Run Stuffing LB
Mentor
Spain wins! They just showed a nice shot of a disappointed "Dutch" negro.
South Africa World Cup 2010
- Thread starter Matra1
- Start date
Jimmy Chitwood
Hall of Famer
what a wonderful last few days. excuse me, please, while i go bask in the glow of White victory.
foobar75
Master
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,332
As soon as I saw those ugly looking negroes coming in for the Dutch, I knew I was then rooting unconditionally for Spain. (I was already rooting for them, but a Dutch win wouldn't have been too terrible).
This is a great win for Spain, as the year of CF continues! I agree with Rebaljo, a Dutch victory with all those useless blacks in the team photo would have sent a very misleading message to the idiot masses out there. I feel bad for Robben, Sneijder, and the rest of the whites on the Dutch team, but this was clearly the best possible scenario.
100% white Spain wins the WC, after 100% white Italy in 2006!
This is a great win for Spain, as the year of CF continues! I agree with Rebaljo, a Dutch victory with all those useless blacks in the team photo would have sent a very misleading message to the idiot masses out there. I feel bad for Robben, Sneijder, and the rest of the whites on the Dutch team, but this was clearly the best possible scenario.
100% white Spain wins the WC, after 100% white Italy in 2006!
Jimmy Chitwood
Hall of Famer
the all-White Red Fury!!!!!!!!
just glorious!!!!!
Thrashen
Hall of Famer
Our athletes have far surpassed all expectations in the 2010 World Cup. Throughout the tournament, every Spanish victory was earned"¦as it was today over Holland (who desperately subbed-in their precious blacks, to no avail).
The top players in the tournament were all white men"¦Villa, Forlan, Klose, Muller, Higuain, Sneijder, and Vittek (and to a lesser extent, Donovan and Robben).
Not a single player of African decent achieved much statistical success or international recognition. Brazil's Luis Fabiano and Ghana's Gyan each had 3 goals in disappointing campaigns.
Overall, it was a very banal performance from the World's Greatest Athletes. Their wretched walls of oppression and deceit are disintegrating, my friends, stein um stein.
The top players in the tournament were all white men"¦Villa, Forlan, Klose, Muller, Higuain, Sneijder, and Vittek (and to a lesser extent, Donovan and Robben).
Not a single player of African decent achieved much statistical success or international recognition. Brazil's Luis Fabiano and Ghana's Gyan each had 3 goals in disappointing campaigns.
Overall, it was a very banal performance from the World's Greatest Athletes. Their wretched walls of oppression and deceit are disintegrating, my friends, stein um stein.
Solomon Kane
Mentor
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Messages
- 783
this is a great result. not only this game...but the overall imagery from the world cup...all white spain beats a mostly white netherlands (their best players being white), tough goalkeeping by both white goalies, poor performances from the affuhletes, africa going nowhere during the tournament, the heroes of the cup: villa, iniesta, the spanish keeper, heck..the whole spanish team, forlan, klose, etc.,...
Now I hope all of europe takes home the message from this world cup....forget african/asian imports...you have enough heart and brilliance in your own people.
Now I hope all of europe takes home the message from this world cup....forget african/asian imports...you have enough heart and brilliance in your own people.
GiovaniMarcon
Mentor
This is indeed a wonderful victory. As with every instance of White athletic success, though, the powers that be will try to forge a double-edged sword.
Yes, young White kids of both genders will see their racial peers succeed on the athletic field, and realize, "Hey -- we can do this!"
-- But you know how it goes in America. The clearly ALL-WHITE triumph will be "discredited" by those with media influence, mostly in the sense that "Americans don't play soccer!"
They will say cretinous things like "America did well in the World Cup, and America doesn't even care about it!" They will retreat back into feeding impressionable youths of all races the message that Blacks are superior athletes -- the spurious and artificially-biased "evidence" of the NBA and NFL will be cited. Thus White children will continue to feel inferior, aw-shucks, "just-happy-to-block-for-the-runningback" types, and Black children will continue to feel entitled and become primadonnas, and the sell-out Whites in charge of all this will continue to get rich.
"Spain's victory doesn't matter to America."
"Spain's victory doesn't matter to America."
"Spain's victory doesn't matter to America."
