Miss California 2009!

[j41181]

Any of you guys still into this stuff?

I hardly pay attention since many of the most recent winners have been either black, Hispanic, or oriental looking. But latest winner is a breath of fresh air, she's a hot blond from North Carolina. Great stuff, consider that Tyler Hansbrough just led the Tar Heels to this year's NCAA championship. She seems a little short, but good enough for any hot-blooded white dude.

I guess there's hope for America after all.

Miss USA 2009 (North Carolina winner)

But Gentlemen, this is the REAL Winner!!!

Miss California 2009 (Carrie Prejean)</font> Edited by: j41181

 

[whiteathlete33]

Yes they always have to have black or hispanic winners in everything so it doesn't look racist.

 

[Jimmy Chitwood]

i have to tell you, i don't follow these kinds of deals. that being said, i fully support Miss California after her proud stance. she proudly affirmed that she believed marriage should be only between a man and a woman when asked a controversial question, and the usual suspect leftists have been giving her a hard time over it.


you are awesome, Miss California!

she is pretty good looking, too.

 

[guest301]

Good for her.

It just goes to show you what a sick perverted time we are all living in when someone stating that a marriage should be between a man and a woman is considered controversial.

 

[darthvader]

The appropriate response should have been "in case you didn't know homosexuals are very very very very very very sick people.

 

[j41181]

i have to tell you, i don't follow these kinds of deals. that being said, i fully support Miss California after her proud stance. she proudly affirmed that she believed marriage should be only between a man and a woman when asked a controversial question, and the usual suspect leftists have been giving her a hard time over it.


you are awesome, Miss California!

she is pretty good looking, too.

 

 

I'm with you there!! She's an awesome blond too!

She should've won!!!

What's wrong with defending traditional marriage?

Damn these stinking liberals!

 

[j41181]

The gay judge who asked Miss California is a scum sucking dickhead!

God bless, Miss California! More power to you!

 

[Animalmuther0]

If you got a weak stomach, don't watch this ass-clown.

Loathesome. Shot down because she was raised with the morals of a man/woman marriage.

 

[GiovaniMarcon]

Sometimes I wish I were dead, just so that I could have a grave to turn over in whenever I hear crap like this.

She should have won. And, also told that homo judge that women's shoes and makeup are for WOMEN.

 

[Colonel_Reb]

I'm with Jimmy and j41181 on this one. Miss California should have won, and was supposedly way ahead until she gave that answer. This PC, filthy garbage sickens me.
Edited by: Colonel_Reb

 

[Tired old White]

I flipped through the photographs on at Foxnews and it is awesome that the top two girls were white because at least a third and maybe as many as half the contestants were black, Hispanic and I believe at least one Asian. Did Perez Hilton ask all the contestants this question or just Miss California?

 

[Don Wassall]

Miss Arizona was hispanic, one of only a couple that I could tell for sure, and she came in third. I thought she was going to win because she seemed like the crowd favorite. None of the blacks made the final five, highly unexpected in this era of open worship by thesystem of everything black. There was only one asian and she was a non-factor. I thought California was going to win, and she probably would have except she displeased the intolerant, hate-filled homosexual judge.


BTW, that was the first time I'd seen Miss USA or Miss America in a long time. Edited by: Don Wassall

 

[Jimmy Chitwood]

not surprisingly, the flaming homo queen that was a judge at the Miss USA contest is throwing more fuel on the fire. *pun*


also, not surprisingly, the abomination doesn't offer an apology and adds further insults... from WorldNetDaily.

Miss USA judge calls beauty queen 'C-word'
Openly homosexual blogger defaces contestant's photos, gives her 0 score

<HR SIZE=1>



Posted: April 21, 2009
8:50 pm Eastern




By Chelsea Schilling
©2009WorldNetDaily



<DIV =Kona JzR5n="true">



<TABLE align=right>
<T>
<TR>
<TD width=297>

Perez Hilton is known for his flamboyant and outrageous behavior
</TD></TR></T></TABLE>


Note: This story contains material that some readers might consider graphic and offensive.


An openly homosexual blogger and judge of the Miss USA pageant has launched into a full-blown attack on Christian contestant Carrie Prejean - calling her a b-tch and a c---, as well as defacing photos of her with sexually explicit drawings - because she believes marriage should be between a man and a woman.


At Sunday night's pageant, Prejean was asked the one question she dreaded most, "Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same-sex marriage; do you think every state should follow suit?"


Her answer, which suddenly has made her the center of both praise and scorn, included the words, "In my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that's how I was raised and that's how I think it should be - between a man and a woman."


Prejean received cheers and applause, along with some boos from the audience. As other contestants watched from backstage, the room was silent.


