OldSchoolBoy75
Guru
DixieDestroyer said:...or perhaps a lawn jockey.
LOL!! I was thinking of that one too, but I didn't want to state the obvious.
OBAMA WON; Here we go
- Thread starter P-NutLane
- Start date
LOL!! I was thinking of that one too, but I didn't want to state the obvious.
screamingeagle
Mentor
The most valuable collectors item is his birth certifcate. No one has ever seen it.
Electric Slide
Mentor
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2007
- Messages
- 1,016
PhillyBirds said:
Philly, why didn't you just leave class? At my school in many of my classes if this was all the instructor was doing, many of us would have just gotten up and walked out. I can't imagine you were being graded on watching the TV or that there was a quiz associated with it, or that the information would on a midterm or final exam. In some of the classes I took, if the instructor even said that was happening, half the class would not have showed up.
I just watched ABC Evening "News," which was nothing more than 30 minutes of Obama worship. One of the pieces showed "children from around the world" talking about Obama. Every one of them spouted the party line about how Obama was going to bring about "world peace" and end all inequalities between different races and religions.
The piece was "reported by" Jim Schiuto, who is the network'smain"reporter" in the Middle East. But how were the clips from all the different countries put together? Obviously ABC put out a directive to its "reporters" in overseas countries and their cameramen to find and film children. I would imagine the children were then prompted on what to say, then the video from the various countries was edited together in New York and Schiuto was faxed a script to read for it.
In any other country this would be recognizable as rather crude government propaganda; here millions watch it and think it's "news."
The piece was "reported by" Jim Schiuto, who is the network'smain"reporter" in the Middle East. But how were the clips from all the different countries put together? Obviously ABC put out a directive to its "reporters" in overseas countries and their cameramen to find and film children. I would imagine the children were then prompted on what to say, then the video from the various countries was edited together in New York and Schiuto was faxed a script to read for it.
In any other country this would be recognizable as rather crude government propaganda; here millions watch it and think it's "news."
Electric Slide
Mentor
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2007
- Messages
- 1,016
Don Wassall said:
Don, I know there's not too many fans of Fox News on here, but I am watching Hannity right now and you do have to give him credit he is not worshiping Obama. He's actually showing a long interview with Rush right now, and he's pointing correctly pointing out that the Left has been racist ones, telling us that we have to hope Obama succeeds just because he's black.
I know many on here don't like Hannity and Rush because they are not pro-white, and that they support Israel and the War on Terror. When you think of it though, they are some of the few in the MSM that are calling out the stupity of cheering for Obama because he is black.
Solomon Kane
Mentor
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Messages
- 783
That's a fair point, Electric. I'm no fan ofLimbaugh and Hannity, but you have to give credit where credit is due.
Electric Slide said:
Yes, they'll go after Obama because they're professional Republican Party cheerleaders. They still pretend there are vast differences between the two parties, and that only demonic liberals prevent the GOP from instituting the small government they claim to advocate, even when Republicans control all three branches of government. They have a vested interest (in their case being paid tens of millions of dollars annually) in being the "respectable opposition."
You're exactly right when you say they're not pro-white while being pro-Zionist and pro-"War on Terror"(anyone who is pro-War on Terror by definition supports a totalitarian surveillance state). And they are in large part responsible for bringing the white masses to the same points of view. They have played key roles in making so many middle class whites anti-white. One can praise them as rear-guard opponents of the "liberals" who always win, but they are merely players in the charade that keeps the one-party-with-two-wings fraud going in perpetuity. A "conservative movement" that plays only defense, at best, when it comes to the key issues of the day is a guaranteed loser, which the "conservatives" have been ever since the end of WWII.
Edited by: Don Wassall
Colonel_Reb
Hall of Famer
Don Wassall said:
Great post Don, and I agree 100%. This is coming from someone who used to listen to them a lot. They aren't real. They just make the situationworse by muddying the water.
GiovaniMarcon
Mentor
I used to listen to Rush often in the late 1990s, and to Hannity a lot during the run-up to the 2004 election. I liked listening to him bash Kerry.
I never liked Anne Coulter, though.
Anyway, no matter what horrible thing Barrack Obama may end up doing, it will be the white man's fault -- or at the worst, the white half of Obama's fault.
I never liked Anne Coulter, though.
Anyway, no matter what horrible thing Barrack Obama may end up doing, it will be the white man's fault -- or at the worst, the white half of Obama's fault.
OldSchoolBoy75
Guru
GiovaniMarcon said:
I started listening to Limbaugh around 1992-93. I would say Limbaugh's heyday was the early-to-mid '90s. I stopped taking neocon talk radio seriously by the late '90s, when the internet began giving people alternatives to the right and left. Post-Twin Towers attacks, neocon talk radio was nothing more than a pro-Israel coffee klatsch.
