NFL News, Rumors and Musings

White players seem to regularly move up in these hypothetical redrafts…

1. Maye
4. Nix
7. Alt
8. Bowers
15. DeJean
20. McConkey
23. Fiske
26. Frazier
27. Rosengarten
32. Pearsall

Barton and McCarthy (ACL in rookie year) move out of the first while DeJean, McConkey, Fiske, Frazier, and Rosengarten move into the first. Also, Nix moves up substantially while Maye takes over as the 1.01. Alt, Bowers, and Pearsall are the same or very close.


 
Leonardfan said:
NFL retardation marketing at its best to appease the black militant sanders cult and do damage control on the “year of the black Qb”. No one can convince me otherwise. He was one of the worst qbs in league.

https://nfltraderumors.co/browns-qb-shedeur-sanders-added-to-pro-bowl-as-replacement/
Click to expand...
Lmao.

Here are his key 2025 regular season stats with the Browns:


• Passing: 1,400 yards, 7 touchdowns, 10 interceptions


• Completion percentage: Approximately 56.6% (around 120/212 in some breakdowns)


• QBR: 18.9 (low, reflecting struggles)


• Rushing: 21 carries for 169 yards and 1 touchdown
 
Leonardfan said:
NFL retardation marketing at its best to appease the black militant sanders cult and do damage control on the “year of the black Qb”. No one can convince me otherwise. He was one of the worst qbs in league.

https://nfltraderumors.co/browns-qb-shedeur-sanders-added-to-pro-bowl-as-replacement/
Click to expand...
This is like when Tyler Huntley made the pro bowl with 3 TDs vs 6 interceptions on the season or something. For Sanders to “deserve” a spot, it would mean every QB other than Brady Cook declining the invite. This is somewhat true, but there were still plenty of other replacement level starters or worse that should have gotten the call.

I’m sure Whitlock will have a field day with this as the NFL appeases the “Schedur-sexuals” as he calls them.
 
Freethinker said:
This is like when Tyler Huntley made the pro bowl with 3 TDs vs 6 interceptions on the season or something. For Sanders to “deserve” a spot, it would mean every QB other than Brady Cook declining the invite. This is somewhat true, but there were still plenty of other replacement level starters or worse that should have gotten the call.

I’m sure Whitlock will have a field day with this as the NFL appeases the “Schedur-sexuals” as he calls them.
Click to expand...
This is just a sign that the Pro Bowl being anything more than a resume padding event has to end. If possibly the worst starting qb in the conference is a replacement all star what integrity does the process have?
 
Freethinker, had to look it up, Huntley threw 2 TD's and had 3 Int's in 2022. In 6 years (30 games/16 starts) he has a total of 13 TD's and 10 Int's. His "17 game average" for his career is 7 TD's and 6 Int's. Not exactly a modern day Tom Brady! Heck, he's not even a modern day Jeff Blake!

Somewhere, perhaps in Colorado, Mike Boryla is smiling ear-to-ear. Never saw him play; don't even know how to pronounce his name? But until Huntley and Shedeur came along, he was best known for being the worst-Pro Bowl selection ever. His name has been trending like wild today (thanks to Sanders) on the Net and he has not started a game in over 49 years! To his credit, Boryla actually was the hero of his lone Pro-Bowl (1976), bringing the NFC back from a 11 point deficit in a short span.

All things considered, Huntley and Sanders are even worse picks than Boryla, as the NFL has evolved to the point were quarterbacks have a much easier time succeeding/posting impressive stats. Higher Int's totals, lower TD numbers and low completion percentages were very much more common then -- Check Archie Manning's stats!

One & Done: Eagles QB Mike Boryla was an unlikely Pro Bowl hero | FOX Sports

One & Done: Philadelphia Eagle Mike Boryla's unlikely Pro Bowl experience
www.foxsports.com www.foxsports.com



Snowplow, as far as the 2024 draft re-do, I think Cole Bishop and Graham Barton should be almost sure fire first rounders. Particularly Bishop, who even perky little Kay Adams suggested was a Pro-Bowl snub! Matt Goncalves, Mason McCormick and Peyton Wilson could also receive 1st round attention in a draft re-do.

Also, why in the world would the Jets select Michael Pennix 11th overall and J.J. McCarthy be dropped all the way out? What has Pennix done to show he's worthy of that?
 
Last edited:
No Belichik musings yet? TBH when you gents argue about how one of our guys makes the HoF I am like DGAF. But thankfully the leftist cucks of the sports media are doing the work of delegitimizing themselves and I hope we take advantage of that.
 
Here is 2025. No idea who the writer is but, like the 2024 article, more White players move up than down. I also think Skattebo could make a strong case had he not been injured. Who knows what will happen with others like TeSlaa, Howard, Ewers, etc.?

1. Dart
3. Shough
4. Campbell
8. Warren
10. Loveland
12. Schwesinger
15. Graham
18. Zabel

Dart and Warren move up.
Shough and Schwesinger move into the first round.
Campbell, Zabel, and Loveland stay the same.

Only Graham moves down, but based on what I’ve read, he came on strong late in the season.


 
The Belichick "snub" for the first ballot of his HoF eligibility is ludicrous and petty. The voters who went against him should be stripped from their rights, as they are clearly non-serious actors following out political and personal grudges, all the way down to resenting his current money-digging whore girlfriend because they don't get to have sex with her, too.

The supposed "cheater" label will surely escape Tom Brady, who signed up for network TV commentary like a good boy.