They will say it over and over again, hoping that the image of All-White Spain bringing home the championship trophy in the most popular game in the world won't be remembered by kids of all races.
Hey media! DEAL WITH IT. Because the floodgates are creaking.
Did you guys notice the increasing number of new members from different parts of the country, and different parts of the world?
Whites have been asleep for a long time. Many -- maybe even most -- are still lazy and refuse to stir. But more and more are waking up. Rock on.
Yes, young White kids of both genders will see their racial peers succeed on the athletic field, and realize, "Hey -- we can do this!"
-- But you know how it goes in America. The clearly ALL-WHITE triumph will be "discredited" by those with media influence, mostly in the sense that "Americans don't play soccer!"
They will say cretinous things like "America did well in the World Cup, and America doesn't even care about it!" They will retreat back into feeding impressionable youths of all races the message that Blacks are superior athletes -- the spurious and artificially-biased "evidence" of the NBA and NFL will be cited. Thus White children will continue to feel inferior, aw-shucks, "just-happy-to-block-for-the-runningback" types, and Black children will continue to feel entitled and become primadonnas, and the sell-out Whites in charge of all this will continue to get rich.
"Spain's victory doesn't matter to America."
"Spain's victory doesn't matter to America."
"Spain's victory doesn't matter to America."
They will say it over and over again, hoping that the image of All-White Spain bringing home the championship trophy in the most popular game in the world won't be remembered by kids of all races.
Hey media! DEAL WITH IT. Because the floodgates are creaking.
Did you guys notice the increasing number of new members from different parts of the country, and different parts of the world?
Whites have been asleep for a long time. Many -- maybe even most -- are still lazy and refuse to stir. But more and more are waking up. Rock on.
GiovaniMarcon, hopefully the floodgates are more than creaking, because I am afraid the media will DEAL WITH IT in the manner you decribed in the beginning of your good post. I say the events of white excellence this past year will hopefully blow open the floodgates so the media will not be able to deal with it.
In ESPN post-game coverage and analysis, they sullied the Great White victory by ending the show with predictions for the 2014 WC. Vuvulaeus Lalas and company ALL predicted in unison that Brazil would not only win the world cup 2014 but go undefeated and untouched. One joker even said the other teams might as well not show up. It was true mental masturbation. They even gave the Brazilians the excuse that the grass in this WC is different than in Brazil and thus, Brazil had some difficulties that they won't have in 2014. Scenes of victorous Brazilian teams were played on the Jew-tube as they fantasized. What an odd way to "celebrate" Spain's victory. Edited by: Kaptain Poop
Jack Lambert
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 4,743
ESPN's sissy boys are just mad because all-white Spain wins the World Cup! They needed comforting by talking about diversity nation.
DixieDestroyer
Hall of Famer
JL, #$*@ ESPN and the horse they (got punked in) by! Viva Reino de España y WPWW!
Edited by: DixieDestroyer
Edited by: DixieDestroyer
Spain busts the Caste system to little pieces. Tremendous victory for Spain, who displayed technical class, physicality, and courage in defeating a very game Holland squad.
What was impressive in this victory (along with defeating Germany) was Spain's suffocating defense. Dutch players were smothered quickly and the short passing game was far and few between in the 1st half fir the talented Dutch.
The White Man is victorious after a long and physical game before over 1 Billion people. The media of course will quickly talk about Lebron James and Dwayne Wade tomorrow. The white kids must remember who the elite athletes are after all.
Back to reality: a tense, aggressive encounter of 2 top teams featuring all White Spain and mostly White Holland. Some really questionable subs on late for the Dutch though.
A few observations:
- English referee Webb was flirting closely with losing complete control of this one. A bad precedent was set early with cards flying like a poker game. Yes, De Jong deserved a red for the kick to the chest..this likely would have ended Holland's chances after 90 minutes. Probably some sort of anti-climatic 2-0 game.
Regardless, I didn't appreciate Spain's constant lobbying to the referee about fouls. Plus, Spain started to dive at challenges which are run of the mill in Bundisliga and EPL every match. I was surprised that Englishman Webb was buying into Spain's antics.
