Pierce, the answer to that question is quite simple. Wariner is much faster than Merritt in the 400. And he would be just as fast in the 200 if he put more meat on him. Wariner only weighs 160 lbs. He ran 20.30 this early in the season and will get in the low 20s, possibly sub 20 in one month in Eugene. Merritt is quicker but Wariner's 43.45 and 43.5 are far faster than anything Merritt has run or will ever run. I had my doubts but now that Wariner has Clyde Hart as a coach you will see just how good he is, again, again, and over again. The best 400m runner in history in the making. He has never even lost a World Championship in his career, and never lost an Olympics with Hart has his coach. The record is only a matter of time. 'Til then, a bunch of gold medals and another younger 15 minutes of fame star in Merritt will wane. Most 400 meter runners are done after a year or two. Wariner has proven that is not him, Lawshawn has not. Edited by: StarWars