"A lot of people were shocked," Miss Vermont told Fox News. "We were all kind of giving each other those eyes, we couldn't believe it."


But blogger and celebrity "judge" Mario Armando Lavandeira, also known by alias Perez Hilton, a self-described "queen of all media," immediately tore into Prejean in a YouTube video he made right after the contest's conclusion, calling her a "dumb b-tch" and claiming she had given "the worst answer in pageant history."


He admitted to giving Prejean a zero score.


In a follow-up interview on MSNBC, the flamboyant judge was asked if he had apologized for his reaction, but instead he added to it.


"I don't apologize," Hilton said on air. "Over the course of the past 24 hours, the more I've thought about it, the more - you know what? - No, I'm going to stand by what I said just like she's standing by what she said. And I called her the 'b' word, and hey, I was thinking the 'c' word."


Prejean, a student at San Diego Christian College, was first runner-up, primarily due to Hilton's vote.


The outraged pageant judge later displayed a photo of Prejean speaking into the microphone on his website. In place of the mic, he drew a white outline of a penis on her face.


Keith Lewis, executive director of Miss California USA/Teen USA, wrote a supportive letter to Hilton, condemning Prejean.


"As co-executive director of Miss CA USA and one of the leaders of the Miss CA family, I am personally saddened and hurt that Miss CA USA 2009 believes marriage rights belong only to a man and a woman," he wrote. "Although I believe all religions should be able to ordain what unions they see fit, I do not believe our government should be able to discriminate against anyone. Religious beliefs have no place in politics in the Miss CA family."


Prejean, already crowned Miss California, was considered a front-runner in the Miss USA contest, but she knew her answer to that one question might not sit well with the panel, especially Hilton.


"Out of all the topics I studied up on, I dreaded that one; I prayed I would not be asked about gay marriage," Prejean told the Fox News Channel's Courtney Friel in an exclusive interview. "If I had any other question, I know I would have won."


Despite providing a response that ultimately cost her the crown, Prejean stood by her answer.


"I knew at that moment after I answered the question, I knew, I was not going to win because of my answer, because I had spoken from my heart, from my beliefs and for my God," she told NBC's "Today" this morning. "I wouldn't have answered it differently. The way I answered may have been offensive. With that question specifically, it's not about being politically correct. For me it was being biblically correct."



<TABLE align=center>
<T>
<TR>
<TD width=200>

Miss Caliornia Carrie Prejean
</TD></TR></T></TABLE>


Hilton also appeared on NBC's "Today," explaining that he demands a Miss USA winner be "politically savvy" and that even though Prejean is a Christian, he doesn't want her "talking about Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, because that's offensive."

there is muchmore to the article on the link, including video of her response and audio of the ****'s criticism.

 

[The Hock]

When I was a kid I used to watch these pageants and flip out over all the babes. Then I got old enough to understand women this gorgeous wouldn't give me the time of day and quit watching. I can pull sevens and eights. Nines and tens are out of reach.

The whole questions seems like a setup. So some Mexican queer who wears pink wigs didn't like her answer and it cost her the pageant. He did her a favor. Now she and her answer will be remembered much more than the PC winner ever will be.

What is it the women say to each other?

You go girl.

 

[OldSchoolBoy75]

Calling Miss California a beeyotch and a c-u-next-tuesday shows how uncouth, callous and unprofessional this glorfied ghey blogger is. Aren't ghey people supposed to be the paragons of "tolerance" that they're always telling America what they lack? Truly the pot calling the kettle black! But this is not unusual for them; remember when Proposition 8 was passed in California; didn't a number of actors and comics do some improv/street theatre-esque film attacking those who supported the proposition? When it comes to "ghey rights", if people like him don't get what they want, they show their true (rainbow) colors. Just another reason why ghey is.....SO GAY!

 

[Don Wassall]

This is a perfect example of the gradualism method of subversion and revolution. Can you imagine anything like this in pre-1967 America?A beauty queen loses a pageant because she believes marriage should be between a man and a woman?????? And she loses because of a flamboyant homosexual queen, an outlandish individual who operates in the open because the entire power structure -- from the media to academia to both wings of the one-party system --is dominated by fellow homosexuals who push an agenda demanding same sex marriage?


It would be simply beyond the comprehension of any American until recently in our history, no more credible than the assertion that in 2009 the Moon would be widely believed to be made of green cheese. The men of this country would not have allowed it, and the women of this country would have been foursquare against it. A biped like Perez Hilton would not have dared to appear in public, much less be some kind of "celebrity," and if he had he would have suffered a sure and just beatdown, every time.


