Miss California 2009!

[guest301]

Great article. Print out copies of that gentleman and pass it around.

 

[DixieDestroyer]

The MSM glorification of sodomite degenerate Hilton is all part of the marketing of evil to "mainstream" the homo agenda and eliminate traditional Christian, American morality. The MSM & "Pink Mafia" are funded/empowered by the Globalist Elite!

 

[Colonel_Reb]

Thanks for posting the article Don. Its a good one!

 

[Tom Iron]

Interesting how they're still going after Miss California. Once a person has stepped on the PC toes, the powers that be are never satisfied until they crucify the individual who has sinned. Their animosity knows no bounds. However, what they don't understand in their frantic attempt at destroying Miss California is that it's always better to let things beautiful young women say and to a large extent do, go. You're always at a disadvantage when you try attacking beautiful young women.

Tom Iron...

 

[j41181]

To Tom Iron,

In other words, it's Beauty and the Beasts (PC-nuts)!!!

 

[ToughJ.Riggins]

I just wanted to say I am proud of this courageous woman for standing up and speaking her mind when she knew she might be crucified as she has been. She said something that MOST people agree with, but was given outright hate by Perez "low-life" Hilton. Hilton is the true hater and he and his blog are pathetic.

I heard though- that the powers that be- may take away this woman's crown simply for topless photos from when she was younger. I think that is only a VERY minor immodest thing and she may not believe in doing those kind of shoots anymore since she says she is a strong Christian. This is NO WHERE NEAR the level of hardcore images.Edited by: ToughJ.Riggins

 

[Van_Slyke_CF]

I don't care if Carrie Prejean did some lingerie shoots or topless photos.

Does anyone really think young women make it big in the modeling/show biz world without showing some skin-at a minimum-to the guys who control the purse strings?

I could be wrong, but I bet very few do.

There was a time a couple of decades ago when Vanna White of "Wheel of Fortune" got additional attention when her lingerie pictures came out.

Somehow I can imagine Carrie Prejean filling Vanna's high heels in a few years when she retires.

All in all, I admire her for her answer during the Miss USA pageant, and wish her the best of luck from here on out.

 

[ToughJ.Riggins]

I agree, it's only slightly immodest and pretty innocent. Actually, compared to the extreme sick stuff out there on the net even Playboy is pretty innocent.

BTW: I'm a libertarian on many issues and understand laws enough (and the Miller test Supreme Court ruling) and believe that any soft core (including Playboy magazine) should be protected as legal by national law.

Anna Kornikova was known to have done topless photos and at least one picture in the recent SI swimsuit issue would be considered soft-core by some people. Models have to portray their beauty to make it in the industry-that's for sure. I don't fault her for her past modeling decisions.

I think the PC police are using this to possibly take away her crown simply b/c she was Un-PC and stated she stays true to her Christian faith.

Edited by: ToughJ.Riggins

 

[jaxvid]

I like the woman and her principled answer in the contest but the picture is too slutty for a professed Christian. End of story. Anyone else, yeah it's no big deal but this chick is portraying herself as conservative and religious.

You don't take your top off and then talk about how religious you are, if you do you will catch a lot of sh*t for it.

But regardless I still support her. After all a foxy blonde with a boob job and semi-nude modeling resume, as well as hating ****s is A-OK in my book!

 

[ToughJ.Riggins]

That's a good point Jaxvid. I mentioned before in my 1st post, if she is a devout Christian she probably wouldn't believe in doing topless photos anymore if she's truly devout. Supposedly- if I recall- it wasn't very recent.

Christians are supposed to be modest. Edited by: ToughJ.Riggins

 

[Don Wassall]

This is the only picture that has surfaced so far, though supposedly more revealing ones may be on the way. This one is PG rated. In fact,it wasn't all that long agowhen movies could show bare breasts and still be rated PG.


Edited by: Don Wassall

 

[Colonel_Reb]

I agree with Tough and jaxvid. Her faith and claims don't match up with this and that is the main reason the press is hounding her. Any excuse to destroy Christianity they will take, and then some.

 

[Bart]

This is the only picture that has surfaced so far, though supposedly more revealing ones may be on the way.  This one is PG rated.  In fact, it wasn't all that long ago when movies could show bare breasts and still be rated PG. 

I don't know about the more revealing photos, but the one seen above is not very racy at all. It probably wouldn't even have caused much of a commotion back in the fifties.

 

[Europe]

She shows more in the pageant than that picture. Even if she has topless photos, who cares.You would be just seeing a little more of her than you saw in the pageant.
She's showing off her nice body either way. Guys still want her topless or not.

 

[Riddlewire]

Should the JCPenny catalog be banned?
As I understand it, this picture was for a modeling job. Just lingerie for a catalog or some such clothing seller. That's why I don't believe any more pictures will turn up. The queer mafia who are intent on destroying her are content to let everyone believe that there's "more where this came from" when, in fact, there isn't.

 

[jaxvid]

More "less" Christian photo's on the way.

I'm liking this girl more and more!!!!

 

[ToughJ.Riggins]

I'm telling you guys- that one particular body paint pic in the latest SI swimsuit issue was probably more racy/ revealing/ "stimulating" than these pics (at least to me). I wouldn't call this girl's shoot "Christian" or anything, but some of the pics I've seen before in a Victoria secret catalog (and the pic I mentioned in the latest SI swimsuit issue) are more provocative than these pics (they show lots of skin by the hips so to speak)

Also, on Fox News- they said Ms. Rhode Island had a provocative shoot done for Maxim. However, she reported her shoot to the pageant heads, so it apparently didn't effect her at all.

