White Purge 2011

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,577
Location
Pennsylvania
The Packers are definitely moving in the wrong direction. I was watching their last exhibition game and all of the backups on defense were black, and the offense wasn't much better; even the o-line was almost all sumo. It's almost always the opposite in the preseason with NFL teams -- mostly black starters, with more Whites as deep backups and training camp fodder showing up on the field in the second half of preseason games. The Packers may look more like a "standard" NFL team in a couple of years, but it's highly unlikely they can maintain last year's high level of play.
 

referendum

Mentor
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Messages
1,687
Yeah, the good news on the Packer front is that Lang won the starting guard battle, keeping an all white O-line, but there will be at least two, I think three black o-line backups. Also, Frank Zombo was either leading or close to it for one of the starting linebacker positions, but now is injured. Also, Nelson should be more involved in offense this year. But, lack of other white Packers on defense and loss of Swain is ominous for the future.
 
M

mattgianone

Guest
WR Greg Ellingson was released by Jacksonville. IM surprised because from camp reports he was doing well and was looking good in limited exposure during preseason games. Is Blair White next?
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
WR Greg Ellingson was released by Jacksonville. IM surprised because from camp reports he was doing well and was looking good in limited exposure during preseason games. Is Blair White next?

Every year its the same man...
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
And it continues.

49ers waived WR Kevin Jurovich.



The local product grabbed some headlines during player-organized workouts as he stood out to Alex Smith. But he never climbed depth chart in real training camp and is a practice squad candidate for the second straight year.
 

FootballDad

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
5,544
Location
Somewhere near Kansas City, MO
The 49rs also waived Tyler Beiler, a D3 receiver out of Bridgewater. This kid was pretty good in college, with amazing measurables (4.39 40, 40.4" vertical). And he can catch, too. Kind of the athlete that Pierre Garcon only wishes he could be. Unfortunately, he doesn't have the necessary melanin boost to lift him from D3 to the pros. Here was his writeup from a 49rs blog when he was signed:

Tyler Beiler, Bridgewater – WR (5’11, 190)
Beiler is an interesting small-WR/possession-WR prospect. Beiler tested fast as his pro-day (4.38 40-yard dash), with OK agility metrics, a nice bench press and a great vertical. Overall, Beiler is very athletic. Beiler was very good at Bridgewater College…but not jaw-dropping (as you would hope for a gem hiding at he lower levels). In 10 games last year, Beiler had 46 rec, 843 yards, 9 TDs. He is probably a “grinderâ€￾ prospect at best…scrapping his way onto a NFL roster maybe; but not a massive upside superstar NFL WR projection.
 

FootballDad

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
5,544
Location
Somewhere near Kansas City, MO
And while we're on the subject of the 49rs, they also waived LB Scott McKillop, who was busy going through his racial apprenticeship and being a WSTD in spite of great production any time that they allowed him on the field. He must have been causing locker room tension among all of the bruvas that play LB for the niners, so he's outta there!
 

FootballDad

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
5,544
Location
Somewhere near Kansas City, MO
The blackening Packers released TE Spencer Havner in addition to Brett Swain. They still have two white guys on the roster at TE, but my money says that they will keep Finley, Williams, and Quarless so that they have an all-afflete stone-hands TE corps for Aaron Rodgers to bounce balls off of.
 

backrow

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
7,401
Location
Spain
damn, i guess his release is imminent now...

Jets WR Logan Payne will undergo surgery on his dislocated left wrist.

Battling Patrick Turner for the final receiver spot, Payne suffered the injury in Monday night's game. The Jets won't have a timetable for his return until after the procedure
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
damn, i guess his release is imminent now...

Jets WR Logan Payne will undergo surgery on his dislocated left wrist.

Battling Patrick Turner for the final receiver spot, Payne suffered the injury in Monday night's game. The Jets won't have a timetable for his return until after the procedure

I'm guessing once everything is said it done it will leave the usual 20 or so white receivers on active rosters.
 
M

mattgianone

Guest
The 49rs also waived Tyler Beiler, a D3 receiver out of Bridgewater. This kid was pretty good in college, with amazing measurables (4.39 40, 40.4" vertical). And he can catch, too. Kind of the athlete that Pierre Garcon only wishes he could be. Unfortunately, he doesn't have the necessary melanin boost to lift him from D3 to the pros. Here was his writeup from a 49rs blog when he was signed:
Well 2 more white receivers need to be purged here.
 

bigunreal

Mentor
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
1,923
Well, Jim Harbaugh's decision making thus far certainly makes a mockery of any claim he is "white friendly." I noted before that the only reason his Stanford teams had so many whites is because the admission policies there are still somewhat stringent, even for football players.

