Donald Trump for prez (?)

Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
703
Your thoughts on Trump's strengths and weaknesses as a presidential candidate ?..
His chances (?)

Personally I like his early, candid remarks about the illegal immigration problem, and Mexico's official complicity in it. Not something you hear everyday from other Republican't appeasers. Is it rhetoric, or real, in your assessment.

(Good article on the value of Trump's criticism of Reconquista Mexico, and confronting hostile cultural-Marxists: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...war-with-univision-only-increases-his-appeal/ )
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Your thoughts on Trump's strengths and weaknesses as a presidential candidate ?..
His chances (?)

Personally I like his early, candid remarks about the illegal immigration problem, and Mexico's official complicity in it. Not something you hear everyday from other Republican't appeasers. Is it rhetoric, or real, in your assessment.

(Good article on the value of Trump's criticism of Reconquista Mexico, and confronting hostile cultural-Marxists: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...war-with-univision-only-increases-his-appeal/ )
Average American I was just thinking about making this thread. Yeah, considering that Repubs have established themselves as Dem light, yeah I am at this point leaning toward's Trump. I dig how so far he is calling it like it is. I am further encouraged that he is not backing down, since NBC cancelled his Miss America/USA show. The other day Michael Savage said he is "Amerika's White Hope". Considering what happened last week and this week, White ppl need a successful leader/business man such as Trump. So far, he is my favorite candidate.
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
My feelings on Trump’s bid for president…why not? American could never possibly sink any lower than the past 20+ years, so why not a sctripted-reality TV star? A few positive things about him…

He’s of German-Scottish heritage. Two ethnicities that certainly garner zero favoritism from the Cultural Marxists who long for a string of non-white national figureheads moving forward.

He’s a man. The cultural Marxists pine for the election of the “first female president,” but it’s already occurred many times (Wilson, Roosevelt, Carter, Bush, Obama, etc).

He’s an ex high school athlete and was apparently a very good football, soccer, and baseball player. Better than most politicians.

His family has no connection to American politics. His father was a real estate developer and his grandparents owned a resteraunt.

He’s created various “beauty pageants” (Miss Universe, Miss USA, Miss Teen USA) that’ve encouraged femininity in women. These sorts of pageants irk Female Supremacists to no end.

He’s pretty funny. His behavior on “The Apprentice” was always humorous and his longstanding “feud” with the Marxist, butch lesbian, Rosie O’ Donnell, was truly hilarious. He’s a good actor, very witty, clever, has lots of experience on camera, and can keep a straight face when insulting someone. Perfect for zinging slow-witted, PC Marxists. God help Hillary (whose embarressing derth of public speaking skills rival only that of Little Barry) if she's ever forced to debate The Donald. She'd get laughed out of the building.

His constant criticism helped in the eventual release of Obama’s long lost birth certificate. Of course, like every other detail relating to the so-called “commander in chief,” it was laughably fake.

He’s been in hot water for calling blacks lazy, suggesting that blacks and Hispanics commit the vast majority of violent crimes, and his recent comments about Mexican immigrants were spot-on: “When Mexico sends its people they're not sending the best. They're not sending you, they're sending people that have lots of problems and they're bringing those problems. They're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime. They're rapists and some, I assume, are good people, but I speak to border guards and they're telling us what we're getting.”

Of course, he’s far from perfect. His commitment to Zionism and love of Jews is sickening and his blond daughter, Ivanka, even converted to Judaism and married a white-looking Yid…

Ivanka-Trump-kids-and-Kushner.jpg


I also hate casinos, one of his many businesses.

In short, regardless of who is POTUS, Zionists will still pull all the strings, all forms of Marxism will still go unchallenged, America will still be at war in the Middle East, US tax dollars will still support Israel, non-white immigration will continue unabated, the Negro/***/Female agenda will continue to flourish, etc. Can't we at least have a NeoCon clown with the world's funniest toupee to entertain us?

Donald-Trump-Finger-Pointing.jpg
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Good post Thrashen. But that is growing hair. He showed the growing hair line to Megan Kelly over a year. I hope to see him debate most of these Repub frauds and then go after thunder thighs.
 