Then, since half of Holland seemed to have a yellow by the 2nd half, Spain decided to play coy and Holland had to keep the physical play somewhat in check..Spain started to carve up the Dutch. Webb realized that all the yellows were out there and then, some inconsistent calls.
Now, Iniesta also came close to being Zidane with his stupid shoulder shove of Van Bommel.
Heitinga's first yellow was BS.
Things were tense all night and both sides did their fair share of antics. This I thought took away from the game flow.
- how great are both goalkeepers? Wow, some tremendous saves from both. Iker Cassilas's foot saved the day on the Robben break away.
Steklenberg saved Holland on some close shots a few times. A PK shootout would have been in some ways unfair given the context of the game.
- Spain's back 4 defense has got to be the world's best. Ramos and Puyol clear cut starters for the all WC team. Xavi all over place kicking ass. A great player there.
- Dutch weaknesses: Van der Viel useless, Van Persie not producing and no real service up the middle. Perhaps a result of Spain's tremendous defense. Not a wonderful choice of subs at the end. Elia did not produce like the coaches thought he would. Not saying he totally sucks, but he didn't add the spark they expected in the one.
The short passing game was no where at all in the 1st half. Some chances and build up in the 2nd, but all that defending and running and Holland started to tire at the end.
Boy, Spain can run forever at high gear it seemed. Seemed as if Holland wanted to play aggressive and throw of Spain's passing tempo because Germany failed to do this and was beat. It was fortunate for both these games to have only been 1-0 in some ways. Holland's physical play did work to some degree, but in the end this back fired. Yellows all over the place (many I thought were not truly deserved) and they had to back off a bit...Spain did the gamesmanship stuff and dove a bit. They don't have to do this. They are so talented anyway.
Heitinga played a damn good game and he should be seen as goat here.
In summary, the best team won and the media will not be too happy that another 100% nationalistic White team has one after Italy in '06.
Spain is Euro and WC champions. And deserving...
What was impressive in this victory (along with defeating Germany) was Spain's suffocating defense. Dutch players were smothered quickly and the short passing game was far and few between in the 1st half fir the talented Dutch.
The White Man is victorious after a long and physical game before over 1 Billion people. The media of course will quickly talk about Lebron James and Dwayne Wade tomorrow. The white kids must remember who the elite athletes are after all.
Back to reality: a tense, aggressive encounter of 2 top teams featuring all White Spain and mostly White Holland. Some really questionable subs on late for the Dutch though.
A few observations:
- English referee Webb was flirting closely with losing complete control of this one. A bad precedent was set early with cards flying like a poker game. Yes, De Jong deserved a red for the kick to the chest..this likely would have ended Holland's chances after 90 minutes. Probably some sort of anti-climatic 2-0 game.
Regardless, I didn't appreciate Spain's constant lobbying to the referee about fouls. Plus, Spain started to dive at challenges which are run of the mill in Bundisliga and EPL every match. I was surprised that Englishman Webb was buying into Spain's antics.
Then, since half of Holland seemed to have a yellow by the 2nd half, Spain decided to play coy and Holland had to keep the physical play somewhat in check..Spain started to carve up the Dutch. Webb realized that all the yellows were out there and then, some inconsistent calls.
Now, Iniesta also came close to being Zidane with his stupid shoulder shove of Van Bommel.
Heitinga's first yellow was BS.
Things were tense all night and both sides did their fair share of antics. This I thought took away from the game flow.
- how great are both goalkeepers? Wow, some tremendous saves from both. Iker Cassilas's foot saved the day on the Robben break away.
Steklenberg saved Holland on some close shots a few times. A PK shootout would have been in some ways unfair given the context of the game.
- Spain's back 4 defense has got to be the world's best. Ramos and Puyol clear cut starters for the all WC team. Xavi all over place kicking ass. A great player there.
- Dutch weaknesses: Van der Viel useless, Van Persie not producing and no real service up the middle. Perhaps a result of Spain's tremendous defense. Not a wonderful choice of subs at the end. Elia did not produce like the coaches thought he would. Not saying he totally sucks, but he didn't add the spark they expected in the one.
The short passing game was no where at all in the 1st half. Some chances and build up in the 2nd, but all that defending and running and Holland started to tire at the end.
