I understand your post is about the way I approach the "black QB issue" more broadly, but I just want to point out that I'm not trying to pass judgement on Penix's potential as a QB in the future. I'm just saying that this stage he is not an upgrade over Cousins who, despite a bad 4 game stretch, has played well at times this season and has playoff experience. If the Falcons were interested in making a run this year, they would ride it out with the veteran and not Penix. On Daniels, I'm commenting on his style of play. Much like RG3 and Kyler, he has been effective as a rookie. But I've seen this movie before, so I remain skeptical.
Onto the larger point (and I understand you're probably close to booting me given the "restrictions" I've had recently) - I would agree that creating an echo chamber on CF of bashing black QBs is
not the ideal strategy. But when you go outside of this forum, what you see is essentially the inverse of that - a 24/7/365 glaze session for virtually every black QB coming up the pipeline from high school to the draft and even guys like Rattler and Richardson who have shown nothing. To be fair, there are a handful of whites who get the same treatment, some even prematurely (Trevor Lawerence comes to mind, although things have turned a bit), but it is increasingly reserved for black QBs. I can no longer take the mainstream assessment of this position seriously when Anthony Richardson goes top 5 and now Milroe is being discussed at an early 1st round pick. Shadeur is also a media hype job, although that's just as much nepotism as it is race. And this is not reserved for legacy media/ESPN types - these narratives trickle down to the average fans, who lap it up without much question.
But yes, I have probably delved into meaningless black quarterback-bashing a few too many times. I'll concede that. But I do believe that as long as the criticisms are
constructive or at least make some sort of cogent point - for example,
this post and
this post - it
is productive, because the pro-black QB narrative goes largely unquestioned outside of here.