Freethinker

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
7,085
Location
Suffolk County, NY
I support Trump in the hopes that he'll turn the election into the circus that it truly is. I hope he rips the establishment Republicans a new one over the many issues they spinelessly capitulate on. He can also tell the big money boosters and special interest lobbies to go to hell as he's independently wealthy enough to fund his own campaign. His domestic policy seems to be the best of the candidates so far. His foreign policy would be as kosher as any, but what the hell, if we're going to get a neocon he might as well be entertaining.

Donald Trump and Rand Paul are the only candidates who mildly interest me. But I'll be hard pressed to give either one my vote knowing the level of jewish arse-kissing both engage in.
 

Kaptain

Master
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
3,346
Location
Minnesota
Right now I'm hoping for Trump. At least he has a voice, money to finance himself, and a name big enough to give him a platform. At least someone will be arguing on our side on the most important issue - immigration.

Rand Paul would be my second choice but he has no voice (mincing words) like his father. And like his father he is terrible on immigration. Like his father he won't be heard in the debates because they won't give him time and he won't demand it. He will muddle his words with intellect speak and everyone will collectively yawn. Trump will at least be heard on one issue. He would have a better chance against Hillary than the will the other Republican candidates. Republicans are notorious for supporting whoever the Republican establishment is pushing for the party to endorse (ie McCain etc) - a candidate that is sure to fail.
 

Charles Martel

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
8,484
Donald Trump is just a Kosher conservative clown. He's worth billions of dollars so you'd think he would have been able to accomplish something politically in terms of White interests but he hasn't. He's not serious. He's a joke in the eyes of most Americans. The only candidate I would think about supporting is Rand Paul and I know all about the Jewish ass kissing he's done over the past couple of years. He's being forced to play the game which his father had too much honor to take part in.
He's not nearly so rich as people think, he's not even in the top 200 on the Forbes list.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,593
Location
Pennsylvania
Right now I'm hoping for Trump. At least he has a voice, money to finance himself, and a name big enough to give him a platform. At least someone will be arguing on our side on the most important issue - immigration.

Rand Paul would be my second choice but he has no voice (mincing words) like his father. And like his father he is terrible on immigration. Like his father he won't be heard in the debates because they won't give him time and he won't demand it. He will muddle his words with intellect speak and everyone will collectively yawn. Trump will at least be heard on one issue. He would have a better chance against Hillary than the will the other Republican candidates. Republicans are notorious for supporting whoever the Republican establishment is pushing for the party to endorse (ie McCain etc) - a candidate that is sure to fail.

Republicans are notorious for being dumb as rocks -- still supporting the "loyal opposition" party that has sold them out time and again for generations. The one-party system with two nearly identical wings works so well because the Republican rank and file never catch on that the party is embarrassed as can be that it has a White base of support and will do everything possible to betray it over and over until Whites are totally marginalized and replaced.
 
L

Lew

Guest
He's not nearly so rich as people think, he's not even in the top 200 on the Forbes list.

He's not worth as much as guys like Bill Gates and Carlos Slim but he's worth 4 billion dollars. That's still a lot of money. I bet if you gave Don Wassall 1 billion dollars he'd be able to make a pretty big impact.

What is trump even saying about immigration btw ? From what I understand he's just against illegal immigration from Mexico. Has he ever said anything about putting a moratorium on legal immigration ? What about ending affirmative action or speaking out against black on white violence ? On foreign policy he's no different than your run of the mill neocon.

Libertarians will never take explicitly pro White positions but their limited government, color-blind approach ends up being very good for Whites. You can be an open borders libertarian but if you also end welfare then who's going to want to immigrate to the US ? The reason most immigrants come to the west is for financial reasons. Libertarians would also end racial preferences, repeal hate crime laws,strengthen the second amendment, and bring back the right to free association. All of that is very good for Whites. And no libertarian is going to use the US military to fight wars for Israel.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Beside immigration I know one thing that Trump will excel at; economy. He has the track record and business acumen to put the US back or near the top. Its going to be fun watching him tear it up at the debates, while others like Bush, Kasich, Christie try to say something to match him and flail away while the audience tunes them out.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
I'm not a huge "fan", but he has far more "testicular fortitude" (on the surface) than the other GOP gutless globalist "go-fers".

