PhillyBirds
Mentor
Don Wassall said:We'll see, but Pegasus to this point has the identical m.o. of a long-time troll here.
And perhaps I'm deceived again. Not the first time
Don Wassall said:We'll see, but Pegasus to this point has the identical m.o. of a long-time troll here.
Pegasus said:snow said:"Gerhart ran a 4.55 (confirmed it was the OFFICIAL ELECTRONIC, NOT HAND TIME, which was 4.51), and got the information from people INSIDE the building, scouts from TEAMS, the exact people who you just said are the only people who get the official times that aren't in the top 15"
I follow this stuff just as closely as you do. I remember last year when Toby's fans were screaming bloody murder over his unofficial 4.53 not being included in the official Top 10. That 4.55 came from AVERAGED HANDTIMES from scouts in the building, NOT the official combine electronic time.
FootballDad : "Even Scott Wright at DraftCountdown averaged Toby's 40 out at 4.55, faster than McCluster's 4.58."
ToughJ.Riggins : "Scott Wright who is pretty anti-white had Gerhart's average hand-time at 4.55. NFLdraftscout had Gerhart's best hand time at 4.5 and his worst at 4.61 and his average around the same as Wright."
"A Virginia Tech engineering major did some little project to get more accurate data on his school's athletes. Did something to where he had the film and ran it in slow mo to get the exact time he started and the exact time he finished. Turns out by his project, Grimm ran in the mid 4.5 range (I think 4.53), quite the difference from the 4.64 the nfl had listed for him. And from the way he played this year at safety, I would say 4.64 is a ridiculous time to put on him. Btw, he ran a 4.48 at his pro day. Usually hand times from the same year aren't off by .16, and I doubt the guy who did the project would be off by .11"
Really? Are you sure that's how it happened? From your very post regarding this incident:
"an engineering major from Tech looked at the film of all the players that ran and had did something to where he could time it right when it started and right when it ended, I think the margin of error was .02. He had Grimm in the 4.5 range, and this was before the 2009 season, before he was preparing for the combine."
So basically what you're telling me is the NFL has an anti-white bias because an engineering major timed some OTHER footage of Grimm, running some OTHER 40, at some OTHER time, on some OTHER track, under some OTHER conditions, and had the unmitigated gallto say the time was .11 off of the time he ran at the 2010 combine. Haha, good one.
"9 times out of 10 the hand time is a little bit faster ( usually not much of a difference when getting into the 4.5 range), well no sh*t. When is a hand time ever slower? Coincidentally the one time Newton runs?"
Chris Johnson ran an unofficial 4.29. His official was an even faster 4.24.
http://theredzonereport.com/2008/02/24/sun-night-combine-notes-feb-24/150/
You read fine? I guess you just skipped over those things above
Or are you just going to pick and choose which arguments you want to make and ignore the rest when you have no explanation?
Naa, didn't skip over anything.
<div>celticdb15 said:Pegasus what do you think of WRs Jeff Maehl and Dane Sanzenbacher??
Pegasus said:<div>snow said:"Gerhart ran a 4.55 (confirmed it was the OFFICIAL ELECTRONIC, NOT HAND
TIME, which was 4.51), and got the information from people INSIDE the
building, scouts from TEAMS, the exact people who you just said are the
only people who get the official times that aren't in the top 15"
</div><div>I follow this stuff just as closely as you do. I remember last year when Toby's fans were screaming bloody murder over his unofficial 4.53 not being included in the official Top 10. That 4.55 came from AVERAGED HANDTIMES from scouts in the building, NOT the official combine electronic time.</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>FootballDad : "Even Scott Wright at DraftCountdown averaged Toby's 40 out at 4.55, faster than McCluster's 4.58."</span></div><div>
</div><div>ToughJ.Riggins : "Scott Wright who is pretty anti-white had Gerhart's average hand-time at 4.55. NFLdraftscout had Gerhart's best hand time at 4.5 and his worst at 4.61 and his average around the same as Wright."</span></div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div></div><div>"A Virginia Tech engineering major did some little project to get more
accurate data on his school's athletes. Did something to where he had
the film and ran it in slow mo to get the exact time he started and the
exact time he finished. Turns out by his project, Grimm ran in the mid
4.5 range (I think 4.53), quite the difference from the 4.64 the nfl had
listed for him. And from the way he played this year at safety, I would
say 4.64 is a ridiculous time to put on him. Btw, he ran a 4.48 at his
pro day. Usually hand times from the same year aren't off by .16, and I
doubt the guy who did the project would be off by .11"
</div><div>Really? Are you sure that's how it happened? From your very post regarding this incident:</div><div>
</div><div>"an engineering major from Tech looked at the film of all the players that ran and had did something to where he could time it right when it started and right when it ended, I think the margin of error was .02. He had Grimm in the 4.5 range, and this was before the 2009 season, before he was preparing for the combine."</span></div><div>
</span></div><div>So basically what you're telling me is the NFL has an anti-white bias because an engineering major timed some OTHER footage of Grimm, running some OTHER 40, at some OTHER time, on some OTHER track, under some OTHER conditions, and that it was .11 faster than the time he ran at the 2010 combine? And that's proof positive of some clandestined plot to turtle him up? Haha, good one.</span></div><div>
</span></div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div></div><div>"9 times out of 10 the hand time is a little bit faster ( usually not
much of a difference when getting into the 4.5 range), well no sh*t.
When is a hand time ever slower? Coincidentally the one time Newton runs?"
</div><div>Chris Johnson ran an unofficial 4.29. His official was an even faster 4.24.</div><div>
</div><div>http://theredzonereport.com/2008/02/24/sun-night-combine-notes-feb-24/150/</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div><div></div></div><div>You read fine? I guess you just skipped over those things above
Or are you just going to pick and choose which arguments you want to make and ignore the rest when you have no explanation?
</div><div>Naa, didn't skip over anything.</div>
Pegasus said:<div>All I did was give an explanation of the difference between Jake Locker's unofficial 4.52 and his official 4.59.
</div>
Thrashen said:Oregon linebacker Casey Matthews (Clay's brother) produced a measly 13 bench press reps at 225 lbs.
That's really pathetic for a 6-2, 230+ pound linebacker....and especially embarrassing when you consider that he is the brother, son, and grandson of former NFL and NCAA athletes.
I played DII college football for two years, so I did my share of weight-lighting 4-5 years back. Today, I'm far from a "dedicated"Â weight-lifter (once or twice a week in my basement). I typically do 10 reps at 225 lbs as a "warm-up set."Â It's really sad knowing that I can easily out-bench one of the top 10 linebacker prospects in the nation.
Unless Matthews runs, leaps, and jumps amazingly well, he won't be drafted. A white athlete must be twice as productive in order to receive half the opportunities of their black counterparts.
Considering all of the strength and muscle loss from the chemotherapy, 29 reps is amazing. What a sign of White strength and determination. Most of the black linebackers can only dream of 29 reps. The team that selects Herzlich will certainly have a steal of a 1st round talent.Irn Bru said:As a BC alum, I'm happy to see Herzlich come in 3rd with 29 reps on the bench. Anyone who's watched his games this season can see he wasn't 100% until maybe the last game. It's sad that he was probably a top 15 pick before he got cancer, but I think he'll have a good combine and get drafted by the 3rd or 4th round.