If Jurovich can't crack that sterling lineup of WRs, what chance does he have anywhere else? Why doesn't Cleveland go after one of these talented but ignored white WRs? And yet Chansi Stuckey and co. continue to find work....

There are unquestionably several quota systems at work here. No team shall have more than 24-25 white players on the roster (thus the move from the Packers to go blacker). No more than 20 or so white WRs in the entire league. No more than 3-4 "outside" white starting WRs in the league. It's all very obvious. The best white WRs often go to the teams that will be the least likely to use them (Lovie Smith particularly lovies to screw with them in Chicago). We all know how the few high profile white college RBs always go to the "wrong" team (see Brian Leonard, Jacob Hester and Toby Gerhart). That isn't bad luck, it's contrived.

That's the way conspiracies work. That's the way the Caste System works.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2004
Messages
2,988
Well, Jim Harbaugh's decision making thus far certainly makes a mockery of any claim he is "white friendly." I noted before that the only reason his Stanford teams had so many whites is because the admission policies there are still somewhat stringent, even for football players.

If Jurovich can't crack that sterling lineup of WRs, what chance does he have anywhere else? Why doesn't Cleveland go after one of these talented but ignored white WRs? And yet Chansi Stuckey and co. continue to find work....

There are unquestionably several quota systems at work here. No team shall have more than 24-25 white players on the roster (thus the move from the Packers to go blacker). No more than 20 or so white WRs in the entire league. No more than 3-4 "outside" white starting WRs in the league. It's all very obvious. The best white WRs often go to the teams that will be the least likely to use them (Lovie Smith particularly lovies to screw with them in Chicago). We all know how the few high profile white college RBs always go to the "wrong" team (see Brian Leonard, Jacob Hester and Toby Gerhart). That isn't bad luck, it's contrived.

That's the way conspiracies work. That's the way the Caste System works.

You don't have a conspiracy when the people in charge agree on everything and don't have to hide their actions. Is somebody telling these coaches to do something they don't want to do?
 

bigunreal

Mentor
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
1,923
Yes, this is more like a conspiracy in plain sight. There's no secret about it to those of us who have the aptitude to see the emperor is wearing no clothes. To most of the general public, however, there is "nothing to see here- move on."

However you define it, the number of whites overall in the league remains almost exactly the same, year after year. There are now more white WRs and even a few white RBs who play, however that has been offset by the dramatic darkening of offensive lines on most teams. Kind of like how the huge increase of white Europeans into the NBA over the past decade has been offset by the virtual elimination of white American players.

However you define it, the coaches and general managers throughout the NFL are using non-football factors (race) when assembling their rosters. They clearly are not selecting the best players, which makes their claim that the primary goal is "winning" to be laughable.
 

DWFan

Mentor
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
741
Well, Jim Harbaugh's decision making thus far certainly makes a mockery of any claim he is "white friendly." I noted before that the only reason his Stanford teams had so many whites is because the admission policies there are still somewhat stringent, even for football players.

If Jurovich can't crack that sterling lineup of WRs, what chance does he have anywhere else? Why doesn't Cleveland go after one of these talented but ignored white WRs? And yet Chansi Stuckey and co. continue to find work....

There are unquestionably several quota systems at work here. No team shall have more than 24-25 white players on the roster (thus the move from the Packers to go blacker). No more than 20 or so white WRs in the entire league. No more than 3-4 "outside" white starting WRs in the league. It's all very obvious. The best white WRs often go to the teams that will be the least likely to use them (Lovie Smith particularly lovies to screw with them in Chicago). We all know how the few high profile white college RBs always go to the "wrong" team (see Brian Leonard, Jacob Hester and Toby Gerhart). That isn't bad luck, it's contrived.

That's the way conspiracies work. That's the way the Caste System works.

