotic duty in wartime because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and we are the arch-plotters of universal wars and the chief beneficiaries of those wars (see the late “Dearborn Independent,”passim, and “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”).

We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism.

Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!

And, oh! I almost forgot the reason of reasons. We are the stiff-necked people who never accepted Christianity, and we are the criminal people who crucified its founder.

But I can tell you, you are self-deceivers. You lack either the self-knowledge or the mettle to face the facts squarely and own up to the truth. You resent the Jew not because, as some of you seem to think, he crucified Jesus but because he gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity but that we have imposed it upon you!

Your loose, contradictory charges against us are not a patch on the blackness of our proved historic offense. You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it? Compared with what Paul the Jew of Tarsus accomplished in Rome, the Russian upheaval is a mere street brawl.

You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well-founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day?

A clumsy Russian forges a set of papers and publishes them in a book called “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right. For the sake of argument we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that beside the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we have never denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?

If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners and movie magnates, when you might as well justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization by the Jewish Gospels?

You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We areintruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom not merely of the latest great war but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it.

Look back a little and see what has happened. Nineteen hundred years ago you were an innocent, care-free, pagan race. You worshipped countless gods and goddesses, the spirits of the air, of the running streams and of the woodland. You took unblushing pride in the glory of your naked bodies.

You carved images of your gods and of the tantalizing human figure. You delighted in the combats of the field, the arena and the battle-ground. War and slavery were fixed institutions in your systems. Disporting yourselves on the hillsides and in the valleys of the great outdoors, you took to speculating on the wonder and mystery of life and laid the foundations of natural science and philosophy. Yours was a noble, sensual culture, unirked by the prickings of a social conscience or by any sentimental questionings about human equality. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.

But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it all without armies, without bullets, without blood or turmoil, without force of any kind. We did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda.

We made you the willing and unconscious bearers of our mission to the whole world, to the barbarous races of the earth, to the countless unborn generations. Without fully understanding what we were doing to you, you became the agents at large of our racial tradition, carrying our gospel to the unexplored ends of the earth.

Our tribal customs have become the core of your moral code. Our tribal laws have furnished the basic groundwork of all your august constitutions and legal systems. Our legends and our folk tales are the sacred lore which you croon to your infants. Our poets have filled your hymnals and your prayer books. Our national history has become an indispensable part of your pastors and priests and scholars. Our kings, our statesmen, our prophets, our warriors are your heroes. Our ancient little country is your Holy Land.

Our national literature is your Holy Bible. What our people thought and taught has become inextricably woven into your very speech and tradition, until no one among you can be called educated who is not familiar with our racial heritage.

Jewish artisans and Jewish fishermen are your teachers and your saints, with countless statues carved in their image and innumerable cathedrals raised to their memories. A Jewish maiden is your ideal of womanhood. A Jewish rebel-prophet is the central figure in your religious worship. We have pulled down your idols, cast aside your racial inheritance, and substituted for them our God and our traditions. No conquest in history can even remotely compare with this clean sweep of our conquest over you.

How did we do it? Almost by accident. Two thousand years ago nearly, in far-off Palestine, our religion had fallen into decay and materialism. Money-changers were in possession of the temple. Degenerate, selfish priests mulcted our people and grew fat. Then a young patriot-idealist arose and went about the land calling for a revival of faith. He had no thought of setting up a new church. Like all the prophets before him, his only aim was to purify and revitalize the old creed. He attacked the priests and drove the money-changers from the temple. This brought him into conflict with the established order and its supporting pillars. The Roman authorities, who were in occupation of the country, fearing his revolutionary agitation as a political effort to oust them, arrested him, tried him and condemned him to death by crucifixion, a common form of execution at that time.

The followers of Jesus of Nazareth, mainly slaves and poor workmen, in their bereavement and disappointment, turned away from the world and formed themselves into a brotherhood of pacifist non-resisters, sharing the memory of their crucified leader and living together communistically. They were merely a new sect in Judea, without power or consequence, neither the first nor the last.

Only after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans did the new creed come into prominence. Then a patriotic Jew named Paul or Saul conceived the idea of humbling the Roman power by destroying the morale or its soldiery with the doctrines of love and non-resistance preached by the little sect of Jewish Christians. He became the Apostle to the Gentiles, he who hitherto had been one of the most active persecutors of the band. And so well did Paul do his work that within four centuries the great empire which had subjugated Palestine along with half of the world, was a heap of ruins. And the law which went forth from Zion became the official religion of Rome.