Boy, Spain can run forever at high gear it seemed. Seemed as if Holland wanted to play aggressive and throw of Spain's passing tempo because Germany failed to do this and was beat. It was fortunate for both these games to have only been 1-0 in some ways. Holland's physical play did work to some degree, but in the end this back fired. Yellows all over the place (many I thought were not truly deserved) and they had to back off a bit...Spain did the gamesmanship stuff and dove a bit. They don't have to do this. They are so talented anyway.
Heitinga played a damn good game and he should be seen as goat here.
In summary, the best team won and the media will not be too happy that another 100% nationalistic White team has one after Italy in '06.
Spain is Euro and WC champions. And deserving...
foobar75
Master
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,332
I watched the replay of the goal by Iniesta a couple of times, and as the announcers also gave him proper credit, that was one heck of a goal. First, the ball got to him in a difficult angle. In a split second, he properly controlled the ball and lined up a cross to the far corner of the goal out of the reach of the goalie. It was a very difficult goal, and he used all of his skills (ball skills, hand/foot-eye coordination, quickness and athleticism) to make it happen. He was clearly the man of the match.
As for the awards, more good news:
1. Thomas Mueller of Germany wins the Golden Boot as the top scorer as well the tournament's outstanding young player.
2. Diego Forlan of Uruguay wins the Golden Ball as the tourney's best player. Others receiving consideration were David Villa, Xavi, and Wesley Sneijder. (yeah, they are all white
)
3. Finally, Cassilas of Spain was voted as the tourney's best goalkeeper.
I can't imagine a better showing by whites at the world's biggest and most popular sporting event. They stamped their authority as the best in the sport, while squashing and trashing the hopes and dreams of ESPN and other fools whose black supremacy agenda along with the so-called rise of African soccer came to a crashing halt.
Although, I must, say, Chris Fowler, Mike Tirico, and their new found pal Alexi "Vuvuzela" Lalas appear to be in top caste form. Fowler on the college side, and Tirico of course at MNF will soon return to more comfortable surroundings where they will have plenty of affletes to worship while pleasing their cultural marxist masters to the full.
Other than the NFL and perhaps the NBA with its declining ratings, they don't have much else left to hold on to anymore as the cracks of the caste system become more visible day by day.
As for the awards, more good news:
1. Thomas Mueller of Germany wins the Golden Boot as the top scorer as well the tournament's outstanding young player.
2. Diego Forlan of Uruguay wins the Golden Ball as the tourney's best player. Others receiving consideration were David Villa, Xavi, and Wesley Sneijder. (yeah, they are all white
3. Finally, Cassilas of Spain was voted as the tourney's best goalkeeper.
I can't imagine a better showing by whites at the world's biggest and most popular sporting event. They stamped their authority as the best in the sport, while squashing and trashing the hopes and dreams of ESPN and other fools whose black supremacy agenda along with the so-called rise of African soccer came to a crashing halt.
Although, I must, say, Chris Fowler, Mike Tirico, and their new found pal Alexi "Vuvuzela" Lalas appear to be in top caste form. Fowler on the college side, and Tirico of course at MNF will soon return to more comfortable surroundings where they will have plenty of affletes to worship while pleasing their cultural marxist masters to the full.
Other than the NFL and perhaps the NBA with its declining ratings, they don't have much else left to hold on to anymore as the cracks of the caste system become more visible day by day.
Deadlift
Hall of Famer
John Heitinga is mixed. When I looked at profiles (which had pics) of the "Dutch" team a few weeks ago, I immediately recognized Heitinga as "mystery meat."
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/player/_/id/10004/john-heitinga?cc=5901&ver=us
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category
utch_people_of_Indonesian_descent
If it was "natural" for Europeans to have lips that grotesque, I honestly would have no interest in preserving European genetics... I don't think wiki screwed up, not for one moment; Just look at his pics on his wiki page.
Even though I have some Dutch ancestry, I'm glad that Spain won, but I wish there would have been more than 1 total goal in the game.
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/player/_/id/10004/john-heitinga?cc=5901&ver=us
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category
utch_people_of_Indonesian_descentIf it was "natural" for Europeans to have lips that grotesque, I honestly would have no interest in preserving European genetics... I don't think wiki screwed up, not for one moment; Just look at his pics on his wiki page.