A thousand other analagous situations, morally, racially, socially, and economically, could be cited. Our country has gone down the moral sewer straight to the depths of hell. Edited by: Don Wassall

 

[Don Wassall]

Nothing against the lovely Miss North Carolina who took the title, but this is my Miss USA 2009:

 

[Colonel_Reb]

Miss Prejean is my Miss USA as well! That girl has convictions and guts and stands by her beliefs. She earned my respect by her public stand.

 

[sport historian]

This is a perfect example of the gradualism method of subversion and revolution.  Can you imagine anything like this in pre-1967 America?  A beauty queen loses a pageant because she believes marriage should be between a man and a woman??????  And she loses because of a flamboyant homosexual queen, an outlandish individual who operates in the open because the entire power structure -- from the media to academia to both wings of the one-party system -- is dominated by fellow homosexuals who push an agenda demanding same sex marriage?


It would be simply beyond the comprehension of any American until recently in our history, no more credible than the assertion that in 2009 the Moon would be widely believed to be made of green cheese.  The men of this country would not have allowed it, and the women of this country would have been foursquare against it.  A biped like Perez Hilton would not have dared to appear in public, much less be some kind of "celebrity," and if he had he would have suffered a sure and just beatdown, every time.


A thousand other analagous situations, morally, racially, socially, and economically, could be cited.  Our country has gone down the moral sewer straight to the depths of hell.  &lt;!-- Message ''"" --&gt;

As someone born in 1950, I have seen this in my lifetime. Over the last 40 years, I have often been amazed at the social breakdown in this country, and the complete indifference to it by the so-called elites. Over the centuries, most ruling classes, no matter how different, would prefer to have a somewhat disciplined society with crime and other disfunction kept under control. Society would seem to be easier to rule. Not the rulers in the Western countries today. Do they want it to be a divide-and-rule scenario? They may be surprised one of these days when there is nothing left to rule.

 

[Bart]

This is a perfect example of the gradualism method of subversion and revolution.  Can you imagine anything like this in pre-1967 America? 

It is also interesting that most of the media is placing the onus on her for making controversial statements, when in fact MOST of the people in this country agree with her. Everything has been turned upside down.

 

[Don Wassall]

This is a perfect example of the gradualism method of subversion and revolution. Can you imagine anything like this in pre-1967 America?A beauty queen loses a pageant because she believes marriage should be between a man and a woman?????? And she loses because of a flamboyant homosexual queen, an outlandish individual who operates in the open because the entire power structure -- from the media to academia to both wings of the one-party system --is dominated by fellow homosexuals who push an agenda demanding same sex marriage?



It would be simply beyond the comprehension of any American until recently in our history, no more credible than the assertion that in 2009 the Moon would be widely believed to be made of green cheese. The men of this country would not have allowed it, and the women of this country would have been foursquare against it. A biped like Perez Hilton would not have dared to appear in public, much less be some kind of "celebrity," and if he had he would have suffered a sure and just beatdown, every time.



A thousand other analagous situations, morally, racially, socially, and economically, could be cited. Our country has gone down the moral sewer straight to the depths of hell.


&lt;!-- Message ''"" --&gt;

As someone born in 1950, I have seen this in my lifetime. Over the last 40 years, I have often been amazed at the social breakdown in this country, and the complete indifference to it by the so-called elites. Over the centuries, most ruling classes, no matter how different, would prefer to have a somewhat disciplined society with crime and other disfunction kept under control. Society would seem to be easier to rule. Not the rulers in the Western countries today. Do they want it to be a divide-and-rule scenario? They may be surprised one of these days when there is nothing left to rule.

I really don't think people born after the end years of the baby boom (roughly those born after the early 1960s) have any way to fully comprehend how much things have changed in America, especially when it comes to how men and women act now as compared to previous generations. It's not their fault asthe past hasbeen pretty much expirgated from textbooks and by the media as Orwell's "1984" has been fulfilled and then some, and older Americans (sadly most can be classified as DWFs) have capitulated to their oppressors when not actively supporting them.


Previous generations have always complained about the values and mores of those that came after them. But it's indisputable that American moral and social values have been completely turned upside down since the Permanent Cultural Revolution went into high gear beginning in 1967-'68.Edited by: Don Wassall

 

[jaxvid]

Previous generations have always complained about the values and mores of those that came after them.  But it's indisputable that American moral and social values have been completely turned upside down since the Permanent Cultural Revolution went into high gear beginning in 1967-'68.

It really is unbelievable. I sometimes think this is all a bad dream and I'll wake up. It is almost impossible to comprehend the changes and how fast they have come. It is also unreal in comparison to what has come before.