This was the beginning of our dominance in your world. But it was only a beginning. From this time forth your history is little more than a struggle for mastery between your own old pagan spirit and our Jewish spirit. Half your wars, great and little, are religious wars, fought over the interpretation of one thing or another in our teachings. You no sooner broke free from your primitive religious simplicity and attempted the practice of the pagan Roman learning than Luther armed with our gospels arose to down you and enthrone our heritage. Take the three principal revolutions in modern times—the French, the American and the Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice?

And the end is still a long way off. We still dominate you. At this very moment your churches are torn asunder by a civil war between Fundamentalists and Modernists, that is to say between those who cling to our teachings and traditions literally and those who are striving by slow steps to dispossess us. In Dayton, Tennessee, a Bible-bred community forbids the teaching of your science because it conflicts with our ancient Jewish account of the origin of life; and Mr. Bryan, the leader of the anti-Jewish Ku Klux Klan in the Democratic National Convention, makes the supreme fight of his life in our behalf, without noticing the contradiction.

Again and again the Puritan heritage of Judea breaks out in waves of stage censorship, Sunday blue laws and national prohibition acts. And while these things are happening you twaddle about Jewish influence in the movies!

Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book and an alien faith which you cannot swallow or digest, which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to accept in full.

In full, of course, you never have accepted our Christian teachings. In your hearts you still are pagans. You still love war and graven images and strife. You still take pride in the glory of the nude human figure. Your social conscience, in spite of all democracy and all your social revolutions, is still a pitifully imperfect thing. We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses, paralyzed your desires. In the midst of battle you are obliged to kneel down to him who commanded you to turn the other cheek, who said “Resist not evil” and “Blessed are the peacemakers.” In your lust for gain you are suddenly disturbed by a memory from your Sunday-school days about taking no thought for the morrow. In your industrial struggles, when you would smash a strike without compunction, you are suddenly reminded that the poor are blessed and that men are brothers in the Fatherhood of the Lord. And as you are about to yield to temptation, your Jewish training puts a deterrent hand on your shoulder and dashes the brimming cup from your lips. You Christians have never become Christianized. To that extent we have failed with you. But we have forever spoiled the fun of paganism for you.

So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make no bones about telling you why. We should not resort to subterfuges and transparent pretexts. With millions of painfully respectable Jewish shopkeepers all about us we should not insult your intelligence and our own honesty by talking about communism as a Jewish philosophy. And with millions of hard-working impecunious Jewish peddlers and laborers we should not make ourselves ridiculous by talking about international capitalism as a Jewish monopoly. No, we should go straight to the point. We should contemplate this confused, ineffectual muddle which we call civilization, this half-Christian half-pagan medley, and—were our places reversed—we should say to you point-blank: “For this mess thanks to you, to your prophets and to your Bible.”
 
Last edited:

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,995
source

The following appeared in The Century Magazine, in January 1928. It was written by one Marcus Eli Ravage (Ravitch), an American immigrant and personal biographer of the Rothschilds family. The piece, which was titled “A Real Case Against the Jews”, was a clever attempt to counter the perceived social anti-Semitism in the USA before the Second World War – no doubt due to Henry Ford’s circulation of The Dearborn Independent. I read this many years ago and have never forgotten it....


But I beg to differ with you, C. Mr Ravage was an honest Jew and he was spilling the beans, telling it like it is!

For a really great and honest and righteous Jew see the writings of Israel Shahak.

Brother Nathaniel has Jewish background too, and I think he's awesome. Here's Brother Nathaniel on Holy Russia vs. the decadent and degenerate USSA. Check it out, mah man - like the bongonians standing in front of the porno joints in Times Square used to say...

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=913
 

Charles Martel

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
8,484
But I beg to differ with you, C. Mr Ravage was an honest Jew and he was spilling the beans, telling it like it is!
I was just quoting the source there, click on the link above it for the full article.

I saw it as a thought-provoking article, so I posted it here.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,995
I was just quoting the source there, click on the link above it for the full article.

I saw it as a thought-provoking article, so I posted it here.



Oh, sorry. I thought that was your comment. And yes it is, and good on you for posting it, like they say in Oz.
 
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
1,779
You resent the Jew not because, as some of you seem to think, he crucified Jesus but because he gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity but that we have imposed it upon you!


Compared with what Paul the Jew of Tarsus accomplished in Rome, the Russian upheaval is a mere street brawl


What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners and movie magnates, when you might as well justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization by the Jewish Gospels


Look back a little and see what has happened. Nineteen hundred years ago you were an innocent, care-free, pagan race.


Our national literature is your Holy Bible.


A Jewish maiden is your ideal of womanhood.


A Jewish rebel-prophet is the central figure in your religious worship.

