"Slam my head into the pavement?"
What the hell is wrong with you?
If you're going to make a rather far-fetched sounding claim (this idea of genetic predisposition) you can expect some incredulity, especially in a "happy hour" section of a
website. This isn't a scientific discussion panel at a Swiss university, which isn't to say scientific claims can't be made, but you shouldn't be too angry if others don't immediately cotton to a theory that goes against their own beliefs.
If that happens, the correct response isn't to get angry and start hurling insults; the correct response it to
explain why you're right.
And, as there are numerous tongue-in-cheek posts in this thread -- a thread that has gradually become humorous -- I think it would be fair to say that my post is more in keeping with the spirit of the thread ("happy hour humor") than your violent rant.
I think we're all basically on the same side of the issue, when it comes right down to it.
If you're looking to impress people on the strength of your bravado you're in the wrong place. Anyone on the internet can claim to be as small as mini me or as big as John Wayne.
All we're left with then is the strength and validity of our arguments -- someone with a very narrow view of masculinity might even suggest that using your brain and using your words is a womanly trait -- in that case, perhaps the internet is wrong for that person, and they should be chopping wood somewhere at a lumber mill in the Canadian Yukon, fighting bears and eating raw meat.[/QUOTE]
This is gonna be the last post i make in this thread as the last thing i want is to get into a war of typed words against a guy i dont know and i'm not a particularly fast typer.
My post was'nt made due to your disagreement.Lets be honest,you resorted to provocative sarcasm which you yourself acknowledged which only equates with rudeness,disrespect[hate that word] buy my book leading to conflict.Why make an antagonistic post to then accuse the reactor of overreacting when the post was constucted as a catylist for the reaction
On a more serious note though,this is the reason i never post pick even when coming acrossfrom time to time certain viewpoints i disagree with.Only leads to disharmony in an otherwise happy house like this forum.I accept differing ideaologies amongst posters are most likely the result of day to day life experiences which i cannot even begin to contemplate,so who am i to tell them their wrong.
My orriginal post was born out of frustration at the previous day which i spent in a park playing football.I witnessed more BM/WF couples than usual along with a couple of ww parrading around what looked like new born babys with their Black partners.This led to afterthoughts and analyzing of why this seems to be a perpetual problem in any country Black men reside with white women in significant numbers.In the cold light of day where objective thought takes over emotional afterthought i realise Black men due to a number of factors will never be able to date white women in the numbers that would pose a threat to white genetic interests.I actually went back to the same place the next day and saw hundreds of white couples,barely any interacial so it generally varies.I'm generally more optimistic than others in this regard.The moral,behavioural and physical differences born out of centuries of evolution which many people are waking up to across the west putting a huge strain on multiculturalism along with the Black mans inability to create and maintain white standards of civilisation,leading to white flight will always drive down the potential for mass mixing.The threat is their though,and thrives in countrys subjected to marxism like Castro's Cuba and other south American countrys.Maybe one of the reasons the US the most capitalist country in the world is ironically one of the most idealogically marxist.