Look for Rush to go back up in popularity. He always does better when the Dems are in power because then he can help vent the frustration at the policies of those idiots, when the R's are in power Rush is useless because then he has to defend the very same policies of the same kind of idiots and it makes him look stupid. He's good at ripping on people and he'll have a lot to do in the next few years.
Solomon Kane
Mentor
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Messages
- 783
jaxvid said:
A good summary of limbaugh's main strengths and deficiencies. he's a good attack journalist, skilled in satire but lacking in genuine wisdom.
And I agree with Don that limbaugh and hannity are foolish for not acknowledging that the republicans are just as bad as the dems.
Then too they know what side their bread is buttered on. Like most conservative talk radio people--they are controlled by the zionist neocon establisment.
of course, another part of the problem is* that they don't know any other brand of conservatism than neo-conservatism.* they seem genuinely puzzled when the word neo-con is used in a derogatory manner byother conservatives. Hannity is so poorly read that he doesn't seem to be aware that the neo-cons were late comers to the american conservative movement--they basically arrived in 1972 after the mcgovern debacle. they were not opposed to the welfare state, "civil rights", etc.
their only beef with the dems was over foreign policy.
Rush is vaguely aware of the older conservatism--but is himself a neocon and a party hack.
We need a daily paleo-con radio show that attacks the neocons as much as the left. There's no reason why we can't use wit and intelligence against Rush Limbaugh, expose him for the fraud which he has become.
I know Glen Beck is a little to Pro-Israel and Pro War on Terror for some of you guys but he regulary complains and dishes it out to both political parties on his radio and new TV show on Fox. He rails everyday against the bailout, loss of liberties, illegal immigration, corruption in Washington and the creeping socialism that is happening. He sounds the clarion call and blows the trumpet everyday for tradional values minded Americans to wake up and man the faxes, emails and phones and change things before it's too late.
White Shogun
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2005
- Messages
- 6,285
guest301 said:
Don't tell anybody.. he's a Mormon. Shhhh.....
OldSchoolBoy75
Guru
White Shogun said:
Actually, he's just a convert to the Mormon faith, who no doubt chose Mormonism because it was the safe way to resist hitting another bottle of booze.
OldSchoolBoy75 said:
Uh-huh, sure thing. Beck turned to Mormonism to solve his past "booze" problem the same way I turned to Christ to solve my "eternity" problem. It's working for Beck so far and I like how it's working for me. Mormon or not, Beck has said in the recent past that he has accepted Jesus Christ as his saviour. How that washes with his Mormon brethren, I have no idea.
Colonel_Reb
Hall of Famer
Fairly easily, 301, when you consider their beliefs and use of ambiguous language when speaking about such things to a non-mormon audience.
Electric Slide
Mentor
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2007
- Messages
- 1,016
guest301 said:Yes I know he is a Mormon. But if a guy agrees with me on most things, some things or just a few important things then I don't care what he is or isn't.
Amen to that. I think oftentimes we fail to see the forest for the trees. If there is somebody who supports something the way I do, I will be with them, but simply disagree with them when we fail to see things the same way. Rush Limbaugh I think is deep down a very decent guy. The reason he supports Jews and Israel is because I really think he feels it's the right thing to do, not because he wants to uphold "neo-cons" desire to evaporate all of our rights.
I think it's important that when we develop our opinions, and truthfully realize what makes things better and what makes things worse, that we should avoide using catch-phrases, buzzwords, and bumper-sticker logic. I honestly simply fail to believe that the Dems and the Repubs are the same party. When you compare it to Al-Qaida, if you want to consider that a "political" party, then yes they look the same. But in the context of American politics they are different and people in both parties fight very hard to try to win their elections. When it comes to passing legislation, people feel that they should give in to certain things so that they can get things done and not stall out on certain issues. Over time, due to bad influences, this can lead us away from what they were trying to accomplish in the first place. Also, you have to factor in that there are liberal Repubs, and conservative Dems, which kind of makes things confusing. But, when you get down too it, you have to realize that the leftist organizations in America who want to codify Global Warming as a supreme law, that want abortion-on demand at taxpayers expense, fight for "gay rights," and "equal-pay" for women, and affirmative action, they always side with democrats and villify republicans. They do this with large sums of cash, and people going to nearly every college campus and low-income neighborhood in America to instill these beliefs, and get democrats elected over republicans.