I'd prefer Rand Paul, but he can't hold his Dad's (respective) jock strap. I suspect Rand's willing to compromise to the PTB more than his Dad did/would.
 

Kaptain

Master
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
3,346
Location
Minnesota
The frustrating thing about Ron Paul is that for a time he had the nation's ear - at least fringe groups made up of young potheads, anti-government libertarians, conspiracy theorists, and in the know nationalists. But, when he had the podium he failed to call the spade a spade. In the heat of the election, knowing the establishment wasn't going to allow him to be the candidate, he could called out who exactly controls the fed, international banking, our media, and our foreign policy. Instead he feigned undying support for those who hated him the most - the "you know whose." He fought fire with a cotton t-shirt. With his die-hard fringe supporters he could have permanently opened a lot of young minds. He blew it and so will his son.
 
Last edited:
L

Lew

Guest
The frustrating thing about Ron Paul is that for a time he had the nation's ear - at least fringe groups made up of young potheads, anti-government libertarians, conspiracy theorists, and in the know nationalists. But, when he had the podium he failed to call the spade a spade. In the heat of the election, knowing the establishment wasn't going to allow him to be the candidate, he could called out who exactly controls the fed, international banking, our media, and our foreign policy. Instead he feigned undying support for those who hated him the most - the "you know whose." He fought fire with a cotton t-shirt. With his die-hard fringe supporters he could have permanently opened a lot of young minds. He blew it and so will his son.

That's a good point. I've never thought of it before. Going back to the 2012 election, even though I kept up with it actively, I'm shocked at how well Ron Paul did. He almost won New Hampshire and Iowa and he ended up wining a few states. He got a lot of votes even with the media totally against him. He had a lot of support and a lot of followers. You're right, he could have woken up a lot of people if he had mentioned you know who. And the worst part is that there's nothing they could have done to harm him. Maybe he was thinking about his son's future in politics, but who knows.
 
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
1,016
I'm not a huge "fan", but he has far more "testicular fortitude" (on the surface) than the other GOP gutless globalist "go-fers".

I'd prefer Rand Paul, but he can't hold his Dad's (respective) jock strap. I suspect Rand's willing to compromise to the PTB more than his Dad did/would.

Trump seems to be the tallest midget in the GOP room at the moment. The best he can probably do is force a possible nominee to move right on a couple of things to stand out from the rest. The PTB want Bush v. Clinton. That's a win-win for them. The debt would remain profitable, and the flood of cheap brown labor would continue unabated. And our fellow countrymen will get all upset about the supposed difference in the outcome. Depressing. If Walker were to really move right on immigration, I might start to think there's some hope. He's not perfect, but might slow down the slide into Perdition.
 

Leonardfan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
23,273
Trump is really nothing more than a political side show. I do think he is the best of the choices - my main political concern is immigration reform and enforcement. He came out and said that he would build a wall - no other person wants to touch immigration and wants to allow the browning of America to continue.

Their really is no good choice though - until someone totally anti-establishment (the establishment is no longer judeo Christian/ European heritage) and vehemently against the PC, progessive and cultural Marxists that permeate and destroy every aspect of this once sustainable society.

The probability of this happening is however slim since it requires a knowledgeable voter base who is aware of everything going on in society. As we all know this is not the case as independent thought has become rare and society marginalizes and outcasts anyone who dare speak up against the new status quo.

Amerika 2.0 will continue to pander to the blacks, gays, illegals and big corporations who continue to line the pockets of politicians so that they can keep up their work of screwing over american workers. The mostly white middle class will continue to be pilfered and get squeezed for as much tax money as possible. Blacks will continue to commit a largely disproportionate number of murders, rapes, assaults and robberies against whites. Illegals will continue to drink and drive killing innocent white people and whites are going to be further marginalized.