Even though I have some Dutch ancestry, I'm glad that Spain won, but I wish there would have been more than 1 total goal in the game.
Deadlift
Hall of Famer
I recall, that some pages back on CF, John Heitinga was being referred to as one of "our" athletes.
So, that's what I'm trying to straighten out. I wasn't responding to Borussia's post. Just wanted to clarify...
So, that's what I'm trying to straighten out. I wasn't responding to Borussia's post. Just wanted to clarify...
waterbed
Mentor
John Heitinga's grandfarther is born in indonesia, and has a white farther and indonensian mother so he is 1/8 indonesian and he is 7/8 white dutch.I see 7/8 white people as white people and people that don't know it of heitinga think he is full blooded white, except Deadlift who can see it impressive no joke. we started every game with 8 whites( including heitinga) and 3 non whites i will tell you why this is a lot. 79.7 of dutch people are ethnic dutch and around 85% of holland is white.But of the younger generation soccer players is far less white then let say the people that are over 50 years old.Because average white dutch women get 1.7 kid against arabs that get 3.7 ( it was even more 20 years ago), black surinamese 2.5 kids somalian around 4 kids etc.( but most of somalians are unbelievable thin and even in soccer you need a bit body or normal body ) so I think under 30 years old's in holland like 30% is non white, the big citys are around 50% white but of young generation is white a minority in big city , and scouts looking for talented mostly in big citys, so whites are not al all underreprsented in the dutch team.
50 years ago people would call the newspaper i have been told if they saw a non white and now you already you have neighberhougds without whites.And you have neighberhouds with a few whites that don't live their because they like it but because they don't have the money to escape as most whites do and search for a white neighberhoud.Bu this is inernational the case i think.
Sorry if i go off topic but sometimes i like to inform you guys about Europe and demograhics etc.
impressive no joke. we started every game with 8 whites( including heitinga) and 3 non whites i will tell you why this is a lot. 79.7 of dutch people are ethnic dutch and around 85% of holland is white.But of the younger generation soccer players is far less white then let say the people that are over 50 years old.Because average white dutch women get 1.7 kid against arabs that get 3.7 ( it was even more 20 years ago), black surinamese 2.5 kids somalian around 4 kids etc.( but most of somalians are unbelievable thin and even in soccer you need a bit body or normal body ) so I think under 30 years old's in holland like 30% is non white, the big citys are around 50% white but of young generation is white a minority in big city , and scouts looking for talented mostly in big citys, so whites are not al all underreprsented in the dutch team.50 years ago people would call the newspaper i have been told if they saw a non white and now you already you have neighberhougds without whites.And you have neighberhouds with a few whites that don't live their because they like it but because they don't have the money to escape as most whites do and search for a white neighberhoud.Bu this is inernational the case i think.
Sorry if i go off topic but sometimes i like to inform you guys about Europe and demograhics etc.
Rebajlo
Mentor
With all due respect to our forum members of Dutch extraction, I must say that I was thoroughly disgusted by the Netherlands' approach in this match, which was supposed to be between the top two teams in the competition - the most watched single sporting event on the planet.
For much of the match, however, one could have believed that one was watching the cynical thugs of Brazil running about in orange shirts, as the Dutch unfortunately employed similar tactics to those which were utilised against them in the quarterfinals.
The first half featured a stream of deliberate fouls perpetrated by the Dutch in order to unsettle the Spaniards and stifle the latter's trademark fluid passing. I fully expected the Netherlands to play a hard defensive game and to rely on counterattacks, but the sheer brutal negativity of their strategy surprised me. They kicked almost every Spanish player in sight and were exceedingly fortunate not to be reduced to ten men following zoo escapee Nigel de Jong's appalling studs-in-the-chest foul on Xabi Alonso - I'm still astounded that he wasn't shown a straight red, yet the Dutch actually had the hide to complain about the refereeing.Given the treatment that they were receiving, with midfield goon Mark van Bommel also tirelessly putting himself about, the Spaniards did well not to blow their tops completely (hell, I would have...) and return the favours with bone-crunching compound interest. But I guess that's why I'm not a top class footballer - that and my lack of the necessary level of skills...
