I have just carried out a quick search of internet news sites on Lemaitre's 100m performance. The news reports are dominated by the Reuters News agency report. For example Yahoo, Daily News, Universal Sports, and numerous others, simply reprint the Reuters report â€" which incidentally contained a factual error about the previous French record; and was not picked up by any of the news carriers. I could find no headline reports in any of the main US and British papers but I only checked a sample of them. BBC Sports had no report but did provide a link to the IAAF report; and the Guardian in a report about another meet did provide a final paragraph about the performance. A Canadian article ridiculed the run by making the point that he was only the 72<SUP>nd</SUP> best in the world; a Singapore report disparaged him by calling him scrawny.
The Reuters article is however, in my view, plainly unpleasant and ill-natured. Rather than just providing the facts of the event, or alternatively providing a balanced view of the young man's national title and record; the reporter attempted to undermine the achievement by only mentioning its distance from Bolt's world record and the number of years since Jim Hinds world record. No mention of the fact Hind's run was at altitude and that it took 15 years for a low altitude sub-10 to be run; no mention that Lemaitre is now one of the youngest (third youngest, I think) to run under 10 seconds or his high ranking in this year's listings. The article makes no attempt to provide a positive perspective or to mention that many previous world record holders (eg: Ben Johnson, Montgomery, Gatlin) were proven PED takers. And, finally, no mention of what is evident to any sports fan: that Lemaitre's physique, along with his flowing stride, is so different to many of the other sub-10 runner.
The Reuters article is however, in my view, plainly unpleasant and ill-natured. Rather than just providing the facts of the event, or alternatively providing a balanced view of the young man's national title and record; the reporter attempted to undermine the achievement by only mentioning its distance from Bolt's world record and the number of years since Jim Hinds world record. No mention of the fact Hind's run was at altitude and that it took 15 years for a low altitude sub-10 to be run; no mention that Lemaitre is now one of the youngest (third youngest, I think) to run under 10 seconds or his high ranking in this year's listings. The article makes no attempt to provide a positive perspective or to mention that many previous world record holders (eg: Ben Johnson, Montgomery, Gatlin) were proven PED takers. And, finally, no mention of what is evident to any sports fan: that Lemaitre's physique, along with his flowing stride, is so different to many of the other sub-10 runner.