Extra Point
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2012
- Messages
- 6,289
on Line from weenieworld:
"Line was placed on I.R. with a September knee injury, but took the opportunity to have his shoulder repaired. A favorite of measurables-based football metrics sites, Line stands 6-foot, 232 and ran 4.65 at his Pro Day. He's been compared to Mike Alstott. Line is a player to monitor during his first full NFL offseason as a potential in-house replacement for free agent Toby Gerhart at No. 2 tailback. Feb 12 -"
I'm guessing that would be opposed to emotion-based DWF sites.
Football metrics are definitely a good thing for white players. Football metrics focus on things that can be measured. They focus on production statistics and athletic test statistics.
For example, Jeff Janis caught 83 passes and ran a 4.37 40, had a 3.98 20 yard shuttle and a 6.64 3 cone. These are objective measurables.
A scout with an anti-white bias might describe Janis as "looks slow," "doesn't have a burst," "not quick enough to get separation." The athletic tests would belie that description. White players who test well athletically have been described this way.
The more people focus on football metrics, the better for white players.