Just likein the Netherlands - Brazil quarterfinal, such churlish spoiling tactics paid dividends for their executors in the first half, for the match was still scoreless, which suited the Dutch game plan of smothering Spain and hoping for a goal from an Arjen Robben-led counterattack, a corner or a free kick. The second half was a bit more open, but I was still less than impressed by the continuing Dutch rough play and their haranguing of the referee, especially by Robben and Wesley Sneijder.I was always hoping for a Spanish victory as they were the only all-White team in contention since the end of the second round and I was mightily relieved when Andres Iniesta scored to prevent the match going to penalties - it would have been a terrible thing if the Dutch had emerged victorious from a penalty shootout, both from a racial point of view and from a purely footballing perspective.
Spain play football exactly how it should be played - i.e., they attack and try to win the game. Their style is based on brilliant individual technique, close control, quick and inventive passing and positive attacking teamwork. Watching Spain is like watching the best quality football from the past, when the objective was to win a match as opposed to not losing a match, when entertaining technique-based football was the norm, not some kind of phenomenal exception. This was the football I watched as a little kid, the football which was generally played up until the first years of the 1990s when the fear of losing became much more important than the desire to win in an impressive manner that could make one's fans proud. Sure, catenaccio and related defence-minded systems were around in various forms since the 1930s, but the philosophy of winning a game was always foremost, be it through constant counterattacking (made possible by the opposition's willingness to attack) or "long ball" football, et cetera. But the era of beautiful technical football ground to a halt with the rise of commercialism and playing for very high financial stakes, which inevitably influenced tactics and therefore changed the game as a spectacle forever. As usual, whenever the business and political sides of things gain the upper hand, the quality of the product being sold suffers adversely. This is exactly the case with football.
The injection of greater numbers of blacks into the sport had a deleterious effect on the level of technique on display. As I mentioned in earlier posts, the American model of "black athleticism" was applied to European football, with an increasing emphasis on"speed" and "power", which the blacks purportedly possess, as opposed to technique and quick thinking, which they most definitely do not. It's no surprise that even the rules of the game changed to accomodate the new breed of (largely black) player with poor technique and tactical awareness but endless straight line running and empty speed - the tackle from behind, whose correct execution required plenty of skill and always allowed defenders to nullify some of the fastest forwards' speed, was banned in 1998, consequently giving the simply "fast" players an instant advantage. The "passive offside" rule was introduced in 2003 ostensiblyin order to facilitate attacking play and reduce stoppages, but one did not have to be a particularly insightful genius to see that some of the reasoning behind the change was to prevent tactically dim-witted black (usually African) strikers who always strayed offside from constantly exploding their teams' attacking moves.
Anyway, sorry for the digression, but it's all to a purpose.
The Spanish victory was a victory for old-style technical football. The media "experts" like to repeat that "modern" football, with its blacks-as-far-as-the-eye-can-see personnel and transparently blunt emphasis on speed and power is a far superior product to the (White dominated) football of previous decades - the cult of the so-called "new era of true professionalism", served up at the altar of pay-TV. Well, Spain have proven that this is all utter bollocks, for the traditional White European style of superb technique and passing has been shown as infinitely superior to the grunting "ultra-professional" philosophies of the modern "athletic"black / non-White-friendly approach.
This is emphatically illustrated by the fact that whichever team played Spain did so in a negative manner, putting everyone behind the ball, fouling, spoiling, and generally sh*tting their pants in an attempt to prevent the Spaniards from playing and scoring, instead of making an effort to score themselves. Why? Because Spain possessed the finest technique, the finest passing, and the most open approach. This was 100% White football played by 100% White men coached by 100% White men.
As I said before - no blacks, no Muslims, no half-breeds, no bullsh*t.
For much of the match, however, one could have believed that one was watching the cynical thugs of Brazil running about in orange shirts, as the Dutch unfortunately employed similar tactics to those which were utilised against them in the quarterfinals.