The followers of Jesus of Nazareth, mainly slaves and poor workmen

Then a patriotic Jew named Paul or Saul conceived the idea of humbling the Roman power by destroying the morale or its soldiery with the doctrines of love and non-resistance preached by the little sect of Jewish Christians

We have imposed upon you an alien book and an alien faith which you cannot swallow or digest


“For this mess thanks to you, to your prophets and to your Bible.”

___________________________________________

Come on,Christians,I've taken the effort of breaking down into separate quotes the 'contentious' parts.

Please respond.

Don't make any excuses,the quotes weren't posted by a guy with a pornographic avatar or inded an alleged jew,or a Christian hater even.

So,come on,do the right thing and put forward a coherent argument.
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
I’ve never read this fascinating piece before, so many thanks for posting, Carcharias.

Despite its coldly-acerbic, highly-enraging, and thoroughly-repugnant implications to the ancestral pagan beliefs/customs of Europeans…it’s one of the most honest, genuine, and profound exposés of International Jewry I’ve ever laid eyes upon.

As Werewolf mentioned, the Yid who penned this is somewhat “honorable” in the sense that he appears fully cognizant of the unadulterated evil his tribe has manifested upon a once-beautiful race.
 
Last edited:

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
The war against Christianity is part of the war against white people. Christianity is the main religion of white people and is targeted for that reason.

White institutions have been infiltrated by leftists, who are anti-white. Modern Christianity has been so infiltrated.

The educational system has also been infiltrated by anti-white leftists. That doesn't mean it makes sense to attack education just as it doesn't make sense to attack Christianity because of the actions of anti-white infiltrators.

Unfortunately, many misguided white people join in the attack against Christianity. Christianity is not inherently anti-white. Many pro-white people are Christians
 

Menelik

Mentor
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
1,175
Location
Georgia
Why is this idiot "black jewish prince" troll protected here? Is he somebody's cousin?
I've often wondered the same about you...zzz
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,995
Speaking of cousin...little known incident involving FBI informant Michael King alias the reverend doctor martin luther king jr.

His FBI handlers approached King shortly before his demise and told him that he'd better start producing some better info for them or they'd turn him loose. King reacted angrily, saying, "Turn me loose? Turn me loose? I'll turn YOU loose. Lyndon [Johnson] is my cousin!"

What he meant by that is unclear.

The night before King was assassinated by whoever assassinated him - probably some govmt. agency like the FBI, according to Rev. Abernathy, King had two prostitutes in his room, white I think, and he was slapping them around.

Now they name boulevards in cities after King - and property values immediately plunge 95% when they do. But the good thing is that if you're in a strange city and want to purchase illegal drugs you know exactly where to go, the nearest MLK Blvd.! Unless you have "connections", in which case you approach the nearest politician.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,471
Location
Pennsylvania
Why is this idiot "black jewish prince" troll protected here? Is he somebody's cousin?

There you go again. Someone who has different opinions than you is not automatically a troll or a Jew, difficult as that concept may be for you to comprehend. What a drama queen you can be.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,995
There you go again. Someone who has different opinions than you is not automatically a troll or a Jew, difficult as that concept may be for you to comprehend. What a drama queen you can be.


WHAT different opinions? "zzzzzz"? That one? How about constantly posting meaningless links? How about ALL THIS:

http://www.castefootball.us/forums/search.php?searchid=621437

Tell me what "different opinions" Menelik The Black Jewish Prince has articulated. I'm waiting. Tell me.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,471
Location
Pennsylvania
His "zzzzzz" is in response to your constantly trying to start flame wars, in violation of the posting guidelines.

He's a member in good standing whether you like it or not. You're not in charge of deciding who can and can't post here. There have been some here who wanted you banned, but I've stood up for you. The bottom line is, if you are so horrified to come across his posts, then ignore them. It's not difficult for an adult to do.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,995
His "zzzzzz" is in response to your constantly trying to start flame wars, in violation of the posting guidelines.

He's a member in good standing whether you like it or not. You're not in charge of deciding who can and can't post here. There have been some here who wanted you banned, but I've stood up for you. The bottom line is, if you are so horrified to come across his posts, then ignore them. It's not difficult for an adult to do.


"His "zzzzzz" is in response to your constantly trying to start flame wars, in violation of the posting guidelines."


Bull. Anyone can look at his history of posting and see that's bull.

"He's a member in good standing whether you like it or not."

There's something fishy about this.

"There have been some here who wanted you banned,"


Then do me a favor and ban me. These forums are a waste of time anyway. I'm getting sick of the whole lot of them.
 
Top