Romney vs. Obama

[jaxvid]

What's going on with this?

Is Obama showing his islamic roots?

An incredible error in judgement?

A feint to actually support israel?

Why would the annointed child of the chosen ones make such a controversial speech at this time?

Maybe the jews don't run the world?

And suprisingly enough the republicans rush in to condemn him and garner support from their true masters. But that just makes the whole thing more curious. Why would the dems give the repubs this opportunity?

Romney: Obama 'threw Israel under the bus'Edited by: jaxvid

 

[space hillbilly]

Just more smoke and mirrors by the PTB.....

 

[FootballDad]

I have to agree with lost. What was the real reason for Obongo's interestingly timed speech? When it comes right down to it, it's none of our business, and ultimately, the speech was nothing more than a photo op/campaign spot when all is said and done. Perhaps that was all it is, and considering Barry is always in campaign mode, it was just a chance to get in front of the cameras. From a substantive level, the speech was simply filled with obvious platitudes, and an empty call for Israel to do something they would never do.


Maybe there is something more pressing afoot, and this is a grand distraction.

 

[Bronk]

Support for Israel is a knee-jerk reaction in American politics. It absolves the supporter of charges of "anti-semitism" and it may earn him a few bucks along the way.

Romney is your standard chicken-crap variety pol, stale and predictable.

 

[Bart]

What's going on with this?

He alienated a large portion of his base by continuing the very policies he campaigned against. No difference between him and Bush in their eyes especially after incursions into Libya and the supposed assassination of OBL.

The Nation of Islam and many militant black groups are also extremely upset. He's an Uncle Tom in their eyes.

So now he's talking tough and pretending to take a hard line.

Netanyahu will play along and gnash his teeth.

In the end nothing will happen. The jews will build more settlements while pretending to make concessions.

And we will pony up even more cash to keep the peace.

Romney steps up and cries foul! We're stabbing the chosenites in the back! Oy!

He is now the front runner in a dull GOP horse race. He has distanced himself from the other nags. Checks are being written at breakneck speed.

 

[Solomon Kane]

Obama is not really sympathetic to the Palestinian cause (not that it's America'soffice to rectify the wrongs in the world). This is just a speech to establish his bona fides as "compassionate". Nothing substantial will change. Israel will still get all the money it wants and more, as well as US-led bombing campaigns against the Libyans, and soon, perhaps, against the Syrians and Iranians.

 

[referendum]

I wonder though if Obama is torn about this. On every issue where race is involved, his instincts is to be against white western civilization. On the Israel issue, his instinct would be to be on the same side of most honest, anti-colonial, anti-western civilization, anti-Christian political thinking, that is to be pro-Palestinian. The irony of course is that political Zionism is no friend to the white world, but on the superficial level, look who are strong friends of Israel. The same politicians who helped defeat amnesty for illegal aliens, for instance, would likely be pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian. Put another way, most strong advocates of a more balanced middle east policies policies are on the left, and would love to see a less white America.
On the other hand, look at Mark Steyn, a man who says the right things about many race and nationality issues, but is a groveling pro-Zionist when it comes to the Israel issue. Would Obama want to be on the same side of this issues as Mark Steyn? I think not.

 

[Observer]

I think it is a green light for Israel to go on the warpath, in self-defense, against nations that are now officially "unstable".

 

[Paleocon]

Of course the mainstream "conservative" movement will denounce Obama for allegedly throwing Israel under the bus; however, that only indicates that mainstream "conservatives" never actually think about the things they believe in. The truth is that Israel has only three choices if it wants to remain a Jewish state: 1) apartheid, 2) genocide, or 3) separation in the form of the "two-state solution." Even knowing that those same "conservatives" would deny that options 1 or 2 were happening if Israel went that route, I still think option 3 is the most viable as a long-term solution.



Edited by: Paleocon

 

[Riddlewire]

More misdirection.
Obama gives a meaningless speech and the whole world focuses on it instead of the criminal act of releasing a fraudulent document and the ever closer approach of the unconstitutional trojan horse known as Obamacare.

 

[DixieDestroyer]

It's most likely just hot air from Obongo. A true Constitionalist POTUS would extract ALL troops from the middle east. It's funny to see the NeoCONs get all up in arms (for their Zionist masters), but it could be part of the ruse.

 

[white is right]

Err good news not...

The tail is still wagging the dog. Netanyahu immediately refuted the "Chosen Ones" border for Israel and basically stated that Israel will control all negotiations. No word on whether Obama's purple lips turned a shade darker from this display of "friendship".....http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/05/20/obama-netanyahu-friday.htmlEdited by: white is right

 

[devans]

He is just stating basic international law, which says that when a war ends you cant keep hold of any territory you have gained - unless that territory is ceded to you by some kind of peace agreement. It has sent shockwaves around the world because this is Israel, and they of course can do what the f*ck they like. The U.S. has always smiled, patted them on the back and sent them a few billions to help with the security issue - and I don't think this is going to change.

