Werner's only season as a full time starter was in 2014, where he posted 50 tackles, 4 sacks, and a forced fumble.
Not great, but decent. Similar stat line to 2015 first rounders Bud Dupree and Vic Beasley.
I guess, not good enough for the Colts, who turned around and signed Trent Cole at a price tag of $8 million per year. and here's what 33 year old Cole did in 2015: 32 tackles, 3 sacks, and 2 forced fumbles.
So you could develop Werner, a young player that you spent a first rounder, only coming at a cost of around $2 million per year, at most. Instead, you bring in the aging veteran Cole, clearly in decline, pay him $8 million per year, and receive less production.
Colts then respond by cutting Werner, and keep the high-priced Cole, who will head into 2016 as the favorite to start at OLB.
Any lurking DWFs, please explain the reasoning on this one. Is it stupidity, or perhaps an ulterior motive?