South Africa World Cup 2010

France starting 4 Frenchmen today and 7 Africans. Aren't they worried that starting so may Frenchmen will dilute the African identity of the team?

Uruguay looks a team to cheer for with 9 whites, 1 mestizo and 1 mulatto.
 
Hahaha ... Ribery (white) made a beautiful pass to an open black player who had a goal but - in typical fashion - kicked it wide.

Uruguay is not great but will have a chance due to the inept black players for France.
 
the blonde-haired, blue-eyed Forlan is running circles around the "affletic" "Frenchmen." dwfsthroughout Franceare crying.
 
Ribery picks up a cheap yellow card in the 19th minute ...
 
Forlan has been not just a star but a superstar for Atletico Madrid the past two seasons. I'd love to see him pop one in the net against the so-called French.
 
Forlan had the best chance of the game. If that shot would have been on target it would have been a goal.

Of course, the french negroes couldnt create anything, they only know to run, the uruguyan defenders anticipated their every move.

And that Mexico dissalowed goal was offside. The south african keeper was in front of the mexican who scored at the moment of the pass, so at that moment only one south african was between the goal and the mexican who scored. That is offside.
 
Another affirmative action call when they sent off the Uruguay player with 10 minutes to go. The blacks still couldn't get it done though they had the usual affirmative action help in each game. Look for Mexico and Uruguay to advance in Group A.
 
Liverlips said:
Another affirmative action call when they sent off the Uruguay player with 10 minutes to go. The blacks still couldn't get it done though they had the usual affirmative action help in each game. Look for Mexico and Uruguay to advance in Group A.




i agree. Frace were awful Southafrica were awful as well. Mexico were on a real off day, dont expect them to play that badly again.


France is the closest tothe NFL,in 1998 they had a majority white tema, of coursre they won the world cup. Now they are a shambles. btw they should not even be in this world cup, ireland should be there.

Anyway good results overall, now its time for the real white teams...
 
so far, the level of play in the World Cup has been dreadful.the only highlights through the initial two games wereprovided by the sparse numbers of White players ... which is weird, because i thought it was all that "affleticism"on the African teams (France and South Africa) that was going to makefor someexciting football.
smiley2.gif
 
Jimmy,

Do you know how "they" push black soccer supremacy? They find the few black "highlights" that exist, and they create a video montage and air it repeatedly.

What is it that they say about blind squirrels and finding nuts?...
smiley36.gif



That being said, I'm concerned about Nigeria against the Argentinians. I was going to bet my friend that Argentina wins this match, but I choked...
 
In holland it was white guilt day.They said because of apartheid many people are poor etcetera.I don't know much about apartheid but since I now how Slavery truly was, I never trust it anymore when they talk bad about whites.
 
Jimmy Chitwood said:
the first controversy of the World Cup favors host South Africa ...
<div> </div>
<div>late in the first half of the opening match with the host team, Mexico has a goal disallowed, apparently for being offsides. however, replays clearly show that a South African defender was standing on the post. which means it is completely impossible for the attacking player to be offsides.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>in all honesty, it wasn't even a questionable goal. it was clearly good, yet it was dis-allowed.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>'twas a completely horrible call by the referee.
smiley5.gif
</div>

The results of the first round, are decided by FIFA with few exceptions in advance.No home team has ever failed to make out of the first round. Of course, there is also the issue of the absolute certainty of mass violence if SA doesn't make it out. In the last WC, the "referee" made certain Ghana advanced to the second round (at the expense of the US). So much for alleged black athletic superiority. If the referee didn't "assist" Ghana , no African team would have made the second round.Edited by: jwhite96
 
Liverlips said:
Another affirmative action call when they sent off the Uruguay player with 10 minutes to go. The blacks still couldn't get it done though they had the usual affirmative action help in each game. Look for Mexico and Uruguay to advance in Group A.

