College Football News

FootballDad

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
5,604
Location
Somewhere near Kansas City, MO
The argument for NIL when players and others who stand to profit from it started braying is that it would compensate them for use of their "name, image, likeness" for jersey sales, their likeness in video games, etc. That sounds reasonable that one should get a cut of profits being generated directly by their "name, image or likeness". Instead it has turned into just a direct-pay mercenary program. Can anyone demonstrate that Dontavious, Vonzella or Shaquan who are going to be paid $5 million generated that much with their NIL? The answer is doubtless "NO" for 90% or more.
 
Top