I also hear most Europeans are more open about topless pics than Americans. They don't see it as a big deal (just what I've heard). They have tons of topless and even full nude beaches over there in some of those countries anyway.

I say let her keep her crown (this is small stuff). Compared to the "sick hardcore" stuff out there on the net I would consider this just "very slightly" immodest.

Sorry for the rant. I just think this has more to do with them judging her for being un-pc with her comments.

 

[Don Wassall]

Here's an emotional Carrie standing up for herself (and backed by Donald Trump!). I don't know what her aspirations are, but she can be someone Middle America can rally around in reaction to the Gay Mafia that controls the media and both identical monopoly parties.


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22413.html

 

[jaxvid]

Here's an emotional Carrie standing up for herself (and backed by Donald Trump!).  I don't know what her aspirations are, but she can be someone Middle America can rally around in reaction to the Gay Mafia that controls the media and both identical monopoly parties.


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22413.html

Dang that chick is hot! How could you not support her!

 

[Freethinker]

Here's an emotional Carrie standing up for herself (and backed by Donald Trump!).  I don't know what her aspirations are, but she can be someone Middle America can rally around in reaction to the Gay Mafia that controls the media and both identical monopoly parties.


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22413.html

Fantastic response by Carrie. I'm truly happy she hasn't backed down to these slimy punks. I loved how she spoke on freedoms and the "c word" (Constitution that is), which is almost like a dirty word these days. With censorship happening more frequently and constitutional freedoms being violated on a daily basis, its important that people in the public eye stand up for this issues. To most this is just a gay rights/ Christianity issue. I see it as being bigger than that. Its about being able to speak honestly and openly and not having to worry about the PC police harassing you, or in this case being cheated out of a title that was deserved.

 

[Tom Iron]

Quite a young woman there. Wherever her grandfather is now, he's proud of a standup grandaughter. I'm sure her parents are also proud of her.

I know I am.

Tom Iron...

 

[Riddlewire]

I'm disappointed in her personal choices.
However, that doesn't change the fact that the queers have no legitimate argument. They're calling her a hypocrite. For what? I don't recall her ever saying that "nude photographs" are a sin. And the asspirates certainly can't say that they find her conduct unbecoming of a pageant queen. They don't believe in decorum of any kind. So they're certainly not offended by some risque pictures.
The truth is, this is religious discrimination. They want to destroy her because she's a Christian. Furthermore, since Hilton was on the judging panel, and since this pageant is actually a 'job application' since it's a paid position, I'm pretty sure Carrie has an ironclad case against the pageant committee. Hilton verifiably voted against her specifically because of her religious beliefs. And then he gave her plenty of ammo with his further ranting on the internet. If she hasn't already begun legal proceedings, then she has been getting some bad advice.
Edited by: Riddlewire

 

[guest301]

Those pictures were mistakes she made in the past, the nude ones anyway. That doesn't take away from the stand up lady she is now and how strong she has weathered all the personal attacks against her from the sodomites. I support her and pray for her and hope she stays strong and uses the platform she has now to make a difference long after her crown goes away.

 

[jaxvid]

I'm disappointed in her personal choices.
However, that doesn't change the fact that the queers have no legitimate argument. They're calling her a hypocrite. For what? I don't recall her ever saying that "nude photographs" are a sin. And the asspirates certainly can't say that they find her conduct unbecoming of a pageant queen. They don't believe in decorum of any kind. So they're certainly not offended by some risque pictures.
The truth is, this is religious discrimination. They want to destroy her because she's a Christian. Furthermore, since Hilton was on the judging panel, and since this pageant is actually a 'job application' since it's a paid position, I'm pretty sure Carrie has an ironclad case against the pageant committee. Hilton verifiably voted against her specifically because of her religious beliefs. And then he gave her plenty of ammo with his further ranting on the internet. If she hasn't already begun legal proceedings, then she has been getting some bad advice.

I think she's a bit of a hypocrite. Clearly posing nude is a salacious act that would be considered a "sin" in any branch of Christianity. Maybe not rising to the level of sodomy but in the same vicinity. I also think her grandfather would be proud of her stand on free speech and embarassed at her nude pics. What father/grandfather would not be?

Also concerning the "religious discrimination" and any legal case, it is not against any law to discriminate based on religion during a beauty pagent. I don't think it should EVER be against the law to discriminate because of religion. There are all kinds of people I would discriminate against because of their religion and that IS your right in a free society. It should only be against the law for the government to discriminate.

Could a muslim woman sue the pagent for discriminating against her because she would only show her eyes as per her religious beliefs? Of course not.

Anyway Carrie is going to "win" this one. She is going to be a poster girl for people who have been attacked by leftists and with her looks she will be around for a long time in the public eye. Carrie for Governor of California!!!

 

[Don Wassall]

I think she's a bit of a hypocrite. Clearly posing nude is a salacious act that would be considered a "sin" in any branch of Christianity.

I don't find any hypocrisy. She was asked a secular political question and answered it in a secular fashion. If she had said, "As a Christian," or, "As a Christian who has never sinned," that would be different. But I see no hypocrisy whatsoever between posing topless and being opposed to homosexual marriage.