You are going to go back and forth with me on this issue because I'm not going to let you use personal insults and false accusations bully me into not replying. Your MO by the way.
Millions of people would have had to be in on the "conspiracy" for it to be successful. There were 8 missions that went to the moon with 5 landing men. The program lasted 10 years. To fake something like this you would have had to have the people in mission control around the world, contractors, researchers, observers, including hostile governments keep the secret. There would have been people involved in producing the fakes. There would be family members, close friends, many people with no stake in keeping such a secret not saying a word until their death. The idea of such a long term, complicated, conspiracy working is ridiculous.
Why you would insinuate that I support Faucci in some way is plain wrong. I have posted that his manipulation of the covid crisis for his personal gain ensures that some day he will be seen as a monster on the level of Dr. Mengele.
Yes I have not bought into every single conspiracy brought up on this site. But has there ever been a conspiracy you didn't believe? It seems like nothing significant ever happens that isn't staged or entirely made up according to you. Please name 1 conspiracy of the last 80 years you don't believe?
Wrong! No one (at least not me) is saying the space program was a hoax from the beginning. There were many people, I don't know about millions but a lot, involved from the beginning, working on the technology and all the other logistics involved. To start from near nothing in 1961 to landing men on the moon by the end of that decade was a very daunting task to put it mildly. That doesn't mean NASA and everyone else involved at all levels weren't trying their best; what it does (possibly) mean is that as the end of the decade neared, it's possible the desired result was "accelerated" to make it look like it had met its target date when it wasn't going to.
If that's what happened, it would be somewhat similar to one of the many school shooting drills going "live." I know you fervently believe the official conspiracy theories on everything from Sandy Hook to the Boston bombing and others, but a helluva lot of people don't, because there are a lot of discrepancies between the official conspiracy theories presented by the corporate media (which never change in the slightest detail after their initial presentation) and what people who have done their own sleuthing have come up with. The internet certainly has made it easier for individuals to do their own digging, at least before the massive censorship began.
If -- again if -- the moon landings ended up being made for TV events, it would have taken a relatively small number of people knowing about it and executing it. Everything else would have been compartmentalized on a need to know basis, and very few people needed to know. Maybe even the President didn't know. And everyone involved would have had to sign confidentiality agreements, such as has become routine. Think of the employees of Area 51, the intel community, and a lot of other government and private sector jobs. By now there's likely millions of people who have signed confidentiality agreements as part of their employment. And there are very serious penalties for those who sign confidentiality agreements and then subsequently violate them.
All I did was bring up the fact that space technology doesn't seem to have advanced in more than half a century, as there are regular reports of rockets misfiring, exploding, etc., in both the public and private sectors. In fact, that technology seems to have regressed while moving forward by leaps and bounds in every other area. Add in the lack of moon visits in half a century, and it's a legitimate inquiry to wonder why and maybe take a look back at the late 1960s and early 1970s with "new eyes" even though true believers will be making the same excuses even if man doesn't return to the moon for 500 years. But many others aren't that easily convinced.
I certainly wasn't motivated by wanting to "attack" or "demonize" Whites and the discussion was and still mostly is civil among posters. There was nothing racial at all involved from my perspective. But first Extra Point piped in that those who don't buy the official story are motivated by the desire to tear down Whites. Not surprising given that the ironically named Extra Point
has no "extra points" -- he has only one point, a single, simplistic, one-size-fits-all situations talking point that he believes satisfactorily explains everything. And then you piped in about "our critics." I figured that meant you must be a high-ranking NASA official, but it turns out you were the aggrieved would-be spokesman for the entire White race, letting it be known that anyone deviating from the official story can only be motivated by animus toward Whites.
Well, when anyone comes on my site essentially saying I'm anti-White, there's going to be pushback, every time. I was interested, and still am, about discussing topics that are off the mainstream beaten path. If you can't respond without making false accusations about people's motivations, then don't be surprised when yours are questioned.