That second-to-last paragraph was awesome until the last three sentences. If it's true about whites being intentionally misdirected by these teams, we need to have some understanding of why they'd be drafted/signed. I've been thinking about it all the time and I don't have a clue.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,577
Location
Pennsylvania
I don't think "conspiracy" is the right word. It's just the way the system works. Everyone who is a public figure understands the unwritten rules (as do we critics of them), because the occasional hapless person who does violate them when it comes to race is publicly crucified. Every commercial or advertisement that has more than three people must have at least one non-White, unless the characters are idiots, in which case an all-White male cast is the norm. Media casts and crews have to be integrated, government workplaces abide by affirmative action, as do most corporations of any size. There are glaring double standards as regards blacks and black behavior all through society that polite company adheres to. Check out this article that was recently on American Renaissance's site and reprinted in a Happy Hour thread: http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/08/are_flash_mobs.php

It's not a conspiracy; rather it's political correctness, or more appropriately, Cultural Marxism at work. Cultural Marxist ideology maintains that blacks are superior athletes to Whites, and that they will effortlessly dominate any sport they are "interested" in. They are "interested" in football and basketball and have talent for those two sports, so organized football and basketball, beginning in the late 1960s when the Permanent Cultural Marxist Revolution began in earnest, slowly institutionalized black dominance in football and basketball, with no small assistance from the media's positive reinforcement of the trends. The unwritten rules the NFL abides by have been codified over time, and no one is going to violate them other than by very stealthy, piecemeal methods, because to do so openly is a lose-lose situation. And very few have any interest in "violating" them anyway, any more than the generals who work their way up through the military are going to speak out against their Commander in Chief, or U.S. foreign policy.

The football (and basketball) scouts, coaches, executives, broadcasters, etc., have been richly rewarded by being good soldiers and playing successfully by the unwritten rules. No written directives from the NFL office are necessary, nor are there small groups of owners secretly meeting to decide how many Whites should be "allowed" to play wide receiver. It's just the way the system works; the NFL is no different than any other societal institution or large corporation, other than it's set up to have black dominance in perpetuity while falsely claiming to be "colorblind."
 
Last edited:

DWFan

Mentor
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
741
As I said, I certainly don't have any surety about this. But I think Don's message has the most likely explanation for teams ruining the white players they draft/sign. Even though in many cases their jobs depend on who they hire, it's no different than those in almost every other business whose jobs depend on who they hire. If they fail, they'll be gone. They are in many cases far meaner about it, but maybe in many cases these coaches/GMs/owners are just like the average brainwashed person.
 

Deadlift

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
5,240
Location
North Carolina
Yes, this is more like a conspiracy in plain sight. There's no secret about it to those of us who have the aptitude to see the emperor is wearing no clothes. To most of the general public, however, there is "nothing to see here- move on."

However you define it, the number of whites overall in the league remains almost exactly the same, year after year. There are now more white WRs and even a few white RBs who play, however that has been offset by the dramatic darkening of offensive lines on most teams. Kind of like how the huge increase of white Europeans into the NBA over the past decade has been offset by the virtual elimination of white American players.

However you define it, the coaches and general managers throughout the NFL are using non-football factors (race) when assembling their rosters. They clearly are not selecting the best players, which makes their claim that the primary goal is "winning" to be laughable.

To any detractors.. is there not a (rather open) conspiracy to "muddy the waters?" When New England makes dumb roster moves, what is the result?.. Teams' like the NYJ and Pittsburgh get "stronger" by default. When Green Bay makes ridiculous roster moves, Philly gets stronger by default. While the power structure may not be able to "ensure" (right now) that the darkest team will win the Superbowl, we are at the point where at least 2 or 3 really dark teams will make the postseason every year. From there, anything can happen.

The power structure enjoys the "circus" that they've manufactured. Look at all the "Terrelle Pryor supplemental draft" nonsense (IMO, this is more ridiculous than the Plaxico Burress stuff).. all the downgrading of Joe Flacco this offseason.. all the hate for Tebow. Surely, someone must be giving the talking-heads of ESPN/NFL Network their "talking points?" While some media people - including some blacks - weren't praising Pryor or his "abilities," his name was still out there "way-too-much." And, of course, there was no shortage of him being mentioned as "very athletic." I don't intend to simply reaffirm that there is indeed a Caste System and that it's "media wing" is critical to their "Big Lie" being maintained, but that the Caste System likely goes deeper than what is generally posted on CF. With the NFL and the White percentage that stays around the same or gets worse, I cannot help but think that there is more of a "centralized control" at work. If a "Whiter" team did happen to add some Whites, the White percentage would hardly spike to 70% or anything, so what is the "danger" that is preventing this from happening? I will contend that it's competence.. "they" don't want us to see how football is supposed to be played. They want dumb black offenses going against dumber black defenses. Interestingly enough, in basketball, "they" thought we would be so enamored by superman blacks going against other superman blacks, but, thankfully, the population has finally seen through it. I say - "the population" - because many of today's "black fans" aren't amped-up either! Hopefully, more and more people will be able to see through "afrolete football" as well.

