South Africa World Cup 2010

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,975
Location
Arkansas
a completely dominant performance by Argentina in the 1-0 win.

hopefully, they will put more goals on the board in future matches, but they controlled the game from start to finish. if i'm not mistaken,Nigeria only had 1 shot on goal. the green-clad african sidewas pathetically inept on offense. offensive, in fact! *pun*
smiley36.gif
theNigeriankeeper, though, was stellar.
 

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
Messi while still scoreless is a joy to watch on the pitch and could have had four goals in that game against the Nigerians. He is Steve Nash with the ball at his feet except Messi obviously has world class speed.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
Jimmy Chitwood said:
a completely dominant performance by Argentina in the 1-0 win. 
<div> </div>
<div>hopefully, they will put more goals on the board in future matches, but they controlled the game from start to finish. if i'm not mistaken, Nigeria only had 1 shot on goal. the green-clad african side was pathetically inept on offense. offensive, in fact! *pun*
smiley36.gif
 the Nigerian keeper, though, was stellar. </div>

All the people in America who keep saying the US needs more black players should take a look at this game. Nigeria as 150 million people also.
 

Deadlift

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
5,240
Location
North Carolina
Europe said:
You can tell the difference in skill in this game. The announcer mentioned that Nigeria didn't look "athletic" out there.Look at Messi picking apart the supposed great black athletes.

Just like most black quarterbacks have horrible touch on their throws, the Nigerians had abysmal touch with their feet, especially in the first half.

Just like many blacks in the "vaunted" NBA don't even know how to properly dribble, the Nigerians had no "ball-skills" in the first half.


Argentina really should have put them away, though.
smiley6.gif
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
Same old coverage by ESPN. Rick Reilly had a story called what if our best athletes played soccer and all the players who were mentioned were black except for a HOCKEY Goalie. So, if you are a hockey goalie,you can be a soccer goalie? Just because you can run people over like a running back doesn't mean you can play soccer. This guy is stupid.He said can you see the English trying to stop Rondo. By English, he means white guys.
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,975
Location
Arkansas
ESPN's commentators tried to make Nigeria sound as if they were competitive in the post-match commentary. "they really applied pressure late" or some such nonsense.

how much pressure was applied when they couldn't put a shot on goal? ha! idiot negrophiles.

as for Rick Reilly, it wouldn't surprise me if he a custom-made pillow to bite. i suspect that his butthole has been worn ragged by black boyfriends over the years, since it's obvious he is in love with every black man on the planet.
 

jcolec02

Mentor
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
886
Location
Tennessee
Jimmy Chitwood said:
ESPN's commentators tried to make Nigeria sound as if they were competitive in the post-match commentary. "they really applied pressure late" or some such nonsense.
<div> </div>
<div>how much pressure was applied when they couldn't put a shot on goal? ha! idiot negrophiles.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>as for Rick Reilly, it wouldn't surprise me if he a custom-made pillow to bite. i suspect that his butthole has been worn ragged by black boyfriends over the years, since it's obvious he is in love with every black man on the planet.</div>
smiley36.gif
smiley36.gif
smiley36.gif
that is the funniest S@%# I have heard all day!!
 

Borussia

Guru
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
231
Location
Florida
Only real impressive part of WC 2010 so far: Argentina.

Wow, just pure class. Messi is astounding. I know Brazilians who 'hate' Argentina due to their rivalry, yet love Messi and actually like watching Argentina eviscerate their opponents because it reminds them of the old glory days of the 70s and 80s when Brazil actually played a very skilled, offensive minded and beautiful form of football.
These Bazil freaks want Argentina to be great and play them in a semi or final.
Well, that says something in my book. Wanting your rival at their peak and to play them for all the marbles.
That's confidence.

From a Caste perspective, Argentina, Spain and maybe Serbia will make us proud.

France is so funny to watch..really we should call them Senegal north.
England looks like typical England - mixture of bone headed mistakes, physical, yet totally ineffective play with tactics that are bar league level. USA has improved, but won't do much once the knockout phase begins (assuming they make it out of the group).

Greece is just pure crap, Nigeria's GK had (oddly) the best individual game from anyone as of yet - lol!
I'm not surprised about South Korea. I have them getting out of the group in my pool.

Trust me, South Africa will advance. I should have placed money on this happening, it was almost a lock as much as anything.
The place for 2nd in Group A will be between Mexico and Uruguay.

