Right, where do I start ? Let's begin with "France".
The "French" team has
become African in
every way. Ten of the 23-man squad may be white (although Franck Ribery is a convert to Islam who is married to an Algerian, so hecan for all practical purposes be classified as non-white)but most of the starters and all of the influential so-called
senior players, who have the greatest voice,are black. Such a situation
guarantees friction, dissent, and anarchy fuelled by typical black arrogance, egoism, aggression and a woeful lack of self-control.The insolent, criminally over-paid blacks of course now believe that they can run the show and the results, or lack thereof, are plain to see.
Back in the days of French success at the 1998 World Cup, the overwhelming majority of the mostinfluential senior players
weren't black - Didier Deschamps, Laurent Blanc, Fabien Barthez, Emmanuel Petit, Bixente Lizarazuwere all white, while Zinedine Zidane was a Berber. The only blacks who wereactual definite first-choiceplayers in that tournament weredefenders Marcel Desailly and Lilian Thuram. Thismajority-white / non-black core allowed the team to function as a traditional European unit, exhibiting respect for the manager anda common purpose (i.e., representing France and winning the competition). Non-black players were the dominant element - once this changed after Euro 2000, "France" was unsurprisingly doomed to follow the fractious, disorganised, and ego-fuelled path of every black African team, with the concomitant disasters on the field.
The hallmarks of any black Africanside are sheer lack of organisation and a comically woefulinability to deal with pressure. I'm sure that You have all noticed that every black African team has a white manager and white senior staff - can You imagine the tactical chaos if they were managed at this level by fellow blacks?
That's the thing - 100% black African players can be relatively successful in European club football as
specific components ofteams in which all of the "serious tactical thinking" is performed by whites, mestizos or Brazilian-style mulatto / quadroon / octoroontypes. The "blacker"the team, the more disorganised and less successful it becomes. When all of these black African "stars" line up in their respective 100% black national teams, without non-blacks to provide the on-fieldleadership, tactical creativityand stability, they arequite hilarious to behold. Once even theslightest pressure is on, the blacks tend to fall to pieces in no time.
Anyway, I'm glad that "France" has been disposed of - I'm sure that the blame shall be placed squarely on the "racist" coach and "racist" white players, who were only picked for their skin colour...
The funny thing is that despite all of the endless hype about the rise of African football and "Africa's destiny", it appears that in all probability not one African side shall manage to make the second round. Remember my post about FIFA aiding an African team to the semifinal stage? For anyone who hasn't read it, (and actually cares
) here's the link again:
http://www.castefootball.us/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=11069&PN=4&title=2010-world-cup
I used the example of the "easy ride" afforded to South Korea in 2002, but this year the situation is a bit different. Why? Because black African teams completely lack the discipline to utilise any advantages that they may be given by the officials. I must admit that theblacks have been
much worse than I anticipated - in order to illustrate, let's look at the Australia- Ghana match.
The Ghanaian keeper'sfailure to hold Mark Bresciano's free kick (pressure, pressure
) led to Australia's goal. The leftist FIFA hierarchy would have collectively soiled themselves in consternation, given that they all probably assumed that the Ghanaians would beat Australia and earn three points, to add to the three that they wereliterally handedby Serbia, thus setting themselves up nicely for the match against Germany.But no, the Australians chucked a toolbox into the creaky African works! What now? As things were, the penalty situation popped up, Ghana was even and Australia was a man down. The FIFA t**sers and white-hating losers worldwide couldn't believe their luck and definitely thought that this would result in an easy Ghanaian win. The Africans, in their excitement, began to put in hefty challenges culminating inLee Addy's brutal tackle from behind on Bresciano - which only earned him a yellow instead of the
normally odds-on red. Here was an obvious "helping hand" for an African team, allowing them to maintain a one-man advantage, in the expectation that they would make it count by translating it into winning goals. But could they do it? Of course not. Despite plenty of possession and heavy breathing, they couldn't score, began to lose heartand as the match wore on Australia came back into it. Once the Socceroos applied the torch later in the second half, the Ghanaians looked terrible, even though they were a man up - theywere jumpy and began giving the ball away needlessly in all kinds of dangerousplaces. If Australia had more of an attacking edge, the Africans would have been finished, no questions asked. Funnily enough, Gourcuff was sent off against hosts South Africa, giving them 65 minutes of numerical advantage by which to increase their goal difference - but what could they achieve? A 2 - 1 win against apsychologically fractured team lacking the desire to compete.
This leads me to my next point, viz.: what can FIFA possibly do to salvage the "African dream" and put at least one African team into the second round? Not much, it seems, because as things stand there are only three teams from that continent still in the running, but all of their chances appearslimmer than a snake's arse. Let's examine them.
The "great hope"
that is the Ivory Coast look stuffed. In order for them to have any chance at all Portugal first has to lose to Brazil. But a "normal" loss won't suffice, given that Portugal's drubbing of North Korea gave them a goal difference of 7, while that of the Ivory Coast is currrently an impressive -2, whichyields an overall difference of 9. That means that even if Brazil beat Portugal 3 - 0, the Elephants (one has to love those nicknames
) would have todefeat the Koreans by seven goals in order to qualify. What are the chances of that? I'm sure that the North Koreans shall have a player sent off to help boost the Ivorian's goal difference, but I can't see Brazil doing over Portugal by a large margin (or, for that matter,even doing them at all). Ifthe Portuguese have a man sent off
andthe North Koreans likewise, well, we shall be seeing desperate acts on the part of the powers that wish to elevate black African football at all costs.
If Ghana couldn't put away a ten-man Australia, then they look utterly incapable of beating Germany in a high pressure match.In order to give the Africans a chance, the Ghanaians would have to be given a penalty AND the Germans would have to have
two players sent off
.Barring the aforementioned shadowy scenario, I cannot see Germany failing to win this match. This would leave Ghana on 4 points and switches our attention to the Australia - Serbia game.
If Serbia wins, then Ghana are out. IfSerbiaget a draw and Ghana loses by more than a goal, Ghana are out. If Australia win, well, that would benefit the Africans
providing they can avoid a thrashing against Germany (which I seriously doubt), because I don't believe that the Socceroos can score remotely enough goals to wipe out their current -4 goal difference. If Germany, for example,beat Ghana3 - 0, Australia would have to beat Serbia by two goals.
The final African team is Algeria, who are overwhelmingly non-black, so their "prestige" value for leftists is automatically far, far lower. Group C is quite finely balanced, especially in terms of goal difference, but the "racial dynamic" is rather peculiar, as bothEngland and the United States field more black players than the North African Algerians. If black players are required to be a highly visible elementin the tournament, then it would be preferable for Slovenia and, paradoxically, Algeria to be eliminated in favour of England or the United States...
Thankfully,I don't have to turn up to work tomorrow until the late afternoon (a true stroke of Fortune!), so I'll be able to cram in both theEngland and Australia games.
The nerves are on edge already...