The first half featured a stream of deliberate fouls perpetrated by the Dutch in order to unsettle the Spaniards and stifle the latter's trademark fluid passing. I fully expected the Netherlands to play a hard defensive game and to rely on counterattacks, but the sheer brutal negativity of their strategy surprised me. They kicked almost every Spanish player in sight and were exceedingly fortunate not to be reduced to ten men following zoo escapee Nigel de Jong's appalling studs-in-the-chest foul on Xabi Alonso - I'm still astounded that he wasn't shown a straight red, yet the Dutch actually had the hide to complain about the refereeing.Given the treatment that they were receiving, with midfield goon Mark van Bommel also tirelessly putting himself about, the Spaniards did well not to blow their tops completely (hell, I would have...) and return the favours with bone-crunching compound interest. But I guess that's why I'm not a top class footballer - that and my lack of the necessary level of skills...
Just likein the Netherlands - Brazil quarterfinal, such churlish spoiling tactics paid dividends for their executors in the first half, for the match was still scoreless, which suited the Dutch game plan of smothering Spain and hoping for a goal from an Arjen Robben-led counterattack, a corner or a free kick. The second half was a bit more open, but I was still less than impressed by the continuing Dutch rough play and their haranguing of the referee, especially by Robben and Wesley Sneijder.I was always hoping for a Spanish victory as they were the only all-White team in contention since the end of the second round and I was mightily relieved when Andres Iniesta scored to prevent the match going to penalties - it would have been a terrible thing if the Dutch had emerged victorious from a penalty shootout, both from a racial point of view and from a purely footballing perspective.
Spain play football exactly how it should be played - i.e., they attack and try to win the game. Their style is based on brilliant individual technique, close control, quick and inventive passing and positive attacking teamwork. Watching Spain is like watching the best quality football from the past, when the objective was to win a match as opposed to not losing a match, when entertaining technique-based football was the norm, not some kind of phenomenal exception. This was the football I watched as a little kid, the football which was generally played up until the first years of the 1990s when the fear of losing became much more important than the desire to win in an impressive manner that could make one's fans proud. Sure, catenaccio and related defence-minded systems were around in various forms since the 1930s, but the philosophy of winning a game was always foremost, be it through constant counterattacking (made possible by the opposition's willingness to attack) or "long ball" football, et cetera. But the era of beautiful technical football ground to a halt with the rise of commercialism and playing for very high financial stakes, which inevitably influenced tactics and therefore changed the game as a spectacle forever. As usual, whenever the business and political sides of things gain the upper hand, the quality of the product being sold suffers adversely. This is exactly the case with football.
The injection of greater numbers of blacks into the sport had a deleterious effect on the level of technique on display. As I mentioned in earlier posts, the American model of "black athleticism" was applied to European football, with an increasing emphasis on"speed" and "power", which the blacks purportedly possess, as opposed to technique and quick thinking, which they most definitely do not. It's no surprise that even the rules of the game changed to accomodate the new breed of (largely black) player with poor technique and tactical awareness but endless straight line running and empty speed - the tackle from behind, whose correct execution required plenty of skill and always allowed defenders to nullify some of the fastest forwards' speed, was banned in 1998, consequently giving the simply "fast" players an instant advantage. The "passive offside" rule was introduced in 2003 ostensiblyin order to facilitate attacking play and reduce stoppages, but one did not have to be a particularly insightful genius to see that some of the reasoning behind the change was to prevent tactically dim-witted black (usually African) strikers who always strayed offside from constantly exploding their teams' attacking moves.
Anyway, sorry for the digression, but it's all to a purpose.
This is emphatically illustrated by the fact that whichever team played Spain did so in a negative manner, putting everyone behind the ball, fouling, spoiling, and generally sh*tting their pants in an attempt to prevent the Spaniards from playing and scoring, instead of making an effort to score themselves. Why? Because Spain possessed the finest technique, the finest passing, and the most open approach. This was 100% White football played by 100% White men coached by 100% White men.
As I said before - no blacks, no Muslims, no half-breeds, no bullsh*t.
Impressive points all around Rebaljo. True, although there has always been a certain amount of fortress defense tactics for decades. Yes, not to the degree of today, but the 'good old days' were far from blissful regarding beautiful attacking strategies.
I agree with your points. Yet, it is not stupid to understand a team's strength and also a team's weaknesses and tactically implement the game plan.
I mean, I hear what you're saying..although please don't be naive enough to think that a team that is weak in technical ability and passing will just go out and play a attack oriented passing game against a team of far superior quality because it's 'good for the game of football' ,etc.