WC so far has not been impressive at all outside of Argentina.
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,975
Location
Arkansas
i think y'all will enjoy reading this opinion piece: Football and the Decline of Man.


an excerpt:

England is suddenly abloom with men, too often shirtless, who feel constrained to brandish Chinese-made St. George's flags (the only kind of "patriotism"Â￾ these helots are permitted) while they glug Danish lager and periodically arise from Chinese-made, popcorn-plastered DFS sofas to do Mexican waves -- that is, when they are not apostrophizing the blind ref, or the mistakes of Rooney or Ferdinand or somebody else who has spent much of his life musing on his metatarsals and endeavoring to remember the salient fact that he is engaged in a game of two halves.
<DIV =itemFullText>


This time, to add to all the usual drivel, there is a new annoying ingredient -- this is "Africa's World Cup,"Â￾ a chance for Africa to show what it can do, a time for stereotypes to be confounded, for a divided nation to come together and face down the apartheid legacy, vibrant continent, diverse, colorful, etc., etc.


This weeklong sermonizing is accompanied by winsome imagery -- townshippers with names like Precious dancing the toyi-toyi while waving plastic assegais -- gap-toothed, grinning, barefoot, ebullient boys bending it like Beckham on fields fashioned apparently from broken glass and landmines -- multiracial (though actually almost entirely black) crowds swaying and harmonizing below the outsized, fluttering Y-Front symbols of the "Rainbow Nation."Â￾


Behind all this, of course, lie stubborn shabby realities -- of a country slipping rapidly from the Second World into the Third, rampant crime, soaring debt, abysmal public health and education, political corruption and extremism, effective expulsion of whites, intertribal divisions, and violent tension against immigrants from even worse-off countries pressing down from the overpeopled north ...
i urge you to read the entire piece by following the link. it's as poignant a commentary as any i've seen regarding the multi-culti aspect of modern football.
 

foobar75

Master
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
2,332
I have been following international soccer since the 80s when I was a kid, and what has happened to some of the European teams rosters lately is an unbelivable situation. You used to have pure, 100% white starting line-ups, all the subs were white, and there was no question who and what they represented. Nowadays, teams like France (quite simply another African team), England, Netherlands, etc, are at least half black or more. Even the once great Germans no longer field an all-white team. How long before the last remaining hold-outs, Italy and Spain join the party?
smiley5.gif


Watching today's England-USA game, I felt that both teams were simply too dark. Each should be starting at a minimum 8-9 whites, with perhaps 1-2 token blacks in there. And we clearly witnessed the awful play of the blacks on both team USA and England. Some of these players have no business being on their respective national teams.

I suspect this is the last time we can still root for team USA in a major international competition. They still field a majority white line-up, so I hope they advance out of group play and perhaps make run into the quarter finals (tough task, no doubt).

USA soccer is well on its way to a majority black make-up in the not too distant future. The national team will probably resemble France as early as the 2014 World Cup, and MLS will probably look more and more like the NFL, as whites are slowly phased out. That is why you are seeing the PTB using their lapdogs in the media to pursue the pro-black agenda. The all too common cry of "where are the black players?" is being heard more and more often when discussing US soccer.

In addition, analysts and commentators like the idiots Rick Reilly, Bill Simmons, and others are pushing out columns about what it would be like if supermen LeBron, Rondo, TO, et al, had actually taken up soccer growing up and how unstoppable they would be today. Look for this moronic rhetoric to increase in the coming years until the goal is achieved.

Soccer has been flying under the radar until a few years ago, but the MLS has finally taken hold, team USA now regularly participates and does reasonably well in various international competitions, and therefore men's soccer cannot be allowed to remain a majority white sport.

Hopefully, we'll still be able to root for Spain, Italy (despite their crap style of play) and Argentina in the years to come.
 

f3dor

Guru
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
246
foobar75 said:
I have been following international soccer since the 80s when I was a kid, and what has happened to some of the European teams rosters lately is an unbelivable situation. You used to have pure, 100% white starting line-ups, all the subs were white, and there was no question who and what they represented. Nowadays, teams like France (quite simply another African team), England, Netherlands, etc, are at least half black or more. Even the once great Germans no longer field an all-white team. How long before the last remaining hold-outs, Italy and Spain join the party?
smiley5.gif


Watching today's England-USA game, I felt that both teams were simply too dark. Each should be starting at a minimum 8-9 whites, with perhaps 1-2 token blacks in there. And we clearly witnessed the awful play of the blacks on both team USA and England. Some of these players have no business being on their respective national teams.

I suspect this is the last time we can still root for team USA in a major international competition. They still field a majority white line-up, so I hope they advance out of group play and perhaps make run into the quarter finals (tough task, no doubt).