As an example, take my grandfather. He lived to see society change from primarily a rural one to mostly an urban one. He lived through the first flight and through the moon landing. But so much of what really mattered was the same for his whole life like it had been for generations.

From the day he was born to the day he died he lived in a world where basic morality was unchanged. People, no matter their religion, believed in moderation, prudence, and honesty. Sex was a private matter. Homosexuality was not debated to be right and wrong, it wasn't even mentioned. The idea was too disturbing. Folks hung out, lived, married, and procreated with their own kind.

The leaders of past generations were venerated for their accomplishments. The history of their people was a proud one. Every media outlet in the country affirmed the goodness of our history and way of life. TV, movies, the news, had a "slant", the slant was to reinforce good moral behavior in all people.

This is the way it was for all 90 years of his life. My life began in his era up to now.

What do I tell my kids? They live in a world were morality and religion are a joke. Everything they are exposed to is aimed at destroying the principals that guided humans through thousands of years of civilization.

I can only assume that there is either a concerted effort or a mental thought process disease among humans today. It is as Don says an effort to reverse EVERY concept of morality. All of the basic morality that mankind has developed over thousands of years.

Men and women together--NO, same sex relations instead.

Honoring of elders, NO, insulting them and trying to stay "young forever" instead.

A belief in a higher power and eternal existance--NO, living totally for the here and now.

Living in harmony with your "tribe", NO mixing with and continual friction with all other tribes.

Modesty? NO, trash talking and bragging.

Prudence? NO, unrestrained flashiness and spending. Waste and materialism.

Moderation? NO, excesses in all things.

Intercourse? NO. oral, anal, everything but what nature meant to be.

Those are but a few examples, I could go on and on. The basic idea is that up is now down, right is now left, etc.

Our "enemies" either in person or in concept have declared war on the basic nature of past human existance. Isn't it obvious that the end result of such a thing is non-existance?

I'm not trying to sermonize here but if you were to take a person from 50-60 years ago and plop them down in front of a TV and let them watch it for a while, what would they think? They would think that the the devil or satan or some evil force had taken over and now ruled over the world. There would be no other way for them to understand it. No past generation could have forseen what has happened to our culture.

Every attempt they made to predict the future was a bright cheery look at a continued striving for a better moral world. At the very worst they forsaw a rigid dogmatic society that exercised strict moral control over the populace.

I look around and see a negro president named OBAMA, I see pierced and tatooed teenagers, broken buildings and lives, piles of unused and discarded crap, a political system that has flat out failed, a media incapable and unwilling to tell the truth, a population mix around me that does not want to be together, that does not function well together, and that deep down dislikes each other. And more bad things are to come.

What possess people to live this way? I was never strictly religious, or especially 'moral' yet I find myself so out of place in this world. What gives?

 

[Tom Iron]

jaxvid,

Yes to everything you said. But you and people like you will continue to fight because what you believe in is right and self evident and it can't be forever suppressed. Up is truly up and down is truly down. Can't get away from it. Every time some one tries running away from the truth, they look back and it's always gaining on them.

The Achilles heel of our enemies is they're wrong and we're right. There's no getting around it. Stay Strong.

Tom Iron...

 

[Fightingtowin]

If you got a weak stomach, don't watch this ass-clown.

Loathesome. Shot down because she was raised with the morals of a man/woman marriage.

Yeah, I could only watch about 5 seconds of that.

So stupid, over 50% of Americans don't believe in gay marriage so why is it a big deal that she doesn't believe in it? This is just an extremist causing noise and the liberal media providing a platform for him.

 

[Thrashen]

Jaxvid, that was a legendary and heartfelt post about the great american trasnformation (into an eventual 3rd world county). I'm only 23, and I too have noticed many, many changes in my lifetime as well.

You know, when "controversial" topics like the Miss USA "gay marriage" issue come up....I think of it as the media powers-that-be slowly digging their own grave, shovel by shovel.

I LIKE the idea of white men watching as the wimpy media overlords fake an outrage over her "same sex marriage" response.

I LIKE the idea of white men watching a flaming homosexual "stand up" for himself and "his rights" the way that white men would never, ever be "permitted."

I LIKE the idea of white men allowing that loud-mouthed, flaming little sh*t to go unchallenged within their own state, within their own country.

I LIKE the idea of white men listening to anti-white propaganda on TV, radio, and in athletics.

I LIKE the idea of white men seeing their sons and daughters ruining their gene pools by interbreeding with non-whites...whilst the media and P-T-B weep their pseudo-tears of joy.

At this point in the "transformation," all of these horrible things are neccisary hate fuel to the eventual revolution. After all, eventually, they WILL go too far. Edited by: Thrashen