The goal is to win. Sometimes it can be easy, sometimes very difficult.
On a another note: I never understood why sides that are predictable in tactics do not implement specific players which could alter a game. Say England in the early-mid 90s with Matt LeTissier. He was like Gazza without the booze, drugs and attitude.
Point being, is you play with what you have and try to be as tactically aware as possible.
Italy has won world cups doing this. Is it always nice to watch? No, although it is reality.
I agree with your points. Yet, it is not stupid to understand a team's strength and also a team's weaknesses and tactically implement the game plan.
I mean, I hear what you're saying..although please don't be naive enough to think that a team that is weak in technical ability and passing will just go out and play a attack oriented passing game against a team of far superior quality because it's 'good for the game of football' ,etc.
The goal is to win. Sometimes it can be easy, sometimes very difficult.
On a another note: I never understood why sides that are predictable in tactics do not implement specific players which could alter a game. Say England in the early-mid 90s with Matt LeTissier. He was like Gazza without the booze, drugs and attitude.
Point being, is you play with what you have and try to be as tactically aware as possible.
Italy has won world cups doing this. Is it always nice to watch? No, although it is reality.
Jimmy Chitwood
Hall of Famer
as has been mentioned, all the individual and team awards have been monopolized by White athletes. how racist!
here's the complete list of awards that have been made public thus far:
Golden Ball (top overall player): Diego Forlan
Silver Ball: Wesley Sneijder
Bronze Ball: David Villa
Golden Boot (top scorer): Thomas Mueller (also spelledMuller)
Silver Boot: David Villa
Bronze Boot: Wesley Sneijder
Golden Glove (top goalkeeper): Iker Casillas
Best Young Player: Thomas Mueller
FIFA Fair Play Trophy: Spain
some interesting historical perspective:
1) Spain is the second all-White team in a row to win the World Cup (Italy 2006).
2) Mueller is the 10th White athlete in a row to win Best Young Player; that's every awardsince 1970.
3) Every single Top Goalkeeper award in history has been won by a White athlete.
4) Only one non-White athlete has won the Golden Boot since the 1966 World Cup.
*************************************************
the official World Cup all-tourney team hasn't been released yet, but i suspect it will be dominated by White athletes ... much like the Castrol Index Top 11, which only has one possibly non-White player (Argentina's Juan Suarez).
for what it's worth, i'll be posting my All-World Cup team later on. i'm interested in seeing who you guys select, as well.Edited by: Jimmy Chitwood
here's the complete list of awards that have been made public thus far:
Golden Ball (top overall player): Diego Forlan
Silver Ball: Wesley Sneijder
Bronze Ball: David Villa
Golden Boot (top scorer): Thomas Mueller (also spelledMuller)
Silver Boot: David Villa
Bronze Boot: Wesley Sneijder
Golden Glove (top goalkeeper): Iker Casillas
Best Young Player: Thomas Mueller
FIFA Fair Play Trophy: Spain
some interesting historical perspective:
1) Spain is the second all-White team in a row to win the World Cup (Italy 2006).
2) Mueller is the 10th White athlete in a row to win Best Young Player; that's every awardsince 1970.
3) Every single Top Goalkeeper award in history has been won by a White athlete.
4) Only one non-White athlete has won the Golden Boot since the 1966 World Cup.
*************************************************
the official World Cup all-tourney team hasn't been released yet, but i suspect it will be dominated by White athletes ... much like the Castrol Index Top 11, which only has one possibly non-White player (Argentina's Juan Suarez).
for what it's worth, i'll be posting my All-World Cup team later on. i'm interested in seeing who you guys select, as well.Edited by: Jimmy Chitwood
Do you see the Dutch mentality.With the game on the line and time running out the coach puts in Elia and shortly thereafter he puts in an afflete who had not played a minute during the tournament.Oh please save us great black superman from failing hands we pass you the torch.By the way did any of you check out Jacob Zuma sitting up there with the monarchy.I'm sure they had plenty to talk about.It's like what's this spear-chucking savage doing here.Anyway,I'm very pleased that Spain won.Good ball control,crisp passing,creativity,knowing each other and a little patience equals victory.It's great being White,ey.