j41181 said:
This is for REBAJLO...
http://sports.yahoo.com/box/blog/box_experts/post/Paris-Hilton-causes-a-stir-at-Pacman-press-confe;_ylt=AtZ49jf5nCKRbbv_gOb3hteUxLYF?urn=box-wp425
I can understand his distaste for Asians, and the picture below speaks for itself...
No disrespect to Pacquiao (below) and his wife (above named Jinky), but there's no question the 2 white gals here are MORE Beautiful (upper left girl especially), and yes, that's PEA BRAINED Paris Hilton.
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>j41181 - Mate, Pacquiao looks like a grotesque catfish in the grip of acute jaundice. As I've mentioned in some of my early posts, here in Australia it seems like every second misshapen, beer-bellied loser over the age of forty is walking around with a toad-faced, nasal-voiced Filipina mail-order bride/concubine/cook/housecleaner/punching bag.Their Viagra habits must be cripplingly expensive, or maybe these dropkicks just close their eyes and think of all of the Australian girls they never had the bollocks to approach or who have continually knocked them back. It's probably (repugnant shudder) an unholy combination of both but, however they manage to do the perversely unspeakable business, they are somehow producing a disturbing number of sickening half-breeds. Anyway, enough of my social observations - let's return to the original topic...</div>
<div></div>
<div>
whiteathlete33 said:
Rebaljo, I don't agree with your post at all. I highly doubt the media is using Pacquiao to divert attention away from the Klitschko brothers. That's not their MO and it never will be. Manny is a rare Filipino champion and that's where that comes in. The Klitschko will always be hated by the DWF's and media simply because of their skin color. Anytime Pacquiao beats another afflete it shows just how poor boxers most blacks are. In my opinion, Wladimir is number 1 pound for pound in the world right now.
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
GiovaniMarcon said:
I don't think Pacquiao gets special attention because the media wants to further embarrass Whites, he gets attention because he's quite simply one of the greatest boxers in recent memory -- all time, even -- from any weight class.
Yes, the media is racist against the Klitschkos but I don't think Asians as a group are not promoted by the media to be anything special athletically. Latinos aren't promoted as an athletically-superior group, either.
Physically, Hispanics and Asians aren't trumpeted by the media as being better than Whites -- only Blacks are given this spurious honor.
</div>
<div></div>
<div>whiteathlete33, GiovaniMarcon - I didn't assert that the media disseminates the idea that Asians are physically superior to Whites (although the "unbeatable eastern martial arts" and 'Bruce Lee is the ultimate fighter" cults have, in my opinion, done just as much damage to White core confidence and pride as the "black super athlete" doctrine). My point was that as a non-White, Pacquiao is instantly more palatable to the Jews than the Klitschkos and is therefore automatically accorded far more publicity than if he happened to be a White with an identical record - and in the current White-dominated climate this makes him an anti-White propaganda device.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Sure, in order to perpetuate their now-flagging myth the media would wholeheartedly prefer their "diversionary golden boy" to be black but, in the absence of suitably qualified Negroes, Pacquiao more than suffices for as we all know, when it comes to positive sports media exposure (especially in the realms of the combat disciplines)
anyone is preferable to a White.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Remember Dariusz Michalczewski's 48 fight unbeaten streak? Of course the boxing regulars on this site remember, but how much of the general public even knows who Michalczewski is? How about Joe Calzaghe? Did these physically larger non-heavyweight lads receive as much publicity in the mainstream media as Pacquiao? Of course not. Why? Because the overwhelming majority of the population knows bugger all about boxing and their opinions are formed solely by what they are shown on TV. Your average punter couldn't tell You the difference between bantamweight and welterweight and couldn't demonstrate a right cross to save his life, yet mention Muhammad Ali or Mike Tyson and everyone instantly knows who You're talking about. The heavyweight champions were always viewed as the pinnacle of the boxing pile and consequently received the proportionate attention, while the purely subjective "pound for pound" ratings were ofminor importance. Today, however, whenever boxing is touched upon all the mainstream media seems to mention is "pound for pound king" Pacquiao, while the heavyweights who would effortlessly knock him into his next incarnation amidst a spray of teeth are nigh on invisible to the general public's eye- and when they are given a bit of exposure it is only to say that the Klitschkos are the boring best of a patently substandard generation, weakened by the absence of the "top black athletes"...</div>
<div></div>
<div>Now, letme be quite clear that I'mnot saying that Pacquiaois
crap. But what I
am saying is that a 5 foot 6 inch geezer who has never fought higher than super welterweight and has racked up plenty of his wins against Filipino gnats at
flyweight suspiciously receives acres and acres more attention than the likes of the exceedingly dominant heavyweight champions. I don't believe that this is even remotely coincidental...</div>
<div>
</span></div>