USA soccer is well on its way to a majority black make-up in the not too distant future. The national team will probably resemble France as early as the 2014 World Cup, and MLS will probably look more and more like the NFL, as whites are slowly phased out. That is why you are seeing the PTB using their lapdogs in the media to pursue the pro-black agenda. The all too common cry of "where are the black players?" is being heard more and more often when discussing US soccer.

In addition, analysts and commentators like the idiots Rick Reilly, Bill Simmons, and others are pushing out columns about what it would be like if supermen LeBron, Rondo, TO, et al, had actually taken up soccer growing up and how unstoppable they would be today. Look for this moronic rhetoric to increase in the coming years until the goal is achieved.

Soccer has been flying under the radar until a few years ago, but the MLS has finally taken hold, team USA now regularly participates and does reasonably well in various international competitions, and therefore men's soccer cannot be allowed to remain a majority white sport.

Hopefully, we'll still be able to root for Spain, Italy (despite their crap style of play) and Argentina in the years to come.

i agree, but i dont worry about it now.

Spain, and italy trust me are very racially aware. PLus did you see nearly 100 percent white team argentina yestersday. The argies consider themselves europeans whites. They were awesome.

So you could look at it from a glass half empty, but i just think that when the spains, the italie's, the argentinas win the world cup, which imo it will bem one of those teams. Then its another victory for this site.

Trust me the self hating whites and the blacks would be yelling that blacks would be best if they were represented in soccer. They are so they have no excuses, lets see who wins, the whites or the blacks.

When i saw the team selction for england i knew we were in trouble. But gareth barry coming back, whihc will eradicate heskey, as i predicted ledly kings body is crumbling so dawson/carragher will take his place. And i reckon joe cole will out the ineffectual Shaun wright phillips.

As for holland, they are actual like arsenal, they are getting whiter, robben, sneider, kuyt, van persie etc. Wheras about 5 years ago, they had egar davids, sedorf, kliverts, they were very black.

The champpions league final was 95 percent white. A big statement to all the managers that pick africans.

Also from a grass roots level, what up and coming black players are they???None.

So let the teams that pickm blacks fail. BTW this is not a racial thing, i bet that the aisan teams and the non white african teams do better than an black team.

Edited by: f3dor
 

trackster

Mentor
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
926
Yes, but Algeria has an all-white team (in fact, 17 of 23 were born in France, which is ironic when you consider the French team). Great win for Slovenia, at any rate--they're the smallest country in the tournament. Hard not to root for an underdog like that.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
trackster said:
Yes, but Algeria has an all-white team (in fact, 17 of 23 were born in France, which is ironic when you consider the French team).  Great win for Slovenia, at any rate--they're the smallest country in the tournament.  Hard not to root for an underdog like that.

Yes, that's the joke of international football. Are Algerians white? You will get some argument on this board. They are certainly not European and shouldn't be in Europe. They are completely different culturally.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
England should start J cole on the left, Gerrard and Barry in the middle and Milner on the right. Lampard can come off the bench and maybe start the next game to give Gerrard a rest. Carrick can come on for Barry because Barry won't be fully fit yet, Crouch and Rooney up front.Edited by: Europe
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
Serbia, a white team that looked great in qualifying, are playing like boys against Ghana. Its 0-0 and they're a man down.

As JimmyC has mentioned, the "best players in the world"Â￾ (on almost every squad) are looking supremely sloppy, unskilled, and boring. Everything about this World Cup seems illegitimate. The white nations who employ blacks (France, England, USA, Germany) deserve everything that's coming to them. For the first time ever, I will be rooting against my homeland, Germany.

Hopefully an all-white squad (I don't care who) will emerge and flush this field of turds.Edited by: Thrashen
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
Thrashen said:
Serbia, a white team that looked great in qualifying, are playing like boys against Ghana. Its 0-0 and they're a man down.



As JimmyC has mentioned, the "best players in the world"Â￾ (on almost every squad) are looking supremely sloppy, unskilled, and boring. Everything about this World Cup seems illegitimate. The white nations who employ blacks (France, England, USA, Germany) deserve everything that's coming to them. For the first time ever, I will be rooting against my homeland, Germany.



Hopefully an all-white squad (I don't care who) will emerge and flush this field of turds.

Thrasen, Germany's roster has 2 blacks on it. I see your point though that's two too many.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
whiteathlete33 said:
Thrashen said:
Serbia, a white team that looked great in qualifying, are playing like boys against Ghana. Its 0-0 and they're a man down.

