Rebajlo, the TV propaganda machine, like ESPN here in the US (ESPN = Jews promoting Blacks) will always promote non-Whites no matter what. In this tournament they did get a bit more ammunition than usual because of the blackness of the teams in the finals, but even if the finals were (for example) Germany - Austria the spotlight (and the camera close-ups during the game) would have probably been mostly on Boateng and Alabba. I do admit this was a bad tournament for White teams and I'm not happy about it, but not necessarily bad for White players. I stand by this. My general line of reasoning is that non-Whites in general and Blacks in particular are not that good in this sport as media would like us to believe (although I admit they might be better than us in some sports like the 100 meter dash, Basketball and some others). I still think White players are the best in this sport, and will remain so for the time being. I also think that the general darkening of this sport that started in the earnest relatively recently (in the 90s) is really part of a larger plan to multiculturalize White coutries and that the media are using the power this sport exerts on the masses to make these aliens acceptable to the society at large. I am curious to understand if your line of reasoning is similar or different. Did this tournament change your opinion? Just trying to understand the point/suggestion you are trying to make.
Regarding the hypothetical game between Croatia and the team described above - a team comprising all these White star players would be difficult to beat, but football/soccer is a team sport where a) a lot depends on how well a team plays together, b)a football team is a kind of a "weakest link" proposition where an otherwise strong team can be defeated because the (otherwise weaker) opponent skillfully identifies and takes advantage of weak points of the team with more "star power". Since Uganda is not exactly a land brimming with football talents, I would still give a better chance of victory to a homogeneous Croatian team. The team you listed above looks like the one of these disaster movies that were so en-vogue in the 70s (think "The Towering Inferno" or similar). These movies had a cast choke-full of first-rate movie stars but the ultimate result was a pretty mediocre, non-memorable film.
Porthos -
The media’s unwavering exaltation of Negroes in sport is a “Cultural Marxist” staple which has been amply documented on Caste Football down the years. My first ever post in the soccer section discussed the systematic promotion of black forwards in England from the late 1970s onwards and was added as an article on the old home page. So we are in full agreement there.
I assume You clearly remember the 1988 European Championship final in which the Netherlands beat the Soviet Union 2-0. I was a teenage football nutcase at the time, getting up at all hours of the Australian night to watch the tournament - and to wince as England lost all three of their group matches
(ten Whites plus semi-retard-faced Jamaican John Barnes in every starting lineup). Marco van Basten scored his eye-popping volley to seal the victory but - lo and behold - next day the Sydney Morning Herald featured a photo of Ruud Gullit and the despicable Frank Rijkaard holding aloft their winners’ medals as a visual accompaniment to a pitifully inadequate write-up of the match. Instead of man of the moment van Basten - who had finished as the competition’s leading scorer with five goals in five matches - the newspaper pictured two of the Netherlands’ three non-White participants (people tend to forget the vaguely Arab-looking part-Surinamese right winger Gerald Vanenburg, while Aron Winter was an unused squad member…). Incidentally, the Soviet lineup included Rinat Dasayev and Vagiz Khidiyatullin. The former is an unmistakable Tatar while the latter is part-Tatar but looks White.
With the exception of the likes of Luis Suarez and Neymar, the truly elite echelon of players are White. That’s something else we agree upon.
Significantly, none can be visually “passed off” as Negroes - hence the relentless promotion of someone like Paul Pogba by a politico-media machine which has failed to learn any lessons from the abysmally humiliating failure of the “Super Mario” campaign.
But sport is a zero sum game and nobody can possibly deny that the teams which regularly progress to at least the quarterfinals stage of tournaments at both club and international level are becoming less and less White, which leads me to the following questions…
At what point does the number of blacks or other non-Whites in a team become unacceptable? At what point does a predominantly black team’s success cease being an exclusive product of the endeavours of a small minority of White players?
You included Reunionese mongrel Dimitri Payet as part of the France’s indispensable “skeleton”. Yet the fact that Payet
isn’t White is just as important as the fact that he
isn’t a Negro. France reached the final but never started more than four Whites. Like I said, in this case people simply see a team with six “black guys” and some sort of an “Indian” beating teams with “all or mostly White guys”.
Let’s forget about France for a moment. Instead of focussing on the runners up, how about we have a look at the actual champions.
Portugal started four blacks against Iceland, three blacks and a part-gypsy (Ricardo Quaresma) against Austria, and five blacks against Hungary. In the knockout stages, they started four blacks against Croatia, six blacks against Poland and five blacks against Wales. Portugal retained five black starters for the final. The gypsy Ricardo Quaresma came on for the injured Cristiano Ronaldo after 25 minutes and Portugal finished the game with six non-Whites on the field (due to an inexplicable lapse of the pen - or, more accurately, the keyboard - in an earlier post I erroneously stated that Eder had replaced Ronaldo
. I have now amended the mistake). In the direct context of our discussion, it is quite notable that Portugal won the final after playing just over two-thirds of regulation time plus all of extra time without their sole White elite echelon megastar.
Portugal scored a total of nine goals - but only three of those were scored by a White (Cristiano Ronaldo). The remaining six were divided between Nani (three), Renato Sanches, Eder and gyppo Ricardo Quaresma. Not good…
As You correctly concluded, Croatia would beat a Uganda side featuring those five White “guest stars”. Now, let’s take the hypothesis a bit further. What if we replaced five of the six Ugandan Negroes with Jerome Boateng, David Alaba (as a left back), Blaise Matuidi, Kingsley Coman, and - just for some extra levity - Kyle Walker? Our notional team now consists of one Ugandan plus Cristiano Ronaldo, Antione Griezmann, Toni Kroos, Blaise Matuidi, Kingsley Coman, Kyle Walker, Laurent Koscielny, Jerome Boateng, and David Alaba, with Hugo Lloris in goal. Would Croatia still win?
