Super Six World Boxing Classic

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
Froch won by split decision. It was a close fight. If they gave it to Dirrell it would have been fair too.Edited by: whiteathlete33
 

Bear Backer

Mentor
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
658
Location
Illinois
Boring fight. A challenger who wants to run, hide, hold and not take it to the champion and the Champ not trying enough to close the distance and letting the runner get away.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
YEAH F..K Yeah

WHITE ATHELETS: 2AFFELETS: 0.......BOO HOO.
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
I was worried about this fight from the beginning. Froch put up a very poor performance. He could have lost this fight easily on the cards and barely escaped beating Jermain Taylor. If I were to rank the fighters in this fight I would have Kessler first, Abraham, Dirrell, Ward, Taylor and finally Froch. He is the weakest link.
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
I don't really like Froch much. He constantly calls out Joe Calzaghe and puts up poor performances. Next up for him is Mikkel Kessler and Froch will be exposed like never before in that fight. Kessler is too quick and seasoned for Froch.
 

Bear Backer

Mentor
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
658
Location
Illinois
whiteathlete33 said:
I was worried about this fight from the beginning. Froch put up a very poor performance. He could have lost this fight easily on the cards and barely escaped beating Jermain Taylor. If I were to rank the fighters in this fight I would have Kessler first, Abraham, Dirrell, Ward, Taylor and finally Froch. He is the weakest link.

I had Dumbass Dirrell ahead by at least two rounds, because Froch didn't look like he wanted to use his power at all in the first few rounds. Then again, all loud mouthed Dirrell did was run the ropes, complain to the referee, proceed to hold while only landing a couple of decent shots. I would say it would could have easily went either way,but because Froch was the champ he got the nod. Dirrell didn't do anything to take it from him either though. After that fight, I'd like to take the title away from them both and say earn it whoever can do it.Edited by: Bear Backer
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
Froch got the win because the fight was in England. In the US this fight would have went to Dirrell for 100 %. Froch's belt belongs to the retired Calzaghe. He doesn't deserve to wear the belt of the greatest champion of all time.
 

Bear Backer

Mentor
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
658
Location
Illinois
whiteathlete33 said:
I don't really like Froch much. He constantly calls out Joe Calzaghe and puts up poor performances. Next up for him is Mikkel Kessler and Froch will be exposed like never before in that fight. Kessler is too quick and seasoned for Froch.

He certainly better not put on a garbage performance like he did tonight if he wants a slim chance to win. I have to wonder what round Froch was talking about when he said that he would "Drag Dirrell into a fight"? Maybe he was talking about the 13th round, or a round of drinks after the boxing match, because he sure didn't look he wanted to drag him into fight during the first 12 rounds.
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
Froch has no chance against Abraham or Kessler. I hate to put white athletes down but Froch showed no heart against a guy who was stepping way up in competition. His defensive skills are almost nonexistent. Making a comparison of him and Abraham and Kessler is like comparing night to day. Kessler and Abraham show excellent defensive skills and look for openings and pace themselves. Froch likes to throw wild off balance punches the whole night and hope for a knockout.
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
Probably the only good thing Froch did all night is that he was the aggressor. That is most likely why the judges gave him the fight. Dirrell was mocking Froch the whole fight and sticking out his tongue. These affletes act worse than 5 year olds.
 

Charles Martel

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
8,484
whiteathlete33 said:
I don't really like Froch much. He constantly calls out Joe Calzaghe and puts up poor performances. Next up for him is Mikkel Kessler and Froch will be exposed like never before in that fight. Kessler is too quick and seasoned for Froch.

I agree. There is a huge difference between the talent of Calzaghe and Froch, and Kessler is MUCH better than Froch too.

I don't know why Froch held back from throwing his right hand several times when he had Dirrell cornered tonight, he seemed rather awkward and uncoordinated.

I scored it 114-114, 6 rounds to Dirrell, 5 to Froch, plus the point deduction and an even round. But the rounds were difficult to score and several could have gone to either boxer. In the early rounds, Froch punched a lot of air, and Dirrell just ran.

Dirrell has good reflexes and skills, but he just ran about 90% of the fight and held for much of the other 10%.

Overall, Froch deserved to win more than Dirrell, because as he said after the fight, you don't deserve to take a world title by just running and holding.
 

Charles Martel

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
8,484
whiteathlete33 said:
Probably the only good thing Froch did all night is that he was the aggressor. That is most likely why the judges gave him the fight. Dirrell was mocking Froch the whole fight and sticking out his tongue. These affletes act worse than 5 year olds.

