2010 Week 9

Hillis is obviously very tough mentally to go along with his physical talents.He's really seized his opportunities in spite of the (psychological) baggage that goes with being the rare White running back. I mentioned it last week, that I think Hillis will help Gerhart quite a bit in running with confidence, and all other White RBs at all levels of competition.
 
On such a joyous day for white RBs its too bad that Gerhart only got two rushes for six yards and one reception for three yards......Minnesota was not a good place for him.
 
Hopefully, Jordan Shipley will put up great numbers on Monday Night Football and get some people's attention.....of course the announcers won't stop talking about the two black clowns long enough to mention his name.
smiley36.gif
 
When these moronic White sportscasters realize their on the way out, I hope the truth of Affirmative Action hits them right between the eyes. Seen an all black nfl show today with keyhawn johnson and two others, one a female. It'z coming.
 
Aaron Rodgers showing the nation what a mobile QB *really* is.
 
Don Wassall said:
It was Phil Simms the airhead who compared Hillis to a 1940s running back. Besides his Caste clownishness, he's just not a very good announcer. Why he's teamed with Jim Nantz on CBS's number one announcing team I'll never understand.
<div></div>
<div>A big downer is Kevin Walter having zero receptions three games in a row.
smiley18.gif
Schaub just doesn't look his way anymore. A starting receiver going three straight games withouta catch is unheard of.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Brent Celek had a doughnut today too. He's having a disappointing season and it doesn't look to get better with Vick as the starter.</div>
Click to expand...

I'm going to have to watch the replay of the Houston game. Is Walter even making it on to the field? He went from having a great game five weeks ago to absolute zero the last three weeks. I'm not sure I've ever seen this from any wide out.
 
Don Wassall said:
It was Phil Simms the airhead who compared Hillis to a 1940s running back.  Besides his Caste clownishness, he's just not a very good announcer.  Why he's teamed with Jim Nantz on CBS's number one announcing team I'll never understand. 
<div> </div>
<div>A big downer is Kevin Walter having zero receptions three games in a row. 
smiley18.gif
  Schaub just doesn't look his way anymore.  A starting receiver going three straight games without a catch is unheard of.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Brent Celek had a doughnut today too.  He's having a disappointing season and it doesn't look to get better with Vick as the starter.</div>
Click to expand...

The 1940s? An oddball comment to be sure. The harder someone like Simms tries to look clever, the more stupid they look.Edited by: sport historian
 
Gotta love the Dead-T from the Packers.
Clearly somebody on the coaching staff would love to utilize that regularly, but they're afraid to try it in anything other than "garbage time".
With all the effete ballerinas on NFL defenses who were drafted to defend spread passing attacks, a super power set like the T could really do some damage with the right offensive personnel.
Hopefully, Green Bay is encouraged by their results.
 
Wish the packers had tried to hammer it in with a couple more Kuhn runs. He's got a solid game going, and it was fun to see a backfield with occasionally two white backs and a white QB running all over the cowboys defense.
 
Brett Favre has been buried several times this season by the media, along with a head "coach" that persist in pissing on his own players, and yet Brett remains death proof!

Today's game was one for the ages for Farvre numbers wise.His legacy keeps getting further and further away from anyone else ever coming close. I'm really hoping the team begins to rally around the real leader of the team and make it into the playoffs.
smiley32.gif
Edited by: WHITE NOISE
 
Clay Mathews with a pick-6. Stud.
 
I wonder if this recent success by Peyton Hillis will create something of a renaissance of larger, Mack truck type running backs, instead of all these weak little dwarves that have been trendy for many years.

Maybe even make the fullback more important someday...

Anyway, I'm sure that Hillis' recent success will be "qualified" somehow by analysts, but then, they've convinced me that Michael Vick is an elite-caliber NFL quarterback.

Wait...
 
Pie said:
Wish the packers had tried to hammer it in with a couple more Kuhn runs. He's got a solid game going, and it was fun to see a backfield with occasionally two white backs and a white QB running all over the cowboys defense.
Click to expand...

When the Packers had a T formation with Kuhn, Hall and Jackson, Crissie Collinsworth said it was reminiscent of "1912 football." What the Packers organization is doing, in a limited but real sense, is reflecting the franchise's history and also its demographic base. They've been playing 8 and 9 Whites on offense and having their way uncontested with caste whore Jerry Jones' degenerate team.

This is another memorable day for those of us fighting to bring about awareness of the Caste System in U.S. sports.
 
Don Wassall said:
Pie said:
Wish the packers had tried to hammer it in with a couple more Kuhn runs. He's got a solid game going, and it was fun to see a backfield with occasionally two white backs and a white QB running all over the cowboys defense.
Click to expand...
<div> </div>
<div>When the Packers had a T formation with Kuhn, Hall and Jackson, Crissie Collinsworth said it was reminiscent of "1912 football."  What the Packers organization is doing, in a limited but real sense, is reflecting the franchise's history and also its demographic base.  They've been playing 8 and 9 Whites on offense and having their way uncontested with caste whore Jerry Jones' degenerate team.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>This is another memorable day for those of us fighting to bring about awareness of the Caste System in U.S. sports.</div>
Click to expand...

Collinsworth hasn't heard of Hornung and Taylor?
 
