whiteathlete33
Hall of Famer
GiovaniMarcon said:I think the trouble with this fight is that Haye has the same chance that any other inferior fighter has against a superior fighter -- both men have two fists, the world is round, anything can happen (though of course, people smartly bet on what's LIKELY to happen).
The trouble lies in the idea that the media is behaving as if Haye has any more than a puncher's chance, and is trying so hard to give Haye a credibility and resume he doesn't deserve.
It's a clear case of anti-Klitchscko bias, and it's even more clear that this bias is racially-motivated in both cases.
Sad is the fact that the media already have a litany of prewriten excuses for Haye's likely demise in this fight, where as if Wlad loses it Haye will promptly retire and declare himself a latterday Cassius Clay, and Wlad's entire career will be discredited by the media. Of course one loss cannot erase a career of proven success, but then again, the media made a contender out of a worthless, WORTHLESS (key word, WORTHLESS) f*g like Haye.
Giovani, Haye shouldn't be champ. The boxing gangsters obviously felt that Haye was an opportunity to make the heavyweight division "exciting" so the judges gave him the W against Valuev. With all the talented European fighters out there they decide to go with the black guy. Typical caste agenda any way you look at it.