Believe me, I'm not saying that the republican party is ideal. The only person whose politics I agree with 100% of the time is MY OWN! Aside from that, if someone is willing to help me accomplish most of my beliefs, I will aplaud that as long as they are not a serial killer, rapist, or support out-right direct anti-white policies such as affirmative action.
Thus, in the context of the zionist run MSM worshiping and celebrating Obama because he is black, I absolutely and unapoligetically give credit to those who speak a different opinion on the matter. I don't belive in any ulterior motive unless there is a reason to believe that. To accomplish our goals we need to think clearly and critically as to what really can help us.
I absolutely respect everyone's right to believe as they wish. I respect the thought and research that everyone here has put into forming their beliefs. I hope that those of us who, on certain issues, have slightly different beliefs (but think it's still in our best interest) will get the same type of respect into our process of thinking these things through. I am grateful for each and every poster on this forum who speaks their mind in a rational way that clearly shows honest thought and a positive intent to help our cause and make our society a better place to exist.
indianwhite
Guru
Not only is America in a Recession, and at War (Iraq, Afghanistan), we are also having a CIVIL WAR</span> (culture war) right here in America. It's LIBERALS</span> vs. CONSERVATIVES</span>, with the silent and INDEPENDENT</span> majority watching from the sidelines without a care.
Edited by: indianwhite
Edited by: indianwhite
I think people who see our present situation clearly should vote their conscience and support a party or politicians that believe in what they do. Support for the Republicans as an alternative to the Democrats has been disasterous. A new way has to be found and it won't be by returning to the Republicans everytime the Dems get some power. There are alternatives but if most who feel this way continue to support R's or D's then nothing good will happen.
indianwhite
Guru
jaxvid</span>, I agree. If people want to see real change, then it has to come from neither the Republicans nor the Democrats, Liberals nor Conservatives. It's the INDEPENDENTS </span>and the silent majority</span> who need to step in, and voice in their concerns on the real predicament that America is in right now. If that will ever happen.jaxvid said:
Edited by: indianwhite
The "conservatives" are not a genuine opposition. They never go on the offensive, they merely slow down the rate of change spearheaded by the liberals and socialists. They are the "right wing" of the imperial globalist empire, not a force that represents whites or America First. But the independents and what's left of the silent majority have been carefully trained that the "conservatives" are the "right wing" and thus they will for the most part remain "centrists."
If you want an example of what I'm talking about here it is:
<H2>McCain Now Obama's No. 1 Senate Ally</H2>
GOP Sen. John McCain is positioning himself to be one of President Barack Obama's strongest supporters, effectively giving Democrats the votes they need to override any GOP attempt to block the new administration's legislative agenda.
Obama heaped warm praise on his GOP rival during a dinner held in McCain's honor the day before the inauguration, calling him a hero.
Insiders duly noted McCain was granted a prime spot on the dais at the inauguration, sandwiched in a seat between White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The day after the inauguration, Obama and McCain spoke again at the National Prayer breakfast.
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/maccain_obama_allies/2009 /01/23/174580.html
The U.S. has a closed, tightly regulated political system. The Dems and Repubs share the spoils and unite to make sure no one else is allowed in on the action, through laws, judicial rulings, and media blackouts and distortions of all non-Republicrat parties and candidates. The system itself is what is bringing about white extinction.
Nothing will change until there is an opposition that calls a spade a spade. To do that genuine conservatives and independents will have to get over their fear of being called "extremist," "racist," etc.and repudiate their bought and kept "leadership."Edited by: Don Wassall
If you want an example of what I'm talking about here it is:
<H2>McCain Now Obama's No. 1 Senate Ally</H2>
GOP Sen. John McCain is positioning himself to be one of President Barack Obama's strongest supporters, effectively giving Democrats the votes they need to override any GOP attempt to block the new administration's legislative agenda.
Obama heaped warm praise on his GOP rival during a dinner held in McCain's honor the day before the inauguration, calling him a hero.
Insiders duly noted McCain was granted a prime spot on the dais at the inauguration, sandwiched in a seat between White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The day after the inauguration, Obama and McCain spoke again at the National Prayer breakfast.
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/maccain_obama_allies/2009 /01/23/174580.html
The U.S. has a closed, tightly regulated political system. The Dems and Repubs share the spoils and unite to make sure no one else is allowed in on the action, through laws, judicial rulings, and media blackouts and distortions of all non-Republicrat parties and candidates. The system itself is what is bringing about white extinction.
Nothing will change until there is an opposition that calls a spade a spade. To do that genuine conservatives and independents will have to get over their fear of being called "extremist," "racist," etc.and repudiate their bought and kept "leadership."Edited by: Don Wassall