In football, some White QBs and OL (Joe Thomas, Jake Long, Steve Hutchinson) still get praise, but look at the vast agenda to downgrade White defensive players. In baseball, some White pitchers still get hype/praise and huge paydays come their way, but there's a vast agenda to downgrade White hitters. Naturally, if there weren't several "taboo" positions, there would likely be significantly more White men in both leagues. It's more than just the elimination of White athletes from the "speed" positions, as there is a White under-representation at DE, DT, ILB, and now OL. The "black talent pool" is clearly shrinking rapidly, so this is becoming a better environment for us to get the truth out there. The existence of the Caste System could have been proven 15 years ago by us, but it's incredibly easier to prove today!
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
If there was a conscious effort to install a caste system then Micheal Vick would have led his team to a superbowl win, as would have McNabb. There would be no Peyton Hillis or Danny Woodhead. Things would be much worse if the whole thing was orchestrated. As it is the system is voluntary and held in place by the slow changing attitudes of fans and the apathy of the media to call attention to it.

Don's post explained it all in very clear fashion, it is worth reading again...

"It's not a conspiracy; rather it's political correctness, or more appropriately, Cultural Marxism at work. Cultural Marxist ideology maintains that blacks are superior athletes to Whites, and that they will effortlessly dominate any sport they are "interested" in. They are "interested" in football and basketball and have talent for those two sports, so organized football and basketball, beginning in the late 1960s when the Permanent Cultural Marxist Revolution began in earnest, slowly institutionalized black dominance in football and basketball, with no small assistance from the media's positive reinforcement of the trends. The unwritten rules the NFL abides by have been codified over time, and no one is going to violate them other than by very stealthy, piecemeal methods, because to do so openly is a lose-lose situation. And very few have any interest in "violating" them anyway, any more than the generals who work their way up through the military are going to speak out against their Commander in Chief, or U.S. foreign policy.

The football (and basketball) scouts, coaches, executives, broadcasters, etc., have been richly rewarded by being good soldiers and playing successfully by the unwritten rules. No written directives from the NFL office are necessary, nor are there small groups of owners secretly meeting to decide how many Whites should be "allowed" to play wide receiver. It's just the way the system works; the NFL is no different than any other societal institution or large corporation, other than it's set up to have black dominance in perpetuity while falsely claiming to be "colorblind."
 

Deadlift

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
5,240
Location
North Carolina
If Joe Flacco doesn't single-handedly lead Baltimore to the promised land, HE gets blamed. If Peyton Manning doesn't single-handedly do likewise, HE gets blamed.

If Jason Campbell never gets to the promised land over the next decade, HE will still be coddled by the MSM! Scam Newton will get at least 5 years to "develop," while Tim Tebow, Brady Quinn and Matt Leinart are already proclaimed "busts"..

The media really likes Aaron Rodgers (probably to spite Favre's Green Bay career), but in ESPNs fantasy QB rankings for 2011, they have Josh Freeman rated above Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco! I think being above Matt Ryan is more of a head-scratcher, considering that they traded everything to draft "Julio Jones" to go alongside Roddy White.

The media and coaches love nearly everyone that has at least one drop of negro ancestry. That's a Caste System.

And, since Philly has made Vick an entrenched starter for several years by giving him 100 million (another typical "Caste System move" if there ever was one), it wouldn't shock me to see him get a Superbowl ring.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,577
Location
Pennsylvania
Regarding Josh Freeman, I think there's a good chance Tampa drops back into the pack this season, maybe even below .500. I just don't see playoff caliber talent on the team, and New Orleans and Atlanta should dominate the NFC South. The team is already too black for the fans, much like what happened in Jacksonville when Shaq Harris was at his blacks-only-need-apply peak a few years back.
 

FootballDad

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
5,544
Location
Somewhere near Kansas City, MO
A few months back, Don posted information about how a lie, such as the caste system, becomes so ingrained into the psyche of a population, that it becomes the "truth" and no work needs to be done to perpetuate the myth, since the myth has now gone from lie to "truth". I couldn't find the particular post, but it would be beneficial to dig it up again.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
Several high quality posts here. The Caste System definitely is no conspiracy.
 
Top