As JimmyC has mentioned, the "best players in the world"Â￾ (on almost every squad) are looking supremely sloppy, unskilled, and boring. Everything about this World Cup seems illegitimate. The white nations who employ blacks (France, England, USA, Germany) deserve everything that's coming to them. For the first time ever, I will be rooting against my homeland, Germany.

Hopefully an all-white squad (I don't care who) will emerge and flush this field of turds.
Thrasen, Germany's roster has 2 blacks on it.  I see your point though that's two too many.

Well, Ghana gets lucky with a handball.

To show what a disgrace football has become, the announcer mentioned the Ghana player who played for Portsmouth and was a "hero" because he helped them beat Southampton is the South Coast battle. Now English fans cheer for Africans playing in their rivalry games.Of course, he was shipped to Russia to play in the Russian league. Why not have Russians play in their league?
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
Thrashen said:
Serbia, a white team that looked great in qualifying, are playing like boys against Ghana. Its 0-0 and they're a man down.

As JimmyC has mentioned, the "best players in the world"Â￾ (on almost every squad) are looking supremely sloppy, unskilled, and boring. Everything about this World Cup seems illegitimate. The white nations who employ blacks (France, England, USA, Germany) deserve everything that's coming to them. For the first time ever, I will be rooting against my homeland, Germany.

Hopefully an all-white squad (I don't care who) will emerge and flush this field of turds.

There is no reason Germany and England should have all these minorities. It's not like the US who have had black people for 300 years living there. England, Germany and France decided to let them in in the last 50 years and Germany really the last 10 to 20.
 

Highlander

Mentor
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Messages
1,778
Serbia's play was uninspired. Only when they went down to 10 players because of the red flag did they seem to be inspired...playing as if there was something to actually play for. It's the WORLD CUP, for chrissakes! If that can't motivate you, I don't know what will. It certainly shows they didn't play anywhere near their full potential.

BTW, I hope Ghana's Serbian head coach, Milovan Rajevac, is proud of his team's victory today.</span></span>
Edited by: Highlander
 

Guest

Newbie
Joined
Dec 17, 2005
Messages
82
Europe said:
trackster said:
Yes, but Algeria has an all-white team (in fact, 17 of 23 were born in France, which is ironic when you consider the French team).  Great win for Slovenia, at any rate--they're the smallest country in the tournament.  Hard not to root for an underdog like that.

Yes, that's the joke of international football. Are Algerians white? You will get some argument on this board. They are certainly not European and shouldn't be in Europe. They are completely different culturally.

Most Algerians and North Africans are White. If you have Caucasoid features and relatively light skin you're white. Being European means nothing as Europe is just a geographic region. Should we not consider Siberians to be White since that is not technically in Europe? What about Turks and Central Asians. We should not let the people who draw maps determine who is White.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
Guest said:
Europe said:
trackster said:
Yes, but Algeria has an all-white team (in fact, 17 of 23 were born in France, which is ironic when you consider the French team).  Great win for Slovenia, at any rate--they're the smallest country in the tournament.  Hard not to root for an underdog like that.

Yes, that's the joke of international football. Are Algerians white? You will get some argument on this board. They are certainly not European and shouldn't be in Europe. They are completely different culturally.

Most Algerians and North Africans are White. If you have Caucasoid features and relatively light skin you're white. Being European means nothing as Europe is just a geographic region. Should we not consider Siberians to be White since that is not technically in Europe? What about Turks and Central Asians. We should not let the people who draw maps determine who is White.

See Rebajlo's posts in the Is Zidane white thread in the soccer section. He has a different perspective and I agree with him.Edited by: Europe
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
Someone on the BBC thread said England should play Rooney at the lone striker and have 5 midfielders: Gerrard,Lampard,Barry,Lennon, J Cole. Barry will be the holding midfielder. I like that.
 

Deadlift

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
5,240
Location
North Carolina
Most Central Asians AREN'T White!

People like to point to Kazakhstan, but that's only one country, and many Whites left when the USSR disintegrated.

Most Turks aren't White, either. Many look like Viets. It's known as "Turkic" (Asiatic) features. Yes, because of invasians, you'll find examples of Turkic features in Hungary, Greece, Balkans, Romania, Bulgaria, Ukraine, but I would SHUN them just like most (Germanic) Aryan Hungarians shun them. If anyone with colored eyes/hair were to mix with the dark eyed/dark haired (and long skulled) Turkics, their White genetics would surely perish... Europe is being invaded, from every direction, by alien genetics.
 
Top