They are often very childish.
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
At least we are 2 and 0 so far!!!!!!!
smiley1.gif
 

Bear Backer

Mentor
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
658
Location
Illinois
Parody said:
whiteathlete33 said:
I don't really like Froch much. He constantly calls out Joe Calzaghe and puts up poor performances. Next up for him is Mikkel Kessler and Froch will be exposed like never before in that fight. Kessler is too quick and seasoned for Froch.

I agree. There is a huge difference between the talent of Calzaghe and Froch, and Kessler is MUCH better than Froch too.

I don't know why Froch held back from throwing his right hand several times when he had Dirrell cornered tonight, he seemed rather awkward and uncoordinated.

I scored it 114-114, 6 rounds to Dirrell, 5 to Froch, plus the point deduction and an even round. But the rounds were difficult to score and several could have gone to either boxer. In the early rounds, Froch punched a lot of air, and Dirrell just ran.

Dirrell has good reflexes and skills, but he just ran about 90% of the fight and held for much of the other 10%.

Overall, Froch deserved to win more than Dirrell, because as he said after the fight, you don't deserve to take a world title by just running and holding.

It cracked me up after the fight how Dirrell's supporters were saying "it be highway robbery." Actually, to me his performance looked more like one of those news clips of an African civil war. The ones where you see the Afreecan militias running around with no apparent motive, firing their AK's in back peddle mode. Taking a few shots and then skedaddlin around the corner of a burned out building. If his camp thinks he did anything to truly EARN that fight they are crazy.
 

The Hock

Master
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
3,905
Location
Northern California
Well, the sport is called boxing and for much of the fight I thought Dirrell boxed Froch's ears off. With a lot of help from Froch, who really looked off kilter in this one.

Very unsatisfying "win".
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Be reading the posts, and I guess Frochy has to feel the CF ers have driven the bus over him. Guys be happy he got the decision! So what if he had to struggle to get the W. Boxing is a very sport u can't look every outing like George Foreman used to say,'win tonite look spectacular next fite'. Unfortuneately Frochy chances of looking great are sli
and none against Kessler, the next match up!
 

Pollyanna

Guru
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
122
Location
Oregon
whiteathlete33 said:
Since Taylor is black 4 losses in his last fight doesn't mean much. He will still be getting good paydays against top fighters.

Taylor is fast becoming the boxing equivalent of Duh- mucous Russell. If he were white, they would be calling for him to retire, rather than continuing to get main event fights. I say keep him in there for some more big fights, as it makes our guys look that much better when they turn his lights off.
 

Pollyanna

Guru
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
122
Location
Oregon
Froch did the best he could against Bolt, I mean Dirrell. Carl came to defend a boxing title and his opponent ran around the ring looking like a Katrina Looter. This negro's "style" is all form and no substance. In economic downturns, folks want value for their money. Dirrell ripped off paying customers with his hybrid wrestling, track and boxing performance. On a side note, Dirrell has a future on Dancing with the Stars.
Edited by: Pollyanna
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
I am glad Dirrell lost. He is a real piece of s--t. He acted like a 5 year old the whole fight. He has no class and sticking out his tongue the whole fight showed that TNB is a reality.
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
The commentators kept on repeating what a great afflete Dirrell was. He does have excellent speed but has no fighting skills. He was lucky to face the weakest fighter in the tournament. Abraham or Kessler would have took his head off.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Too bad Carl did not punch him in the jaw and snap off that lingering tongue. That would have been funny.
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
I wonder how this next black dope will do against Kessler. Last night I almost had a heart attack when they were reading the scores. I don't think Kessler will disappoint.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
I wonder if Dirrell will try the same lame strategy of disparging his next opponent King Aurther? If he does, he does to his own peril. I have a feeling that AA is going to ruin Dirrell. After AA is done with him, he will have a mandatory visit and stay at the hospital for what poor Taylor has...a concussion. I hope Taylor is ok and retires.

I am certain he is done with boxing. Allen Green is the next affelet fodder for our champs. He is the "replacement affelet."(sounds like a sitcom)LOL
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
Dirrell was running around the ring for almost the whole fight. He was obviously afraid of Froch's power. His speed is what kept him in the fight as he was able to counterpunch while Froch was coming after him. Dirrell is a terrible fighter.
 

Charles Martel

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
8,484
And, as expected, the Zionist sportwriters are already coming out with articles attacking the winning white fighters styles:

Froch & Abraham Both Win - But Do You Like Their Style?

I knew it must be written by one of the supremacists when I saw the headline. Sure enough, written by Paul Strauss.

Man, their hatred of the white goyim must run deep! They are pathetic and insane to take it out on our athletes.
smiley21.gif
 
Top