Is it really true franchise QB's have no input on offensive players? That seems odd. What boss doesn't get expect their senior employees to provide some feedback on the people they are going to interact with? I find it hard to believe that a Brady or Manning is not solicited for their opinions on the guys they throw to a hundred times a season. I'm not saying they have yea or nay status on players but on the other hand how can super competitive people not want to have input on important decisions?
I think their input will vary from situation to situation, Denver is clearly different then Indianapolis but still, is a GM not going to care if a QB doesn't have chemistry (or dislikes) a receiver? I imagine in many cases it's very important. In almost every employment situation the viewpoint of other employees holds a lot of weight. I don't see why it wouldn't in football.
Franchise QB's are not GM's but I think they can have some influence in player decisions.
I think their input will vary from situation to situation, Denver is clearly different then Indianapolis but still, is a GM not going to care if a QB doesn't have chemistry (or dislikes) a receiver? I imagine in many cases it's very important. In almost every employment situation the viewpoint of other employees holds a lot of weight. I don't see why it wouldn't in football.
Franchise QB's are not GM's but I think they can have some influence in player decisions.