There will be no such labels on any, say, college coaches like Nick Saban (under Belichick's tree), who most assuredly built his legacy through naked cheating by the clandestine paying of top players (or over-signing recruiting classes and stashing "grey-shirt" injuries in JUCO land). It's hypocritical and especially funny because for once, it's not explicitly over Trump Support (although I suspect that's it, too, even though Saban is pretty silent).

I think it's just as stupid to exclude such baseball players as Pete Rose, Roger Clemens, and even Barry Bonds on such grounds. Put up a plaque with a big asterisk underneath - Trump will amend those plaques by presidential decree, then we can enjoy another feature of each party's reign to include which athletes they decide to retroactively admonish or not admonish by re-casting their bronze plaques to read something different! This is the democratic way.
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure this is the real Ryan Leaf weighing in on the Belichick matter. Pretty funny - he's making money by engagement-farming from DWFs yelling at him in his comments (engagement-bait). He obviously doesn't have a vote, but I shouldn't explain the joke.

*maybe he's not even making money (no blue check), just being funny
 
Belichick was snubbed not because of failure, but because of success, specifically, his willingness to win with white players in positions traditionally reserved for Black athletes. That success challenged the caste system in football, and the backlash looks like an effort to put him back in his place.
 
wokewhite232 said:
Belichick was snubbed not because of failure, but because of success, specifically, his willingness to win with white players in positions traditionally reserved for Black athletes. That success challenged the caste system in football, and the backlash looks like an effort to put him back in his place.
Click to expand...
This may well be the reason. I’ve heard the reason given that he was a “cheater” and some of these idiotic voters wanted to punish him for the first year due to that? This is all so tiresome.
 
Bucky said:
Robert Kraft/BB Divorce that messy?

Click to expand...

If Kraft is poisoning the well against BB getting into the hall of fame when it's "his turn". Somebody should remind the voters about his adventures in low grade rub and tug storefronts. Get somebody like Christian Fauria to say "We muv you a long time" when presenting his hall of fame credentials.

The hall of fame has lost it's way if the greatest post free agency coach has to wait for his sins of cheating when you could argue every coach post Paul Brown has looked the other way with PED's(steroids, HGH, speed and pain killers) if not advocated for their distribution to corrupt team doctors..
 
Last edited:
I have no emotional investment into whether or not Belichick gets into the Hall of Fame. He went woke to appease accusations of being "right wing" (even though he was never really right wing) and now apparently the amount of Dane-geld he paid wasn't enough. The pro-BB vs. anti-BB faction war is a battle between two groups of libtards and I have no dog in this fight.

How many Super Bowls Belichick could have won without Tom Brady will never be known, though for his part Brady has shown that he could win a Super Bowl (in his 40s, no less) without Belichick. Knowing the way the standard clown show operates, BB will probably get in eventually after he does some more groveling, this is likely just a temporary setback to "teach him some more lessons." Either way, like I said, I don't care.

The much bigger issue is the way the league has apparently made it illegal for any team to replicate the white-friendly, championship winning team (or white-friendly offense, anyway) of the BB/Brady Patriots. This in a supposed "copycat" league. The late, great Tom Iron (RIP) had a theory that the NFL's controllers flat-out told the Patriots there would be no more fielding largely white teams, and Brady saw the writing on the wall and bailed out. I strongly believe that Tom Iron was right. I'm skeptical that we'll ever see another single team stacked with that much white talent, a team that we could get truly excited for. That's a shame, and that's the real issue to be concerned about.
 
I'm an old fella and the game I want to remember the most was when the Pats and their white friendly team stuffed it down KC's gullet in the playoffs. And I am not even a Pats fan, heck I'm not even a Packers fan at this point.
 


Part of the reason I am not a fan of the NFL except to watch White men play is that the women of the Left being exceptional office politicians are looting the NFL as they have done to just about all the institutions that once propped up the USA.
 
wokewhite232 said:
Belichick was snubbed not because of failure, but because of success, specifically, his willingness to win with white players in positions traditionally reserved for Black athletes. That success challenged the caste system in football, and the backlash looks like an effort to put him back in his place.
Click to expand...
Spot on.
 
Gator Dad said:
I have no emotional investment into whether or not Belichick gets into the Hall of Fame. He went woke to appease accusations of being "right wing" (even though he was never really right wing) and now apparently the amount of Dane-geld he paid wasn't enough. The pro-BB vs. anti-BB faction war is a battle between two groups of libtards and I have no dog in this fight.

How many Super Bowls Belichick could have won without Tom Brady will never be known, though for his part Brady has shown that he could win a Super Bowl (in his 40s, no less) without Belichick. Knowing the way the standard clown show operates, BB will probably get in eventually after he does some more groveling, this is likely just a temporary setback to "teach him some more lessons." Either way, like I said, I don't care.

The much bigger issue is the way the league has apparently made it illegal for any team to replicate the white-friendly, championship winning team (or white-friendly offense, anyway) of the BB/Brady Patriots. This in a supposed "copycat" league. The late, great Tom Iron (RIP) had a theory that the NFL's controllers flat-out told the Patriots there would be no more fielding largely white teams, and Brady saw the writing on the wall and bailed out. I strongly believe that Tom Iron was right. I'm skeptical that we'll ever see another single team stacked with that much white talent, a team that we could get truly excited for. That's a shame, and that's the real issue to be concerned about.
Click to expand...
I am in full agreement that the league mandated the Patriots could no longer field white-majority teams. The optics of it could not continue: the whitest team in the league (full of white skill players no less) dominating for nearly two decades was unacceptable to the Jewish owners and media who had a “black supremacy” narrative (psychological warfare) to keep white men without pride and thus resolve to take the nation back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
American Freedom News
Back
Top