You've got to love these ex-player "analysts." Simms uses the 1940s as a frame of reference for a white RB and Collinsworth uses 1912.
 
sport historian said:
You've got to love these ex-player "analysts." Simms uses the 1940s as a frame of reference for a white RB and Collinsworth uses 1912.
Click to expand...

Colonsworst is one upping Simms in the sport of competitive white-bashing?

And c'mon, 1912, Chris? That's not nearly far enough back, considering the last time a collection of blacks got owned that bad on a field it was the 1860's.
Edited by: Pie
 
sport historian said:
You've got to love these ex-player "analysts." Simms uses the 1940s as a frame of reference for a white RB and Collinsworth uses 1912.
Click to expand...

smiley36.gif
Such shameless sellouts. And Collinsworth was a perennial thousand yard receiver in the 1980s. . . pathetic. . . there's not sufficient adjectives to describe him.
 
I didn't get to watch any games today, but I loved how Hillis exploded today! Great Job!
smiley4.gif


With the caste system being exposed, it's no surprise that affletes are trying to take white players out of the game, to keep their watered-down product going.
 
Even Hester got in the act a little for the Chargers with three medium receptions and a few runs.
 
Thrashen said:
On "Football Night in America,"Â￾ they were giving Hillis high praise until Dan Patrick exclaimed that Hillis "looked like Touchdown Tommy Vardell out there!"Â￾ Har har. Their time in the sun is fading fast.
Click to expand...




Yeah, Peyton Hillis isn't really like Tommy "Touchdown" Vardell. Vardell had limited NFL success while Hillis has a shot to be a superstar.

To Dan Patrick's credit, he also compared Hillis to Kevin Mack at the end of the segment. Not a bad comparison, especially since Mack also played for the Browns, but I think Hillis has the chance to be much better.Edited by: Csonka72
 
Don Wassall said:
sport historian said:
You've got to love these ex-player "analysts." Simms uses the 1940s as a frame of reference for a white RB and Collinsworth uses 1912.
Click to expand...
<div> </div>
<div>
smiley36.gif
 Such shameless sellouts.  And Collinsworth was a perennial thousand yard receiver in the 1980s. . . pathetic. . . there's not sufficient adjectives to describe him.</div>
Click to expand...
Collinsworth must be trying his new comedy club roast work. It seems stupid and juvenile enough but really it's pretty calculated. If he tried those zingers on a Black qb/kicker or a non White Hispanic he would be getting suspended like "Sheckie" Kornholer.....
smiley11.gif
Edited by: white is right
 
I just watched the NFL Network's "highlights" of the Cleveland-New England game, and it was about 2 minutes long, but the only Hillis play shown was his TD run in the 4th quarter. Could the anti-White agenda be any more obvious and blatant?

Just think if the NFL hadn't had a black starting QB in a quarter of a century, and one was tearing it up but was ignored as much as possible by the media. And the DWFs can't even use the excuse of "well the coaches and announcers are White, how could they possibly be anti-White," because the NFL Network uses "mooch" as the designated White minority along with 3 negro cohorts (Deion Sanders, Michael Irvin and Fran Charles) on their highlight show.Edited by: Don Wassall
 
Don Wassall said:
I just watched the NFL Network's "highlights" of the Cleveland-New England game, and it was about 2 minutes long, but the only Hillis play shown was his TD run in the 4th quarter.  Could the anti-White agenda be any more obvious and blatant? 
<div> </div>
<div>Just think if the NFL hadn't had a black starting QB in a quarter of a century, and one was tearing it up but was ignored as much as possible by the media.  And the DWFs can't even use the excuse of "well the coaches and announcers are White, how could they possibly be anti-White," because the NFL Network uses "mooch" as the designated White minority along with 3 negro cohorts (Deion Sanders, Michael Irvin and Fran Charles) on their highlight show.</div>
Click to expand...

Aha, so those are the a$$hats doing the highlights on the NFL Network. I've been wondering this one for weeks. I do not get this channel on my cable line-up, but watch the highlights on NFL.com. What I have noticed is that there's always one guy doing the announcing, and a couple of clowns, clearly black, who are the "analysts". I sort of suspected one was Sanders, but I wasn't sure. The thing that's been bothering me is that these two blacks always mock, insult, and ridicule the white players in all of the highlights. The usually break into laugther if a white player makes a play, and any compliments are clearly made in a deragotary and condescending manner.

The NFL Network is pure and total garbage, along with all these announcers who never cease to amaze me. Having exhausted their usual caste lexicon, they are now coming up with new and completely non-sensical words and phrases to insult white players. What exactly is a "1940s running back", and how the heck does Collinsworthless even come up with drivel like "1912s football"?
smiley5.gif


I think we can set out sights higher for Hillis now. 1000 yards is a foregone conclusion (barring anything unfortunate like an injury). He should be able to get it in 3-4 games. We can look for him to be among the leaders by the end of season. He more or less missed 2 games (the first 2) until he was made the feature back, so a couple more monster games like this will balance things out.

I have no doubt that Toby Gerhart could put up similar numbers himself if he were a feature back. It's just a damn shame he had to end up on a team with the best RB in the NFL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
American Freedom News
Back
Top