Ireland actually beat France and rightfully should be playing in place of France. However, the current second in command of the FIFA mafia is Michele Platini of ..... France. So in the most obvious case in cheating by a referee I've ever seen , he allowed 2 French goals which were the result of Theirry Henry using his hand twice to score the goals. Even someone who knows zero about soccer probably knows you aren't allowed to use your hands (unless it brings in more income to FIFA).

And of course, this a celebration of black athletic and moral superiority. Ireland's team which doesn't have any blacks( I believe)would spoil the atmosphere.Edited by: jwhite96
 
jwhite96 said:
Jimmy Chitwood said:
the first controversy of the World Cup favors host South Africa ...
<div> </div>
<div>late in the first half of the opening match with the host team, Mexico has a goal disallowed, apparently for being offsides. however, replays clearly show that a South African defender was standing on the post. which means it is completely impossible for the attacking player to be offsides.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>in all honesty, it wasn't even a questionable goal. it was clearly good, yet it was dis-allowed.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>'twas a completely horrible call by the referee.
smiley5.gif
</div>

The results of the first round, are decided by FIFA with few exceptions in advance.No home team has ever failed to make out of the first round. Of course, there is also the issue of the absolute certainty of mass violence if SA doesn't make it out. In the last WC, the "referee" made certain Ghana advanced to the second round (at the expense of the US). So much for alleged black athletic superiority. If the referee didn't "assist" Ghana , no African team would have made the second round.

Somebody here on one thread showed how Japan and South Korea got favorable calls when they hosted it in 2002.
 
Both games today were horrible. France is even worse than I though.

South Korea-Greece will be another boring draw(0:0 or 1:1)
smiley5.gif


Greece should be banned from all UEFA & FIFA events, their defensive playing style drive me crazy.
smiley7.gif


The good news are Argentina-Nigeria & England-USA should be good exciting games with many goals.
smiley32.gif
 
Rebajlo said:




ahahah i remember that, i rmemeber southkorea spain. Joaquin did a cross when it was a foot inside the line to set up a goal, but was disallowed. It was unbelievable.


Anyway if heskey starts i am boycotting supporting england....
 
Greece looked awful, as usual. they made Korea look like world-beaters.

up next ... come on, Argentina!
smiley20.gif
 
in the early going, Argentina is making the affletic Nigerians look cement-footed. the Nigerian keeper has been under near-constant attack, whilst the Argentines are pure poetry in motion. they're sharing the ball and getting one scoring chance after another.

they need to take advantage of some of these point-blank shots, though. how many times have we seen a dominant team get stunned in a game they controlled simply because they didn't put the ball in the back of the net, and consequently put the game away ...
 
the Nigerian keeper is certainly earning his cap. he's the only thing keeping the africans in the game. on the few opportunities that the Nigerians have had a chance to score, they've sprayed their shots well wide of the target.

meanwhile, Argentina is relentlessly attacking. their shots are on goal, and it's only the outstanding effort thus far by the Nigerian keeper (including a beautiful finger-tip save of a Messi shot) that has prevented this from becoming a first-half blow-out.
 
Is there a swarm of killer bees descending on South African? I can't stand those horns. Who wants to blow a horn all game? Drums should also be banned.English league games with only singing have the best atmosphere. I hate the English pep band also. I even heard noise makers at the 06 WC in Germany. Please stop it.
 
You can tell the difference in skill in this game. The announcer mentioned that Nigeria didn't look "athletic" out there.Look at Messi picking apart the supposed great black athletes.
 
Europe, you are spot on. Argentina is simply better in all phases of the game, from speed to skill to teamwork. the only problem is that they are NOT taking advantage of all their chances to score ... it's still a 1-0 lead, and that can change very, very quickly.

it should be well put away at this point, with a 2 or 3 goal margin, but the Argentines simply can't solve the problem of the Nigerian keeper, who has had a terrific match.

also, i abhor those horns. they are annoying, like a mosquito in your ear.
 
American Freedom News
Back
Top