 

[jaxvid]

This just in from the AIPAC conference....Obama was misquoted, 1967 borders are out, jews still rule amerikan politics, business as usual.

 

[Westside]

How can Barry be misquoted, when he gave a major speech and the words flowed from his mouth and the whole world heard it? No, his walking back some of it. Deep down BO has "issues" with jews that should score points here.

 

[jaxvid]

How can Barry be misquoted, when he gave a major speech and the words flowed from his mouth and the whole world heard it? No, his walking back some of it. Deep down BO has "issues" with jews that should score points here.

Exactly! If he would have stuck to his story I would have got out a Barry in 2012 yard sign. But no, he can't even channel his true Muslim self.

 

[FootballDad]

He is just stating basic international law, which says that when a war ends you cant keep hold of any territory you have gained - unless that territory is ceded to you by some kind of peace agreement.

International law!

After war, the terms all always dictated by the victor. Remember what happened to Germany after WW2?

 

[Westside]

Just under the surface I believe Barry is a socialist/soft communist. He appreciates his White blood, kind of embarrassed by his negro father's blood. Understands the jewish manipulations, sides with his inner Muslim beliefs. There is an ABSOLUTE REASON why he has NEVER set foot in the "Promised Land", three years into his presidency!!

He seems like a likable guy and gives off a vibe of being a good husband and father......BUT his idealogy of socialism and redistrubution of wealth from those who have it to those to lazy get it, is not the American Way. The Obamacare he championed will be his fall. Also, for all the acclaim of him being so smart, not buying it. Just listen to him without the teleprompters or off script . Alot of pauses, aaahs and Duhs. Yes, he has mastered the speech via teleprompters but his thinking is un American.

 

[Westside]

The Jews in J-Town, Pico Blvd / Roberston Ave, area of West Los Angeles are really bewildered by Barack. Funny to listen try to defend that speech other day with gloom and fright on their mugs.

 

[Bart]

How can Barry be misquoted, when he gave a major speech and the words flowed from his mouth and the whole world heard it? No, his walking back some of it. Deep down BO has "issues" with jews that should score points here.

Exactly! If he would have stuck to his story I would have got out a Barry in 2012 yard sign. But no, he can't even channel his true Muslim self.

You're on a roll.

 

[devans]

He is just stating basic international law, which says that when a war ends you cant keep hold of any territory you have gained - unless that territory is ceded to you by some kind of peace agreement.

International law!

After war, the terms all always dictated by the victor. Remember what happened to Germany after WW2?

Yes you are right - to the victor goes the spoils. After WW2 however the only bit of territory taken by the west was Alsace Lorraine, which has always see sawed between being part of France or Germany. The Russians completely re-drew the map of eastern Europe of course - but that was over 65 years ago and the U.N. now try to avoid the situation (IN Law) were a country can go to war to gain territory - even if you were not the aggressor. That doesn't mean it doesn't happen - just that it is not legal (for what its worth)

 

[white is right]

The President of the US addressed congress err the Prime Minister of Israel. When Barry addresses congress there is more rancour then when a leader of near rogue state. Like trained seals to the AIPAC financial whale they all barked for a piece of fish....

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/05/24/israel-netanyahu-congress.html

 

[Riddlewire]

I'm not sure there's any more need for this thread.

The Jewish video Obama doesn't want on the web

It's clear Obama never forgot which group he serves.

Btw, since when does the White House officially honor "American Jewish Heritage Month"? Do they also honor Norwegian-American History Month (a group similar in size to the jews)? Oh, silly me, there is no such designated period. But the jews get a whole f#c&ing month?

 

[Highlander]

I had no idea that May was "American Jewish Heritage Month". I wonder if they have a ceremony celebrating the private Federal Reserve and the perversion of Hollywood.

So, we have February for "Black History Month", March for "Womens' History Month", May for "American Jewish Heritage Month", and June for "Gay Pride/History (or whatever) Month". I wonder if the Hispanics have their own month too. If not, it'll only be a matter of time. Which month is "White History Month"? Is there one that celebrates the accomplishments that men have made to this country?


Edited by: Highlander

 

[DixieDestroyer]

I had no idea that May was "American Jewish Heritage Month".  I wonder if they have a ceremony celebrating the private Federal Reserve and the perversion of Hollywood.So, we have February for "Black History Month", March for "Womens' History Month", May for "American Jewish Heritage Month", and June for "Gay Pride/History (or whatever) Month".  I wonder if the Hispanics have their own month too.  If not, it'll only be a matter of time.  Which month is "White History Month"?  Is there one that celebrates the accomplishments that men have made to this country?

There aren't enough weeks in a decade, much less a month to overview the mass contributions & accomplishments of the great White race.