Once this becomes a nation where every group is a minority all hell is going to break loose. It's pretty easy to see and I feel that what I have just said isn't far off base or representative of some lunatic fringe. The sad thing is the lunatic fringe is in control and steering this country straight to hell.
 

Freethinker

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
7,085
Location
Suffolk County, NY
Libertarians will never take explicitly pro White positions but their limited government, color-blind approach ends up being very good for Whites. You can be an open borders libertarian but if you also end welfare then who's going to want to immigrate to the US ? The reason most immigrants come to the west is for financial reasons. Libertarians would also end racial preferences, repeal hate crime laws,strengthen the second amendment, and bring back the right to free association. All of that is very good for Whites. And no libertarian is going to use the US military to fight wars for Israel.
Well said on Libertarians. History has shown that when the playing field is level and when the "chosen ones" are kept out of positions of power, we do extremely well for ourselves.

As for Ron Paul, his biggest flaw is public speaking. I believe that he himself admitted a few times that he wished he was better at getting the message across. Maybe age had something to do with this as well.

An electable candidate for us would have to combine a showman with charisma and guts like Donald Trump and an intellectual with honor, integrity and a strong platform like Ron Paul. This candidate would be near perfect. The only person I could think of remotely like this would be Jesse Ventura. But he's not as smart as Paul and too liberal on certain issues. He's does however speak out against government coverups / false flags like 9-11, the JFK assassination, etc.
 

BeyondFedUp

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
4,468
Location
United States
Some of the greatest minds who have ever lived were Christian, while some of the most famous homosexual's were philosophers! Get it?

Amen, and +100,000,000.
Some of the greatest minds and thinkers in history have been Christians. The spoiled anti-christs running around thinking they're "wise" are actually FOOLS. They can repent and believe on Christ or suffer the Second Death in the Lake of Fire...after confessing Jesus as Lord to the glory of God the Father: [h=1]Philippians 2:10-12 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;[/h]11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

Rev. 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
 

Matra2

Master
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
2,317
The same NBC that doctored a recording to make Hispanic George Zimmermann seem guilty of "racism" fires Donald Trump for discriminating against Mexicans. Trump, along with NBC rivals (yeah right!) should be pointing this out. Actually, given the current climate I'm surprised Trump survived the whole Birther thing a few years ago. Offending Mexicans may now be like offending blacks, Jews, Muslims, a$$ bandits, "strong women", and every other self-identified victim group.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
Amen, and +100,000,000.
Some of the greatest minds and thinkers in history have been Christians. The spoiled anti-christs running around thinking they're "wise" are actually FOOLS. They can repent and believe on Christ or suffer the Second Death in the Lake of Fire...after confessing Jesus as Lord to the glory of God the Father: [h=1]Philippians 2:10-12 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;[/h]11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

Rev. 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Men like Isaac Newton, Constantine the Great, Bach, Robert E Lee, CS Lewis, Thomas Dixon, JJ Thomson, de Toqueville & Dr.David Duke are fine examples of the intellect & character of Christians.
 

BeyondFedUp

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
4,468
Location
United States
The same NBC that doctored a recording to make Hispanic George Zimmermann seem guilty of "racism" fires Donald Trump for discriminating against Mexicans. Trump, along with NBC rivals (yeah right!) should be pointing this out. Actually, given the current climate I'm surprised Trump survived the whole Birther thing a few years ago. Offending Mexicans may now be like offending blacks, Jews, Muslims, a$$ bandits, "strong women", and every other self-identified victim group.

Matra2 you are right on target, and your new avatar is great!!
I think I'll get me a shirt with that:icon_grin:.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Yesterday Emmitt Smiff said he can no longer be a judge for Miss America, due to Trump's truth remarks. He responds, "who cares", I'll find another judge. I love his straight talk. So far it has struck a real cord with a lot of Amerikans. I hope his momentum continues.
 

WHITE NOISE

Mentor
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
791
Location
Pacific NW
Oh boy, another Ross Perot with platform shoes and hair plugs! This guy has no chance, none.

I can't believe that there are still some deluded enough to think that all of this dog and pony show presented by the MSM is real.

Get ready for Hillery.
 
Top